Don't know to be quite honest. I do expect resolution and fps to be better on xbox series x, but load times / pop ins to be better on PS5. Also, just to set the record straight, I'm getting neither console. I am getting xbox series s just because I'm cheap and want to play all the xbox game pass games. So I have no stake in the XSX/PS5 fight despite my username lol.
Hell no, people are on crack if they think that on either side imo.
Note that PS5's Shader Engine per CU count ratio (two shader engines, 18 active CU per SE) is the same as RX 5700 (two shader engines, 18 active CU per SE) and RX 6800 XT (four shader engines, 18 active CU per SE).Nope, variable pervasive fine gated clocks are part of big Navi and RDNA2, point 1 below and per CU based (could be DCU)
A slde that poeple missed or did not get from AMD about big NAVI
Anyone claiming that is an idiot, frankly. It’s annoying because all of Team Blue use those figures to try and then bash the Xbox, when those figures were never even remotely possible.
Nah, don't see that happening. The only main difference for me at the end of the day is one company provides xbox game pass and a cheaper console. Call me a casual, but I don't care. Still love my nintendo switch too besides being under power.
So that means PS5 DevKit will be always a step a ahead of Xbox devkit?
Perfect.
PS5's smallish die size indicates otherwise.
Look at the frame graph, the same effect happened a bit earlier on XSX and the frame drop there was bigger compared to PS5. All the way down to 50 in fact.
At 7:00 mark, not quite the same due to XSX's extra red indicators.
The red indicators dropped the frame rate by that much?
The marketing deal just prevented the PS5 version to be showed and/or sent to journos before launch.
I'm pretty sure it's the mix of the explosion effect, the crowd and the blur that causes the drop. In this instance the particular effect only happened on PS5. In the previous image, the same effect happened on both but slightly different times, and one held up better than the other.
The red indicators are also associated with a significant frame rate drop on PS5
It's not CPU. This same exact scene with NPCs on-screen runs between 30-27fps on base PS4, the console with the slowest Jaguar CPU. And the Zen 2 inside SX should easily be more than 4x faster than PS4's CPU. So it's definitely not CPU.Come on now. The PS5 drops just as low just after that scene. But there is actually a scene that I find puzzling, where PS5 has a definitive advantage: in the city with plenty of NPCs. PS5 never drops here and it's not about GPU. It's about CPU and both CPUs are virtually identical.
DeepEnigma is faster than me!
I think you’ll find the poster was showing how stupid all these cherry picked screenshots are. The game performs essentially exactly the same on both consoles.
Not during the crowd scene tho
I agree with that for the most part honestly. But I still think in the context of so many people shouting that the PS5 is underpowered for so long, this comparison is a massive turnaround and vindicates everyone who said the consoles are basically identical in power. And that shouldn't be downplayed or swept under the rug.
Very true. And to be fair I still expect that Xbox will have its wins along the way in some places, as will PS5. That's how close it is. I think there will be many instances where within the same game, some sections will perform better on one console and then it will flip in another section.
I got the same impression after we got the full specs of both machines. Especially after the HotChips conference where MS went into more detail regarding their GPU... And then when I compared it to PS5, it was clear to me PS5 was a better designed machine overall. And the games showcasing this to be true is the proof of that.
Yes, if you look at the GPU of both PS4 Pro and X1X, there's 2x more ROPs on Pro resulting in 55% more pixel fillrate in Pro's favor. Not all parts of the Pro's GPU is inferior.Very interesting results... It seems PS4 Pro maintains 30FPS the whole time, kinda matching what DF said in WD:L comparison that Ubisoft's main optimization target is PS4 Pro.
The first platform dropped frames is Xbox One S, then shockingly Xbox One X, after that base PS4. That brings more questions than answers...
So the same goes for the magic SSD secret sauce too then, right? All the dozens of topics about how incredible it will be and how all games will load instantly and you'll never see a load screen on the PS5 and how it'll be 3x+ faster on the PS5 shouldn't be downplayed or swept under the rug too, correct?
Someone didn't catch the VG Tech vid/stats.
Playstation fans have turned into Apple fans overnight.Jesus Christ what are we in for this gen? It only took 1 day......
Another guy looking at just TF numbers and calling it a day.
YOU BETTER STOP MAKING FUN OF THE XBOX SERIES S
PS5 holds 60fps nearly 100% of the time while XSX holds it 87% of the time and has 5x more tearing than PS5. The result is from VG Tech testing further into the game.
Loadtime is the most boring metric for the next-gen SSD's, the true potential is the stream ability the what it can do. And is in that arena that the PS5 superior technology could really paid dividends for Sony.
If your cheap gaming pc has the same cpu, and same gpu architecture and features as the latest gaming pc in 5 years time, and you play at the correct resolution then yes you can.
More particles on PS5, not like-for-like.
What makes you think that AC is fill rate (pixel or texel?) bound, just curious.
