Yeah no this is totally wrong, Bttaglia or Lineman started it and it has been since parroted by Xbox fans in the likes of lort, longdi and darkmage for example.
Its in the next gen thread.
I dont even recognize their names, and i hope they are not Twitter trolls because i said on here. People keep quoting Twitter people, like that tool that said XSX would have 50fps more in games, and then act like all Xbox fanboys feel that.
I don't. But I believe in terms of relevance and meaningfulness, we can categorize these comparisons in three groups:
Dude the next gen thread is there for all to see. It started after DF said what that develoepr had told them, and then hundreds of pages for months about 'bad tools' in the Next Gen thread about it, right up to launch. And its always Sony fans that constantly bring up the tools on here.
The latest video for kh3 has back compatability in the title. TH is a full next gen patch. Are you really this dumb?
ahhaaha "for them" who? you guys (usual suspects) are becoming embarassing , the excitement of not having another game where you have a noteworthy difference in resolution is making you crank up quickly I see. Unfortunately it will not last long
Dude stop. They are all last gen games given a patch to improve them for next gen. Lets not be pedantic here.
And when you see an exodus of certain users whenever XSX 'wins' a comparison, it shows how scared they are inside for the future.
No they aren't.
And why do you think that is?
The green side or xbox fans... Tim, Dealer, Batallhia, Tom Warrior, Jeef Grub, Jez, Misterxmedia, Bluesomething, Aaron, Rich... here in GAF you, Ricky, Stuart, Senjutsusomething, etc... I need to list all of you?
Almost all of them are in this thread too, and they may be on twitter I don't know and don't care, but I was only talking about gaf users.Maybe an username like Riky or monarchjt ring a bell to you?
Which Xbox users then?, and like i said, the next gen thread is there for all to see. All you have to do is go to DF, find that vid where Rich talked about what the devs said, check the date, then go to that date in the troll thread.
And still both are 99% (it's all in VGTech spreadsheet). It means that XSX drops frames in other places where PS5 doesn't, and the end-result turns out to be the same, despite that one big drop of 113FPS on PS5.
Well i'll keep my open then for them.
i was talking about you etho...you , heisenberg, geordie and all the usual Sony fanboys I don't think there is a need to name you all ..you guys are all threads and we know each other very good ). we all have our happy days
)
It is fact that the Xbox this generation completely changed its development environment. Why is that something to mock? I have said numerous times that cross generational titles aren't the way to judge the capabilities of these new consoles. I guess I'm living rent free in people's minds like Riky. Oh well he's good company.
one drops to 1080p and one doesn't
Thanks.i was talking about you etho...you , heisenberg, geordie and all the usual Sony fanboys I don't think there is a need to name you all ..you guys are all threads and we know each other very good ). we all have our happy days
Slide show. Literally unplayable.
this thing will never be accepted. I can't wait that the graphics engines will use the peculiarities of the new hw to see the real differences of these machines. For now the clock is helping inevitably the ps5, will it last? , I doubt about it
but but but some said it was unplayable when was 56 fps vs 60
I'm not against fanboyism ..people do the same with football, formula 1 and everything else ... I enjoy it. Believe me I enjoy it 99% of the time
No one said it was. Its just funny when the MOST POWERFUL CONSOLE OF ALL TIME was pushing out less frames than 9TF PS5.
I realise my post may sound agressive, but please understand it is not,it is just revisionism to claim that the tools is a PS fanboy argument.
It comes from darkmage an user claiming to be neutral that strangely always root for Xbox and has barely anything good to say about playstation.He also has posts saying that colt or timdog are neutral too (if you don't remember colt is the guy that claimed 50fps more based on gpu alone).
if there are huge differences between those consoles you wont find them in this game ... maybe the next one?it really is funny especially if you know that all the potential of hw is not yet exploited.
Unplayable? No.
To be fair, even the Remedy dev said about that, he even said about the tools being way behind PS5.
We are back at tools lol fucking hell.
Same goes for the fps, It's hard to get exact like for like gameplay.
You are so amazingly wrong. Look at any cpu bench that properly supports multi thread and you will see doubling cores literally doubles performance. How much more linear do you want?It was and is always better.
The units counts started become a thing after the processors reached the physical limit in clock of the architecture.
The increase in units give a performance curve more disproportional than the increase in clock.
The clock x performance curve is very linear until you reach the physical limit of the architecture.
That is where the overclock scheme lives and where the false claims come because they doesn't understand what is happening.
Now of course if you can't increase the clock why not increase the units count? There is no harm in more performance.... it just the increase is performance is not close to linear like the clock gives and depends a lot on the parallelism coded on the software level to have a good performance scaling... clock increase doesn't rely on software.
BTW recent tests.
RDNA 2 vs. RDNA vs. GCN: IPC und CU-Skalierung im Test
Wie profitiert AMD RDNA 2 von mehr CUs? Wie viel schneller sind 40 CUs von RDNA 2 als 40 von RDNA oder gar GCN? Der Test liefert Antworten.www.computerbase.de
But if want you can find tests on Google that goes down to archaic 486 or Pentinum processors.
There were a lot of discussion when the first dual-core processors started to be released.
so vgtech told us how many of time % of the time the res drop on xsx ? vgtech said how many times the ps5 drops fps?
Df have covered this game?! Or are you throwing around generalisations from unrelated games?
When PS5 fixes its console whine, activates its storage bay, and does something about its less than pleasant UI then I'll have something to cheer. I can give Xbox props because I own and used both consoles. There is a reason that the poll of people who own both prefer the Xbox. I never claimed to be neutral only that in don't make up negative stuff about either system. People are free to like whatever they want. The most vocal haters of the Xbox don't know much about the system.
And the dirt 5 devs said otherwise, honestly, I don't think anybody is credible there be it devs or random foruum users like you and I( or you and me ?I never understood the difference).Because when everybody contradicts everybody, then nothin is to be believe.
Actually yes... on PS5 it is 21 frames or 175ms (each frame is 8.3ms in 120fps games) and Series X it is 3 frames or 25ms... the stats doesn't say if it is in the same point/moment or it is in separate cases.
you should tell to devs to stop with it. like the Remedy one did you listen to what he said?
NBA2K21 on next-gen consoles is using a totally new engine.
Well you know that he is doing that for free in his spare time? There are still no tools to automate the pixel counting part that must be done manually.
and now the res ? %? 1 sec for the entire game? or it drop 60% of the time ?
so it's really hard to claim a victory for someone why ppl act like one version is better than another ?
