• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Possible Megaton Incoming. New Rumor surround Microsoft series S

lefty1117

Gold Member
I'm a big xbox fan, have been since the beginning, but I'm wondering why I would get one since it seems all the games will be on PC as well? What are the xbox exclusives for the next gen? (that won't be on PC) Halo Infinite will be on PC right?
 

Moogle11

Banned
I'm a big xbox fan, have been since the beginning, but I'm wondering why I would get one since it seems all the games will be on PC as well? What are the xbox exclusives for the next gen? (that won't be on PC) Halo Infinite will be on PC right?

Yes. Ever since they started Play Anywhere, all their first party games have been on PC. And I believe they plan for all to be on Steam as well as the Windows Store going foward. And yes, Infinite will be on PC day one, including on Gamepass for PC, just like Gears 5 and all their first party games have been for a while.

The only thing you may miss are some third party games that don't get a PC version (Kindgom Hearts and so on). But if you plan to get a PS5 you'll be covered.

MS doesn't care much whether PC gamers buy an Xbox, they're fine getting their money on PC where they also sell their games, DLC and Gamepass.
 
Last edited:
I'm a big xbox fan, have been since the beginning, but I'm wondering why I would get one since it seems all the games will be on PC as well? What are the xbox exclusives for the next gen? (that won't be on PC) Halo Infinite will be on PC right?
The Xbox brand isn't just the console, you can clearly see this by just looking at their marketing and services. If you play on Game Pass for PC then you are an Xbox customer.
 
Everyone saying that Lockhart won’t be a leap are obviously forgetting that it will include an SSD - which Sonygaf has lead me to believe is the most important factor in next gen.
Yea, it'll have an SSD. That is the next gen factor. Every generation people ask "Whats so great about this coming gen? It better not just be a graphical jump" In reality that's what most of us here want. I think we're all too stupid to realize that this is the jump we've been looking for, the SSD/bottleneck and I/O speeds. Up till now, game design has not changed, on the developers side anyway. They finally get a game changer and most of the time people just make fun of it... because all we really care about is better graphics, thats the honest truth. We just want our games to look prettier and run smoother.
 
Man you need to drop that argument. supporting low end is not going to prevent high end from looking good. It never has on the PC if the developer chose to take advantage of the high end hardware.
Don't want to get into this age old argument (tons of that on here already), but I believe otherwise myself. Let's not take it further.

Whatever, this is just me being selfish. If this means more people can afford a shiny new thing to make them happy, cool. Not one of those everything should be targeted at high end PC ppl. Just want the base to be higher. What's the point of next gen machines if current gen can run the same exprience, slightly shittier?
 
Yea, it'll have an SSD. That is the next gen factor. Every generation people ask "Whats so great about this coming gen? It better not just be a graphical jump" In reality that's what most of us here want. I think we're all too stupid to realize that this is the jump we've been looking for, the SSD/bottleneck and I/O speeds. Up till now, game design has not changed, on the developers side anyway. They finally get a game changer and most of the time people just make fun of it... because all we really care about is better graphics, thats the honest truth. We just want our games to look prettier and run smoother.

Not me, I would forego all of that for better AI and more responsive, dynamic and intricate systems.
 

Ezekiel_

Banned
Microsoft doesn't care about selling hardware, though.

Why sell a cheaper XsX at a loss when you can sell a X1X or even a X1S?

If they really don't care about selling hardware, why don't they publish their games on Playstation platforms ?

Why make new consoles if you don't care about making money from it ?

If they only want to sell software and services, why not publish on Playstation consoles ?

I would buy Gears of war 6 on Playstation 5.
 
Microsoft has the pockets to do something crazy like this if they choose too.

Ah yes, the infamous ‘war chest card’

And it doesn’t really make sense for them to push this out now, they need to push more series X consoles out the door, what’s the point of the ‘Worlds most power console’ if there’s a handful of people own it, most people will pick the series S.
 
You should source. When all we have is the word of some guy, and the rumors are this extraordinary...

If these YouTubers are talking about it on their channels I don't see an issue with sharing them as a source.

Oh -Arcadia- -Arcadia-

tenor.gif


:messenger_tears_of_joy:
 
I'm confused.

I thought the lockhart is the Series S?

And what do you mean by base model Series X? How many Series X's are there? Are you telling me they're flooding the market with many models and confusing people?
This is not getting enough attention imo.

I got confused the other day at all the names.

All these Xbox consoles will confuse casuals.

I guess that's why it would make sense for MS to release their next gen cheapest model as cheap as possible.
 
  • Thoughtful
Reactions: TLZ

Sethbacca

Member
99% sure Lockhart is $299

75% XsX is $499

Which still feels like a mistake. Ps5 digital 2.5 times more power at likely only about $100 more makes the $299 an absolute shit deal. If I were Sony Id advertise that shit into the ground. Now if the PS5 digital is 499 and the disc is higher it becomes a different ballgame tho.
 
Not me, I would forego all of that for better AI and more responsive, dynamic and intricate systems.
And we might actually get that this generation because of these consoles architecture, that includes the SSD. You know what, I think people should stop specifically point to the SSD, because the SSD is just one component of why these consoles architectures are a leap forward.
 

Kumomeme

Member
i wonder what happened when both consoles release midgen refresh later at next gen

that 3 sku from ms that devs need optimize...even this gen lot of devs still dont bother to release upgrade patch for ps4 pro/x1x

on other side, if sony manages to put ps5 price nicely between both consoles, it could bring trouble to ms
 

HeisenbergFX4

Gold Member
Which still feels like a mistake. Ps5 digital 2.5 times more power at likely only about $100 more makes the $299 an absolute shit deal. If I were Sony Id advertise that shit into the ground. Now if the PS5 digital is 499 and the disc is higher it becomes a different ballgame tho.

I 100% agree IF Sony can get their digital down to $399 then it wont matter.

But I think PS5 disk will be $499 and digital $449 those are guesses.
 

jakinov

Member
MS holding the entire generation back with their shitty 4TF machine.

I'm conflicted in wanting Xbox to fail, on one hand theyre gotta be a competitor to light a fire under Sony's ass, on the other hand I hate to see multiplatform devs being forced to design their games around such a weak hardware
I highly doubt they are going to do 4TF. That's less than the PS4 pro. I think it'll somewhere between 6-8 just to be a step higher than the Xbox One X.

Devs can do whatever they want, they can design around the lowest powered machine or they can aim high and then scale down. It doesn't have to run on the weakest platform while they develop. It's extra work to have to optimize for another platform but people underestimate how low you can go to get a game running on weaker hardware. We had 360/PS3 games running on an iPhone and we got the Witcher 3 running on a Switch. Even when it was just X1 vs PS4; developers didn't deliberately reduce the PS4 resolution to 720P-900P to match the Xbox. Then there's the PS4 Pro and Xbox One X where developers were openly willing to bump up all kinds of graphic settings beyond resolution and frame rate and even shove in better textures. Games can also use techniques like dynamic resolution and can even cut frame rates in half to maintain the visual fidelity that people expect from next-gen to be able to run on a weaker console. A lot of these developers are going to support PC and they probably aren't going to expect everyone to have the latest high-end GPUs from the last couple of years.
 
I heard a ton of rumors about these systems but assuming they are all true Microsofts offering would look like this.

1. Xbox Series X
2. Xbox Series X Digital Edition
3. Xbox Series S
4. Xbox Series S Digital Edition

Doesn't this seem like too many offerings?

Realistically I'm expecting the regular Series X paired with a Series S thats Diskless.
 

Skyrxzaur

Neo Member
Phil Spencer already states that Xbox has the full backing of the CEO Satya AND CFO of Microsoft, I believe Amy Hood. I wouldn’t count this possibility out quite yet. Taking a major loss to gain market share and than earning it back with game pass subscriptions, Xbox live gold and game sales makes sense in the long term. Lockhart is digital no? So they get a better chunk of the change.
 
I highly doubt they are going to do 4TF. That's less than the PS4 pro. I think it'll somewhere between 6-8 just to be a step higher than the Xbox One X.
Current gen are GCN flops. Next gen is RDNA flops. An RDNA flop is like 1.5-2x a GCN flop

So the lockhart is 4tf RDNA (8tf GCN) where the X is 6tf GCN
 

Astral Dog

Member
16
Ram requirements drop as you lower in resolution as 4k vram consumption is concid... you know what, no. Keep going all.
16GB (maybe 13 for games)is not a lot for 4k but i believe lockhart should the same amount anyways, no point in having less that would be a pain in the ass for developers
 

Vawn

Banned
The only difference between Series S and Series X are the teraflops. It's the same exact architecture, same exact CPU and same exact GPU with just lower TFs. oh and the SSD. The only difference there will be is the resolution honestly but it will be an easily 1080p 60 FPS ONLY machine. Ur not losing anything. You will be paying $100 or $200 dollars less for lack of 8 TFs

Yeah they just removed that block of Teraflops out of the machine. That's how computers work.

What does a teraflop look like again? I forget.
 

Krisprolls

Banned
It wouldn't make sense. It would cost them tons of money and they would lose the same vs Sony because their problem is the lack of good exclusives, not the price.
 

Skyrxzaur

Neo Member
MS holding the entire generation back with their shitty 4TF machine.

I'm conflicted in wanting Xbox to fail, on one hand theyre gotta be a competitor to light a fire under Sony's ass, on the other hand I hate to see multiplatform devs being forced to design their games around such a weak hardware

huh? How would anything be held back. The supposed Lockhear
If they did that they would lose money in a way they never did before.

Sure, gamepass and Live could compensate for the loss, but still.

And here's the thing, while most of the hardcore crowd is excited to see what MS can do, i don't see any of the more casual players talking about it at all.

Isnt that exactly the reason TO do something as bold as that? A price that low would win back the casual market with no questions asked. Also, they took a $125 dollar hit per unit with the 360. It’s definitely not an unprecedented strategy by any means.
 
I highly doubt they are going to do 4TF. That's less than the PS4 pro. I think it'll somewhere between 6-8 just to be a step higher than the Xbox One X.

Devs can do whatever they want, they can design around the lowest powered machine or they can aim high and then scale down. It doesn't have to run on the weakest platform while they develop. It's extra work to have to optimize for another platform but people underestimate how low you can go to get a game running on weaker hardware. We had 360/PS3 games running on an iPhone and we got the Witcher 3 running on a Switch. Even when it was just X1 vs PS4; developers didn't deliberately reduce the PS4 resolution to 720P-900P to match the Xbox. Then there's the PS4 Pro and Xbox One X where developers were openly willing to bump up all kinds of graphic settings beyond resolution and frame rate and even shove in better textures. Games can also use techniques like dynamic resolution and can even cut frame rates in half to maintain the visual fidelity that people expect from next-gen to be able to run on a weaker console. A lot of these developers are going to support PC and they probably aren't going to expect everyone to have the latest high-end GPUs from the last couple of years.
The consensus is that RDNA2 is much more efficient than the GCN architecture, the one that the PS4/One GPU's are built on. So really a 4TF Series S consoles with the CPU would still be more powerful than a One X.
 

Astral Dog

Member
I have a good digital library, but buying a new games machine that ONLY plays digital games sounds really shitty,i can't commit to such a restriction

Physical + Digital for me,whenever its convenient
 
Last edited:

Dr_Salt

Member
My great grandfather who died 2 years ago came to me while I was sleeping via remote astral projection to tell me that Microsoft is gonna give away the consoles for free during its first year of release. I have no proof of this but I can make a thread and tell you everything about it.
 
Last edited:
Isnt that exactly the reason TO do something as bold as that? A price that low would win back the casual market with no questions asked. Also, they took a $125 dollar hit per unit with the 360. It’s definitely not an unprecedented strategy by any means.
And they learned from losing $125 per unit. They said "fuck that" when it came to the Xbox One. But, they could revisit that in the future. I don't think they'd want to take a $125 loss again, but they might be willing to take a $25 loss, maybe $50?
 

Skyrxzaur

Neo Member
And they learned from losing $125 per unit. They said "fuck that" when it came to the Xbox One. But, they could revisit that in the future. I don't think they'd want to take a $125 loss again, but they might be willing to take a $25 loss, maybe $50?

You make a good case but at the same time, the Xbox brand has never been backed as hard as it is now by Microsoft. They finally see the potential long term profits with the brand considering it’s their perfect gateway into the streaming war against Apple, Google and Amazon. It’s always been an after thought, especially during the disappointing launch that was the Xbox One. Phil Spencer claims apparently they have “the full backing of Microsoft to be agile on price” and they “feel like they have a strategy that can win.” So I guess we’ll have to wait and see what that translates to.
 

Jtibh

Banned
Which still feels like a mistake. Ps5 digital 2.5 times more power at likely only about $100 more makes the $299 an absolute shit deal. If I were Sony Id advertise that shit into the ground. Now if the PS5 digital is 499 and the disc is higher it becomes a different ballgame tho.
I am sure ps5 digital is 500 and disc is 500 as well.
With the digital version being offered with more ssd space .
 
This is going to be the most interesting marketing campaign of all time.

Xbox Series S would be the target at 30fps at 1080p? Then those same games would just be upped to 60fps at 4K?

Sony will release a PS4 with a SSD?
^ which I would totally buy if its portable.
 

jakinov

Member
Current gen are GCN flops. Next gen is RDNA flops. An RDNA flop is like 1.5-2x a GCN flop

So the lockhart is 4tf RDNA (8tf GCN) where the X is 6tf GCN
The consensus is that RDNA2 is much more efficient than the GCN architecture, the one that the PS4/One GPU's are built on. So really a 4TF Series S consoles with the CPU would still be more powerful than a One X.


That's interesting. I don't really follow GPU tech so I never knew about that.
 

Gamernyc78

Banned
Next incoming thread:

Megatin from sources I cannot expose. I talked to sources Sony to undercut Microsoft and release ps5 for 350 lol foh with this nonsense smh.

When all else fails tell a lie or a story lol 😂
 
Last edited:
The Xbox brand isn't just the console, you can clearly see this by just looking at their marketing and services. If you play on Game Pass for PC then you are an Xbox customer.

The fact that he is asking the question tells you everything you need to know about how successful Microsoft has been marketing that story. It's a very difficult story to tell but it's the only strategy left that makes sense. Let's be the Netflix of gaming!

There's only one problem: AAA games cost a ton to make and developers need to be able to make their money back. Microsoft can eat the costs but can third-party AAA devs? Will be damn interesting.
 
Last edited:

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
GamePass to them is more important than game attach rates were in the previous gen. They can justify a $399 Series X on the back of subscriptions.
Yup.

And digital sales and micro trans keep going up.

Who cares about a $4-5 royalty cut from a third party disc when gamers are skewing to digital where a $60 game is suddenly an $18 cut (30%).

Sony and MS can literally sell one digital game and get as much third party money than selling 3-4 discs.
 

Joey.

Member
I'd insta buy a $200 XSS but its not happening guys.

PS5 - $599
PS5 Digital - $499

XSX - $499
XSS - $399

I have a gut feeling PS will cost more this gen. I think Xbox will try hard to undercut PS.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom