They put out very good versions. By the looks of it. Even a good Series S variant.
This is a statement of fact. XSS just got 70+ more games recently that run at 60 or 120 fps. The PS5 is more 'powerful' yet the horrible console holding everything back is getting more support to play games at higher framerates. What good is all that power when 'old' games run no better on the new hardware? This plays into the value proposition I had mentioned earlier. Plus is $100 cheaper. You can get both resident evil AND the XSS for the price of the PS5. It is what it is.
I think I would rather listen to what developers say. Not producers or a guy who set his PS5 on fire (is that actually true??) and says 'probably not'.
I wonder on average how many PCs out there best the XSS in terms of specs? This generation will be over by the time the XSS speced device will be the minimum required.
Wow more name calling and childishness how sad. The last refuge for people who have no point. At least it's something you know how to do because clearly you know nothing about the XSS. It's OK man the XSS is a fantastic value for the price no matter how much you hate it and try and craft a narrative. Devs will use the features of the device and gaming will survive another day.
What does that mean to a customer looking to maximize the value of their hard earned money? Will they listen to a technical explanation why the more expensive device doesn't offer certain features or just grab one that works? Sony can always rely on their brand name dominance but it doesn't mean they offer the best value for customers. I'm glad options exist.
He blocked me on Twitter after i suggested it could be due to having candles too close that discolored the casing
It's the elephant in the room they never reply to, I wonder why.....
A producer, not a developer, who played a game and didn't notice the missing ray tracing and stuttering to 20fps.
And?
The dumbass marked the wrong part, that's not even where the APU is.
Yeah, I guess he was going for it overheating but failed miserably. I saw some suggested it could be the result of how the casing is manufactured, ”injection spots” was the term used, which is a plausible theory since mine show a slightly lighter white color in the same spot when looked at from a specific angle. In the end it doesn’t really matter what caused it or how, its mostly him immediately drawing the conclusion that its due to overheating and making a twitter post about it saying ”this console man, ffs”, reposting the Leonardi conversation ad infinitum and so on.
It runs on a 1060 with 6gb of VRAM.
A halfway house gen console affecting any part of the game design is bad news. Why wouldn't it be?
It is the ray tracing 4K where the game needs 8+ GB VRAM
Take your own advice from earlier dude and use the search.
Lots of the complaints were tied to the immature development kit the new Xbox console had too. It's where all the lame 'tools' jokes came from but it was a well known fact. At the end of the day the XSS isn't even the worst speced device these games need to run on so its obvious that the commentary is more of a dig at MS than a genuine concern for the future of console gaming. It is quite impressive what MS was able to put out for $299.
Some people felt the need to point out that this game was evidence of a problem with the XSS. Other people stepped up to set the record straight.The fuck going on this thread?I thought it was about RE8 analysis of vgt not series S hardware....
I've looked I can't find a benchmark where it hits 20fps.........
All criticism has come from the developers dude. You like to spin that fanboy angle huh? Wonder why.
The fuck going on this thread?
The fuck going on this thread?
No. Those complaints were due to limited RAM in XSS. It's why some devs drop RT from the S. Remedy explicitly mentioned RT was dropped due to hardware limitation, but then they removed that statement likely because it made MS look bad.
The tools joke came when DF broke the news that devs weren't happy with GDK and were having problems with it.
This reeks of damage control. Some devs will move on to make RT graphics card as a minimum requirement. I know for a fact that 4A Games' next game will be one of them since their engine's lighting system is now fully ray traced (see: Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition) and already requires RT GPU as minimum to boot, more devs will follow suit. Whenever their new game comes out (2-3 years from now), by then PC minimum GPU/VRAM spec will have moved above and beyond what's inside Series S and this is when the hardware inside that console will be of a big hindrance to the devs, especially the RAM. So yeah, it will hold back game development.
You're in denial as usual. There's no crystal ball nor am I "thinking" it. 4A Games basically told this to DF that their next game's minimum required GPU spec will be RT capable GPU only, and I can see 4A won't be the only one to do this. Like I said, their engine's whole lighting scheme is now fully ray traced and as such it won't run on non-RT GPUs. Watch their vid on Metro Enhanced, it's confirmed. There's also DF interview with 4A Games coming up shortly.
