Support NeoGAF

[S0ULZB0URNE]

I went with the XSX version.
That Atmos surround support is the difference maker.

 

[Exanthus]

Could be ps5 runs at lower resolution. Still I checked the video multiple time, even the part about the zoom with "significant" higher resolution on series X. The sharpness is virtually identical, you have to check the fine edges in some spots to find the difference. I don't know what of noticeable difference they talking about, it's purely math difference in the end. At least they would show some clear picture about it, because such reconstruction works really well, how they can define noticeable something so trivial without a clear comparison side by side, I don't get it. Still I invite someone to post some pictures at this point.

I don't know how you manage to get away with your little crusades, but with how it's been lately here it won't last long.

Back on topic... Games good, obvious advantages to each hardware as expected this gen. Looking forward to see what can be done for a game like this that is built for next gen. Leaving the old stuff behind.

 

[FatKingBallman]

They also said the advantage is only mitaged a little regarding performance. 1-2 fps difference and probably a random area having issues on xbox series x which will be patched like most games. Sorry, but you lose.

My life is ruined then.:/ LOL At least i have not lost touch with reality

 

[Negotiator101]

So basically if series x ran at the same resolution has PS5, it would have a way more better fps than PS5 all together.

Yeah you have a 20% resolution advantage but only a 3% performance advantage possibly less, but the now the usual suspects are trying to claim a victory because of a borked gamma issue on PS5 .

 

[FlyyGOD]

Ps5 dips below 1080p just like the Series S.

 

[FatKingBallman]

Ps5 dips below 1080p just like the Series S.

Actually no.. Lowest is 1015p.

 

[fighterman101]

My life is ruined then. LOL At least i have not lost touch with reality

Xbox series X has better load times, performance with VRR enabled, graphics/resolution, and sound thanks to Atmos. Nope, reality is quite good for us xsx guys.

 

[fighterman101]

Actually no. Lowest is 1015p.

1015p is lower than 1080p lol

 

[FatKingBallman]

1015p is lower than 1080p lol

Just like Series S? Naah...

 

[fighterman101]

Just like Series S? Naah

Series S dips below 1080p too just like PS5.

 

[FatKingBallman]

Series S dips below 1080p too just like PS5.

Even lower.

Xbox series X has better load times, performance with VRR enabled, graphics/resolution, and sound thanks to Atmos.

Btw. you have a section where PS5 is loads better. LOL. PC is the fastest. Btw. game is analyzed without VRR, so, performance isn't better.

Nope, reality is quite good for us xsx guys.

Actually, reality is really rough for you. Since 2013. :/

 

[pratyush]

Still not a complete next gen makeover but very impressive one and that too for free. Great work. Gamers should support such companies.

 

[fighterman101]

Even lower.



Btw. you have a section where PS5 is loads better. LOL. PC is the fastest



Actually, reality is really rough for you. Since 2013.

Do you mean XSX? Hiding behind PC? I guess you have no choice since you aren't getting star field and elder scrolls. In the DF article, it says the game loads better on XSX. Things have been good for us Xbox guys especially lately. Got to play many games for a cheap price with XGP while PS5 owners have to pay over 70 dollars just to play a 15 hour game lol.

 

[Physiognomonics]

Could be ps5 runs at lower resolution. Still I checked the video multiple time, even the part about the zoom with "significant" higher resolution on series X. The sharpness is virtually identical, you have to check the fine edges in some spots to find the difference. I don't know what of noticeable difference they talking about, it's purely math difference in the end. At least they would show some clear picture about it, because such reconstruction works really well, how they can define noticeable something so trivial without a clear comparison side by side, I don't get it. Still I invite someone to post some pictures at this point.

The problem is I suspect he is done a bit of cherry picking here. He shows open-world resolution (and as you said hard to spot the difference) but oddly this time he doesn't talk about cutscenes (res / framerate) or resolution during combat. He said min resolution should drop lower on PS5, but without proof of this. Only a guess.

Remember when he specifically tested a photo mode in Control in order to show the only area that showed framerate advantage on XSX? In others games he often shows framerate tests about demanding cutscenes (like in RE8) or Hitman 3.

I don't doubt the average res could be lower on PS5, but what I am saying is that he is doing cherry picking in order to talk about the biggest difference when it could be only visible in specific scenes (like empty open world scenes), and much less in others kind of demanding scenes where the PS5 has actually the framerate advantage (like in combat scenes with plenty of alpha effects).

 

[FatKingBallman]

Do you mean XSX? Hiding behind PC? I guess you have no choice since you aren't getting star field and Skyrim games. In the DF article, it says the game loads better on XSX.

I'm not hiding behind PC. LOL. PC is included in that comparison. So, XSX isn't the fastest. Also, you deliberatelly ignoring the part in the video where PS5 loads faster too.

Things have been good for us Xbox guys especially lately. Got to play many games for cheap price while PS5 owners have to pay over 70 dollars just to play one 15 hour game lol.

I admire your mentality.

 

[fighterman101]

I'm not hiding behind PC. LOL. PC is included in that comparison. So, XSX isn't the fastest. Also, you deliberatelly ignoring the part in the video where PS5 loads faster too.

I'm going by the article which seems to be what you were referring too as well in this thread. Xbox is a tad better in load times which is enough for you to claim victory on performance while ignoring the fact the PS5 goes below 1080p lol.

 

[Loope]

The problem is I suspect he is done a bit of cherry picking here. He shows open-world resolution (and as you said hard to spot the difference) but oddly this time he doesn't talk about cutscenes (res / framerate) or resolution during combat. He said min resolution should drop lower on PS5, but without proof of this. Only a guess.

Remember when he specifically tested a photo mode in Control in order to show the only area that showed framerate advantage on XSX? In others games he often shows framerate tests about demanding cutscenes (like in RE8) or Hitman 3.

I don't doubt the average res could be lower on PS5, but what I am saying is that he is doing cherry picking in order to talk about the biggest difference when it could be only visible in specific scenes (like empty open world scenes), and much less in others kind of demanding scenes where the PS5 has actually the framerate advantage (like in combat scenes with plenty of alpha effects).

Was it really because of it? Really? To anybody that understood what they were going for, they used as a sort of benchmark, because the opportunity presented itself due to the way photomode is done in Control. Maybe you guys should start bringing receipts for these accusations of yours, everytime DF isn't hyping up your console of choice.

 

[scydrex]

Haven't watch it yet. Does it run on BC on PS5 and XBX?

 

[Mister Wolf]

Actually, PS5 never drops below 1000p. Lowest is 1015p actually.



Ah, VRR excuse. Sure. Everyone loves VRR excuse. So, what is the excuse for higher CUs count on XSX GPU and almost 2 TF which is sooo important for RT performance, yet it performs worse than PS5 and stutters like crap?

Spending money on a good display is an excuse?

 

[FatKingBallman]

I'm going by the article which seems to be what you were referring too as well in this thread. Xbox is a tad better in load times which is enough for you to claim victory on performance while ignoring the fact the PS5 goes below 1080p lol.

I don't ignore the article. And article is referred to video and vice versa. XSX does have better load times, but also PS5 has better load times it seems according to video in some cases. Same as XSX has better fps in some cases, but overall PS5 performs better. Don't worry. I'm not ignoring the fact that PS5 dips below 1080p ( never did at all ) No need to spin that i did. But also XSS range is 1080p, where XSX dips to 1080p as lowest. Yeah, we won't ignore that, aren't we.

 

[FatKingBallman]

Spending money on a good display is an excuse?

Spend your money how you want and where. But yeah, mentioning VRR is excuse if XSX performs worse. As DF stated in video and in article.

 

[Armorian]

1015p is lower than 1080p lol

1015p is almost 4x the pixels as 512p

 

[fighterman101]

I don't ignore the article. And article is referred to video and vice versa. XSX does have better load times, but also PS5 has better load times it seems according to video in some cases. Same as XSX has better fps in some cases, but overall PS5 performs better. Don't worry. I'm not ignoring the fact that PS5 dips below 1080p ( never did at all ) No need to spin that i did. But also XSS range is 1080p, where XSX dips to 1080p as lowest. Yeah, we won't ignore that, aren't we.

Okay, then we can't ignore when Digital Foundry said XSX version was the clear winner. They said CUT and DRY advantage.

 

[FatKingBallman]

Okay, then we can't ignore when Digital Foundry said XSX version was the clear winner. They said CUT and DRY advantage.

Oh, again you took sentence out of context.

 

[yamaci17]

Haven't watch it yet. Does it run on BC on PS5 and XBX?

Hell no, this is a special edition that is specially tailored to run with RT GI

This version of game does not even run on PS4/Pro/One/One X or any non-RT GPUs

 

[GhostOfTsu]

Why are the colors so weird on Series X? Regardless, it's on sale right now at 70% off on PSN so I bought that version already. Never finished it on Game Pass before it left.

 

[Md Ray]

You want the best image quality and the smoothest gameplay on console, so you want an Xbox Series X.

If an Xbox brethren have PS5 and SX, no VRR display, but wants solid performance, where should they go?

 

[MasterCornholio]

Hell no, this is a special edition that is specially tailored to run with RT GI

This version of game does not even run on PS4/Pro/One/One X or any non-RT GPUs

Does the XSS lose anything in this version?

I looked at the charts and it seems it has all the features. The XSS is a lot weaker than the other two so it must lose something.

 

[FlyyGOD]

Actually no.. Lowest is 1015p.

I could be mistaken but Isn't 1015p below 1080p?

 

[Arias05]

I could be mistaken but Isn't 1015p below 1080p?

It is lol
XSX > ps5 .

 

[Md Ray]

I went with the XSX version.
That Atmos surround support is the difference maker.

Traitor.

 

[MarkMe2525]

I'm glad a waited to get a tv with VRR. I'll get the best of both worlds

 

[Skifi28]

Wow, it's actually playable now with a controller, unlike the previous gen version.

 

[Con-Z-epT]

Send me to EXODUS if old!

 

[Shodan09]

Another clear win for Xbox.

 

[Rossco EZ]

Nope. Looks like Xbox fans have meltdowns. VRR, yada, yada, yada, DF won't mentioned VRR just to be nice to PS5. LOL



You literally said that DF mention VRR in pretty much every video. They don't. But please continue...

you are mental

 

[Shodan09]

1015p is almost 4x the pixels as 512p

Funny how this matters when PS5 is better than series S but suddenly doesn't matter when series X has the advantage over PS5...

 

[FatKingBallman]

I could be mistaken but Isn't 1015p below 1080p?

It is lol
XSX > ps5 .

It is, yeah. But also XSX dips to 1080p which is XSS max res. Probably same ballpark then :/

Funny how this matters when PS5 is better than series S but suddenly doesn't matter when series X has the advantage over PS5...

Funny thing is when PS5 has advantage over XSX and his almost 2TF advantage, but that doesn't matter, i guess

 

[Elias]

Series X wins again.

 

[Krappadizzle]

The game looks fuckin' awesome on both platforms and people should play it.

 

[Armorian]

Funny how this matters when PS5 is better than series S but suddenly doesn't matter when series X has the advantage over PS5...

But you can see that difference between XSS and PS5 is huge (almost 4x the pixels) vs "only" (over) 20% that XSX offers beyond PS5?

 

[Topher]

These comparisons have become boring. Resolution better on XSX. Frame rate better on PS5.

 

[StreetsofBeige]

Nice win for Series X.

Funny how this matters when PS5 is better than series S but suddenly doesn't matter when series X has the advantage over PS5...

Didn't know the new battleground involved PS5 vs Series S.

 

[Krappadizzle]

These comparisons have become boring. Resolution better on XSX. Frame rate better on PS5.

Even then, they are usually so close to each other that the difference in practical application becomes almost mute. I find it funny that fanboys, after years of accepting sub-1080p/30fps games and hollering from the top of the mountain how AMAZING whatever game is, are arguing over percentage points of resolution and framerate. At this point when we are so much further down the spectrum in performance and resolution that to try and make some definitive judgement one way or the other becomes hilarious.

As primarily a PC gamer that's been playing at 1440p+ resolutions and 144hz for literally 8+ years and playing off of SSD's even longer than that and being completely dismissed in the past as just superfluous fluff, find it hilarious to see these arguments now. It's never important until your side can do it and in these instances the differences are so damn small that the arguments are literally over percentage points of such insignificance that it's comical. I love it guys. Never, EVER change.

 

[SatansReverence]

Yeah, another spin from Xbox fan. Its normal now

***

XSX stretching its legs. Upto ~35% higher pixel output is nothing to sneeze at. Of course a certain subset is trying its hardest to clutch at literally less than %5 at worse fps (but they wont mention when the opposite is true)

assurdum and F FatKingBallman are high as fuck on the copium right now.

 

[StreetsofBeige]

Even then, they are usually so close to each other that the difference in practical application becomes almost mute. I find it funny that fanboys, after years of accepting sub-1080p/30fps games and hollering from the top of the mountain how AMAZING whatever game is, are arguing over percentage points of resolution and framerate. At this point when we are so much further down the spectrum in performance and resolution that to try and make some definitive judgement one way or the other becomes hilarious.

As primarily a PC gamer that's been playing at 1440p+ resolutions and 144hz for literally 8+ years and playing off of SSD's even longer than that and being completely dismissed in the past as just superfluous fluff, find it hilarious to see these arguments now. It's never important until your side can do it and in these instances the differences are so damn small that the arguments are literally over percentage points of such insignificance that it's comical. I love it guys. Never, EVER change.

Sit back and enjoy.

Console warriors never include guys like you because they know their plastic boxes get smoked. Also, no console ecosystem supporter ever dares compare number of games and price of games on Steam/GOG/humble bundles etc... vs. console digital marketplaces.

And console fans saying PC is overrated because only a small % of PC gamers have awesome rigs to play ultra settings, you can say them to them too. Only a small % of console gamers have PS5/Series X too. The vast majority of console gamers are still playing PS4 and Xbox One from 2013 technology.

 

[TLZ]

Ps5 dips below 1080p just like the Series S.

Series S > PS5.

Spoiler

All day

 

[Topher]

Even then, they are usually so close to each other that the difference in practical application becomes almost mute. I find it funny that fanboys, after years of accepting sub-1080p/30fps games and hollering from the top of the mountain how AMAZING whatever game is, are arguing over percentage points of resolution and framerate. At this point when we are so much further down the spectrum in performance and resolution that to try and make some definitive judgement one way or the other becomes hilarious.

As primarily a PC gamer that's been playing at 1440p+ resolutions and 144hz for literally 8+ years and playing off of SSD's even longer than that and being completely dismissed in the past as just superfluous fluff, find it hilarious to see these arguments now. It's never important until your side can do it and in these instances the differences are so damn small that the arguments are literally over percentage points of such insignificance that it's comical. I love it guys. Never, EVER change.

 

[Krappadizzle]

 

[rapid32.5]

I went with the XSX version.
That Atmos surround support is the difference maker.

Just got the official Xbox wireless headset yesterday. I'm impressed overall with the sound per dollar value. Atmos in this game makes a difference.