Support NeoGAF

[geordiemp]

So Basically best versions are: PS5 pre-patch > PS5 post-patch > XSX post-patch > XSX pre-patch

XSX is best version if you play on a 1080p display now.

 

[Neko Mimi Mode]

I find more brutal the more powerful machine can't give the same performance of the weaker and it needs to low at 1080p, frankly.

You would, wouldn't you?

Everything is console wars with you. It wouldn't surprise me to find you actually don't have a next gen console yet, so you don't actually play games like this. Low FPS, tearing and dynamic resolution are all nebulous concepts which exist in the ether, waiting to be plucked out when it makes your future plastic box of choice seem superior.

Lol at Hix shamelessly trying to turn 1080p into a W.

It's not a W. I'm saying the patch was bad on both and not necessarily representative of either console's potential.

But ok, you guys win.

 

[NEbeast]

Ubisoft broke the ps5 version.

 

[BlueXImpulse]

Do you think making fun of a disabled person is funny ? Your sick man, sort your head out.

Anything to protect the name of Xbox. Really sad to see that.

 

[assurdum]

You would, wouldn't you?

Everything is console wars with you. It wouldn't surprise me to find you actually don't have a next gen console yet, so you don't actually play games like this. Low FPS, tearing and dynamic resolution are all nebulous concepts which exist in the ether, waiting to be plucked out when it makes your future plastic box of choice seem superior.



It's not a W. I'm saying the patch was bad on both and not necessarily representative of either console's potential.

But ok, you guys win.

Says the guy who reported repeatedly Valhalla would have been 4k native on series X and laughed to everyone who pointed out to him how irrational he was. You really have a short memory if I can say.

 

[DForce]

The thread was clearly created with a "PS5 wins again" slant

Xbox guys were celebrating a "win" before the actual comparisons were released.

Now you seem to have a major problem with it.

 

[ethomaz]

PS5 was fine with the actual render limited to 1440p with very low tearing.
Ubi trying parity dropped it and make both the image and performance worst in that version.

How do you decrease the image quality, decrease the performance and increase the tearing with a patch?

Now the Xbox dropping resolution was expected and even DF thought it needed a more aggressive VRS to hold 60fps and decrease the tearing.

 

[JonkyDonk]

John Linneman still saying on twitter you are better off without this patch on PS5. He says it doesn't 'ruin' it but it makes it worse.

 

[Knitted Knight]

PS5 was fine with the actual render limited to 1440p with very low tearing.
Ubi trying parity dropped it and make both the image and performance worst in that version.

How do you decrease the image quality, decrease the performance and increase the tearing with a patch?

Now the Xbox dropping resolution was expected and even DF thought it needed a more aggressive VRS to hold 60fps and decrease the tearing.

Rushed patch with little QA. Kiddie slider play.

 

[Neko Mimi Mode]

Xbox guys were celebrating a "win" before the actual comparisons were released.

Now you seem to have a major problem with it.

Two wrongs make a right, great logic there.

So here's the rub, in this comparison video PS5s performance is tanking and the other consoles measured don't seem to be doing that hot either.

Instead of us all agreeing this is yet again another case of Ubisoft shitting out a poorly optimised video game, we're console warring. It's sad and I'm done. Take your W if you want.

 

[Hezekiah]

Where art thou, Colteastwood? Oh where art the 40% difference between SX and PS5?

How's that tool doing?

Too busy banning people from viewing his Twitter page.

 

[StateofMajora]

bad game, bad dev and it's rushed. Surprised?

 

[ReBurn]

If it's not broken fix it until it is.

 

[Low Moral Fibre]

Both are bad for different reasons and I wouldn’t call either a win.

I have it on XSX and the performance mode is much more enjoyable for me post patch as the tearing and drops were very distracting so it would be my personal choice over the PS5 version which still looks poor and clearly needs to drop further but 1080p on a cross-gen game is undeniably weak.

 

[SSfox]

XSX is best version if you play on a 1080p display now.

Pure graphics wise yes, but with Dualsens in mind the win will still go to PS5 version imo

 

[CatLady]

I was hoping to find a killer Black Friday deal on Valhalla, now I'm glad that didn't happen, I think I'll wait on this one until Ubi gets it together.

 

[thelastword]

PS5 wins since XSX isn't outperforming the PS5 in any game. If this stays that way, then yes....multiplats will be best on PS5 together with the controller.

I'm not seeing any advantages for XSX atm. Other then a great service like gamepass and more mature BC, it also feels the console is a bit dead atm.

Microsoft is completely silent around it and it looks like the marketing is also kinda dead. They will have a hard time when Sony announce their gamepass competitor.

Well, when most of your marketing is based on FUD Discord and Twitter handles, when the actual results come and it does not mesh with the fudulent hype, there is not much you can do or say then. The reality is like a blinding sun. Lots of these folk will go back to their caves in hibernation. Till the tools mature I guess.

 

[mhirano]

Ubisoft employee learning Microsoft and Sony new tools and fixing ACV performance:

 

[FrankWza]

Disgusting

Yup

 

[DForce]

Two wrongs make a right, great logic there.

So here's the rub, in this comparison video PS5s performance is tanking and the other consoles measured don't seem to be doing that hot either.

Instead of us all agreeing this is yet again another case of Ubisoft shitting out a poorly optimised video game, we're console warring. It's sad and I'm done. Take your W if you want.

You're not getting it.

I'm calling out the fact that you didn't complain this much when Xbox fans were celebrating a "win" months ago when it was announced that PlayStation 5 would run Assassins Creed at an upscaled 4K vs the Xbox Series X version at a full native 4K (which turned out to be false).

You were even laugh reacting at the comments Xbox fans were making on the thread.



I don't care who "wins", I just expect these consoles to be close in performance, but it is interesting that PS5 is neck and neck with Xbox, which is considered to be the most powerful console in the world.

 

[MasterCornholio]

That's not how you fix things Ubisoft.

 

[Exanthus]

What a cluster......
They said 1080p to was uncommon/rare so no point even focussing on that.

Clearly Ubi are masters in there craft...

 

[Valued Gamer]

Th

Wow even the people laughing at this, you are all sick and should be ashamed. Disgusting

Stop with the faux outrage.
Make less blatant console waring threads.

 

[mhirano]

Th

Stop with the faux outrage.
Make less blatant console waring threads.

Maybe if you stop being an asshole then we can think about it.

 

[Coulomb_Barrier]

Whoa I thought this gen was meant to be 1440p PS5 vs 4K Xbox.

Not 1080p Xbox vs 1440p PS5

 

[MasterCornholio]

Th

Stop with the faux outrage.
Make less blatant console waring threads.

What's wrong with the thread? I mean anytime there's a comparison thread there's always going to be console warring in it.

 

[Low Moral Fibre]

I’m surprised XSX is pretty much solid 30fps in Quality Mode as, to put it bluntly, it feels like shit.

 

[SSfox]

Well, when most of your marketing is based on FUD Discord and Twitter handles, when the actual results come and it does not mesh with the fudulent hype, there is not much you can do or say then. The reality is like a blinding sun. Lots of these folk will go back to their caves in hibernation. Till the tools mature I guess.

You can notice the contrast already when you see for example Sony guys like Shu or Hermen Hulst and cie post about actual games stuffs, while people like Major Nelson or Aaron retweet DF comparatif and even pin those tweets (of course they don't retweet DF anymore now that PS5 is the one outperforming)

 

[DinoD]

XSX is best version if you play on a 1080p display now.

Finally a console that shows how 1080p is done right.

 

[thelastword]

Says the guy who reported repeatedly Valhalla would have been 4k native on series X and laughed to everyone who pointed out to him how irrational he was. You really have a short memory if I can say.

That's true isn't it.... I heard there was a big thread where AC on Series X would be 4k native and PS would be up to 4k.....PS got so much licks on this, so much gloating, but now PS5 has better rez and better effects with that. Strange times...

 

[Tripolygon]

Both are bad for different reasons and I wouldn’t call either a win.

I have it on XSX and the performance mode is much more enjoyable for me post patch as the tearing and drops were very distracting so it would be my personal choice over the PS5 version which still looks poor and clearly needs to drop further but 1080p on a cross-gen game is undeniably weak.

Nope

So Basically best versions are: PS5 pre-patch > PS5 post-patch > XSX post-patch > XSX pre-patch

This is why I love physical games. Original code can never be replaced unless you update.

 

[Exanthus]

Never noticed the tearing since I had VRR turned on anyway.

 

[Valued Gamer]

What's wrong with the thread? I mean anytime there's a comparison thread there's always going to be console warring in it.

OP is one of the leading fanboys here.
Posts a thread with only half the info to make one console look inferior to another to make himself feel more secure in his possible console choice.
Please.

 

[Self High Five]

Shame on you.

 

[SSfox]

 

[Neko Mimi Mode]

You're not getting it.

I'm calling out the fact that you didn't complain this much when Xbox fans were celebrating a "win" months ago when it was announced that PlayStation 5 would run Assassins Creed at an upscaled 4K vs the Xbox Series X version at a full native 4K (which turned out to be false).

You were even laugh reacting at the comments Xbox fans were making on the thread.



I don't care who "wins", I just expect these consoles to be close in performance, but it is interesting that PS5 is neck and neck with Xbox, which is considered to be the most powerful console in the world.

So laugh reacting is back to being a good thing again, apparently?

Again, two wrongs apparently make the right with you.

If there is a power advantage to series X, it's minimal and parity will be the main story of the generation.

Ultimately however this game, particularly with this patch, isn't a good indication of anything.

What's wrong with the thread? I mean anytime there's a comparison thread there's always going to be console warring in it.

OP didn't even wait to post the name of the game in his thread title, such was his haste to console war.

It's a performance test, but, instead of talking about performance, he and everyone else seem to be discussing minimum dynamic resolution targets.

Nope

PS5 post patch has way more screen tearing and frequent FPS dips, so a more accurate list would be PS5 pre patch > XsX post patch > PS5 post patch

 

[Coulomb_Barrier]

Spencer must be pulling his hair out at this game, 1080p res on Series X is a bad fucking look lol, no matter if it is temporary.

 

[jhjfss]

600p on the series S? We are off to a wonderful start, aren't we?

 

[Md Ray]

So are we saying the Series S is a 576p machine, and the Series X is a 1080p machine?




I'm just kidding folks.

It makes sense. SX is between 2.5-3x faster machine. And 675p to 1080p is a 2.56x increase.

 

[massivekettle]

These threads are rapidly becoming insufferable. Everything has to be about one console upping the other.

Can we instead focus on how shitty Ubisoft’s engine and optimisation is?

 

[Redlancet]

What is your definition of “many?”

many?

 

[Cherrypepsi]

what happened to PS5 though, framerate AND resolution got worse?
that is true masterwork

 

[JareBear: Remastered]

many?

Ok, guy.

 

[anaphase]

OP was in a frenzy, frothing at the mouth typing the title out, damn homie

 

[assurdum]

So laugh reacting is back to being a good thing again, apparently?

Again, two wrongs apparently make the right with you.

If there is a power advantage to series X, it's minimal and parity will be the main story of the generation.

Ultimately however this game, particularly with this patch, isn't a good indication of anything.



OP didn't even wait to post the name of the game in his thread title, such was his haste to console war.

It's a performance test, but, instead of talking about performance, he and everyone else seem to be discussing minimum dynamic resolution targets.



PS5 post patch has way more screen tearing and frequent FPS dips, so a more accurate list would be PS5 pre patch > XsX post patch > PS5 post patch

Someone help him.

 

[Neko Mimi Mode]

Someone help him.

Another useless post from you.

It's a wonder you've lasted three months.

 

[AntonioBanderasXsX]

51fps ouuff, drop it to 1080

 

[assurdum]

Another useless post from you.

It's a wonder you've lasted three months.

What exactly of more useful have your post compared mine in the past three months? You even reported a lot of misinformation, many times.

 

[MasterCornholio]

OP is one of the leading fanboys here.
Posts a thread with only half the info to make one console look inferior to another to make himself feel more secure in his possible console choice.
Please.

I don't think either console wins with the patch. Anyways you can always request that a mod make changes to the thread if you want it to be more fair.

 

[DForce]

So laugh reacting is back to being a good thing again, apparently?

Again, two wrongs apparently make the right with you.

If there is a power advantage to series X, it's minimal and parity will be the main story of the generation.

Ultimately however this game, particularly with this patch, isn't a good indication of anything.

You're making excuses. If you had no problem with Xbox fans doing it, then don't have a problem with PS fans doing it.