Support NeoGAF

[SlimySnake]

literally identical lol

even the ssd performance is the same.

these are clearly not good games to do comparisons on.

 

[Redlancet]

- Both are quite good at keeping 60FPS (in the area he tested)
- PS5 is vsynced, XSX is not
- Denamic res on both with ~1440p as the lowest limit (seen on XSX)
- PS5 loads 12% faster LOL Power of the SSD

So far differences between consoles are minimal, certainly not ~20%. WDL will be interesting.

not only minimal but also in favour of ps5, its funny after all the fuss and chest beating

 

[-Arcadia-]

Maybe we’re not far enough into the gen yet, and I have doubts about NX Gamer, based on the types of people (the kind that like picking up swords and shields for their brand) that recommend him while trashing DF (need to watch more), but I’ve been pretty impressed about how well PS5 has held up.

If one frame differences and 5-8 ones (in a 120 FPS mode) are going to be the story here, it may be that 12 TF didn’t tell all of it, after all.

 

[Hendrick's]

All those extra FLOPS are really showing here.

All that 2X SSD speed and Cerny IO really showing here.

 

[Edgelord79]

VRR will be a big deal for Ubisoft games I feel.

I have been playing Valhalla on the Series X and can confirm what video says. Some screen tearing, frame rate drops in areas with extreme vegetation and lighting.

Doubt this has anything to do with the console's ability and more to do with the difficulty in developing for it and Ubisoft's track record for optimization.

 

[DonMigs85]

Pretty good so far, the differences aren't as stark as PS4 vs Xbone so far

 

[kyliethicc]

shocking. how can the 9 TF RDNA 1.5 console match the WORLDS MOST POWERFUL CONSOLE?

12 TERAFLOPS FULL RDNA 2 CONSTANT FULL CLOCKS = 9 TFLOP downclocking RDNA 1.5

or perhaps the PS5 is actually just as powerful

 

[The_Mike]

- PS5 loads 12% faster LOL Power of the SSD

Tbh it seems a bit off with exactly this game. Its the only game that's so different regarding g load times. In the other thread there's some games that turns a few seconds to PS5s favor and vice versa.

Could be something about ac contacting overloaded ubi servers or something?

 

[Insane Metal]

All that 2X SSD speed and Cerny IO really showing here.

Such a pity he doesn't show initial loading times. They're less than half on PS5 indeed.

 

[ethomaz]

The fact PS5 uses VSYNC already tell you PS5 is doing more GPU processing to delivery the same thing than Xbox without tearing.

 

[Blue Spring]

buzzwords of the this gen, ULTRA FAST SSD, 12TF MACHINE

none of which are a significant improvement one over another

Nah, we have seen the SSD at work with Miles Morales and Demon's Souls.

 

[MCplayer]

Very interesting indeed he didnt go into much detail but what i can gather this is where it gets interesting

Xsx - has screen tearing compared to ps5

Ps5 has a slight advantage to loading compared to xsx

Xsx and ps5 and heres the wacky part xsx can maintain a slight higher rez but can drop as low as 1440p where ps5 holds higher then 1440p

no you guys are missing something about the XSX going for the 1440p, these comparisons apart from the cutscenes aren't the same, diferent things happen during the gameplay shown, so PS5 could also drop to 1440p if the gameplay was exactly the same as XSX

 

[JareBear: Remastered]

I’ll be honest, I didn’t expect it to be this close. I’m surprised.

Even less of a difference than I thought there'd be.

Like to see later sections though

GIF was already GIF’d earlier in thread. Broaden your horizons

 

[-Arcadia-]

I mean, consider that people were expecting a PS4 Pro/One X gap between the Series X and the PS5, and how much that hasn’t come to pass, even in these early stages.

 

[kyliethicc]

so AC viking on PS5 has the better new controller, loads faster, and has less screen tearing

and same res/fps

lololol Phil better buy ubisoft soon

 

[MCplayer]

Nah, we have seen the SSD at work with Miles Morales and Demon's Souls.

dont worry xbox will have some too

 

[Ass of Can Whooping]

GIF was already GIF’d earlier in thread. Broaden your horizons

 

[Hendrick's]

Such a pity he doesn't show initial loading times. They're less than half on PS5 indeed.

The war of seconds has arrived.

 

[Ozzy Onya A2Z]

Cool, I'm going to sign out of these comparison videos. Basically fuck all difference in loading, fuck all difference in visual. Now Sony and Xbox get to working on great games. Hardware ain't the bottleneck like previous generations, it's up to devs now.

 

[Dogman]

Someone check on MrFunSocks please. I'm worried

 

[Agnostic2020]

All that 2X SSD speed and Cerny IO really showing here.

Xsx dropping to 1440p vs ps5 dropping to 1640p .that gpu difference is really showing here

 

[loktaiextatus]

Maybe we’re not far enough into the gen yet, and I have doubts about NX Gamer, based on the types of people (the kind that like picking up swords and shields for their brand) that recommend him while trashing DF (need to watch more), but I’ve been pretty impressed about how well PS5 has held up.

If one frame differences and 5-8 ones (in a 120 FPS mode) are going to be the story here, it may be that 12 TF didn’t tell all of it, after all.

I've been saying this since the beginning. 10.3 does 85 percent of what 12.15 does. On top of that floating point operations isn't all a gpu does.... its. A big part but being otherwise the same a higher clock increases fill rate and non workload tasks.... not enough to "make up" for something but its other unrelated tasks that happen faster . If 100 percent of frame rate was dependent on floating point operations you'd be looking at 60fps on ps5 and like high 60s on the xbox and in some titles you maybe could see that but since fill rate etc are factored in... maybe expect closer to 5fps difference max unless the titles are optimized for one or the other .

 

[azertydu91]

And now shall start the pettyness war!!!!
Who's gonna be the most ?
Who will be reasonable?
Let's find out in ..... Am I the pettiest of them all!!!!

 

[Katt”BuckNasty”Johnston]

Lol it’s almost like people really took their preferred console’s marketing way too seriously . A frame difference for the “MoSt PoWeRfUl” console and a 12% difference for the “BFSSD”.

That aside, once things are more optimized I’m curious of the differences.

 

[Insane Metal]

The war of seconds has arrived.

You were the one asking about precious seconds due to double the speed IO.

 

[Stuart360]

The fact PS5 uses VSYNC already tell you PS5 is doing more GPU processing to delivery the same thing than Xbox without tearing.

It does use Vsync on XSX, just adaptive. Probably 2 seperate teams doing both ports. The framerate graph shows the game is 60fps at most times so doesnt really matter.

 

[Okamiden]

PS5 holding back XSX confirmed.

 

[Blue Spring]

dont worry xbox will have some too

Are you talking about loading times? What do you expect to see?

 

[sncvsrtoip]

well, I knew that both consoles will be quite close but not expected that so close

 

[Xaero Gravity]

Ok boring comparison in the end. Almost identicle in every way.
Ubisoft being Ubisoft.

It avoids debates and stuff

 

[JareBear: Remastered]

Such a pity he doesn't show initial loading times. They're less than half on PS5 indeed.

isn’t that because PS5 skips the splash logos tho? Or am I wrong?

Xsx dropping to 1440p vs ps5 dropping to 1640p .that gpu difference is really showing here

He did say the PS5 probably drops to 1440p too but he just didn’t count it in this coverage

 

[Edgelord79]

shocking. how can the 9 TF RDNA 1.5 console match the WORLDS MOST POWERFUL CONSOLE?

12 TERAFLOPS FULL RDNA 2 CONSTANT FULL CLOCKS = 9 TFLOP downclocking RDNA 1.5

or perhaps the PS5 is actually just as powerful

It's not. It's just math.

However there is more than just power involved in developing games. PlayStation has been touted as having an easier development kit and this is pretty huge. What it gives up in power, it makes up in efficiencies.

 

[DeepEnigma]

Frames are same

Xsx has some screen tearing


Ps5 goes down to 1640p
While xsx goes down to 1440p

Oh damn!

 

[nikolino840]

What about level of detail and depth of field?
I'm at work...
Some fog and blurs?
And pop up?

 

[SlimySnake]

I mean, consider that people were expecting a PS4 Pro/One X gap between the Series X and the PS5, and how much that hasn’t come to pass, even in these early stages.

Dusk Golem in hiding.

 

[M_A_C]

So PS five VERY slightly ahead in all areas. Seems like a winner to me

 

[Knitted Knight]

So what we looking at? 2 wins for PS5 so far?

 

[JareBear: Remastered]

If we had taken bets, I would have lost money on it being this close.

Interesting first results!

I’ll admit I was wrong here

 

[DForce]

People on this forum said it was going to be the PS4 Pro and Xbox One X all over again. lol

 

[kyliethicc]

dont worry xbox will have some too

*coming soon in a patch after next E3

It's not. It's just math.

However there is more than just power involved in developing games. PlayStation has been touted as having an easier development kit and this is pretty huge. What it gives up in power, it makes up in efficiencies.

nope. 1 PS5 TFLOP > 1 XSX TFLOP

they're different custom architectures. And per FLOP, PS5 is clearly more powerful. Just look at the results

 

[Vick]

Ok boring comparison in the end. Almost identicle in every way.
Ubisoft being Ubisoft.

Despite the resolution starting from 5:15 i notice a pretty substantial difference in lighting. Is it due to time of day or what?
I much prefer the look of SX there.

 

[MCplayer]

Are you talking about loading times? What do you expect to see?

short load times on xbox game studio titles, some almost instant too

 

[JareBear: Remastered]

To be fair, this was a weak analysis. Will wait for DF more in depth video.

I wonder if the DF analysis will find differences in textures/effects and whatnot

 

[Hendrick's]

To be fair, this was a weak analysis. Will wait for DF more in depth video.

 

[Stuart360]

So what we looking at? 2 wins for PS5 so far?

Nah 1 win for XSX (a clear win with DMC), and a draw for both with Valhalla.

Right off to actually play the game, have fun children.

 

[Edgelord79]

*coming soon in a patch after next E3

nope. 1 PS5 TFLOP > 1 XSX TFLOP

they're different custom architectures. And per FLOP, PS5 is clearly more powerful. Just look at the results

Ok chief.

After all, one game is a robust sample size.

 

[kyliethicc]

To be fair, this was a weak analysis. Will wait for DF more in depth video.

absolutely when the results don't fit your narrative - ignore the facts

 

[spartan30gr]

360p/60 frames, confirmed for both consoles

 

[GHG]

Ps5 goes down to 1640p
While xsx goes down to 1440p

Ah so that's what they meant when they said "up to" vs "at".

 

[Insane Metal]

isn’t that because PS5 skips the splash logos tho? Or am I wrong?



He did say the PS5 probably drops to 1440p too but he just didn’t count it in this coverage

This video has different results, but the splash screens were there for 7 seconds.



So 52s for PS5 and 1:26 for XSX. 1:19 if you count out the splash screens. Still a bit faster.