• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Possible Megaton Incoming. New Rumor surround Microsoft series S

ManaByte

Member
I'd insta buy a $200 XSS but its not happening guys.

PS5 - $599
PS5 Digital - $499

XSX - $499
XSS - $399

I have a gut feeling PS will cost more this gen. I think Xbox will try hard to undercut PS.

You seriously think an all-digital lower powered console meant for streaming is going to sell for $400?
 

Vawn

Banned
You seriously think an all-digital lower powered console meant for streaming is going to sell for $400?

I don't think the S will be "meant for streaming". If that's all it was, it wouldn't even be capable of playing the same games and would be something like a Roku and cost maybe $120 with a controller.

But, I do agree it will be more than $100 difference, especially if it is only 4TF and all-digital. Whatever the X is, the S will likely be $200 cheaper. I'd assume $500 and $300.
 

lefty1117

Gold Member
Yes. Ever since they started Play Anywhere, all their first party games have been on PC. And I believe they plan for all to be on Steam as well as the Windows Store going foward. And yes, Infinite will be on PC day one, including on Gamepass for PC, just like Gears 5 and all their first party games have been for a while.

The only thing you may miss are some third party games that don't get a PC version (Kindgom Hearts and so on). But if you plan to get a PS5 you'll be covered.

MS doesn't care much whether PC gamers buy an Xbox, they're fine getting their money on PC where they also sell their games, DLC and Gamepass.

OK, then by that strategy MS has made it an easier call for me to get a PS5 instead of an xsex. Though I do think the xsex will be the better hardware, but the Ps5 will have games that the other doesn't and that will really be the only reason to get it.

By the way don't take that as a complaint ... for me as a consumer that's a better option because I only have to buy one console to get access to the majority of the games. I have a gaming PC so buying an xbox doesn't seem like it will be worth it for me this generation. strange, but I'm OK with it!
 
Last edited:

jakinov

Member
I'm a big xbox fan, have been since the beginning, but I'm wondering why I would get one since it seems all the games will be on PC as well? What are the xbox exclusives for the next gen? (that won't be on PC) Halo Infinite will be on PC right?
Well if you don't see a reason to get one then don't. I gave away my Xbox a while ago for this reason. I'd only get a new one if it were dirt cheap. Most of the money made from consoles is from people buying games because platform owners get a royalty of around $8 per game sold even more if it's digital because they cut out the middle man and charge the same price. Consoles are sometimes sold at a loss, or close to break-even. There's different camps of people. PC-only, console only and mixed. PC-only will never buy a console, Microsoft makes money off them by selling first-party on PC. Console-only will never buy (or at least use) a gaming capable PC for gaming; so for them whether or not the game is on PC is not relevant. For the people who are willing to be multi-platform owners like PlayStation fans but want an Xbox too or who would have bought everything because they are an enthusiast; it's going to be a hard battle to convince those people to buy third party games on the console (that you don't make much money on) anyways and a hard battle to even convince some of them to dish out hundreds of dollars just to play certain games. You can just sell to them on PC make money off exclusives, and then the PC-only people who buy your exclusives may (or may not) compensate for any loss revenue from potential multi-platformers willing to buy PCs. The amount of people who are multi-platformers is arguably probably pretty low considering that they have to spend a considerable amount of money to be one.
 
199 one s
299 one x
399 series s
499 series x

this seems like the most likely scenario to me

also explains the 200 dollar "rumors"

lmfao. They're not that stupid. They won't market a console that has been able to be had regularly for $170 or less brand new as part of a lineup that includes a series s at $400.

Unlikely to the extreme. That would mean literally zero discount to the older products in light of the newer consoles releasing. X with get a big cut when the new consoles release (it's already dirt cheap with bundles/deals). The One S will become what the super slim Ps2 was back in the day-- a soon to be $99 console that is for the masses/casuals who buy it to play Just Dance or whatever.
 

Jtibh

Banned
Hm. That's not much then.

Well, good luck!
Whats not much?
My expense?

Lets just say i can buy 2 ps5's a day if i want too.

Not here to discuss my income but you wanted to know how to make more money.
Work hard follow your dreams and never get distracted.
Stay focused even if things become hard .
 

Hayriko

Member
MS should lower the prices of the xbones. OneS $150 and OneX to a $250 or drop the oneS as soon as possible and sell the oneX for $200-250 bundled with halo infinite/gamepass. And then later in the gen releasing the series S
 

Jtibh

Banned
Pretty sure Sony said they are identical except the drive. Meaning SSD is the same.
I dont see the digital version selling less then 500.

Ok lets say ssd is the same so maybe they throw something in to price it equal.
Its either this or we are looking at 600 for the disc version.
 

Joey.

Member
You seriously think an all-digital lower powered console meant for streaming is going to sell for $400?

I seriously could.
I cannot for the life of me expect a $199 XSS.
If they could do it, god bless.

But isn't that what he Xbox One S Digital is going for? Doesn't make sense to me.
The Blu-ray disc drive is around $20 cost. Unless they want to lose a megaton of money per console, I can't see it.
 
Last edited:

ManaByte

Member
I seriously could.
I cannot for the life of me expect a $199 XSS.
If they could do it, god bless.

But isn't that what he Xbox One S Digital is going for? Doesn't make sense to me.
The Blu-ray disc drive is around $20 cost. Unless they want to lose a megaton of money per console, I can't see it.

The Xbox One S Digital is going to be removed from the channel. Lockhart will replace it.
 

Gamer79

Predicts the worst decade for Sony starting 2022
For those of you who are butt hurt, calm down. I reported it as a Rumor and do not have official "sources." Take everything with a grain of salt. That being said, it is a possible to be true.
 

REE Machine

Banned
New rumors from some insiders and reported by some reliable youtubers I do not wish to advertise here about the Price of Series S.

Rumors suggesting the base model could sell for a super aggressive price at $399 and the Lockhart model for a crazy $200.

The lockhart is said to have a more powerful gpu than the One X but all digital and not on the level of a Series S.

Microsoft has the pockets to do something crazy like this if they choose too. If a person can play the new Halo for $200 with a lower resolution, holy shit that's impossible to beat. Stay tuned!

Here is one of the fellows I am talking about, and respect him.


This is why it will never work and be that cheap, it doesn't matter if they have deep pockets they have shareholders to appease. They don't give a fuck about deep pockets, all they care about is how are they going to make their money back, and quick. They would never take a huge hit like that and tell them "well wait 5 years then you'll see a return"
 

quest

Not Banned from OT
I'm sure this is about as true as the rumor of jlo and beyonce coming over to my house next weekend for a 3sum and my wife filming it. I don't know how people even take some of these rumors as remotely true. You want to say 499.99-349.99 or 449.99 and 299.99 I can entertainment it. To sell the lockheart at well over 150 dollar loss on low margin customers is fantasy island with mr. Roark and tattoo.
 
Last edited:

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
SeX 12tf $500
All digital S 4tf model $300

Get rid of all the other last gen S and X models. Tempting to keep them around and dump them for $199, but why? So scrape up sales of bargain hunters? Ok, slash the price to $150-200 to flush them all out. No more.

Got to cut the tail off at some point.
 
Last edited:

ManaByte

Member
SeX 12tf $500
All digital S 4tf model $300

Get rid of all the other last gen S and X models. Tempting to keep them around and dump them for $199, but why? So scrape up sales of bargain hunters? Ok, slash the price to $150-200 to flush them all out. No more.

Got to cut the tail off at some point.

MS doesn't keep them around. They discontinued the launch Xbox One the day the One S hit the market.
 

kraspkibble

Permabanned.
That's a good price if true but all digital would be a hard pass. I'd rather get the Series X if the games are there
There will be games on the S too...haha. if it's all digital I'm very tempted. They should make an all digital version of the X too. Physical media is outdated and needs to die. The sooner people accept digital the better. The people holding onto their plastic discs for dear life are cheapskates stuck in the past.
 

Moogle11

Banned
OK, then by that strategy MS has made it an easier call for me to get a PS5 instead of an xsex. Though I do think the xsex will be the better hardware, but the Ps5 will have games that the other doesn't and that will really be the only reason to get it.

By the way don't take that as a complaint ... for me as a consumer that's a better option because I only have to buy one console to get access to the majority of the games. I have a gaming PC so buying an xbox doesn't seem like it will be worth it for me this generation. strange, but I'm OK with it!

Totally agreed. It's an awesome strategy for PC gamers as they no longer need an Xbox to play all those games and can just get a PS4 for Sony exclusives and the few third party console IPs like Kingdom Hearts that don't make it to PC for whatever reason. And Nintendo if one wants their games.

I'm not a big fan of most of MS exclusives, but I love what they're doing with this approach. I don't give a shit about any of the platform holders. I'd be thrilled if Sony and Nintendo did the same approach and put all their stuff on PC too so I could just have one platform and play every game out there. I have no loyalty to any of these corporations, Sony and Nintendo just happen to make a lot of exclusive games that suit my tastes.

It will probably never happen, best will get is just needing one device and separate streaming/download game services once internet and cloud technology is advanced enough. Much like movies/shows now where you can just buy one device (smart TV, Apple TV/Roku/whatever box) and access everything, but will need multiple services to do so. Still better to me than owning multiple expensive and electric sucking boxes though.
 
Last edited:
lol wtf, people really have the face to say things like "MS has the pockets to do something crazy like this."

Yes, it's crazy and precisely because MS doesn't go around burning money that they have the pockets in the first place. Wake up, that's not how business work for a trillion dollar company or for any successful business.
It's more fun to let these people who make these comments wallow in their delusion.
 

kraspkibble

Permabanned.
16GB (maybe 13 for games)is not a lot for 4k but i believe lockhart should the same amount anyways, no point in having less that would be a pain in the ass for developers
On consoles yeah 16GB is weak. It's fine on PC because RAM isn't shared. Gpus have their own dedicated VRAM.

VRAM stores textures + frame buffer. 16GB isn't enough to store 4K textures and 60 frames. They will need to decide between 4K 30fps + 1080/1440p 60fps for most games. They will be games that can hit 4k 60fps but they are likely to be 1st party game or Indies with weak graphics.

said it all along that these consoles needed at least 20GB. Definitely looks like 60fps won't be the standard yet again.
 
You make a good case but at the same time, the Xbox brand has never been backed as hard as it is now by Microsoft. They finally see the potential long term profits with the brand considering it’s their perfect gateway into the streaming war against Apple, Google and Amazon. It’s always been an after thought, especially during the disappointing launch that was the Xbox One. Phil Spencer claims apparently they have “the full backing of Microsoft to be agile on price” and they “feel like they have a strategy that can win.” So I guess we’ll have to wait and see what that translates to.
If it's war against Apple, Google, Amazon and their weapon is Xbox, that's a losing battle. MS backs Xbox because it is their only product that is "cool" they currently don't have any product that young people think is cool. Zune was an attempt to get a younger demographic. Minecraft was a purchase to capture the younger demo.
 

CrustyBritches

Gold Member
This is the same rumor from the b3d source that was posted here yesterday morning.

Personally, I don't see the sense in taking a hit on the premium model when you have an affordable entry model to push mainstream sales. $399 would make sense if XSX was the only model.
 
Last edited:

Hobbygaming

has been asked to post in 'Grounded' mode.
There will be games on the S too...haha. if it's all digital I'm very tempted. They should make an all digital version of the X too. Physical media is outdated and needs to die. The sooner people accept digital the better. The people holding onto their plastic discs for dear life are cheapskates stuck in the past.
I meant if they have some games I want then I'd get the Series X and not the digital. It's also not about being cheap. I get most of my games at release for $60 lol
 
They should try selling one SKU first.... I mean they tried having loads of SKU's last gen.... they sell them here for less than 200 all the time. It just doesn't matter.


What are you smoking?
A next gen console for 200 bucks will definitely sell a ton. No matter what country it is in(except for Japan) this economic environment.
 

Kazza

Member
No, RAM too according to rumors.

If the Series S is going to target 1080p rather than 4K, wouldn't it naturally require less RAM when loading lower res assets?

lol wtf, people really have the face to say things like "MS has the pockets to do something crazy like this."

Yes, it's crazy and precisely because MS doesn't go around burning money that they have the pockets in the first place. Wake up, that's not how business work for a trillion dollar company or for any successful business.

They burnt through a lot of money with the OG Xbox, so they have done it in the past. I thought they might go aggressive price-wise with the One X, but then they slapped a $500 price tag on it. Maybe they were just keeping their gunpowder dry for the next gen.

What about games that are pushing high quality assets/fidelity at 1080/1440P instead of 4K on PS5/XBseX? Just dropping the resolution won't be enough.
What about games that are pushing high quality assets/fidelity at 1080/1440P instead of 4K on PS5/XBseX? Just dropping the resolution won't be enough.

You all assume next gen games will all run at Native 4k, and devs will just make them 1080P for Lockhart. But some next gen games won't go for that

I had similar concerns before the recent next-gen games showcases. Since it's obvious now that the vast majority of devs will be spunking most of the next-gen power on 4K res and a bit of ray tracing, rather than insane physics or intelligent AI, I feel confident that the lockheart can simply reduce the resolution by 75% to 1080p and not hold back next gen games at all.
 

Gamer79

Predicts the worst decade for Sony starting 2022
This is why it will never work and be that cheap, it doesn't matter if they have deep pockets they have shareholders to appease. They don't give a fuck about deep pockets, all they care about is how are they going to make their money back, and quick. They would never take a huge hit like that and tell them "well wait 5 years then you'll see a return"

My theory like many have touched on in this thread.

Their bread and butter is going to be Game Pass. It is in their best interest to get the new Xbox in as many hands as possible. You give the hardware away pretty cheap then you get the money from the subscription. The printer business has been doing this for years. You can buy a decent desktop printer for $35 but when it's time to replace the ink, it's time to pay the piper. The ink is often times more expensive than the machine.
 

Kazza

Member
For any Sony fans getting a little worried about rumours of MS's aggressive pricing, remember it will put pressure on Sony to reduce prices too, benefiting everyone. When Sony releases the PS5 for $499 instead of $599, don't forget to thank Phil for saving you $100.
 
This is literally been said for the past 20 years it has become a meme at this point.

I'm sure Apple, Google or Amazon can subsidize a $99 next gen console with $5000 retail PC specs and shit on both MS & Sony. Successful corporations don't become successful by burning money.

This is different. Steve Ballmer didn't support Xbox like Nadella has. Phil Spencer has confirmed Nadella fully supports Xbox, and has MS's backing on Xbox(hence the huge recent investments in 1st party). Phil reports directly to Nadella now.

In the past, Phil explained that Xbox was treated more as a band that was ok as long as they didn't make a lot of noise in the basement when Ballmer was CEO.

New leadership!
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom