Support NeoGAF

[ErRor88]

Mortal Shell on PS5 using version 1.000.005 uses a dynamic resolution with the highest native resolution found being 3200x1800 and the lowest native resolution found being approximately 2304x1296. Temporal upsampling is used to reconstruct a 3200x1800 resolution when rendering natively below this resolution.

The lowest resolution found on PS5 was during the scene at 6:50 and the PS5 drops its resolution more in this scene than the Xbox Series X does. In the scene where the Xbox Series X dropped to its lowest resolution found which was approximately 2560x1440 the PS5 also dropped its resolution to approximately 2560x1440.

Stats: https://bit.ly/3dn3XM5
Frames Pixel Counted: https://bit.ly/3mWikub

Platforms	PS5
Frame Amounts
Game Frames	56149
Video Frames	56169
Frame Tearing Statistics
Total Torn Frames	0
Lowest Torn Line	-
Frame Height	2160
Frame Time Statistics
Mean Frame Time	16.67ms
Median Frame Time	16.67ms
Maximum Frame Time	33.33ms
Minimum Frame Time	16.67ms
95th Percentile Frame Time	16.67ms
99th Percentile Frame Time	16.67ms
Frame Rate Statistics
Mean Frame Rate	59.98fps
Median Frame Rate	60fps
Maximum Frame Rate	60fps
Minimum Frame Rate	55fps
5th Percentile Frame Rate	60fps
1st Percentile Frame Rate	59fps
Frame Time Counts
16.67ms	56129 (99.96%)
33.33ms	20 (0.04%)
Other
Dropped Frames	0
Runt Frames	0
Runt Frame Thresholds	20 rows

 

[xion4360]

nice to see it fixed.

 

[DJ12]

PS5 doesn't not like how they did the fire effects.

Take out those dropped frames, it's locked to 60 I guess.

Good job over in the end.

 

[Kangx]

Great job. The res lower bound a little bit lower than the x but it dropping less frame and more stable on the ps5. Good trade off.

 

[Elios83]

Finally what it should have been since the beginning.

 

[Superayate]

As discussed previously, nice update (and on par with previous 1440p framerate results, and XsX ones with slightly more stable frame rate but slightly lower bound res)

As

 

[Salmon Snake]

Glad to see them fixing the game for PS5.
I'll get it eventually and I've already downloaded the Rotting Christ dlc

 

[Blizzje]

How does the ps5 version compare to a RX 5700 XT in this game? Couple of videos on YouTube show that at least on ultra 1440p it can't hold 60fps, but interested to see how the ps5 compares to this.

 

[Skifi28]

It took a while, but we finally got there. Was all the hassle really worth it over the original 1440p locked? Probably not.

 

[sncvsrtoip]

It took a while, but we finally got there. Was all the hassle really worth it over the original 1440p locked? Probably not.

probably was, generaly sharper graphics with better overal performance

 

[assurdum]

But but Riky tell me couldn't be fixed.

 

[ethomaz]

Looks like the game is now how they promised.

Great performance with up to 1800p resolution... there is not texture loading issues on PS5 version too.

 

[ethomaz]

Great job. The res lower bound a little bit lower than the x but it dropping less frame and more stable on the ps5. Good trade off.

That part is a bit weird... the places Series X drops to mininum the PS5 has the same resolution.

But there is one place that PS5 dropped to 1296p... 6:50 on the video.

 

[assurdum]

That part is a bit weird... the places Series X drops to mininum the PS5 has the same resolution.

But there is one place that PS5 dropped to 1296p... 6:50 on the video.

Wasn't fixed 1440p at 60fps locked in the first patch? Lol the fuck happening of different with the DRS in this scene? Some engine are really bizzarre.

 

[Lysandros]

That part is a bit weird... the places Series X drops to mininum the PS5 has the same resolution.

But there is one place that PS5 dropped to 1296p... 6:50 on the video.

Indeed, it's just one scene, the versions are now near identical with PS5 having ever so slightly better frame rate without any screan tearing contrary to the XSX version.

 

[ethomaz]

Wasn't fixed 1440p at 60fps locked in the first patch? Lol the fuck happening of different with the DRS in this scene? Some engine are really bizzarre.

That is why it is weird... it basically get low as 1440p in the same scenes in both consoles.
But that one I posted is the only place it drops to 1296p on PS5 and it is not dropping to 1440p on Series X.

He s aid that.

"The lowest resolution found on PS5 was during the scene at 6:50 and the PS5 drops its resolution more in this scene than the Xbox Series X does. In the scene where the Xbox Series X dropped to its lowest resolution found which was approximately 2560x1440 the PS5 also dropped its resolution to approximately 2560x1440."

Basically the resolution of both are very similar and that 6:50 is the exception.

Indeed, it's just one scene, the versions are now near identical with PS5 having ever so slightly better frame rate without any screan tearing contrary to the XSX version.

Xbox version is not VSynced if you look at the frametimes that makes it tear.

 

[Lysandros]

Xbox version is not VSynced if you look at the frametimes that makes it tear.

Yes, i could tell that by the number of torn frames on XSX side.

 

[Bo_Hazem]

 

[thelastword]

As discussed previously, nice update (and on par with previous 1440p framerate results, and XsX ones with slightly more stable frame rate but slightly lower bound res)

As

WOW, if PS5 tore like the Series consoles, it's minimum framerate would probably be 58-59fps.......

 

[Bernd Lauert]

>people talking about torn frames

 

[alabtrosMyster]

But but Riky tell me couldn't be fixed.

We are lucky the PS5 is even able to run games at all!

 

[ethomaz]

As discussed previously, nice update (and on par with previous 1440p framerate results, and XsX ones with slightly more stable frame rate but slightly lower bound res)

As

This image shows framrate more stable on PS5 plus some tear on Series X and a lot S.

Series are not VSynced that made the frame time all out of the place.

Edit - I believe I mistook what you said... sorry.

 

[Duchess]

I'm so very glad the devs too the time to fix this. Looking forward to playing it on my PS5

 

[OneTruth]

Series are not VSynced that made the frame time all out of the place.

You are sure, that last patch (few days ago) for XSX/XSS dont add VSync??.

Booth version is IDENTICAL. Only fanboys see difference between 1440p -1296p and avarage framrate 59.96 vs 59.89.

 

[ethomaz]

You are sure, that last patch (few days ago) for XSX/XSS dont add VSync??.

Booth version is IDENTICAL. Only fanboys see difference between 1440p -1296p and avarage framrate 59.96 vs 59.89.

There is any test with the new patch? Because the table shows it is not VSynced.

They did fix the texture streaming issues too?

 

[Shmunter]

And balance in the galaxy has again been restored

 

[OneTruth]

This image shows framrate more stable on PS5

This image shows framrate more stable on PS5

There is any test with the new patch? Because the table shows it is not VSynced.

They did fix the texture streaming issues too?

100% yes.



"The texture streaming issues that the Xbox Series S previously had have been improved."

 

[ethomaz]

100% yes.



"The texture streaming issues that the Xbox Series S previously had have been improved."

Thanks for the link.
They just tested the S version and it is not VSynced plus there are texture streaming issues yet but it is indeed a improvement in that regard.

I believe it should be the same for Series X... no VSync and improved texture streaming issues.

The tearing is very decreased too... 3000 frames in previous patch to 60 in this new one... that is another evidence it is not using VSync.

PS. About VSync look at the minimum and maximum frametimes... VSync doesn’t allow 13 or 25... it is either 16.66 or 33.33 because VSync will delay the render for these times... that result in tear.

 

[Bramble]

Funny some dudes acted like the fps dips on PS5 were due to HW limitations. Fast forward and now it's the better version.

 

[alabtrosMyster]

Funny some dudes acted like the fps dips on PS5 were due to HW limitations. Fast forward and now it's the better version.

This is called double dipping!

 

[sircaw]

Funny some dudes acted like the fps dips on PS5 were due to HW limitations. Fast forward and now it's the better version.

The war continues

 

[alabtrosMyster]

PS. About VSync look at the minimum and maximum frametimes... VSync doesn’t allow 13 or 25... it is either 16.66 or 33.33 because VSync will delay the render for these times... that result in tear.

You got it all mixed up, tearing only appears when vsync is disabled (you can have partial vsync where the fps is capped at 60 and when it drops below the data is sent to the screen ASAP, which results in smoother movement but a teared frame, which is not necessarily easy to spot depending where it's located on the screen).

 

[Armorian]

>people talking about torn frames

99% of people have fixed refresh displays that can't clean this shit up.

 

[alabtrosMyster]

99% of people have fixed refresh displays that can't clean this shit up.

Nope, on that other thread there was a very scientific survey that demonstrated that the vast majority of people have 4k OLED screens capable of VRR.

Which is nice, because people were never this fast to adopt a new display technology.

 

[M1chl]

This game received wayyy more hype from botched patches, than from quality product. But good for them....

 

[akaFullmetal]

Nice improvements, just need to work on a few small screen tears and looks to be working well on all systems.

 

[Armorian]

Nope, on that other thread there was a very scientific survey that demonstrated that the vast majority of people have 4k OLED screens capable of VRR.

Which is nice, because people were never this fast to adopt a new display technology.

Sorry I was this misguided, I'm sure Riky and few other people ensured survey results were representative for the overall market

 

[ethomaz]

Nope, on that other thread there was a very scientific survey that demonstrated that the vast majority of people have 4k OLED screens capable of VRR.

Which is nice, because people were never this fast to adopt a new display technology.

How that works if most displays being produced are not HDMI 2.1?
Even OLED production is way lower compared with others techs LCD LED.

In 2020 it was shipped around 4 million OLED TVs (not all of these were HDMI 2.1) where sold where 2.04 million come from LG.

 

[DenchDeckard]

Most people who are buying a ps5 and a series x are the first to jump on the latest and greatest tvs. We are the enthusiasts after all. Give me vrr Sony!

 

[ethomaz]

Most people who are buying a ps5 and a series x are the first to jump on the latest and greatest tvs. We are the enthusiasts after all. Give me vrr Sony!

I'm enthusiastic and play on a PLASMA Full HD and I still didn't see any reason to migrate to 4k... I'm waiting the definitive HDMI 2.1 TV but it is not on the market yet... maybe next year.

 

[DenchDeckard]

I'm enthusiastic and play on a PLASMA Full HD and I still didn't see any reason to migrate to 4k... I'm waiting the definitive HDMI 2.1 TV but it is not on the market yet... maybe next year.

There are a lot of people who went out and git hdmi 2.1 tvs last year, currently. The lg cx is great and big option for many.

 

[ethomaz]

There are a lot of people who went out and git hdmi 2.1 tvs last year, currently. The lg cx is great and big option for many.

It was probably the best option but still have several issues with HDMI 2.1 including VRR that were not possible to be fixed without new hardware.

I will let that test phase for the specialists... when they put a 4k TV without the issues I will probably buy one... even the new Sony OLEDs are still not there.

 

[Redneckerz]

You know, in practice (As in, people playing the game regularly) are never going to see such small deficits on average on all consoles.

Series S's GPU is getting tested here. 1280 cores can only do so much and to attempt 60 makes it more of a hassle for that machine than all the other current-gen hardware

Looks like the game is now how they promised.

Great performance with up to 1800p resolution... there is not texture loading issues on PS5 version too.

We were promised 4K60!

Joking aside, its early days. The fact that we now routinously see 60 FPS games appear for most titles is such a relevation to the console gamer. Though, it remains interesting that the One X often hits higher resolutions.

WOW, if PS5 tore like the Series consoles, it's minimum framerate would probably be 58-59fps.......

Its kind of disappointing that this is thelastword of thelastword.

 

[geordiemp]

The war continues

How you doin fishy ?

 

[sircaw]

How you doin fishy ?

Hey there m8, long time no see, doing better now thanks, was terribly sick for ages., where was my get-well card dammit.

I am back in the groove, still don't own a ps5, dammit. Hows the traveling going or are you a prisoner too.

 

[DenchDeckard]

So has the texture streaming issue been fixed on the series X?

Good to know if they managed to overcome that bottleneck of the 10gb split memory! Haha /s

 

[JackMcGunns]

Funny some dudes acted like the fps dips on PS5 were due to HW limitations. Fast forward and now it's the better version.

The irony is every head to head when PS5 wins it's hardware related, but suddenly it's about software optimizations and tools... which is it?

 

[ethomaz]

So has the texture streaming issue been fixed on the series X?

Good to know if they managed to overcome that bottleneck of the 10gb split memory! Haha /s

The issue was decreased on Series S... not fixed.
There is no test on Series X yet.

 

[FrankWza]

.

 

[alabtrosMyster]

How that works if most displays being produced are not HDMI 2.1?

Good question! I would have to find the thread, if you were to believe its "survey" most people had VRR displays (maybe they self identified as such).