Md Ray
Member
|
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
[VGT] Resident Evil Village DEMO: PS5 vs Xbox Series X|S Frame Rate Comparison
- Thread starter Md Ray
- Start date
xion4360
Member
Actually it performs slightly better on series x.
AnotherOne
Member
Sony fanboys downplay the 1-5 fps xsx advantage? But If it was the other way around they'd make sure even their neighbor knows about it.
Last edited:
ikbalCO
Member
Yeah, they better off with locking the fps to 30 on series s or lower the resolution to 1080p
Md Ray
Member
Res should be dropped to 1080cb.
Last edited:
From struggling at 1080p at 60fps with no ray tracing on PS5 vs no issues at native 4K on XSX to both using 4k CB with same ray tracing settings and pretty much same performance.
Also Capcom must be punished by Jim for letting a couple of extra frame rate drops slide into the PS5 version, the marketing deal didn't allow for that!?
Oh the FUD and fake stories from ''insiders''
Finally the bullshit is over...with this game.
Also Capcom must be punished by Jim for letting a couple of extra frame rate drops slide into the PS5 version, the marketing deal didn't allow for that!?
Oh the FUD and fake stories from ''insiders''
Finally the bullshit is over...with this game.
Last edited:
I'm quite impressed by the Series S. People clown on it, but the no-RT mode is a non dynamic 1440p locked 60 fps. Basically what it advertised itself as. But I guess The Medium throws out any good will for the Series consoles..
Capcom actually downplayed performance across the board for all consoles. For example, they said 1440p 30 for RT XSS and 1440p 45 performance, but it's more like 1440/45 and 1440/60.
I think they'd be better off capping at 30 for RT on XSS. Frame pacing must feel awful. I doubt dropping resolution to 1080p would provide a near locked experience, either.
Seems like a quality game for everyone, other than the reported input issues on Xbox compared to PS.
Capcom actually downplayed performance across the board for all consoles. For example, they said 1440p 30 for RT XSS and 1440p 45 performance, but it's more like 1440/45 and 1440/60.
I think they'd be better off capping at 30 for RT on XSS. Frame pacing must feel awful. I doubt dropping resolution to 1080p would provide a near locked experience, either.
Seems like a quality game for everyone, other than the reported input issues on Xbox compared to PS.
Zoro7
Banned
I want that increase of 0.2 average frame rate. 2 TF of extra POWAAAAAAA!
Last edited:
DenchDeckard
Moderated wildly
Glad I bought on the series x. Hugs LG CX and vrr enabled Xbox.
the tools have matured to 0.2 average frame rate improvement....
....another one!
seriously though, ps5 needs VRR.
the tools have matured to 0.2 average frame rate improvement....
....another one!
seriously though, ps5 needs VRR.
Last edited:
MasterCornholio
Member
Damn both systems are extremely close in this one. Looks like it's a very good experience on both.
Yes, but PS5 can't handle 60 fps even in 1080p not that long ago, in comparison to flawless 4k60 xbox version, so it's a pretty good jump.
Last edited:
assurdum
Banned
Dusk Golem redeemed!
MasterCornholio
Member
True but I don't think anyone would really notice that. The Series S version needs to improve though. A locked 30FPs would make it fine though or a lower resolution to hit 60FPs.
Last edited:
assurdum
Banned
Well considered the difference in the CUs is still quite surprising see the ps5 so close.
Sloth Guevara
Banned
Great that they run great.
Shame I can’t handle scary games like this
Shame I can’t handle scary games like this
MasterCornholio
Member
Hopefully it gets patched into the PS5 soon for those with VRR displays.
Edit: Sony did market VRR support so I'm sure they are working hard on it to avoid a law suit.
Last edited:
sncvsrtoip
Member
no if you take real compute and bandwidth advantage into account and stop this cu number bs
MasterCornholio
Member
no if you take real compute and bandwidth advantage into account and stop this cu number bs
Wouldn't that make it even more surprising?
Chukhopops
Member
I’ve heard it’s really, really good!
Last edited by a moderator:
assurdum
Banned
Well but more CUs still should give important benefit in terms of performance for raytracing, that's undoubted.no if you take real compute and bandwidth advantage into account and stop this cu number bs
sncvsrtoip
Member
higher clocks also so still 20% compute advantage, talking about cu number without clock is bs
FatKingBallman
Banned
no if you take real compute and bandwidth advantage into account and stop this cu number bs
But 1.8 TF difference. As it should be, right? I mean, in RT mode where XSX should have the big advantage
assurdum
Banned
Again we are talking of CUs advantage. There isn't an universal benefit for the whole GPU but in dedicated tasks more CUs still should outperform less CUs even though faster
MasterCornholio
Member
Not trolling here but the Series S is the only one struggling to hit 60FPs. It wouldn't be a bad idea if the developers reduced the resolution or locked it at 30FPs. I really don't like seeing the framerate be that unstable on any platform.
DenchDeckard
Moderated wildly
Just watched the video, clear Xbox advantage through the whole play through. Ps5 drops when npcs are on screen, seems to waver drops into the high 50s a considerable amount while the Xbox stays locked. this is where VRR comes into a world of its own for these consoles. Sony really needs to get this sorted.
assurdum
Banned
1.8 TF means nothing. But more CUs still outperform less CUs that's undeniable. Now of course faster more balanced CUs job should decrease such advantage but it's impressive we are talking of just 2 FPS of difference.
Last edited:
MasterCornholio
Member
Still seems like a very small advantage to me. It's not like the framerate is so bad on the PS5 that it ruins the experience. I agree that Sony needs to get VRR working though.
01011001
Banned
not necessarily. with RT reflections for example you can run into a CPU bottleneck or simply a GPU bottleneck. real time reflections means less culling as objects/characters behind the camera need to be loaded/animated in addition to the stuff you'd normally see without RT
so while the act of calculating rays might be faster on Series X, the thing that you see in reflections might mean other parts of the hardware are limiting performance
Last edited:
sncvsrtoip
Member
cu * clock matter but some try to talking about cu number only to show that gap is bigger which is not
Last edited:
ChuckeRearmed
Member
But will fight over a single drop in a single scene like in Hitman
xion4360
Member
all you have to do is turn off RT and then you get a locked 60 on series s.
they should lock to 30 on Series S RT and the last gen systems.
Last edited:
MasterCornholio
Member
I don't think it's correct to offer RT at 60FPs if it can't handle it well at that. Unlike the other systems the game is very playable with RT on.
DenchDeckard
Moderated wildly
oh, I completely agree. I played through both demos on the ps5 and the only point I actually really noticed any hitches were when I entered that fancy room in the castle demo. Gonna try out the Xbox now to play it again.
Agent_Nobody
Member
You’d figure it would be a pretty big priority for them considering part of their business is selling TVs with VRR, it’s a weird situation when their competitors hardware works better on their TVs than theirs do.
FatKingBallman
Banned
Ahaaa, bootleneck. I knew it.
cu * clock matter but some try to talking only about cu number only to show that gap is bigger which is not
We have numerous statements how XSX should have a big advantage in compute in games because RT is scaling with numbers of CUs. Well, if you are in photomode. :/
Last edited:
DenchDeckard
Moderated wildly
i imagine resolution etc is identical as per sonys contract for parity?
MasterCornholio
Member
Sony fanboys downplay the 1-5 fps xsx advantage? But If it was the other way around they'd make sure even their neighbor knows about it.
And that's a massive difference? Honestly it's a small difference and nobody should be ashamed of the PS5 version. If Dealer was right then I would be concerned.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
This is why it's not out yet. Since they have so much invested with TVs, Film, Imaging Sensors, etc., they are waiting on the HDMI board to certify it. Supposedly it's done, but held up due to certification. These are the rules Sony has always played by when it came to certs.
Moridianae
Member
So nearly identical on both systems?
"BuT DuSk GoLeM saId!!?!?!"
What a
.
"BuT DuSk GoLeM saId!!?!?!"
What a
.
Thirty7ven
Banned
Wasn’t the PS5 supposed to struggle with this game?
The Hamburglar
Banned
Sony fanboys downplay the 1-5 fps xsx advantage? But If it was the other way around they'd make sure even their neighbor knows about it.
The fact a 100 dollar more expensive machine with a beefier gpu performs the same is more embarrassing for series x than ps5 losing 2fps.
Actually to your point it’s the Xbox fans always crying about the their persecution, just like you are now.
assurdum
Banned
There is a static data to establish such things. What you think to see isn't it exactly scientific.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
He already admitted to making it up because he was butthurt about the PS getting too much praise at the time.So nearly identical on both systems?
"BuT DuSk GoLeM saId!!?!?!"
What a
Total clown shows who let their favorite brands dictate their identity.
Last edited: