You left out this part for a reason.
Once again, you're wasting my time by injecting your own interpretation into a game which was perfectly explained to us in the first game. I don't grasp your post because it's filled with nonsense. You can't force your argument on anyone that's based on nothing. But you just attempted to take a recording from the first game out of context to"prove" your point which failed. This means you have nothing. I'm done.
Intentions = / = Results
Countless medical trials were predicated on the idea of reaching a medical breakthrough; merely saying that doesn't mean its a sure thing, especially when it comes to aa virus that utterly crippled humanity.
He's not taking things out of context to prove his point, he's showing how the original game handled the dilemma. It wasn't purely a black or white thing, that Elie's sacrifice wouldn't have guaranteed humanity being saved