We dont know the ins and outs with whats happening with Koji and Sony.death stranding has a metascore of 82 now.
thats why sony and kojima relation have turned cold?
this 'metascore is everything' sony, means we wont get 2nd chance games like nier automata?
So you believe something like GOW is as similar to TLoU2 as Iron is similar Avengers?They are literally all third person action adventures? Some have open worlds, some don't. Some are more focused on the action, some aren't.
Am I missing some games?
Death Stranding won loads of GOTY awards, the most of any game that year. DS was polarising among big US reviewers (like IGN) but it got loads of 100/100. Days Gone was general outright average across the board. The two aren't the same.death stranding has a metascore of 82 now.
thats why sony and kojima relation have turned cold?
this 'metascore is everything' sony, means we wont get 2nd chance games like nier automata?
At the end of 2019 yes, it was at around 5M PSN users (+/- 10% error margin, also consider it's users and not sales so includes 2nd accounts in the same console, 2nd hand, etc). As of November 2020, when they changed the store for PS5 that number was around 9M PSN users:According to @davidjaffe DG sold about 5 mil.
Sorry but this guy talks too much shit for having delivered a really mediocre game, one that launched in awful shape. Days Gone got the sales and reception it deserved - it only became worth playing long after launch when they put more work in to it. His game is a textbook example of one you shouldn't buy at launch so I don't think we should put much stock in to what he says. Sounds extremely bitter.Days Gone game director also says don’t complain that the game doesn’t have a sequel if you didn’t support it at release
Days Gone game director: ‘Don’t complain that the game doesn’t have a sequel if you didn’t support it at release’
That gamers should support games at release, John Garvin, one of Bend’s key ex-collaborators and co-creator of Days Gone, said in a conversation with game designer David Jaffe during a stream. In the conversation, Jaffe mentioned that more and more people have been paying attention to Days Gone...nintendosmash.com
Seriously. I understand the passion around his work but Christ. This game was full of development issues even until the past year, abysmal loading time, glitches which stuck the game progression, but the problem was the players who didn't supported it to launch and the lower metacritic score? For real? Did he has ever played it at least? Because I start to have some doubt.Sorry but this guy talks too much shit for having delivered a really mediocre game, one that launched in awful shape. Days Gone got the sales and reception it deserved - it only became worth playing long after launch when they put more work in to it. His game is a textbook example of one you shouldn't buy at launch so I don't think we should but much stock in to what he says. Sounds extremely bitter.
Let me guess you hate Gamepass and you are scared of it. Your fanboyism is showing. You and the rest of the fools need to hold Sony accountable. Just like you do with Microsoft and Nintendo and the rest of the gaming industry.What’s wrong with having standards? Otherwise your encouraging garbage that’s perfect for cheap rental service.
And they will forget about it in weeks but when it comes to Microsoft or Nintendo.Fanboys will defend this idiocy as usual, but it’s stupid business.
Not the point, but you keep playing dumb and not hold Sony accountable.Launched a game that was extremely buggy. Ohhhhhhh oh it's Sony's fault
And this is why we need to hold Sony the same accountability as we do with Nintendo, Microsoft, and the rest of the gaming industry, it's a shame too because this will be forgotten by next week or so.
Yes I’m scared of a rental service, I best get me some pills to calm my shakes.Let me guess you hate Gamepass and you are scared of it. Your fanboyism is showing. You and the rest of the fools need to hold Sony accountable. Just like you do with Microsoft and Nintendo and the rest of the gaming industry.
And they will forget about it in weeks but when it comes to Microsoft or Nintendo.
Not the point, but you keep playing dumb and not hold Sony accountable.
Speaking for myself, I deeply hate service as gamepass even if Sony was behind it. Is it more fair to name fanboy who hates some business practices or who defends it?Let me guess you hate Gamepass and you are scared of it. Your fanboyism is showing. You and the rest of the fools need to hold Sony accountable. Just like you do with Microsoft and Nintendo and the rest of the gaming industry.
But at the same time he's right (he also was fired 6 days after the game launched not to mention he was the creative director not a "tech" guy). People quote 'Days Gone' selling over 5M but the large majority of those sales were at $30 or less and far after launch. So when someone says "why isn't there a sequel in the works" look no further than when the sales went up. We already see that mentality with games nowadays "Looks interesting but not for $60"Sorry but this guy talks too much shit for having delivered a really mediocre game, one that launched in awful shape. Days Gone got the sales and reception it deserved - it only became worth playing long after launch when they put more work in to it. His game is a textbook example of one you shouldn't buy at launch so I don't think we should put much stock in to what he says. Sounds extremely bitter.
Take a peak at Cory's tweeter and see for yourselfHold on... was GoW considered woke or was it given a pass because a of some reason?
Metacritic is the opposite of bad. Did you know that soccer teams get bonuses if they win or get at certain positions? A middle-of-the-road team is not going to be expected to win the championship but at least to be one of two positions better; is an incentive and drives competition. and "competition is always better".this is why metacritic rating is bad for industry. there lot of complaint before that publishers even take advantages of this system against devs for example hold bonus if it not reach certain rating although it sell well and stuff.
Nice one!Lol @ you being so impressed with yourself and your cliche snarky response. Neogaf is full of your type and its boring.
Oh please, if Obs had done less on New Vegas and actually fixed the mess they put in at launch, it would easily have made 85. Even I thought the score was generous, considering.Corporations can manipulate that score as they will, not directly but surely indirectly by bribing journous when they think it's convenient.
Does anybody remember when Obsidian would get a bonus from Bethesda if Fallout: New Vegas got a score of 85 or more on Metacritic, and "coincidentally" it never got past 84?
Obsidian denied bonus over New Vegas Metacritic score - Studio Head
Company co-founder says studio received no royalties from open-world RPG hit, missed average review score bonus payment by one point.www.gamespot.comFallout: New Vegas
The latest game in the post-nuclear RPG series is being developed by many members of the Fallout 1 and 2 team at Obsidian Entertainment using the Fallout 3 engine.www.metacritic.com
Wake up, people.
soccer team? are you talking about sports? completely different situation here mateMetacritic is the opposite of bad. Did you know that soccer teams get bonuses if they win or get at certain positions? A middle-of-the-road team is not going to be expected to win the championship but at least to be one of two positions better; is an incentive and drives competition. and "competition is always better".
As a consumer is a fast way to see the "quality" of something by itself and not mudded with some drama that only gets exposed and exacerbated through social media, articles of these YouTube videos that have this pity clickbait thumbnails.
Things can always go worse.You mean the ones that they already have in the bag? No need for that, the "relationship" is already strong.
And the team lost their jobs.Although somehow Knack got a sequel.
When the standard is metacritic, lmao.What’s wrong with having standards? Otherwise your encouraging garbage that’s perfect for cheap rental service.
To be fair, not because the game was bad, but because Sony is going full elitist and is sacrficing variety (which has always been a strong point for playstation) for premium quality, as it seems.And the team lost their jobs.
So it seems if your game doesn't score high, you lose your job. Lovely place to workTo be fair, not because the game was bad, but because Sony is going full elitist and is sacrficing variety (which has always been a strong point for playstation) for premium quality, as it seems.
Sorry but this guy talks too much shit for having delivered a really mediocre game, one that launched in awful shape. Days Gone got the sales and reception it deserved - it only became worth playing long after launch when they put more work in to it. His game is a textbook example of one you shouldn't buy at launch so I don't think we should put much stock in to what he says. Sounds extremely bitter.
They didnt lose their jobs. Just the team was dismantled, which is a very different thing...So it seems if your game doesn't score high, you lose your job. Lovely place to work