It's hard to derail something that wasn't on track in the first place.In before PS fanboys derail the thread
I quoted a specific sentence of yours, where you were basically said that the SSD difference is more important than the GPU difference. I directly replied saying that a GPU cannot punch above its weight, no matter how fast the SSD. Then you started spouting the same old SSD buzz words that people love to repeat, and they were not relevant at all to what I was saying. When I countered those, you starting with a bunch of appeal to authority and no true Scotsman fallacies to downplay my statements, and then you declare yourself some sort of victor. And now you have the audacity to tell me now that I am telling you things that are not the point of your post? GTFO of here. Ignore list it is.
At 30fps. Funny, I thought Xbox zealots had a problem with games that prioritise resolution over performance.Hilarious and apparently Sony has the marketing on this game. Reminds me of RDR2, Sony had the marketing, but it looked like crap on the Pro but was absolutely gorgeous in native 4K on the X.
Validation for an outcome some people are hoping for.> Console not released.
> Game still in alpha development (probably).
Why is this thread still going?
> Console not released.
> Game still in alpha development (probably).
Why is this thread still going?
So when Call of Duty: Ghosts was reportedly struggling on Xbox One, we should've just dismissed that rumor as well since it was not released yet and still had time for optimization, correct? Sony fans just needed validation back then too? funny how that works.
If PS5 is struggling this early to get up to speed with Series X, then we could be looking at a preview on how the rest of the generation will play out on multiplatform titles.
Lol sure bud. I have a feeling we are going to see this More and MoreIt's 1080p 60fps. It's an engine issue.
If you ever owned a gaming PC, then you would know the PS5 is more than capable of achieving 1080p 60fps with no problem.
But you have Xbox community who are unable to grasp this simple concept that can be done with a few minutes worth of research.
So when Call of Duty: Ghosts was reportedly struggling on Xbox One, we should've just dismissed that rumor as well since it was not released yet and still had time for optimization, correct? Sony fans just needed validation for an outcome they were hoping for back then too? why weren't those threads dismissed? funny how that works.
If PS5 is struggling this early to get up to speed with Series X, then we could be looking at a preview on how the rest of the generation will play out on multiplatform titles.
Lol sure bud. I have a feeling we are going to see this More and More
It's 1080p 60fps. It's an engine issue.
If you ever owned a gaming PC, then you would know the PS5 is more than capable of achieving 1080p 60fps with no problem.
But you have Xbox community who are unable to grasp this simple concept that can be done with a few minutes worth of research.
I mention people like you in my post already.Lol sure bud. I have a feeling we are going to see this More and More
I already posted this before, but you're talking about a 2070 super vs 2080 super level of performance gap. If PS5 cannot maintain 4k 60fps, then a small reduction in resolution quality would help maintain the target frame-rate.I doubt it's struggling at 1080p/60 too, that might be a typo and we're talking about 4K/60, that would make more sense. XSX could be running it at 4K/60 and PS5 may be having trouble running that natively, but then there's the checkerboard option, although we don't know if MS also has an efficient reconstruction method this time around. All I'm saying is that last gen we had similar murmurs and rumors at the beginning and we saw how that turned out. No one is saying "Don't buy a PS5 now", I just think it's a discussion worth having.
I doubt it's struggling at 1080p/60 too, that might be a typo and we're talking about 4K/60, that would make more sense. XSX could be running it at 4K/60 and PS5 may be having trouble running that natively, but then there's the checkerboard option, although we don't know if MS also has an efficient reconstruction method this time around. All I'm saying is that last gen we had similar murmurs and rumors at the beginning and we saw how that turned out. No one is saying "Don't buy a PS5 now", I just think it's a discussion worth having.
So when Call of Duty: Ghosts was reportedly struggling on Xbox One, we should've just dismissed that rumor as well since it was not released yet and still had time for optimization, correct? Sony fans just needed validation for an outcome they were hoping for back then too? why weren't those threads dismissed? funny how that works.
If PS5 is struggling this early to get up to speed with Series X, then we could be looking at a preview on how the rest of the generation will play out on multiplatform titles.
I think this bothering alot of people (including me) because when you look at the specifications it should be a 1080P vs 4K kind of a situation. I understand games might be 1800P or 1440P on the PS5 but 1080P? That's suggesting a massive power difference and the specifications don't reflect that.
That's the part that's bothering me the most. Either Sony has lied to us about the specifications or there's something seriously wrong with the console. That's the worry that alot of people have right now.
I personally believe that they are alot closer than that and all this is just some crazy misinterpretation of the situation.
The only thing happening here is how willing you are to actually believe the PS5 is a total shitshow and Sony doesn't know what they're doing when designing hardware. Doesn't matter what we've seen so far during the PS5 reveal, Unreal 5 demo, or first hand developer accounts. Nope. What matters here is If this current rumor makes you feel better about buying a Series X, than hold on for dear life.
> Console not released.
> Game still in alpha development (probably).
Why is this thread still going?
Because xsx is also not released and the xsx version is also in alpha development and yet runs the game at native 4k 60 fps.> Console not released.
> Game still in alpha development (probably).
Why is this thread still going?
Because xsx is also not released and the xsx version is also in alpha development and yet runs the game at native 4k 60 fps.
No we are discussing the rumor like we would any other rumor instead of begging it to be shut down because we are snowflakes who can't hear anything bad about our favorite console.Isn't this a little early to even be worrying about something like that? And to say the game is running way better on a different console when the game isn't even near complete and is just in early stages.....
We are taking a rumor as certain now?
it's also probably easier to port a PC version to XBSX.
Xbox fans need a thread to feel at home in. They need something to help them feel better in these trying times.
Xbox fans, it's going to be alright. When re8 comes out running better on the Xbox, the tide will definitely change. It maybe a few years before everyone on game pass gets to play it, but the Xbox will have bested the Playstation and for that, you can hold your head high.
Yeah hold your head high and have pride in your plastic box.. smh.. sad thing is people will take this serious instead of understanding sarcasm.Xbox fans need a thread to feel at home in. They need something to help them feel better in these trying times.
Xbox fans, it's going to be alright. When re8 comes out running better on the Xbox, the tide will definitely change. It maybe a few years before everyone on game pass gets to play it, but the Xbox will have bested the Playstation and for that, you can hold your head high.
How? Everything that is transferred through the I/O still needs to be processed by at least the GPU, and in many cases also the CPU. Having faster I/O with limited GPU performance is like having a car engine that can do 15k RPM but can't shift past 2nd gear.
> Console not released.
> Game still in alpha development (probably).
Why is this thread still going?
Some people just don't get it. Xbox Series X is more powerful than PS5. This is true, nobody is denying this. BUT, the devil is in small details. The difference between these console is very very small (16-18%), that's the smallest difference ever between competitors, and that's just raw specs on paper. Real-life difference in games is supposed to be even smaller (the versions might be almost identical). That's what trustful insiders like Mat, Jason told us all along.
Spreading FUD bulshit like Dusk Gulem (that Series X is MUCH MORE superior than PS5, 12 vs 9) is wrong, and those poeple deserve to eat shit for that.
i myself can't wait for DuskGolem to eat the crow when the game is released
It's hard to derail something that wasn't on track in the first place.
the thing its the gap is way smaller than the one with the ps4 pro vs the x and nobody cares,this is gonna be a really hard generation for some peopleI already posted this before, but you're talking about a 2070 super vs 2080 super level of performance gap. If PS5 cannot maintain 4k 60fps, then a small reduction in resolution quality would help maintain the target frame-rate.
You guys are acting like the gap is much better than it actually is.
The devil is in the details, but I think people are expecting a 16-18% difference are in for a rude awakening. If the GPU was capable of running a rock solid 2.23ghz like most people here seem to think, Cerny would have said that. The fact that the rosiest language the marketing team could come up with is "we expect the GPU to run at or near those speeds most of the time" most likely means the system will rarely, if ever, be running at that frequency.
Especially because they felt compelled to add in "or near" when describing the GPU. Which they didn't feel compelled to add when describing the CPU. Makes me think those GPU clocks may be a bit of smoke and mirrors and not exactly practical nor achievable under typical circumstances. Time will tell, but the carefully worded marketing speak leads me to believe the real world performance delta is going to be larger than most people are anticipating.
Your tag is very fitting lol
ad hominem always indicates a loser.
idiots: wow, that hidden power must be incredible, so hidden that NO ONE SAW.
idiots: wow, you have to see this, RDNA1, super heat, garbage hurrr durrrrrrr
it is because of this low intellectual level of the average xbox consumer who writes on the internet.
I can't believe how bad it looks. There are a lot of PS3 games looking better than that...
Maybe take a look in the mirror for a few seconds.
Well, first party studio vs third party studio. The first party studios had much more time to make their games ready for something like this show, while third-party studios had ... a vague spec and not that much time. The game is not out yet and it will be month/years until it gets released. The SDK get's better, ...
As the xbox series x/s still uses a Windows underneath and the game is developed on e.g. DirectX 12 which is well known for a while, it would be much easier to port it over to the xbox series x. But that will change over time, when also third party developers hat time to work with the SDK for a while.
lol
talk shit on the internet.
lose reason, obviously
victimize yourself.