Short reply with no counter argument. Looks like you realized your mistake.
Again, it’s a DF thread, what are you expecting that people will talk about? Discussing small differences has been the case in every face off since forever. Why are we pretending that 10% difference isn’t enough now? You either watch these videos and accept that we’re looking at differences that normal people wouldn’t notice, only to declare a winner, or you ignore them and play the game instead.
I apologize. I just havent evAr read online about how DF is inaccurate or vague..
Take a pic of the scene and show the sync please... they are not synced in the video.
Don' forget there's also a 59 vs 51 spot in favour of Xbox.
That scene drops to 51 on Xbox Series X a second before the PlayStation 5 does.
So any time VGTech or DF shows videos going forward where Xbox has higher frames over PS5, you and Dforce are going to claim their videos recordings are out of sync because your message board viewership overrides their analysis?
You can just show a pic with the video synced lol
Riky
does that and is called out about that.
It’s worth to point out the ”consistent slight performance edge” is mostly reduced to stress points. They both hit 60fps more than 99% of the time, at least in the demo according to VGtech. It will be interesting to see VGtechs findings on the full game though to get some perspective on how big the difference is between the two. In this DF comparison, John only measured the times they both dropped and they might be pretty far and few in between.
Your syncing claim doesn't even make sense because in that 30 second section, Xbox has a higher frames time for almost the entire part of that section so it doesn't even matter if syncing is spot on or even off by a second. Xbox will be ahead anyway.
You can just show a pic with the video synced lol
That is how comparision works.
You should compared the same scene... not a frame here and other there lol
I'm not using a unsynced pic to create a narrrative.
But it is not the first time
Sorry if there are posts more important worth responding to with more depth than your stuff, I can't help that
My point with responding to you was in being dismissive of DF calling them disingenuous, that's another attempt of character defamation and you have a history of that with them. But you always do this despite the fact if certain platform holders or devs felt similar of DF, they would...revoke access privileges and blacklist DF from doing technical coverage on their hardware/games, let alone not bother having devs go discuss their games with them in hour-long episodes?
Those facts work against your illusion; your post simply verified what DF already said but you were triggered enough by the idea of any perf advantage for a certain platform in this area you had to sleuth for frames proving...what they already alluded to in their original wording.
Great going there, truly.
The ONLY times where I discounted DF was when VG Tech uncovered something different, that was LATER recognized by digital foundry, one point in particular was the call of Duty chase scene. 
I lost sight of the goalposts for 1 minute and now 5 seconds of loading screens are more important than smoother frame rates across the board. Hard times!
I bet the average person will notice one more than the other.
5? ps5 goes into the lower 40s where the XsX I dont think ever goes below 50 in this video. maybe 49?
- Xbox Series X better frame rate
FTFY
You got a lot more image snapshots to explain as that section is 30 seconds long and Xbox is higher almost the entre time. And going by your snapshots, it even confirms it during that part of the chart.I watched it several times and I can tell you're either lying or you're missing what's happening.
This is 59 vs 51 that you're talking about.
DF states in their video that it dips hard when alpha particle effects appear on screen. This happens EXACTLY before.
It drops to 52 with the effects on screen.
After it appears, the frame starts to go up by 2 frames per second.
You can tell its one second late as shown when the monster appears. The PS5 is behind. This means you have to compare dips WHEN it actually appears.
You're the one cherry picking.
You are not using like to like frames too.I watched it several times and I can tell you're either lying or you're missing what's happening.
This is 59 vs 51 that you're talking about.
DF states in their video that it dips hard when alpha particle effects appear on screen. This happens EXACTLY before.
It drops to 52 with the effects on screen.
After it appears, the frame starts to go up by 2 frames per second.
You can tell its one second late as shown when the monster appears. The PS5 is behind. This means you have to compare dips WHEN it actually appears.
Yep, 30 second better average frame-rate on Xbox.. up to 10%.
Not cherry picking at all. I'm just going by the DF video.
Likewise, in a 10 hour game it's 6.5 seconds difference out of 36000 seconds of gameplay with PS5's faster loading because there's no loading outside of the initial start. Both games run acceptably and the nitpicking is stupid.
6.5 seconds (or 4.5x faster) in initial loading is irrelevant.
