Precisely. Plenty of My favorite games this gen were 30fps like Bloodborne and BotW. Would 60fps be nice? Yes, more is always better, but i also understand you cant give more frames without taking something else in return whether its resolution or graphics
Funny thing is people in NeoGAF all going crazy over "ray-tracing" and how its going to change gaming and these same people still expecting the games run 60FPS.
Is this a joke post? please someone tell me this just badly made joke post.
Don't know whom you're kidding when you're 'working', but you shouldn't judge based on yourself. Just because someone isn't digging doesn't mean that he can't do stressful and tiring work.Yeah because sitting at a desk is hard work.
Go cry some more.
Try harder mate. The majority is not stupid.
If it's not a fighting game, 60fps is a no go. If a game can't run higher than my refresh rate, it's a no go. 60fps should be the absolute MINIMUM for all games in the last 10 years. Prioritizing resolution over framerate was the worst mistake devs made this generation.
Common sense shows that devs have been aiming at 4k, vs 1080p @60fps.
It also depends on budget, time and man power or if the devs want to go with open world or even the game uses lot of physics similar to Control (which I heard has some FPS issues for that very reason).
So why is 4k even a thing for games? 4k should only be for movies and what not, unless the hardware can output that. There are so many games that go for high end visuals, but prioritize that over framerate. It's the dumbest thing to do, as framerate, input lag, etc are extremely vital to reaction time and make a better experience than 24fps with a higher resolution. That shit is pure cringe.
People like you are showing you've never done a hard days work.
So.... With that being said, why is 4k the aim for many games, rather than running at 1080p 60fps with better textures, ai, physics, lighting, aa, ambient occlusion, lod, etc? Would it make more sense to sacrifice resolution for Fidelity and immersion? 30fps is horrible, dropping below 30fps is a nightmare. 60fps is barely tolerable. Maybe I'm spoiled.
Imo next gen consoles should of targeted 1440p. That would leave room for much better visuals. We couldnt even hit 1080p with every game this gen, then they are going straight to 4k. Its a waste of resources, and dont get me started on Ray Tracing.
I agree with 1440p, but there are like no tv's that support that resolution. Either 1080p, or 4k, no in-between. So they literally waste resources to aim at 4k, rather than everything else. Frame rate comes later apparently.
1.8tf vs 12ft
You forgot that their are ultrawide and 360hz displays!Cute how console players think 60FPS is a true generational leap when there's already 240hz monitors now
60FPS in games that need it, 30FPS in games that don't need (pretty much every single Sony exclusive because theyre slow paced TPS)
The thing is that there are barely any 1440p TVs, so you'd either watch at 1080p with downsampling or 4k with upscaling.
Thread.
Which is a good and poor example, because the game should have never been locked, but at the same time shows what can be done on pc. Easy fix, and it works great. But should never have been locked to begin with. But pretty much only fighting games are locked at 60, everything else will play at whatever your hardware can output, including 1000fps in some games
It isn't my fault that most devs are brainwashed at uni with libtard propaganda making them weak and unable/unwilling to stick up for them selves in the workplace.
So for the last what 20 years iv been able to play 90% of the games that have come out on pc and console at 60fps ultra and thats a fail?
Iconic 30fps.
When there is nothing in view, 23fps in cities and crowded areas
