• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Eurogamer why our Starfield: review will be late (DF unaffected and will be on time)

Thabass

Member
But as you’ve seen in the reports, the whole deal with so many UK outlets being barred and the reasons why is unprecedented. Which makes the reports newsworthy. Hence all the attention.
If its' truly CMA, then I can understand it, but isn't DF in the UK? Why are they getting special treatment? Something doesn't add up.
 

Killer8

Member
Starfield is not the game that will be dinged for not being woke. what are you going on about? We all know why eurogamer and edge werent sent copies. they are the only publications who are still harsh on games.

Edge are still harsh ("they use the whole scale!"), but the prestige of them being one of the few truth tellers in gaming evaporates once you look behind the anonymous nature of the articles. Their staff have all done a ton of freelance work for other shitty rags like The Guardian, Vice, Kotaku and Polygon. So there's nothing actually unique about them or Eurogamer. It's just the other cheek of the same journalistic arse.
 

Ozriel

M$FT
If its' truly CMA, then I can understand it, but isn't DF in the UK? Why are they getting special treatment? Something doesn't add up.

DF are the most popular tech analysis site at the moment, Todd likes to watch it and It would look like a massive red flag if they weren’t given access to a game made by a developer with a history of bugs.
 

SJRB

Gold Member
HomelyQualifiedKillifish-max-1mb.gif
 
I mean it was a bad look they shared a code with DF with instructions that even Rich said was unprecedented so they had to give Eurogamer a code after the blowback, this was a sad thread to read Bethesda/MS was obviously wrong in this situation regardless if you agree with a review. I wonder how some would've felt if Sony gave a code to NXgamer for his Ign graphics breakdown with explicit instructions that no other part of ign would be provided a review code 🤔..lol it's just a strange situation that should've been avoided before a big release
 
If its' truly CMA, then I can understand it, but isn't DF in the UK? Why are they getting special treatment? Something doesn't add up.

And you’ve seen the report that an hour after Eurogamer published the report that they hadn’t received a review copy, Bethesda magically sent them one. Nothing about it adds up, just Bethesda pulling shenanigans and causing problems for no reason. Either share the codes or don’t, why make this situation where outlets feel the need to go public because Bethesda makes an unnecessary situation where there are inexplicable Haves and Have Nots and no one knows what the hell is going on. PR blunder for sure.
 

Montauk

Member
Edge are still harsh ("they use the whole scale!"), but the prestige of them being one of the few truth tellers in gaming evaporates once you look behind the anonymous nature of the articles. Their staff have all done a ton of freelance work for other shitty rags like The Guardian, Vice, Kotaku and Polygon. So there's nothing actually unique about them or Eurogamer. It's just the other cheek of the same journalistic arse.

Harsh = “they’ve published reviews I disagreed with”

You just have to do these little bits of translation quite a lot, because people won’t use writing to convey what they actually mean.
 
Last edited:

Panajev2001a

GAF's Pleasant Genius
It's not made up, but keep carrying the water. People have posted those exerts years ago which was mainly in the great massive "next gen" tech thread. If I have free time, I will try and do some digging, you are free to do so as well.

It was with early on games.

Just like mid-gen refreshes are now not so exciting and concerning, since one brand is PRing they may not be doing one. They gushed over that brand's mid-gen last gen. And the "concern" for devs, but not the same concern back when the X/S was announced? They specifically said "scaling should be simple." What changed?
Without even digging up the rest, just the last point you made being answered with anything but something that sounds like “ok, well the flip flopping over Pro consoles + the scaling is simple / engines scale yadayada stuff they peddled when XSS launches contradicts what concern they are raising about Pro consoles now that only one console manufacturer is rumoured to be launching one does make it reek of bias” would be very odd.

Which is why I guess you will just be ignored and a new goalpost will be erected when it is difficult to find this post anymore 😂.
 

Thabass

Member
DF are the most popular tech analysis site at the moment, Todd likes to watch it and It would look like a massive red flag if they weren’t given access to a game made by a developer with a history of bugs.
That's irrelevant if it's a CMA issue. If it's truly a CMA issue, it wouldn't matter if Todd Bethesda likes them or not, they wouldn't be able to get a code. Why are Eurogamer shunned and DF isn't?

Take out the feelings that Todd Howard or even Phil Spencer has for EG/DF if CMA is an issue, because those opinions aren't part of the equation if it's a regulatory issue.
 
DF are the most popular tech analysis site at the moment, Todd likes to watch it and It would look like a massive red flag if they weren’t given access to a game made by a developer with a history of bugs.

Todd loves DF and respects them greatly. I doubt it was ever a question they’d be provided codes.
 

Thabass

Member
And you’ve seen the report that an hour after Eurogamer published the report that they hadn’t received a review copy, Bethesda magically sent them one. Nothing about it adds up, just Bethesda pulling shenanigans and causing problems for no reason. Either share the codes or don’t, why make this situation where outlets feel the need to go public because Bethesda makes an unnecessary situation where there are inexplicable Haves and Have Nots and no one knows what the hell is going on. PR blunder for sure.
That's one hell of a PR blunder. Almost makes it seem like they just "forgot" about Eurogamer.

They didn't just forget
 

Banjo64

cumsessed
Wow man the DF obsession is truly insane here. You guys are so off the deep end you’re at the bottom of the Mariana trench.

Some of you must have been holding this laughable conspiratorial grudge for like approaching a decade by now.

Aren’t half of you in your 30s and 40s? Isn’t it time to let it go lads?
Are you an alt? I notice you stopped posting for 3 years and only resumed recently, and you are now mainly posting in Microsoft threads (mass posting at that). Has your other account been banned recently?
 
That's one hell of a PR blunder. Almost makes it seem like they just "forgot" about Eurogamer.

They didn't just forget

Oh it was deliberate for sure. They had a list of people to send codes to, and clearly a list of who not to. I’m still curious to know the Why, behind-closed-doors “fly on the wall” reason that only higher-ups like Hines or Howard know. I could guess, but I’d love to know the unbridled truth.

Maybe Phil and Matt Booty saw Eurogamer’s story about being withheld despite DF and called Hines and were like WTF dude, we don’t need bad press like this.
 
Last edited:

Ozriel

M$FT
That's irrelevant if it's a CMA issue. If it's truly a CMA issue, it wouldn't matter if Todd Bethesda likes them or not, they wouldn't be able to get a code. Why are Eurogamer shunned and DF isn't?

Take out the feelings that Todd Howard or even Phil Spencer has for EG/DF if CMA is an issue, because those opinions aren't part of the equation if it's a regulatory issue.

Isn’t it obvious to you that it isn’t a CMA issue?

I have to question the sanity of anyone thinking that’s the reason. The game is going on sale in the Uk anyway. How does it strike a blow at the CMA to deny certain UK outlets codes?

Jeez
 

Thabass

Member
Oh it was deliberate for sure. They had a list of people to send codes to, and clearly a list of who not to. I’m still curious to know the Why, behind-closed-doors “fly on the wall” reason that only higher-ups like Hines or Howard know. I could guess, but I’d love to know the unbridled truth.

Maybe Phil and Matt Booty saw Eurogamer’s story about being withheld despite DF and called Hines and were like WTF dude, we don’t need bad press like this.
Yeah, hence my questioning on it. They have a clear reason, I'm assuming that Eurogamer has been a thorn in their side for a while or something. Either that, or the CMA is a real sticking point. Either way, I think Microsoft is big mad about the CMA holding up a certain sale.

Isn’t it obvious to you that it isn’t a CMA issue?

I have to question the sanity of anyone thinking that’s the reason. The game is going on sale in the Uk anyway. How does it strike a blow at the CMA to deny certain UK outlets codes?

Jeez

It probably isn't, but I'm still questioning it regardless. Especially since we have no answers. I don't just assume something is true until I get actual facts.
 
Last edited:

SABRE220

Member
Their reviews are shit anyway. FFXVI had this shite globbed in the middle


They shit all over Kingdom Come: Deliverance and the game's rep really tanked because of it.
Jesus...imagine putting so much emphasis on ethnicity in a fictional world in a damn game review. The game creator can make the whole cast blue lizardmen for all I care its his game and its not like they purposely put in offensive or bigoted content. Normally eurogamer was a great review site from my past recollection, Im hoping this is a rare instance from a single reviewer?
 
Last edited:

SABRE220

Member
Did microsoft just throw a hissy fit and say screw you to all uk outlets:messenger_grinning_sweat:?I dont think even they can be so petty, but only giving reviewcopies to select outlets that are partial to bethesda games does not look too good. It seems like they are trying to get that metacritic score up on launch by hook or crook..I would have hoped they would be very confident in their game instead of this.
 
Last edited:

Killer8

Member
Harsh = “they’ve published reviews I disagreed with”

You just have to do these little bits of translation quite a lot, because people won’t use writing to convey what they actually mean.

Harsh in the context of Edge = they have a consistent, documented pattern of scoring games lower than the Metacritic average.

It's not my personal take, it just is what it is. And it's mostly because of the way their scoring methodology works (a 5 from Edge = average in the truest sense of the word).

But their practice of low-balling the average also shouldn't elevate them to a status of somehow being more truthful or honest than other publications. Once you see past their scoring as being part of their brand, they are basically other publications in terms of their staff makeup behind-the-scenes.
 

RyRy93

Member
A late embargo combined with many outlets now even getting a review copy before launch, EA did this with the last couple of Battlefields and it meant decent scores day 1 dropping considerably about a week later.
 

Ginzeen

Banned
A late embargo combined with many outlets now even getting a review copy before launch, EA did this with the last couple of Battlefields and it meant decent scores day 1 dropping considerably about a week later.
Many outlets and people gotten a code. Only some outlets didn't get one. Euro gamer and edge lmao. It's easy to see why they didn't get one. Nothing burger.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
DeepEnigma DeepEnigma see, ignore, spin a new narrative, rinse and repeat ;).

Exactly ;)

- The game probably bad technically - DF got the code
- Eurogamer and Edge are the only harsh reviewers left - Eurogamer got the code
- They're only sending codes to evangalized websites: US outlets all got codes, UK only issue
- Only Xbox centric websites got the code: Pure Xbox didn't get the code
- But Pure Xbox reviewed Redfall low - Jizz and Windows Central gave the same score

What will these crazy kids think of next.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom