-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Outriders Demo - PS5 and Series X graphics and performance comparison
- Thread starter LivingD3AD
- Start date
N30RYU
Member
At 1:45 you can also see PS5 version having slightly better textures (look at the emblem)
Last edited:
Concern
Member
Thats rich considering this is a thread made for console warring lol. Op conveniently again leaves out any context on a demo that has minimal differences.
Hilariously its about a demo
Physiognomonics
Member
They need to lower the resolution on XSX ASAP. While the game is mostly locked at 60fps on PS5, it's usually hovering at 55-60 on XSX. Reducing the resolution will help.
This is what Ubisoft did with AC Valhalla on XSX.
This is what Ubisoft did with AC Valhalla on XSX.
Last edited:
FrankWza
Member
Driven away like all the other “quality” posters. Even the safe space wasn’t enough to keep him....safe(?)
MasterCornholio
Member
Thats rich considering this is a thread made for console warring lol. Op conveniently again leaves out any context on a demo that has minimal differences.
Hilariously its about a demo
Well if you watched the video he said he doubts the final version will be much different.
But Hostiles reasons for leaving wasn't due to console warring. He simply didn't like the way gaf is going.
Bittermich
Banned
Wonder if this would have been posted if this dude would show other results.
MasterCornholio
Member
Tell it to yourself.
I already talked to
geordiemp
about this kind of thing before.Maybe imagine things differently if that helps you?
I already had my discussion with Hostile in case you didn't notice. Never called him an Xbox faking to own a PS5. I genuinely think he was being given consoles that were turned in due to coil whine.
Last edited:
Exanthus
Banned
Thats rich considering this is a thread made for console warring lol. Op conveniently again leaves out any context on a demo that has minimal differences.
Hilariously its about a demo
And the usual offenders need to make themselves known by posting the same thing due to a apparent PS advantage pmsl... For a demo.
Armorian
Banned
Game releases in ~1 month so it's very close to the final code. Better representation of gameplay performance than photo mode...
An other confirmation that only IOInteractive got the magic tools with PS5 continuining to perform the same or slightly better in all the other native titles.
And to those stating that this is just a demo and it doesn't count....I totally expect them to keep the same attitude when the next RE8 demo is released and (huge) IF XSX ends up having a 59.8fps average vs the 59.2fps PS5 average but probably that won't be necessary and they will continue to say that demos won't matter even then.
And to those stating that this is just a demo and it doesn't count....I totally expect them to keep the same attitude when the next RE8 demo is released and (huge) IF XSX ends up having a 59.8fps average vs the 59.2fps PS5 average
but probably that won't be necessary and they will continue to say that demos won't matter even then.
Last edited:
GHG
Member
oldergamer
Member
Its a demo, perhaps wait for the actual game? seriously though, now demos are being benchmarked?
oldergamer
Member
Xbox is running a high resolution. you can see it easily in the side by side.
TheThreadsThatBindUs
Member
"Yeah, why are people trying to analyse a freaking demo for heaven's sak-...."
"... oh, an apparent Xbox advantage? Carry on..."
VFXVeteran
Banned
I personally don't see any "lighting" differences this guy is mentioning. Both versions look like HDR isn't working (at least compared to the PC version). There is massive desaturation in the Xbox version. PS5 shows a little bit better saturated colors. Not sure what's going on there. Could be the recording software can't record HDR mode on the TV.
Last edited:
ethomaz
Banned
I agree. Let’s benchmark photo modes.
Last edited:
The Xbox One, One S was an absolute beast vs the PS4 and Pro, havent you heard?
Exactly.An other confirmation that only IOInteractive got the magic tools with PS5 continuining to perform the same or slightly better in all the other native titles.
And to those stating that this is just a demo and it doesn't count....I totally expect them to keep the same attitude when the next RE8 demo is released and (huge) IF XSX ends up having a 59.8fps average vs the 59.2fps PS5 average
Once again, something that has been used before for comparisons all of a sudden doesn't matter?
Its so confusing.
Last edited:
Physiognomonics
Member
DF did a whole article and created a narrative that will supposedly last the whole generation... with a photo mode.
Exanthus
Banned
Ah right, I forget it's always back and forth here.
Leyasu
Banned
Yeah and no. Whilst the game won't change much, performance can.
Even Ubi went back and upped the performance on every platform with Fenyx rising.
Leyasu
Banned
Just like Fenyx rising at launch was ?What are those sad people talking about here? We know it's a demo of the "final game", they mostly use demos to stress-test servers. This is 99.99% final game. Take another L and deal with it, it's like 20+ streak so it's not a surprise.
Bo_Hazem
Banned
Even the latest one with the latest update didn't get 100% breakdown from neutral sources like VGTech. So we don't really know about if XSX has reached parity or not. DF is more generalizing and talking a lot than needed. VGTech shows side by side comparisons with zero comments on the video.
Well, this is the current state of the game, many were touting DX12 Ultimate that will make games have much more gains vs PS5's API, and here's reality again:
MasterCornholio
Member
You can literally apply that to any game and accuse every comparison being null and void at launch.
The most funny is people talki
I think It´s mostly depends from the Engine. Some engines will work better on PS5 and others on SX.An other confirmation that only IOInteractive got the magic tools with PS5 continuining to perform the same or slightly better in all the other native titles.
And to those stating that this is just a demo and it doesn't count....I totally expect them to keep the same attitude when the next RE8 demo is released and (huge) IF XSX ends up having a 59.8fps average vs the 59.2fps PS5 average
Last edited:
BlueXImpulse
Banned
Even the latest one with the latest update didn't get 100% breakdown from neutral sources like VGTech. So we don't really know about if XSX has reached parity or not. DF is more generalizing and talking a lot than needed. VGTech shows side by side comparisons with zero comments on the video.
Well, this is the current state of the game, many were touting DX12 Ultimate that will make games have much more gains vs PS5's API, and here's reality again:
Locked 60 is the performance we expect with next generation gaming.
It´s not the reality.Even the latest one with the latest update didn't get 100% breakdown from neutral sources like VGTech. So we don't really know about if XSX has reached parity or not. DF is more generalizing and talking a lot than needed. VGTech shows side by side comparisons with zero comments on the video.
Well, this is the current state of the game, many were touting DX12 Ultimate that will make games have much more gains vs PS5's API, and here's reality again:
1. We don´t know if Series X has an issue with HDR for example, and really it looks like.
2. It´s not the final version with the final patch so we should wait for it, because maybe one version is more advanced than the other.
3. We are comparing this from a video from youtube with compresión and we don´t know how this new youtuber with only 3,5 subscribers made this.
As always, it is making a lot of noise without having enough arguments and what is worse, a demo.
Fans love making noise even without waiting for the final data and even if they have to lie.
As Gobbels said "a lie repeated a thousand times becomes true". That is the tactic of some fans.
Leyasu
Banned
Even the latest one with the latest update didn't get 100% breakdown from neutral sources like VGTech. So we don't really know about if XSX has reached parity or not. DF is more generalizing and talking a lot than needed. VGTech shows side by side comparisons with zero comments on the video.
Well, this is the current state of the game, many were touting DX12 Ultimate that will make games have much more gains vs PS5's API, and here's reality again:
I doubt if anyone will go back and look again at Fenyx. The game is already discounted.
My reply was more about saying that things are set from this demo. When obviously that is not the case. I am not accusing anyone of anything. Just using a bit of common sense.
FatKingBallman
Banned
Well, but there is a trade of for that. Worse framerate.
Well, there were demo comparisons in the past, even on Digital Foundry or NXGamer or VGTech
Exanthus
Banned
What are those sad people talking about here? We know it's a demo of the "final game", they mostly use demos to stress-test servers. This is 99.99% final game. Take another L and deal with it, it's like 20+ streak so it's not a surprise.
So much passion
Bo_Hazem
Banned
That's the idea, also at the end of the day we are having fun here. Honestly won't be bothered by either version, but...
Last edited:
Leyasu
Banned
Enjoy!!That's the idea, also at the end of the day we are having fun here, honestly won't be bothered with either version, but...
Krisprolls
Banned
Ok it runs better on PS5 as usual, but do we know if this game is RDNA 2 ?
Last edited:
Silent Viper
Banned
Its a demo. Doesnt mean final game willl have same problem. Frame rate can easily be fixed based on feedback.Another day, another case of Xbox unable to hold 60 fps
Non issue and most posts including yours is nothing but concern trolling.
Last edited:
Silent Viper
Banned
2 fps difference in a demo. Too early to judge. Lets wait for final version. Issues like this can easily be fixed
I see lot of FUD in your words.
Like it was mentioned, where was this energy with RE Village being used as the ultimate judge of PS5 performance. Gotta be more consistent, folks.
I get it, this is someone we've never heard of. I haven't. But dont sit here and try to act like demos have never been used before in comparisons when the results dont go your way.
Never heard of them.
I get it, this is someone we've never heard of. I haven't. But dont sit here and try to act like demos have never been used before in comparisons when the results dont go your way.
geordiemp
Member
Earns me a good living thanks. Maybe one day you will not have to serve at McDs ? I was taking the piss.
Do you and concern not get bored console warring and insulting others ?
Do you have jobs, kids to advise through life, more important things to do in your life ? Whatever, I am bored, enjoy your little war about subjects you dont have a clue what your talking about so all you can do is simple minded ad homenem, and cant even do that well.
I really dont miss this place.
Old Empire.
Member
Untrue, DF confirmed Series graphics are superior to PS5 version for Cyberpunk. The series was 4K for Hitman- PS5 was not. Devil May Cry ran better on the Series X in three of the four performance/quality modes.
And of course the majority of upgraded games for next gen are better on the series.
The only game, i can think of right now, that PS5 had a slight advantage, in a parity game was Assassin creed Valhalla.
FatKingBallman
Banned
Never heard for Digital Foundry, NXgamer and VGTech?
Looks like you've ignored what NXgamer said in one of the comparison regarding Cyberpunk on XSX. What's the point of so called "superior graphics" when it has worse performance :
QUOTE from 5:00
Quote from 6:25
So, CDPR should scale down settings on X1X version and XSX will run it as good as PS5 like it is now
Last edited:
Physiognomonics
Member
Nope both games are running at 4K. The lighting seems different though.
Krisprolls
Banned
Looks like Alzheimer to me. CoD, Fenix, Valhalla, DMC5 high framerate mode, Dirt 5, Cyberpunk after latest patch... Every game basically runs better on PS5. Selective memory I guess.
Only exception is basically Hitman 3, but since settings are better on PS4 Pro vs One X or Series S on that one, it's probably more due to dev choices and targets than anything else.
Last edited:
Never heard for Digital Foundry, NXgamer and VGTech?
Looks like you've ignored what NXgamer said in one of the comparison regarding Cyberpunk on XSX. What's the point of so called "superior graphics" when it has worse performance :
QUOTE from 5:00
Quote from 6:25
So, CDPR should scale down settings on X1X version and XSX will run it as good as PS5 like it is now
I don´t believe that NXgamer would say something so absurd like that. PS5 version has the graphics of PS4 and it´s totally normal that it keeps 60 frames. 60 frames it´s great but 99,9% of the people in the world can´t notice the difference between 55 and 60 fps.
Concern
Member
Xaero Gravity
NEXT LEVEL lame™
Fake
Member
This please.
Old Empire.
Member
Never heard for Digital Foundry, NXgamer and VGTech?
Looks like you've ignored what NXgamer said in one of the comparison regarding Cyberpunk on XSX. What's the point of so called "superior graphics" when it has worse performance :
QUOTE from 5:00
Quote from 6:25
So, CDPR should scale down settings on X1X version and XSX will run it as good as PS5 like it is now
There is a massive difference in the game image's quality and what's happening on screen.
In the same area on both consoles, The PS5 has no cars, lighting seems off, and the buildings graphics don't look next gen
