Can you add an extra SSD, or is it only replace?
You can use any kind if it’s just for storage. It will copy the game you want in a minute or under.
Here is the disconnect. I said that an SSD fast enough for the PS5 will be a run of the mill. What did I mean? I meant, you can just go buy one.
It doesnt need to be certified. It doesnt need to be Sony branded, it doesnt need to be "whitelisted". Simply a drive that performs well enough
will work.
If I used the term "off the shelf" you wouldnt have a problem with it... yet they both mean exactly the same thing.
A "run of the mill" car for instance doesnt mean some arent faster or slower or bigger or smaller.
Its not the same thing as saying "cookie cutter" or "average" or "cheap" or anything else.
You will be able to go into a shop... (Do we even do that anymore?) or online and buy one. It wont be hard to get, brand specific, or
"exotic". Thats literally all I said, and people who have a bone to pick with Sony for some reason are making my statement into something it never was.
First have to see how big install games are now, but 625Gb gets you 4-8 games
You can yes, but this will pose a challenge initially as there are no consumer grade SSDs as fast as the one inside the PS5 and Sony requires said replacement to match its performance at least.
This, of course, will not be a problem next year I assume.
Well 4 games is the worst case of course, but let's say you already install the latest CoD (180-190GB) and RDR2 (140-150GB), that's already halve of your available space.In what world are all games this gigantic? I mean we don't know how big next-gen games will be but Jesus.
Well 4 games is the worst case of course, but let's say you already install the latest CoD (180-190GB) and RDR2 (140-150GB), that's already halve of your available space.
Also thats not what the tweet says
It says 825gb isnt 1tb-175gb.
Then it says there will be just over 700gb usable space for the user.
In case of RDR2 I took the worst case scenario (digital version). 149GB, source. My point was merely that in worst case scenarios that 650GB can be full pretty quickly. But we still have to see how big games will actually be since all consoles are now rocking SSD's.The size of CoD is totally unacceptable and most people would agree. RDR 2 is also 105GB.
I currently have a 2TB external SSD (1.89 usable space) hooked up to my PS4 Pro and have 46 games loaded on it, that's not anywhere near all of the games I own so there was no way in hell they'd have been able to include an SSD big enough to fit all of the games I buy so this is a non issue for me. You'll likely be able to fit 15 or more full games on the internal SSD and add external storage if you don't feel like deleting and redownloading games over time. If you can't get by with 15 games to choose from at once you have a problem lol. I wish we could get larger storage of course but knowing the extra benefits we get with them choosing to beef up the SSD I think it's worth the tradeoff.
Not planning to go digital, so more than enough for me.
you are aware games like warzone takes that space on this generartion because streaming from the hd cant be done quick enough and they need to have the same assets a lot of times,no?So 2 seasons of warzone then
Pathetic tbh
you are aware games like warzone takes that space on this generartion because streaming from the hd cant be done quick enough and they need to have the same assets a lot of times,no?
I dont think this is that bad tbh. Ideally you would have a large external HDD and offload games you dont play as much to it. lets say the average AAA title is 100gb. it would only take like what 20 mins to transfer a game back onto the SSD? 5 mins if using a external SATA SSD.
That's all well and good, but we really don't want to shorten the SSD lifespan by repeatedly writing entire games to it.I dont think this is that bad tbh. Ideally you would have a large external HDD and offload games you dont play as much to it. lets say the average AAA title is 100gb. it would only take like what 20 mins to transfer a game back onto the SSD? 5 mins if using a external SATA SSD.
lol Destiny 2 hit 150 gigs on consoles? WTF
I think Shadowkeep pushed it up to (~100GB) and the update system is awful with updates needing to overwrite massive blocks of the file (which hopefully Cerny was saying should go away with the PS5). So a 700MB update required 60GB of working space for example. In my case, I had to delete a game just to get that update on it for my 500GB launch model. But they we have Beyond Light dropping in November as well which will be more content. Some content will be retired though in the vault, it's not clear if the enhanced versions have any 4K asset packs either.
To be Honest, i dont know anymoreYou do realise that I'm just being sarcastic....no?
2 gigs of Sonys proprietary SSD? theres a reason its only 850 gigs to become with—its radically expensive. 2 tb model would probably raise the cost another $100 or so
I'm tired.
Is this more FUD, or is there actually any evidence at all to prove it?
Crying about "Team Blue" making PS5 sound better than it is, when that appears to be your exact role on anything Xbox related.What narrative was I wanting to spin here exactly? Is correcting misinformation - that the PS5 has a 1TB SSD - now called "spinning a narrative"?
How big is Astrobot?
I'm tired.
Is this more FUD, or is there actually any evidence at all to prove it?