• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

VGTech: Metro Exodus PS5 vs Xbox Series X|S

MaDBrute

Banned
Meaningless if we look at how it performs 99.9% of the time. A “who gives a fuck” stat. There’s nothing to learn from it, and anybody who chooses one version over the other on account of that is a certified idiot.
Not if it causes stutter during aiming.
 
So you use MSRP for XSS and then accuse me of "hate" for using the MSRP for GPUs?

What Is Wrong With You Season 2 GIF by The Office
Can you buy a XSS for $300? I think you can. People constantly state the XSS is easily available. Can you buy an RTX 3060 for MSRP? I doubt it. Don't get upset with reality. The point is that this game runs quite well on the XSS and that is demonstrably true.
 

Mr Moose

Member
Can you buy a XSS for $300? I think you can. People constantly state the XSS is easily available. Can you buy an RTX 3060 for MSRP? I doubt it. Don't get upset with reality. The point is that this game runs quite well on the XSS and that is demonstrably true.
That's like saying "did you pay MSRP for your console or did you get scalped? PS5 digital $800, brrrr".
 
That's like saying "did you pay MSRP for your console or did you get scalped? PS5 digital $800, brrrr".
For $300 the XSS is doing amazing things. I didn't bring up the PS5 at all. They aren't really targeting the same audience seeing how the PS5 is more expensive. It is not impressive to pay more and get more. For the price of the PS5 you can get the XSS AND this game AND get Game pass for a few months. Not in the same league for value.
 
This is why I always mention VGtech is the best. They point out resolution when they drop. They provide the whole table of data. They don't interject with their commentary and decide for us. They do a like for like extensive frame rate comparison. It suck that they are not half popular as DF. I guess because they are kinda boring when there are no commentary.
They are using programs to detect the difference, DF on the other hand are highly knowledgeable on the many rendering techniques used in games, thats why they talk about this stuff.
 

assurdum

Banned
The DF findings are still valid mate, obviously DF looked at more scenes that's why there were bigger differences.
I would bet my balls you would say that 😂 like no they are repeatedly less accurate to VGtech and they take sample here and there, without any logic. But it was obvious from the same video 1800p Vs 1500/1200p was utterly ridiculous as average difference.
 
Last edited:

Mr Moose

Member
For $300 the XSS is doing amazing things. I didn't bring up the PS5 at all. They aren't really targeting the same audience seeing how the PS5 is more expensive. It is not impressive to pay more and get more. For the price of the PS5 you can get the XSS AND this game AND get Game pass for a few months. Not in the same league for value.
You brought up not being able to buy GPUs for MSRP. So, lets say I bought a Series S for $499 from a scalper... Do you see how stupid what you are saying it?
 

Topher

Gold Member
Can you buy a XSS for $300? I think you can. People constantly state the XSS is easily available. Can you buy an RTX 3060 for MSRP? I doubt it. Don't get upset with reality. The point is that this game runs quite well on the XSS and that is demonstrably true.

This is what you asked: "Are there any $300 video cards that have raytracing?"

What I posted was reality. You just don't like the answer. The RTX 2060 is a $300 card. The fact that its price is being jacked up on eBay by overwhelming demand doesn't change that.

As far as XSS availability, you can make your point very easily by providing a link to a site that is currently selling the console at MSRP. But then you would need to rephrase your original question to reference GPU pricing on eBay.
 
Last edited:

dcmk7

Banned
For $300 the XSS is doing amazing things. I didn't bring up the PS5 at all. They aren't really targeting the same audience seeing how the PS5 is more expensive. It is not impressive to pay more and get more. For the price of the PS5 you can get the XSS AND this game AND get Game pass for a few months. Not in the same league for value.
Not everyone wants to be playing compromised version of games for the entire generation. Missing features here and there.

For a full next gen experience have to pay a bit more.

Performance to price the PS5 DE, can't be beaten at the moment. It even has a bigger hard drive. But you know this.

And you're only interested in derailing / trolling another thread.
 
Last edited:
I would bet my balls you would say that 😂 like no they are repeatedly less accurate to VGtech and they take sample here and there, without any logic. But it was obvious from the same video 1800p Vs 1500/1200p was utterly ridiculous as average difference.
I prefer vgtech too.

Images on high quality to download and manually compare. Excel data to manually analyse frames.

DF loves to focus on outliers. That's ok, but they could show the data to have better comprehension of the average gameplay.
 
Last edited:
You brought up not being able to buy GPUs for MSRP. So, lets say I bought a Series S for $499 from a scalper... Do you see how stupid what you are saying it?
That goes against what I saw here that there were tons of XSS unsold on the shelves. Is that true or not? If it is true no one should be buying a scalped XSS. If you are buying an XSS for retail my point remains. If you can buy a RTX 2060, 3060 for retail you'd still need to buy the computer to go along with it. Why argue that the XSS isn't impressive for the price?

This is what you asked: "Are there any $300 video cards that have raytracing?"

What I posted was reality. You just don't like the answer. The RTX 2060 is a $300 card. The fact that its price is being jacked up on eBay by overwhelming demand doesn't change that.

As far as XSS availability, you can make your point very easily by providing a link to a site that is currently selling the console at MSRP.
You are right. I should have asked if you could build a PC or buy another console for $300 that does raytracing. Forgive my poor phrasing. I don't have the lists of European sites selling the XSS available but I doubt you'd argue that the XSS is sold out worldwide. My point again is that for the price the XSS is doing things more expensive devices are not. That is a fact. This game is the latest example.

Not everyone wants to be playing compromised version of games for the entire generation. Missing features here and there.

For a full next gen experience have to pay a bit more.

Performance to price the PS5 DE, can't be beaten at the moment. It even has a bigger hard drive. But you know this.

And you're only interested in derailing / trolling another thread.
No where did I bring up the PS5. I was talking about the XSS. If you looked at this video it's clear the PS5 version is also compromised with this game so your point is lost. The only way this get derailed is if you insist of making comparisons to the PS5 when I didn't bring any up. You want to pay more that's fine. I am talking about price and value.
 
Last edited:

assurdum

Banned
I prefer vgtech too.

Images on high quality to download and manually compare. Excel data to manually analyse frames.

DF loves to focus on outliers. That's ok, but they could show the data to have better comprehension of the average gameplay.
I frankly tired to DF and their way to spin the narrative in some way favour of the Xbox, frankly. The whole Alex chats about the resolution smelled of damage controls to me from the beginning and look at it, here we go again. Another overstimate difference on the same side 🤷‍♂️
 
Last edited:
You can't even write a coherent argument pal 😃
I'm not arguing with you or anyone, thing is you have a unhealthy dislike for Digital Foundry and it's employees for some reason. This has caused you to believe they are biased towards one platform over another, with you suggesting on multiple occasions that they are lying. Please take a moment to think how silly your way of thinking is and realise not everyone has a bias or a agenda.
 

assurdum

Banned
I'm not arguing with you or anyone, thing is you have a unhealthy dislike for Digital Foundry and it's employees for some reason. This has caused you to believe they are biased towards one platform over another, with you suggesting on multiple occasions that they are lying. Please take a moment to think how silly your way of thinking is and realise not everyone has a bias or a agenda.
Listen, I'm tired to see they repeatedly overstimate the same side and understate the other. You believe it's a coincidence? Ok you are free to think it. Personally no their agenda is clear and I always wait VGTECH to have a clear idea how really the things stack up because DF is never trustworthy to spot such difference. I can make a long list about their "ingenuous" mistakes if you care to know, and they are always in favour to the same brand.
 
Last edited:

Topher

Gold Member
You are right. I should have asked if you could build a PC or buy another console for $300 that does raytracing. Forgive my poor phrasing. I don't have the lists of European sites selling the XSS available but I doubt you'd argue that the XSS is sold out worldwide. My point again is that for the price the XSS is doing things more expensive devices are not. That is a fact. This game is the latest example.

Fair enough. And I agree with you. You are not going to find another console or build a PC that does RT at that price.
 

Thirty7ven

Banned
Much less? The XSS has features more expensive consoles lack. Outside of resolution how are you getting less? The fact that this game has graphical features on the XSS the X1X does not flies against the 'less' notion.

You win man, comparing the XSS to a discontinued console and ignoring competing products to create a fictional scenario where it can be considered an impressive feat of technology is peak marketing speak. That’s damn good, hats off.
 
Last edited:

Black_Stride

do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
So you use MSRP for XSS and then accuse me of "hate" for using the MSRP for GPUs?

What Is Wrong With You Season 2 GIF by The Office

The XSS can be found at MSRP relatively easily.
I literally just go to Xbox.com and choose a retailer alot of them have it or will be getting it in like a week or two at MSRP.

I asked the same question for literally every GPU right now, even some lowly RTX3060<--- RTX 3050 more like!
And I cant get anywhere near MSRP for any GPU.

I hear EVGA in the US does some queue or something that guarantees MSRP but I dont know how true that is....im not in the US.
 

Chukhopops

Member
But it’s impressive to pay a bit less and get much less huh 🤔
Why do people struggle so much to understand that it’s a different audience? PS5 DE is 3.45 times bigger than the S, costs €100 more and doesn’t exactly exist in the most favorable ecosystem if you’re conscious about money in general.

It’s fine to point out that the S is less powerful, but that’s not the point of its existence - it’s a cheap entry point into a massively more affordable ecosystem.
 

dcmk7

Banned
No where did I bring up the PS5. I was talking about the XSS. If you looked at this video it's clear the PS5 version is also compromised with this game so your point is lost. The only way this get derailed is if you insist of making comparisons to the PS5 when I didn't bring any up. You want to pay more that's fine. I am talking about price and value.

You brought it up right here pal.

For $300 the XSS is doing amazing things. I didn't bring up the PS5 at all. They aren't really targeting the same audience seeing how the PS5 is more expensive. It is not impressive to pay more and get more. For the price of the PS5 you can get the XSS AND this game AND get Game pass for a few months. Not in the same league for value.

So, no you're clearly talking about it.

If you looked at this video it's clear the PS5 version is also compromised with this game so your point is lost.
I don't think you know what compromised means.

Where a studio builds the game and then cut features out and reshapes it, in order to get it to work for something inferior. This has been the story so far with the XSS.

Like even MS first party studios are doing it. With Doom Eternal, the next gen patch is shipping without RT. Whilst all the other next gen consoles are getting that feature.

Doesn't really seem fair for the owners. When expecting the same game as the XSX. To be missing an important next gen feature such as that. And even to occasionally play at a very low resolution image such as ~500p.

But again this is all off topic. Not sure why you are so argumentative with people.
 
Last edited:

Thirty7ven

Banned
Why do people struggle so much to understand that it’s a different audience? PS5 DE is 3.45 times bigger than the S, costs €100 more and doesn’t exactly exist in the most favorable ecosystem if you’re conscious about money in general.

We are debating what makes the XSS an impressive piece of technology, not size, not audience, not ecosystems. How does Metro show that? It doesn’t.

Like, you can be happy with it, you can be happy with the results, surprised by the results but calling it an impressive piece of tech? Doesn’t even pass the tech bang for buck test. There’s a reason why a whole lot of people were aiming for 249$ tops and dreaming of 199$. At 299$, considering how cut back it is, nothing impressive about how it performs. Let’s not forget that the promise was that for 4K games on XSX, SS would deliver 1440p by just flipping a switch.

Also the whole “audience that needs a smaller console” isn’t really a thing, unless it’s portable. But whatever, size yeah.
 
Last edited:
Listen, I'm tired to see they repeatedly overstimate the same side and understate the other. You believe it's a coincidence? Ok you are free to think it. Personally no their agenda is clear and I always wait VGTECH to have a clear idea how really the things stack up because DF is never trustworthy to spot such difference. I can make a long list about their "ingenuous" mistakes if you care to know, and they are always in favour to the same brand.
DF are a much BIGGER outfit and have more money, its there job. The people who run VGTECH are almost certainly doing this as a side project, therefore they wouldn't have the time to cover the games as comprehensively as DF, hence they come with a slightly less different resolution difference than DF did. DF didn't make the numbers up they just covered more of the game, they also had access to the developer of the game and I'm pretty sure they know DF are correct.
 

assurdum

Banned
So a quick resume: 22% of resolution difference dynamically in favour of the series X with the minimum at 10%. All that said, I even used the lower resolution to calculate the pixels difference, which wide the gap in favour of the series X. That's a total different picture of what DF offered.
 
Last edited:

assurdum

Banned
DF are a much BIGGER outfit and have more money, its there job. The people who run VGTECH are almost certainly doing this as a side project, therefore they wouldn't have the time to cover the games as comprehensively as DF, hence they come with a slightly less different resolution difference than DF did. DF didn't make the numbers up they just covered more of the game, they also had access to the developer of the game and I'm pretty sure they know DF are correct.
:messenger_hushed: I won't even reply because I want to give to you a moment to reread to what you have written here, to rethink about it.
 

assurdum

Banned
So the framerate some people called a "stuttering mess" is in fact 99.76% time locked at 60fps😂

Plus always clearing the 1080p mark. As expected it's another one.
Yes it's another one pathetic war post by you. But speaking which was the ps5 supposed to run at 35% of less pixels most of the times and lower than 1008p because Alex predicted it in the DF thread? :pie_thinking:
And he laughs. What a pathetic troll.
 
Last edited:

Bo_Hazem

Banned



PS5 uses a dynamic resolution with the highest native resolution found being approximately 2844x1600 and the lowest resolution found being approximately 1792x1008. Pixel counts at 1792x1008 seem to be rare on PS5. PS5 uses temporal upsampling to reconstruct a 3840x2160 resolution. Xbox Series X uses a dynamic resolution with the highest native resolution found being approximately 2844x1600 and the lowest resolution found being approximately 1920x1080. Pixel counts at 1920x1080 seem to be rare on Xbox Series X. Xbox Series X uses temporal upsampling to reconstruct a 3840x2160 resolution. Below are some example pixel counts for certain scenes on PS5 and Xbox Series X. Note that these figures are approximate and not necessarily representative of how the entirety of a given area will render. Volga Level Opening Train Scene - PS5: 2560x1440, Series X: 2844x1600 Caspian Level Driving - PS5: 2560x1440, Series X: 2844x1600 Taiga Level Exploration - PS5: 2176x1224, Series X: 2400x1350 Taiga Level Forest Demanding Scene - PS5: 1792x1008, Series X: 1920x1080 Xbox Series S uses a dynamic resolution with the highest native resolution found being approximately 1621x912 and the lowest resolution found being approximately 1056x594. Pixel counts at 1056x594 seem to be rare on Xbox Series S. Xbox Series S uses temporal upsampling to reconstruct a 1920x1080 resolution.


Stats: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1d_yHRLNdaRX86APUsOLpI_S2-iNmLHChb-kyIyEOcPU/htmlview


giphy.gif


PS5 is 99.99% at 60fps vs 99.76% on XSX, with the lowest frame on PS5 being 58fps vs 50fps on XSX. PS5 has dropped only 3 frames from 16.67ms window vs 70 frames dropped on XSX.

We have a clear winner here.

PlatformsPS5Xbox Series XXbox Series S
2Frame Amounts
3Game Frames295162943429439
4Video Frames295202952029520
5Frame Tearing Statistics
6Total Torn Frames000
7Lowest Torn Line---
8Frame Height216021601080
9Frame Time Statistics
10Mean Frame Time16.67ms16.72ms16.71ms
11Median Frame Time16.67ms16.67ms16.67ms
12Maximum Frame Time50ms133.33ms150ms
13Minimum Frame Time16.67ms16.67ms16.67ms
1495th Percentile Frame Time16.67ms16.67ms16.67ms
1599th Percentile Frame Time16.67ms16.67ms16.67ms
16Frame Rate Statistics
17Mean Frame Rate59.99fps59.82fps59.84fps
18Median Frame Rate60fps60fps60fps
19Maximum Frame Rate60fps60fps60fps
20Minimum Frame Rate58fps50fps50fps
215th Percentile Frame Rate60fps59fps59fps
221st Percentile Frame Rate60fps57fps58fps
23Frame Time Counts
2416.67ms29513 (99.99%)29364 (99.76%)29376 (99.79%)
2533.33ms2 (0.01%)63 (0.21%)54 (0.18%)
2650ms1 (0%)4 (0.01%)7 (0.02%)
2766.67ms0 (0%)1 (0%)0 (0%)
28100ms0 (0%)1 (0%)1 (0%)
29133.33ms0 (0%)1 (0%)0 (0%)
30150ms0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (0%)
31Other
32Dropped Frames000
33Runt Frames000
34Runt Frame Thresholds20 rows20 rows20 rows
 
You win man, comparing the XSS to a discontinued console and ignoring competing products to create a fictional scenario where it can be considered an impressive feat of technology is peak marketing speak. That’s damn good, hats off.
There are no competing products that offer more for less or even the same. The only thing fictional is believing that the least expensive console with raytracing is offering less when you had to spends hundreds more to see the same features elsewhere. Hats off to you to look for the negative when there are clearly more positives.
 

ethomaz

Banned
This is what you asked: "Are there any $300 video cards that have raytracing?"

What I posted was reality. You just don't like the answer. The RTX 2060 is a $300 card. The fact that its price is being jacked up on eBay by overwhelming demand doesn't change that.

As far as XSS availability, you can make your point very easily by providing a link to a site that is currently selling the console at MSRP. But then you would need to rephrase your original question to reference GPU pricing on eBay.
He hated you because you know you reply was 100% on spot.
 

Thirty7ven

Banned
There are no competing products that offer more for less or even the same. The only thing fictional is believing that the least expensive console with raytracing is offering less when you had to spends hundreds more to see the same features elsewhere. Hats off to you to look for the negative when there are clearly more positives.

Hundreds more? So when all else fails just throw some more bs at the wall and hope for the best.

I’m not saying it’s not the right console for you, but it’s not impressive technology. If it were a portable machine it would be impressive. No, being able to transport it from the living room to the bedroom does NOT make it portable hmkay
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom