DenchDeckard
Moderated wildly
Xbox needs some texture filtering but has a rather large resolution advantage. They just need to patch that in, and then its an easy win for Xbox.
Native resolution pixel counts at 1920x1080 seem to be very rare on Xbox Series X and were found less often than on PS5.
Must be adventurous.I'd rather play change the router DNS than Outriders or Soulstorm tbh
I'm actually being unfair to Soulstorm for a joke. The old games were good just not really my thing, so if Soulstorm matches the past quality it is actually probably a good game.Must be adventurous.
They need to improve their AF tools then.Kinda crazy that ps5 is dropping to 1080p more often, I thought with the speed of the GPU it wouldnt need to do so as much.
I deffo think the tools seem to be shaping up.
Picture quality and framerate better on PS5, XBOX has the higher resolution......XBOX increases resolution at the deficit of PQ.
Framerate is basically the same.Conclusion. PS5 better image quality and frame rate. XSX better resolution.
If I remember correctly, this is yet another game with better texture filtering on PS5.....I also observed better effects on PS5 too like DOF and MB...
Hey, it dropped 2 frames less! PS5 wins.you have to be joking right, like literally nothing in it. PS5 has the drop to the lowest point in FPS but it isn't even noticeable, your trolling just gets worse and worse
Conclusion. PS5 better image quality and frame rate. XSX better resolution.
Actually Series X has the lowest drop in framerate... one frame at 50ms (between 20 and 29fps) but it is just one frame for 50ms and it is imperceptible.you have to be joking right, like literally nothing in it. PS5 has the drop to the lowest point in FPS but it isn't even noticeable, your trolling just gets worse and worse
Now in this pic, what do you see, the resolution advantage or the texture advantage.....I feel when games start to use the IO to do more varied locales using even higher fidelity textures, where you move faster between different locales whilst keeping textures placed in within seconds or a second, the differences will expand even more....Seeing textures load in or swapped in would be something you see less on PS5 due to the faster IO...Anything texture/asset related tbh....Huge texture filtering advantage in ps5
Game is included in gamepass, huge win for Xbox ANOTHER ONE!!Huge texture filtering advantage in ps5
Glad they got the framerate sorted on xbox though.
Whatever happens XSX always wins for some people. Funny stuff.
check minimum frame rate and PS5 is 55fps and xbox series x is 56FPs so ps5 has lowest but there is nothing in it basicallyActually Series X has the lowest drop in framerate... one frame at 50ms (20fps) but it is just one frame for 50ms and it is imperceptible.
That's $30 dollars per fewer dropped frames. Seems worth it.Hey, it dropped 2 frames less! PS5 wins.
in fanboys dream yesDeja vu? We already knew it performed better on PS5 right?
I'm not sure. Wouldnt fps and frame time go together?check minimum frame rate and PS5 is 55fps and xbox series x is 56FPs so ps5 has lowest but there is nothing in it basically
Number of frames in that second higher yes.check minimum frame rate and PS5 is 55fps and xbox series x is 56FPs so ps5 has lowest but there is nothing in it basically
its on the first page the stats, also there is only 3fps difference between the 2 in the whole count of fps on the whole testI'm not sure. Wouldnt fps and frame time go together?
How could PS5 be lowest at 55 fps, but X has the worst frame time of 50 which is 20 fps?
Don't be upset. PS5 wins again but it's only outriders so who caresPerformed better? 0.01? We already knew that resolution wise Series X was trashing PS5 again.
Don't be upset. PS5 wins again but it's only outriders so who cares
Ya, I saw the chart, but wouldnt a 50 frame time mean X would have a Min Frame Time of 20 fps?its on the first page the stats
Is the game shit? *scratches it off the "maybe buy later" list*I would if I had to pay 60 dollars for it.
Only for 1 frame though.Ya, I saw the chart, but wouldnt a 50 frame time mean X would have a Min Frame Time of 20 fps?
Maybe I'm misinterpreting the charts wrong and these things dont go together.
Number of frames in that second higher yes.
But you said drop and Series X has the lowest drop... 50ms... 50ms is when the render is below 30fps.
It dropped to 20-29fps for 50ms but in that second number of frames where higher because the others 58 frames were in 16ms.
Ya, I saw the chart, but wouldnt a 50 frame time mean X would have a Min Frame Time of 20 fps?
Maybe I'm misinterpreting the charts wrong and these things dont go together.
Is the game shit? *scratches it off the "maybe buy later" list*
Only for 1 frame though.
Only if your name is Riky aka VRRXSX the best version I guess.
Probably because in one second you have 1 frame in 50ms but all the others in 16ms... that give you 58 frames in that second.I'm not sure. Wouldnt fps and frame time go together?
How could PS5 be lowest at 55 fps, but X has the worst frame time of 50 which is 20 fps?
What does VRR have to do with anything? The performance is essentially locked 60 on both consoles.Only if your name is Riky aka VRR
Ah. That makes sense. I was treating each frame on its own as a fully prorated fps.Probably because in one second you have 1 frame in 50ms but all the others in 16ms... that give you 58 frames in that second.
basically nobody will notice the difference on either version frame rate wiseProbably because in one second you have 1 frame in 50ms but all the others in 16ms... that give you 58 frames in that second.
50ms in 1 frame
950ms in 57 frames (16.66ms)
The 950ms can be 1x 33.33ms and 55x 16.66ms... the combination just need to be equal or over 56 frames in that second.
VRR gives the edge to XSX, according to the infamous and official VRR connoisseur Riky.What does VRR have to do with anything? The performance is essentially locked 60 on both consoles.
Yeap it is near impossible to see these changes unless you use some tool.basically nobody will notice the difference on either version frame rate wise
great all round for both sets of console ownersYeap it is near impossible to see these changes unless you use some tool.
What happened there? AF looks completely broken on Xbox, looks like N64 textures further into the screen.Some people can notice 3008x1692 vs 3456x1944
but not this...
All the time I think, it was noticed in the beta.What happened there? AF looks completely broken on Xbox, looks like N64 textures further into the screen.
Is it like that all the time or is that some split second oddity?
All the time. It was already like this in the demo and was already noticed by VGTech.What happened there? AF looks completely broken on Xbox, looks like N64 textures further into the screen.
Is it like that all the time or is that some split second oddity?