Everyone can kina shut up a little now..no?
To be honest 720p on a 4tf state of the art gpu is a joke even if it is 60fps, the game doesn't even scream next gen or have any crazy amount of extra effects. Lots of versions is causing lots of the cross gen games to be disappointing.
Is it just me or does he seem to run in circles a lot on the SX version? Probably just a coincidence, it just seemed he kept more characters in view on average on the SX side. It must be hard to get like for like in a game like this while also attempting to stress the hardware.
As a SX owner, I told myself not to watch comparisons as I love my box and am happy with it, so what is the point.... Yet here I am!
NX Gamer is biased for Sony. DF is neutral and says it how it isSo NX and VG have very different results for the same game?
And NX and DF have different results for the same Game?
Oh my.
Yes the guys caught reading a script for their Gears 5 tech review are very neutralNX Gamer is biased for Sony. DF is neutral and says it how it is
Weren't some people laughing at the PS4, a 7 year old console doing 720 60fps in a recent game on an old Jaguar CPU?.....Theses persons should be livid with XSS's performance then..To be honest 720p on a 4tf state of the art gpu is a joke even if it is 60fps, the game doesn't even scream next gen or have any crazy amount of extra effects. Lots of versions is causing lots of the cross gen games to be disappointing.
Yes the guy who because of his rabid fan base wouldn't do videos of the first nextgen game because it was a Microsoft game. Call me when he puts up some pro Microsoft videos he had lots of opportunities with fs2020. Digital foundry kisses Sonys ass all the time see spiderman and souls videos on top of many more. They are still the only unbiased site who treats each with respectYes the guys caught reading a script for their Gears 5 tech review are very neutral
They are biased but not biased. Got it.Yes the guy who because of his rabid fan base wouldn't do videos of the first nextgen game because it was a Microsoft game. Call me when he puts up some pro Microsoft videos he had lots of opportunities with fs2020. Digital foundry kisses Sonys ass all the time see spiderman and souls videos on top of many more. They are still the only unbiased site who treats each with respect
If treating both sides with respect is biased sure.They are biased but not biased. Got it.
It is not even a fair comparison for Xbox anymore.
PS5 was downgraded with the new patch. IQ drop, resolution drop, performance drop and even so it continue having better IQ, better resolution and better performance than Series X.
Maybe next patch Ubisoft reach the bottom parity.
Yeah Sony is just going to keep improving and pulling away.The tools are getting better.
What are you talking about? His last two comparison vids were in depth and he showed a lot of good examples of what he was talking about. This one was just a quick update on something he already covered before. And this 'Sony bias' thing is utter nonsense. He likes Playstation games so what? Are you accusing him of making things up or tampering with the data? What proof do you have?I've seen a few NXgamer vids now and I'm not impressed. Completely amateur and his Sony bias is on display for all to see.
But the real problem is with his analysis. They're just not very in depth. He TALKS a lot but doesn't SHOW you very much at all. I find myself watching the same scenes on repeat over and over again while listening to some guys opinions that aren't backed up with what's being shown in the video.
I do enjoy watching technical breakdowns and performance analysis so I hope NXgamer will improve with time, but as it stands right now his analysis just don't bring much to the table.
He works full time and is independent, can't put the hours in that DF can as that's they're full time gig. I think you're being unfair he's very good at getting to the point. Sometimes he doesn't break it down for the dummy's to understand but that's a them problem.I've seen a few NXgamer vids now and I'm not impressed. Completely amateur and his Sony bias is on display for all to see.
But the real problem is with his analysis. They're just not very in depth. He TALKS a lot but doesn't SHOW you very much at all. I find myself watching the same scenes on repeat over and over again while listening to some guys opinions that aren't backed up with what's being shown in the video.
I do enjoy watching technical breakdowns and performance analysis so I hope NXgamer will improve with time, but as it stands right now his analysis just don't bring much to the table.
That was something!Yes the guys caught reading a script for their Gears 5 tech review are very neutral
No idea what you're talking about bubYes the guys caught reading a script for their Gears 5 tech review are very neutral
What are you talking about? His last two comparison vids were in depth and he showed a lot of good examples of what he was talking about. This one was just a quick update on something he already covered before. And this 'Sony bias' thing is utter nonsense. He likes Playstation games so what? Are you accusing him of making things up or tampering with the data? What proof do you have?
I thought you were able to tell such things at a glance?
Fucking Wolverine hereNo idea what you're talking about bub
And as a PC gamer ( I don't own an Xbox ) who recently just started watching his vids, it's just obvious that he leans heavily towards Sony. And that's actually kind of a problem for someone in his position.
And as a PC gamer ( I don't own an Xbox ) who recently just started watching his vids, it's just obvious that he leans heavily towards Sony. And that's actually kind of a problem for someone in his position.
DF has 1 million subs, NX gamer has 50k. that also has something to do with it.True. that’s also the reason why isn’t really considered Professional by MS nor Sony
MS and Sony approached DF, Mark Cerny even had an interview with DF. Not with NXGamer. And this is the reason.
NXGamer - could you please do a video on PC, XSX, PS5 in Quality mode vs. PC @ Ultra mode. I'd like to know if they are using the same fidelity in the shaders, LOD, lighting, etc..
That was something!
So better effects and LOD on PS5.....I think if this was reversed, a certain tech channel would be making it known as a huge gulf....Funny the silence and get ready for "it's pretty much the same" when they would pinpoint an extra leaf, a better texture in one part of an entire level or anything on the XBONEX that was better....Yet now, like for like is back in the dialogue...They can't see anything or too busy...
I've seen a few NXgamer vids now and I'm not impressed. Completely amateur and his Sony bias is on display for all to see.
But the real problem is with his analysis. They're just not very in depth. He TALKS a lot but doesn't SHOW you very much at all. I find myself watching the same scenes on repeat over and over again while listening to some guys opinions that aren't backed up with what's being shown in the video.
I do enjoy watching technical breakdowns and performance analysis so I hope NXgamer will improve with time, but as it stands right now his analysis just don't bring much to the table.
Don't really see the point of this video.. gets off the boat and does one fight encounter and makes a conclusion, atleast go to a few towns or some of the raids and see how it performs.
Good work NXG. Could you just clarify if the PS5 settings you mentioned (LoDs, alphas) were always this high or have they changed after this patch? I'm just trying to figure out why the tearing has gotten worse seemingly.
The problem with this analysis is that it only covers a small beginning portion of the game. I understand why Michael couldn't do exhuasting testing again; he has a lot more stuff to do and doesn't have the time.
But if we look at a bigger sample size, it becomes apparent that Ubisoft has messed up the PS5 version.
Pre-patch, PS5 was holding 60 FPS 97% of the time (XSX was 87%). Now post-patch, PS5 is holding 60 FPS only 92% of the time (and XSX does it 96%).
They improved the XSX by lowering the average resolution (right call) and made it closer to PS5's pre-patch 97% frametime. But there was absolutely 0 reason to tweak and mess up the PS5 version. Now it drops frames and tears 250% more than XSX's version (previously it was 500% less than XSX).
Doesn't make any sense!
I think you are explaining another tech channel precisely not NXgamer...If anything NXgamer shows you exactly what's happening on screen, unlike "XBOX version runs better" trust me dawg, without showing the 120Hz framerate mode or a blip.....Whoa there, put the gun away. I'm not attacking him personally or accusing him of tampering with anything. You just made all that up out of thin air.
And as a PC gamer ( I don't own an Xbox ) who recently just started watching his vids, it's just obvious that he leans heavily towards Sony. And that's actually kind of a problem for someone in his position.
What I said is that I don't find his analysis to be very in depth. It's also heavy on opinion and light on fact. Or it may just be an issue with his style of editing. My advice would be to always SHOW the thing that you're talking about. This is a graphics analysis after all. I find it very off putting when what he's talking about is nowhere onscreen.