squarealex
Member
Glorious 1080p/50fps without RT
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
[VGT] Resident Evil Village DEMO: PS5 vs Xbox Series X|S Frame Rate Comparison
- Thread starter Md Ray
- Start date
01011001
Banned
well Control showed a relatively big advantage for SX in RT mode. which is why I think they should add an option to unlock the framerate on Series X as the photo mode shows it can reach 50fps in most scenes and with a VRR screen that is more than acceptable.
Control is set in pretty small confined areas, so other limiting factors aren't as common. meaning the Performance in RT mode is almost entirely bound to the ray calculations of the console.
Last edited:
Warnen
Don't pass gaas, it is your Destiny!
aren’t they both $500?
Orta
Banned
Shhhh. You can't say that.
xion4360
Member
ashamed? lmfao who would even say stuff like that
its funny to me how people react to performance on console games, like its a point of pride for the ps5 to match up to the xbox because it technically should not, or its all "another one" gifs when it just slightly outperforms it.
its ever so slightly more stable on the series x, wow burn your ps5's
its funny to me how people react to performance on console games, like its a point of pride for the ps5 to match up to the xbox because it technically should not, or its all "another one" gifs when it just slightly outperforms it.
its ever so slightly more stable on the series x, wow burn your ps5's
assurdum
Banned
Can't wait to hear them define the series X difference transformative because VRR.
Last edited:
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
ashamed? lmfao who would even say stuff like that
its funny to me how people react to performance on console games, like its a point of pride for the ps5 to match up to the xbox because it technically should not, or its all "another one" gifs when it just slightly outperforms it.
its ever so slightly more stable on the series x, wow burn your ps5's
AnotherOne
Member
You're absolutely right the difference is small hardly brag worthy I was just pointing out that some ppl on here make sure that when ps5 performs better than xsx they go overboard, personally I'm getting it for ps5 because of the controller.
Heisenberg007
Gold Journalism
No it didn't.
Of course it was supposed to be 8k120 on xsx, day one on gamepass of course, and two pizzas from phil, but evil sony you know...
assurdum
Banned
Native 4k vs 4k CBR if I remind correctly. The funny thing I said to such people just needed to rewatch the DMC5 SE to predict how would be ended with such engine. Slightly more stable raytracing mode and that's it.Boy oh boy...
Look at those 12tfin action.
I was certain it was gonna be a ....much....bigger difference. According to certain folks.
Last edited:
01011001
Banned
10fps difference in many scenes, and even more in some. (16% advantage on average)
the difference is big enough that an unlocked mode would make sense on SX
although I advocate for every game tk always have an option to change the FPS lock no matter how the performance is
Last edited:
AnotherOne
Member
Boy oh boy...
Look at those 12tf
I was certain it was gonna be a ....much....bigger difference. According to certain folks.
So the xsx should automatically perform better than ps5 just because? The developer's input to use extra horsepower is up to them.
Chukhopops
Member
Never forget that launch Valhalla had a mean frame rate difference of 0.23 FPS and was considered a Watergate-level crisis from the blue team’s point of view.
Now there’s a difference of the exact same 0.23 FPS but suddenly it’s « nearly identical », I wonder what changed?
Now there’s a difference of the exact same 0.23 FPS but suddenly it’s « nearly identical », I wonder what changed?
Last edited:
SantaC
Member
This game is crossgen
xion4360
Member
1-5 fps is all the rage around here...10+ fps difference? pffff identical.
Warnen
Don't pass gaas, it is your Destiny!
Never forget that launch Valhalla had a mean frame rate difference of 0.23 FPS and was considered a Watergate-level crisis from the blue team’s point of view.
Now there’s a difference of the exact same 0.23 FPS but suddenly it’s « nearly identical », I wonder what changed?
Honestly...you can say slightly all day.
My oh my.
One day we will stop pretending the PS5 DE doesnt exist.
Damn near everywhere outside of NA the PS5DE usually outsells the Series consoles combined.
If the PS5DE doesnt exist...then neither does the Series consoles outside of NA.
AnotherOne
Member
Exactly.But will fight over a single drop in a single scene like in Hitman
Thirty7ven
Banned
Never forget that launch Valhalla had a mean frame rate difference of 0.23 FPS and was considered a Watergate-level crisis from the blue team’s point of view.
Now there’s a difference of the exact same 0.23 FPS but suddenly it’s « nearly identical », I wonder what changed?
Sony fans aren’t the ones who spent 10 months convincing the world that the 2TF advantage would be a big thing.
Retcon specialists tripping themselves over a couple of frames. The outcome has been embarrassing for those warriors.
Last edited:
xion4360
Member
I tried so hard to get the DE but at the end of the day I was only able to get the 500 disc version...its all good tho feel like I have all the options.
Warnen
Don't pass gaas, it is your Destiny!
?
I know the PS5 DE exist, it was the one I owned, but kinda odd to compare the gimped one with the Series X. Apple to Apple and all.
assurdum
Banned
Crossgen should even run better on series X thanks to the virtual coded development
John Wick
Member
But I thought there was a signed deal to keep parity? Isn't that what the xbox fans were saying when that contract document leaked???
Sony fanboys downplay the 1-5 fps xsx advantage? But If it was the other way around they'd make sure even their neighbor knows about it.
I mean Sony should be taking Capcom to court over those 2-3fps
Last edited:
Lokaum D+
Member
i like how ppl now talk about parity, knowing that consoles has been holding back PC since aways, if is Sony contract u guys just deal with it, now u guys know how PC gamers feels XD
Last edited:
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
People saying for a year before launch that the 12>10 and it was going to crush the PS5? That could not have anything to do with rub on either side, no, of course not.Never forget that launch Valhalla had a mean frame rate difference of 0.23 FPS and was considered a Watergate-level crisis from the blue team’s point of view.
Now there’s a difference of the exact same 0.23 FPS but suddenly it’s « nearly identical », I wonder what changed?
Yet real world results show what devs have been saying, these boxes will trade minuscule blows. You know, the comments that one base laughed at and still do even when presented with the very facts. When is it all going to sink in?
xion4360
Member
Crossgen should even run better on series X thanks to the virtual coded development
you can say that buts its a native game on the ps5 and series..its using Ray Tracing after all.
This is gonna be a comical generation. I'm ready.
PS5DE is gimped because of no disc drive....? Then what does that make the Series S? On life support?
The specs in the DE is the exact same as the regular PS5.
Blame MS for not making a discless XSX for $100 less.
Last edited:
John Wick
Member
That was just Dusk Idiot making nonsense up. Any game won't run well in early development
Last edited:
assurdum
Banned
A difference of 0,23 FPS on launch Valhalla? Even DF asked desperately for a downgrade in resolution on series X because they can't stand the tearing and the drops, the hell you are talking about?Never forget that launch Valhalla had a mean frame rate difference of 0.23 FPS and was considered a Watergate-level crisis from the blue team’s point of view.
Now there’s a difference of the exact same 0.23 FPS but suddenly it’s « nearly identical », I wonder what changed?
Last edited:
sircaw
Banned
After being told for months on end about how much more superior the x box was with all its power, and all the fud how shit the ps5 was going to be, it was pretty shocking how close the consoles turned out. Remember, Sony invested more into their controller, their SSD, their sound engine, and also have an identical machine at 100 bucks less, if you're going to shit talk, do it better.Never forget that launch Valhalla had a mean frame rate difference of 0.23 FPS and was considered a Watergate-level crisis from the blue team’s point of view.
Now there’s a difference of the exact same 0.23 FPS but suddenly it’s « nearly identical », I wonder what changed?
Last edited:
Chukhopops
Member
People saying for a year before launch that the 12>10 and it was going to crush the PS5? That could not have anything to do with rub on either side, no, of course not.
Yet real world results show what devs have been saying, these boxes will trade minuscule blows. You know, the comments that one base laughed at and still do even when presented with the very facts. When is it all going to sink in?
This has nothing to do with my point though, is 0.23 FPS a big difference or not? Or did that change since November?
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Last edited:
Warnen
Don't pass gaas, it is your Destiny!
Well it’s the lesser of the 2 offerings. Can’t play physical games on it is or watch blurys those are huge compromises.
Neither of those should matter to Game Pass fans....right?
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Which have nothing to do with game performance, in a game performance thread. You are splitting hairs to "not be wrong" about his correct $400 for the SAME PERFORMING BOX as the $500 counterpart in the PS5.
MasterCornholio
Member
The dualsense would definitely convince me to pick up the PS5 version of a game if it wasn't far behind the XSX one technically. That controller does add a heck of a lot to the overall experience.
Thirty7ven
Banned
It’s a surprise when PS5 outperforms the XSX, even if it’s by a minuscule difference. It’s accepted that XSX has the more robust GPU grunt.
Chukhopops
Member
Well feel free to check the thread then!
AC:
59.85 vs 59.62 = 0.23 FPS mean
Resident Evil village:
59.79 vs 59.56 = 0.23 FPS mean
In fact, RE:V has an even higher difference in percentage.
Last edited:
assurdum
Banned
Again use photomode as benchmark for just a bug in an hardware with variable clock frequency...how reliable can be when the machine downclock the frequency on purpose if higher clock is not required in such mode?
Warnen
Don't pass gaas, it is your Destiny!
I love being the best kind of right, Technically right!
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Warnen
Don't pass gaas, it is your Destiny!
Don’t think RE8 is on Gamepass
Neither are blu ray movies or physical games.
Last edited:
MasterCornholio
Member
True but the difference is also very small. It's not like either system is vastly behind the other or anything.