ikr who they kidding? re: desert anyway, so sparse
That comment makes no sense. It doesn't beat pure RT lighting in any way.
970+ wow basically the things about SSD and i/o as we was assuming was true and you don't need at all (AT ALL) that type of i / o that people was saying after the PS5 demo ... lol .... and is also in 4k this one vs 1440.
and you? what type of SSD?getting 60-ish at 1080 on a laptop 2070, pretty impressive:
>dlss off
What is this supposed to mean? I gave an objective comment which can't be disputed at all. And I'm not impressed with Cyberpunk's RT. I was speaking more about Metro EE which implements RT like it should be used.
I can try putting up a link to the file. I haven't thought of that before. Just wanted to show the facts to mitigate any other assumptions on what the hardware is doing on the PC side of things.
I haven’t been able to package a project into a exe on UE5 because it says SDK not found. I could never find UE5 sdk.
Whatever the fps is, PS5 will manage barely half of that. Just deal with it like a big boy
everyone else is okay with this reality but you are melting down for some reason.
You right now:
VFXVeteran
? Noticing any performance differences between the two if you've tested?
Your picture is extremely blurry though, doesn't look like it's running at 1080p. I'm trying it right now on a GTX 1080 and I get around 30 in this area personally.getting 60-ish at 1080 on a laptop 2070, pretty impressive:
Man, get outta here with that warring shit dude.
Essentially means: "I lost the argument, I don't have any facts or a rebuttal, and now I'm gonna pretend like I somehow won because of the deep love for my plastic box"
VFXVeteran
has it running at a much higher resolution and framerate than what has been shown last year. And the performance next gen consoles are getting on this same exact demo, is 1080p @ 30fps. Crazy how you and others will peddle some weird agenda with all the data right in front of it. Didn't know people could just get hit with the Stevie Wonder overnight. ahaha "more Dynamic PS5 demo" ahahhah go to sleep you are drunk
i thought i had it set to 1080p, will recheck it.
you can't even move in that section is basically a movie and all just at 1440p @ 30fps
Whatever the fps is, PS5 will manage barely half of that. Just deal with it like a big boy
Julius Ibidus
4K with Windows display settings 'Scale' set to 300%:
4K with Windows display settings 'Scale' set to 100%:
yeah, i thought i was at 1080p but looks like i was at 720p, will have to retry it.I'm on a 2060 Super(~2070) and I was having an issue with the game seemingly not scaling with resolution correctly. At 1080p/1440p/4K they were all looking similar and I was getting superior performance to what I expected(40-60fps). Then I remembered that some DLSS games will scale from the Windows text and apps Scale option. Let's say you're on a 1080p display using DSR to get to 4K and your Windows display settings scale is set to 300%, your target game resolution will be set from that, not 4K. IIRC the RTX Star Wars demo does this too.
Also, despite this being a packaged project, it's still doing some form of shader caching. The first time you run it, it will lag and stutter, then as you've cached everything it will become extremely smooth and load faster.
P.S.- I'm pretty sure the lowest base resolution allowed is 720p. That's why all the different resolutions I tried performed nearly the same. During one of the first runs of the .exe version, GeForce overlay screenshot pooped out into a separate folder and it was 720p.
There is no truly detailed stuff that isn’t available yet. All the rock assets used in the demo are available today on Quixel Bridge.
quixel.com
And so many people believed that was fake, yet the results are speaking for themselves!
this result are the clearest of the answers to the reality of the facts. Tim was lying.
VFXVeteran
there's a link on page 1 i believe.Upload it somewhere? Pretty please?
It's the link in the description. Google drive link. Not sure if I can directly link on here, so sending you there instead.Upload it somewhere? Pretty please?
you need to install like 5 different things. .Net and uh visual studio and some other stuff.
Wouldnt be the first time. Tim hates Microsoft.
Tim does that shit every single new generation. Makes up for it with the PC players after we forgive him, every time. Rinses and repeats.
ue5 work doing preloading/caching in fact many have launched the demo from old mechanical hdd with great results. the faster your SSD the less preloading the engine will do
CamHostage
You can absolutely build your own UE5 project outside of the Valley of Ancients project. You can with certainty use nanite meshes right out Quixel Bridge from within UE5(no Valley Ancients project invovled), along with Meta Humans. You can also edit the Ancients project in whatever manner you desire.
Are you asking why nobody has made a native UE5 game in under a week?
The guy I linked has a whole channel of stuff well beyond that. I've done it myself. Spray painted an unholy amount of dynamic grass and some trees all over the Ancients demo map. Added a character, enemies, etc.
this is what i have at 4k in some place :
edit : for comparison on other place
I flew to every edge and detail stayed the same...i think.
do you mean the drone is not the real character and this won't happen if i try and can get there ?
