Village is fine but re2, re3 and re4 will crash on maxed settings with rt because of vram.
I am using dedicated vram overlay. it's going overboard and crashing atm bout 9700mb used.
Hmm
Might be, the 2022 patches to DX12 and RT have just exploded VRAM but i think the screenshot above are from release for RE3. Might see the same behavior as RE4 RT maybe. DF bashed the patch on release, Capcom even made the dx11 version available because of all the complaints.
Try to disable shadow cache if not done already, i read its an outlier for problems. Also keep in mind that texture high (2-3-4-5-6-7-8 GB) are basically the same quality texture but at different LOD pop-in. You might find comfortable values way under max.
But yea, fucking sad state of affairs when there's so many problems with ports.
DF ripped them
While I understand that one may have been a flagship at the time, saying the power level is meaningless is wrong as we will always need to take in to consideration the market, component costs, and actual power level to determine value.
I can concede that the value level is lower, however it's not quite as bad as what is being implied. (acting like it's 5x as much or something) The fact is it's still a very powerful card and is comparable to other hardware on the market at that price point today. (some would even say cheaper than the competition for overall power)
Yep agreed.My 3080 10gb is showing vram limits in two or three games. Fps is fine with 4k and dlss. Raw 4k is starting to struggle in few games
I was expecting 8 gigs of memory being nvdia, so I guess not terrible? They should print that on the box.
Does inflation works on mid range cards only ?Seems like quite a few people in this thread pretend that inflation doesn't exist
3080 had the same performance 2 and a half years ago with the same price.
Also, in reality, in retail, it will be even more expensive.
Until you realise that how cut down this AD104 configuration is to have the exact core count as last gen's GA104, with less ROPS. Where they would naturally give you higher specs gen on gen. They are selling you smaller dies for hyper inflated costs and you are only netting performance increases from the higher clocks and the small cache. Actually went backwards in some ways with lower bus and less ROP's.
If AMD can offer higher specs per tier, even at inflated prices.. the specs should at least be better.
We all know you ain't gonna switch.looks like I'll need to switch to AMD once my 3070 is no longer viable
Nvidia is getting unbeliveable greedy.
The 2070 Super released for $499 back in 2018
Meanwhile this card is beigng released for double the price
What kind of math is this ?Nvidia is getting unbeliveable greedy.
The 2070 Super released for $499 back in 2018
Meanwhile this card is beigng released for double the price
Nvidia keep doing this (price inflation games) every generation. The 3090 was overpriced for gaming, so not sure it's the best reference point.Does inflation works on mid range cards only ?
Because as far as I know the 4090 is about the same price as 3090 from 2 years and half ago ( it was MSRP 1500$ but in reality the cheapest was 1600$) because FE was no where to be found outside of the first initial release.
Yet you can buy a 4090 for 1600$. So inflation seems to work only where you want to defend a company I guess right ? Lol
No. Those prices are just a greed from Nvidia. Period. And while I am part of the problem as I own a 4090. I think the 4080 is a scam. And the 4070ti with it.
4070$ at 600$ ? Not so bad to be honest if it's little bit more powerful than the 3080 with more vram and frame generation sure. That's 100$ cheaper than the 10G version and 200$ cheaper than 3080 12 gigs.
Yeah that is a good price for the card. Would have been perfect at 500$
Where the heck is AMD's cards?
I'd rather buy a new console, or a PSVR2.
3090 was overpriced and a bad buy for gamers when it launched and ended up making the 4090 seem like a good deal.Does inflation works on mid range cards only ?
Because as far as I know the 4090 is about the same price as 3090 from 2 years and half ago ( it was MSRP 1500$ but in reality the cheapest was 1600$) because FE was no where to be found outside of the first initial release.
It's not cheap, but it's not terrible. And it's inline with inflation. The $500 GPU of 2017/2018 is today's $600 GPU.It’s astonishing that $599 is now on the cheap side for gpu’s.
This is what’s mystifying. The goal is wide open for the taking, and it’s like they’re waiting to react to what Nvidia does.
This is what’s mystifying. The goal is wide open for the taking, and it’s like they’re waiting to react to what Nvidia does.
I’ve switched over to AMD, but I fully expect to be buying Intel in the future. Hope they keep on the path that they’ve been on.
The 7900 XT is selling so bad that I think the rest of the desktop lineup has been cancelled.
Its better than expected because of the nonsense pricing this generation. Everything including the 4090 is overpriced, but at least that has the specs and performance to back it up and it is a top of the line, halo SKU.The 3080 was $699 and in the states the 4080/4070ti are available at MSRP basically any given day of the week.
ASUS TUF RTX 4070 Ti Graphics Card with 12GB DDR6 | Newegg.com - Newegg.com
Buy ASUS TUF Gaming NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming Graphics Card (PCIe 4.0, 12GB GDDR6X, HDMI 2.1a, DisplayPort 1.4a) TUF-RTX4070TI-12G-GAMING with fast shipping and top-rated customer service. Once you know, you Newegg!www.newegg.com
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Gaming Graphics Card (PCIe 4.0, 16GB GDDR6X, HDMI 2.1a, DisplayPort 1.4a) TUF-RTX4080-16G-GAMING - Newegg.com
Buy ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4080 Gaming Graphics Card (PCIe 4.0, 16GB GDDR6X, HDMI 2.1a, DisplayPort 1.4a) TUF-RTX4080-16G-GAMING with fast shipping and top-rated customer service. Once you know, you Newegg!www.newegg.com
But certainly it isn't ideal, obviously $499 would have been better. $599 still better than I expected though.
The technology has changed a bit but as long as the end result is still moving forward it is hard to compare the particulars. There are 512bit cards realesed more than a decade ago that get outperformed by the 64bit RX6500, it happens.
I'd like to see more advancement as much as the next guy, but not something I see happening this generation.
I'd rather buy a new console, or a PSVR2.
It didn't matter if it was a bad buy or not. That is subjective to what it was used for. For gaming only ? Yeah. But for video production and vmix and premiere like I used it for ? ( Plus gaming ) No it wasn't .3090 was overpriced and a bad buy for gamers when it launched and ended up making the 4090 seem like a good deal.
It's not cheap, but it's not terrible. And it's inline with inflation. The $500 GPU of 2017/2018 is today's $600 GPU.
The 4080 is absolutely indefensible, I've seen hardcore Jensen dick suckers even tap out on that one.It didn't matter if it was a bad buy or not. That is subjective to what it was used for. For gaming only ? Yeah. But for video production and xmix and premiere like I used it for ? ( Plus gaming ) No it wasn't .
The point is the 3090 to 4090 there is no inflation in price. Yet people claim the inflation is the reason we have a 4080 for 1200$. No it's not. It's Nvidia greed
I can confirm. Love the guy and his leather penis, but I'm not being paid enough to defend that shit.The 4080 is absolutely indefensible, I've seen hardcore Jensen dick suckers even tap out on that one.
According to the leaks, they have driver problems. I think that's why the smaller cards have been delayed.This is what’s mystifying. The goal is wide open for the taking, and it’s like they’re waiting to react to what Nvidia does.
I’ve switched over to AMD, but I fully expect to be buying Intel in the future. Hope they keep on the path that they’ve been on.
It’s a great card, but they shot themselves in the foot with the stupid $900 msrp. Hardware Unboxed even said had it launched at $800, reviews would’ve been different.
Low vram is to ensure clients gonna want/need/be forced to upgrade card to new one in max 2 generations, some will even do it in one generation but just look at 3080 10gigs vram, once the rtx 5k series hits every owner gonna want new gpu unless they downgrade themselfs to playing new demanding games in 1080p, and if u were rtx 3080 owner ofc u were playing at least in 1440p.Is vram expensive or at they just being stingy?
There was a $100 increase for 4090. $200 would have been more in line with inflation. Nvidia priced it this way to get people like you to buy it, and it worked.It didn't matter if it was a bad buy or not. That is subjective to what it was used for. For gaming only ? Yeah. But for video production and xmix and premiere like I used it for ? ( Plus gaming ) No it wasn't .
The point is the 3090 to 4090 there is no inflation in price. Yet people claim the inflation is the reason we have a 4080 for 1200$. No it's not. It's Nvidia greed
Its not even particulars. Its a two generation node jump and we're getting what 30% more performance and paying $100 premium for it years later.
600 is the msrp without tax... that makes it automatic 700 in EU... or more for 3rd partyPeople crying over 599 price tag wait till some triple fan super cooling deluxe edition aftermarket card going for 800$ at least.
"3.6 Roentgen? Not great, not terrible"
Because you aren't looking at the trend of power and price over time. The 1080ti the most powerful card at the time launched for 699$. Just because 6yrs later a low mid range 4070 launched at "x3 the power" (it's not really) at 599$ doesnt mean it can't be overpriced. By that logic the Cray 1 cost $30M, doesn’t mean a prebuilt PC today that's 1000x more powerfull isn't overpriced at $5,000. Technology drops in price so even x3 can still be overpriced 6yrs later.
According to idiots on the internet, sure.Isn't this card actually a 4050 or 4060 specs wise?
So how does Jensen's cock taste?According to idiots on the internet, sure.
I'd rather buy a new console, or a PSVR2.
I agree with this generally, but aren't we talking about 10FL vs 30TL here plus DLSS 3.0? So kind of a huge jump up.
Maybe if they launch a pro model next year......
While this is true, in reality though. You don't see the performance difference that 10 vs 30 tf suggest it would. Mainly due to PC bot being optimized same way as consoles ( hopefully to get it fixed with the new direct x 12 update that unified the vram usage. ) But as it stand right now , 10 vs 30 gives you the idea it's 3x more performance when it's barely 1.5 .
Not to mention other costs of PC as it's not just a video card.
PC has its advantages. It's not even same league. But consoles costs dirt compared to PC
Navi 32 is intended to compete with AD104 (4070 Ti/4070), and should do fine from a margins perspective. It just apparently isn't ready yet.AMD so far
They probably know they can't undercut Nvidia anyway so might as well play the game and get margin out of this already low margin business.
They undercut, Nvidia undercuts... AMD undercuts again? Just how deep are the pockets for a market where they have ~5% ?
They also have Intel breathing down their neck who has the same market share in GPU but also competes CPU.
It's a tight rope for AMD i tell ya that.
AMD knows the bread and butter are enterprises and consoles. For Nvidia it's enterprise/science/AI. Nobody really cares for selling an halo product to <1% gamers. Why make any waves for that? To have a dozen peoples online cream their pants that team red owned team green? There's barely any money in that.
4070 is supposed to be 200 W TDP so 1000 W PSU is overkill more than likely.Is a 1000 watt power supply enough? I don't remember what mine is, and I don't think there is a way too see unless I open up the case?
So how does Jensen's cock taste?
But your 3060 is the problem. That video card barely gets the same result as ps5 or Xbox. If that's the card I have, I will be playing on a console fuck PC.I'm a big console person even though I have a "decent" PC with a 3060 that I hardly ever use for gaming, so your preaching to the choir here lol. While I realize the 10 vs 30 isn't exactly that, I think you are over minimizing a bit the huge gains DLSS has. That said, despite the gap, the problem isn't just the games and the closed architecture vs the open platform, it's more complex in that games are build to be scalable and it's not really pushing the PC. Yes you can go up in frame rate and perhaps a bit in resolution, but what is really getting you? I know I'm arguing with myself here at this point.
The 3070 was $500 MSRP before crypto wrecked prices.Isn't that 200 dollars too much? It is the only Nvidia card that would come into question for me. But I would wait and see how AMD reacts to it and a price reduction.
The 4080 is $500 more expensive than the 3080.everything in the 4000 series is 1-3 hundred dollars overpriced
It has more VRAM, less power usage, supports DLSS3 and costs less. The 3080 will be outclassed by this card.A $200 price gap between 4070 and 4070ti is nuts.
It’ll be interesting to see how this stacks up against a 3080 in 1440p.