• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Mass Effect Legendary Edition launching on May 14

Radical_3d

Member
What more? The overhauled ME1's combat, UI, aiming system, inventory, drastically improved graphics and drastically decreased loading times. Plus the upgrade on ME2 and ME3 graphics, 60FPS on PS4 pro and Xbox OneX, 4K, and inclusion of all DLC of all 3 games.

Maybe 60$ it's a bit too much and 40-50 would be a better price for a remaster of 3 games..but we live in the timeline where Nintendo released 3 a N64 rom, a Gamecube Rom and a Wii ISO in a pack for 60 bucks so that's what we have.
The graphic and loading stuff is mostly by hardware, not software. And some things are automated, like the overhauled textures. The UI, god damnit, any game dev can tell you how much you spend in changing that. The inventory is still an unknown by devs words. Yes, they make the ME1 combat better but that may just be a copy paste of the other versions since they didn’t even bothered in making an engine migration. This is not a lazy cash grab but it’s not because the source material was so old that just upping the resolution wouldn’t work.

If a whole new Mass Effect costs 60€ this can’t be just 10€ cheaper. I’ll wait for the unavoidable 2 months drop.
 
Apparently there is one dlc that didn't make it


I don't think many will morn the ommission of the Pinnacle station dlc. I think I played it once thought it was shite and never touched it again. But it kinda illustrates the attitude Bioware and EA had to this franchise. How the fuck do yoiu lose source code and backups to what you keep claiming to be a premier franchise.

As for the price tag I have to go along with people saying it is way too much. Especially for those of us that have already bought and played the games in the past. I had really expected a £30 price tag based on the info we have had about the work they did. I dunno it comes across as money grabbing the only game that has seen extensive work is Mass Effect 1 the others have just got a slight touch up. That doesn't warrant the full price tag. At 30 quid i would have preordered it the minute it appeard on steam. But 60 quid yeah I am gonna think about it and might wait to see some reviews on just how broken it is gonna be (cos you know it will be a complete shitfest).
 

royox

Member
But it kinda illustrates the attitude Bioware and EA had to this franchise. How the fuck do yoiu lose source code and backups to what you keep claiming to be a premier franchise

Because Bioware (that wasn't part of EA at that moment) didn't do that DLC, they left it to a 3rd party and they lost the data or it got corrupted. Bioware did the rest of DLC of the franchise.
 
Because Bioware (that wasn't part of EA at that moment) didn't do that DLC, they left it to a 3rd party and they lost the data or it got corrupted. Bioware did the rest of DLC of the franchise.
Yeah I did read the article ;-) I know Demiurge did the Pinncale DLC and the PC port. It doesn't change the fact though that Bioware should have taken better care of things. To lose a part of the mass effect franchise is pretty disgusting and just kinda shows the seeds of incompetence were there right at the beginning of the franchise.
 

MMaRsu

Banned
They'll probably fuck this up, but damn, May looking stacked already.

3uW6jKP.png
Wow so stacked!!

:') what
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
Remake vs Remaster though. One costs £70 for one game and the other costs £60 for 3. I'd rather them give it the bluepoint remake treatment but it would cost £60-70 per game, Then just imagine the comments above who are saying £60 for the trilogy is to pricey, they'd have to remortgage there houses or something with how dramatic there sounding.

Uncharted collection had 3 gams for $50 AFAIK and looked so good on PS4 Pro at 60fps with reworked graphics. Demon's Souls is now the pillar of gaming graphics so comparing it to this garbage is just funny.
 

The Shepard

Member
Uncharted collection had 3 gams for $50 AFAIK and looked so good on PS4 Pro at 60fps with reworked graphics. Demon's Souls is now the pillar of gaming graphics so comparing it to this garbage is just funny.

Don't forget all the dlc you get with mass effect LE, that's worth a tenner surely over what you payed for the uncharted trilogy. Also mass effect 1 has had a lot of work put into it, it basically plays more like 2 and 3 now, with all textures and characters touched up across the 3 games with a reworked ui, lighting, menus and vehicle/player controls.

I have the uncharted trilogy and it's not all that different to how I played it all originally on ps3, with the exception of 60fps and uped resolution to 1080p, I played on pro to. Mass effect trilogy is 4k 60fps on ps5.

And whilst demons souls is amazing, it still cost me more than this trilogy for the one game. I compared price not graphics, remake v remaster. I have the platinum for demons souls (ps5) and uncharted 2 (ps3) was my first ever.
 
Last edited:
Don't see a problem with this at all. It's 3 games and a ton of DLC.
So basically $19.99 for each game + dlc, considering the work out into upgrading the graphics, it’s honestly not a terrible deal.
I'm aware there's bound to be some disagreements, but I'm not hugely enamoured with what's on offer. Mass Effect 1 appears to have been remade and upgraded to modern standards and I'm excited about that, whereas the other games have been given some tweaks and a new coat of paint to warrant the price tag. From the screenshots it appears as though they've mashed together depth of field and a tonne of bloom all over the place and it ruins the atmosphere, especially in those Reaper images which lack the moody red background. Not to mention there's a devoted modding community who have worked on graphic improvements and tweaks for years. And people need to stop waving around the damn downloadable content argument because most of them are character and weapon packs and the multiplayer component has been removed also. I'm pleased people are happy to have most of the content in one package, but considering I already bought ME3 when it hit Steam, I'll wait for this to go on sale before purchasing.
 

Ascend

Member
And people need to stop waving around the damn downloadable content argument because most of them are character and weapon packs
It's still a lot of DLC... Here's each paid DLC and their original price, omitting all the weapon packs and Genesis packs. Characters are included, because they generally include missions also.
ME1
Bring down the Sky ($1)

ME2
Kasumi - Stolen Memory ($7)
Overlord ($7)
Lair of the Shadow Broker ($10)
Arrival ($7)

ME3
From Ashes ($10)
Leviathan ($10)
Omega ($15)
Citadel ($15)

That's over $80 worth of DLC that is actual content, all of which never were discounted. And of all of them, only one do I consider overpriced, which is Omega.
 

mcz117chief

Member
Pinnacle station was not made by BioWare.
It was made by Demiurge Studios, so I’m wondering if that’s why it wasn’t included. It didn’t really add anything story wise like Bring Down the Sky dlc and was pretty much forgotten.
Source code was lost

Apparently there is one dlc that didn't make it


I don't think many will morn the ommission of the Pinnacle station dlc. I think I played it once thought it was shite and never touched it again.
It was pretty good, it gave you a nice backstory about the contact wars and you could relive one of the major battles even. I definitely prefer it to Bring Down the Sky.
 
Last edited:

Umbasaborne

Banned
I thought pinacle station was awful, it wont be missed. I really like bring down the sky though, its simple, but at the time it was more mass effect before mass effect 2
 

Esca

Member
I didn't play any of the dlc for ME games and I barely remember them so I'm looking forward to this. I've been having a decent time with Andromeda which so far imo isn't horrible like people make it out to be imo
 

Pallas

Member
Source code was lost


It was pretty good, it gave you a nice backstory about the contact wars and you could relive one of the major battles even. I definitely prefer it to Bring Down the Sky.

Gotcha, was wondering where that came from. Anyway, Shame it was lost but I enjoyed BDTS mission more, just the atmosphere and ... it was pretty much your first time facing off against, interacting and seeing Batarians for the first time, codex be damned.

That music playing when you land on the asteroid ... you knew shit was about to get real.
 
It's still a lot of DLC... Here's each paid DLC and their original price, omitting all the weapon packs and Genesis packs. Characters are included, because they generally include missions also.
ME1
Bring down the Sky ($1)

ME2
Kasumi - Stolen Memory ($7)
Overlord ($7)
Lair of the Shadow Broker ($10)
Arrival ($7)

ME3
From Ashes ($10)
Leviathan ($10)
Omega ($15)
Citadel ($15)

That's over $80 worth of DLC that is actual content, all of which never were discounted. And of all of them, only one do I consider overpriced, which is Omega.
You make a good argument, but can we use those old prices as a guide nowadays? Some of the DLC was bundled together into the Mass Effect Trilogy if I remember correctly, though this upcoming collection is much more comprehensive.

200
 

mcz117chief

Member
Gotcha, was wondering where that came from. Anyway, Shame it was lost but I enjoyed BDTS mission more, just the atmosphere and ... it was pretty much your first time facing off against, interacting and seeing Batarians for the first time, codex be damned.

That music playing when you land on the asteroid ... you knew shit was about to get real.
It is a good DLC too no doubt, I just enjoyed Pinnacle a bit more.
 

Pallas

Member
Anyone seen this yet? It’s the “cache” legendary edition that .... *DRUMROLL* ... comes without an actual copy of the game for $149.99.

bRmnJzR.jpg
 
Last edited:

BigTnaples

Todd Howard's Secret GAF Account
Been trying to find an answer online but nothing thus far.

I REALLY want to know if can you holster your weapon in Mass Effect 3 now that the memory isn’t an issue?

This would be a huge Quality of Life improvement for the game. It’s annoying as hell, and inconsistent with the rest of the series, which makes it an ideal change for a remaster like this, where the goal is more consistency and cohesiveness to the trilogy.
 

Corgi1985

Banned
5 mid-size releases within 21 days isn't stacked? Care to show me an example of what is?
Half life: November 19, 1998
Zelda ocarina of time: November 21, 1998
Thief: December 1, 1998
Turok 2: December 10, 1998

Hell 3 weeks after thief you had baldur's gate and earlier in the fall you had metal gear solid.

Also lol at expecting anything regarding pokemon to not be a dumpster fire filled with mediocrity after the half assed pokemon sword
 

Lone Wolf

Member
Been trying to find an answer online but nothing thus far.

I REALLY want to know if can you holster your weapon in Mass Effect 3 now that the memory isn’t an issue?

This would be a huge Quality of Life improvement for the game. It’s annoying as hell, and inconsistent with the rest of the series, which makes it an ideal change for a remaster like this, where the goal is more consistency and cohesiveness to the trilogy.
It hasn’t been mentioned.
 

AV

We ain't outta here in ten minutes, we won't need no rocket to fly through space
Half life: November 19, 1998
Zelda ocarina of time: November 21, 1998
Thief: December 1, 1998
Turok 2: December 10, 1998

Hell 3 weeks after thief you had baldur's gate and earlier in the fall you had metal gear solid.

Also lol at expecting anything regarding pokemon to not be a dumpster fire filled with mediocrity after the half assed pokemon sword

Stacked doesn't mean every game has to be a legendary classic. You had to go back over 22 years just to find that example. It just means a bunch of promising games released in a really short window, which happens every so often.

Pokémon Snap isn't being developed by Game Freak either, Bandai Namco (Smash) are doing it. I wouldn't be trying another Game Freak game after S+S.
 

DustQueen

Banned
I guess I'll give it a whirl. I loved ME, but couldn't get into ME2 and thus never even played 3 or Andromeda.
Cos in ME2 almost every scene or dialogue is there to lead to poor man's 3rd person shootout and that is it for the whole 20 hours + they literally do not bother with having actual main quest line. Do 20 side quests n receive your cliffhanger invitation.
ME1 was the only good one out of all 4.
 
Last edited:

Shmunter

Member
Cos in ME2 almost every scene or dialogue is there to lead to poor man's 3rd person shootout and that is it for the whole 20 hours + they literally do not bother with having actual main quest line. Do 20 side quests n receive your cliffhanger invitation.
ME1 was the only good one out of all 4.
Have to agree. I was transported into the ME1 universe. Finished ME2 and felt nothing.

Gave #3 a hot go but gave up and never looked back.
 

Synless

Member
I loved the entire Maas Effect series, Andromeda included. One thing I constantly said to myself throughout the series was that I wish the sequels were as great overall as the first game. ME1 was pure magic.
 
Have to agree. I was transported into the ME1 universe. Finished ME2 and felt nothing.

Gave #3 a hot go but gave up and never looked back.
That's a shame. Personally, ME2 was probably my favorite single player campaign of all time. The game is 90% side quests, but those quests are also the entire point of the main narrative. I went in with the idea that the game was going to be all about building a team, and that's exactly what I got. It also was the only game in the series where it felt like your choices in a past game really mattered.
 

Arachnid

Member
Wow so stacked!!

:') what
A mainline sequel in the most popular horror franchise of all time, a remastered pack of last gens best trilogy, and a new IP from Arkane who's made nothing but fantastic new IPs this past gen. Returnal and Pokemon Snap don't interest me personally, but the former has been hyped to living hell by Sony and the latter has been hyped by its fanbase. All that in a month? How is that not stacked lol

What are you on about?
 

JayK47

Member
Legendary? Nothing legendary about it so far. Many of the "improvements" have been a step backwards in my opinion. It really is a missed opportunity if you ask me. Such a great series deserves better than higher resolution textures and some improved controls. How about some new missions or adding in some cut content, like a director's cut? This really is just coming across like a cash grab.
 
Legendary? Nothing legendary about it so far. Many of the "improvements" have been a step backwards in my opinion. It really is a missed opportunity if you ask me. Such a great series deserves better than higher resolution textures and some improved controls. How about some new missions or adding in some cut content, like a director's cut? This really is just coming across like a cash grab.

Dude on top of the main game you are getting all the DLCs as well. Like how much more story do you want? This package is a a good 120+ hour marathon. Its a remaster, its jsut upgraded. I dont want anything new, Id rather they focus their new ideas on a new ME.
 
Top Bottom