PSVR is great and is only missing a strong lineup of games (respect to capcom and RE7).
I don’t even like racing games and this would sell the system for me. Racing in vr is fun as shitgive me full gt7 psvr2 support
![]()
Introducing the next generation of VR on PlayStation
First details on the next-generation VR system coming to the PS5 console.blog.playstation.com
There is no reason why they couldn't provide a wireless version as an option, for a higher price. For the base unit I think it is best to have something competent for a reasonable price.Glad it's happening. I'm especially excited to see the new VR controller. The PS Moves were always kind of a lame stand-in without a joystick.
I never expected it to come this year, so that doesn't disappoint me. In fact, I'm surprised they announced it so early.
Bummer that it isn't wireless, but you can't have everything. Maybe next gen.
The ps4 was obviously hampered by its lack of power when PSVR came out and so looking back I understand why GT sport's VR mode as so fucking gimped. But, if the ps5 and next gen psvr can't handle a full racing game like gt7 in VR then I don't think they shoudl bother.give me full gt7 psvr2 support
Latency is the single big reason.while not wireless , a single cord is great news. possibly 2022 with E3 showing this year maybe. excited either way.
Of course it was coming. I dont get why ppl doubted it. Sony wasnt trying to throw everything out there at once.Lol all the experts in the other thread saying psvr2 wasn't coming.
this. fucking annoying i havent used mine in ages. but again people are fools to expect a wireless one unless they want 30min of battery![]()
For the love of God, keep it to the ONE cable or better yet, WIRELESS if they can pull it off.
The PSVR is a freaking mess with cables. Terrible.
It also needs to be wireless.I'll being paying attention but Quest has made it hard for me to look at any other VR solution long term. PSVR was priced great for what it was but it was very quickly eclipsed tech wise. I hope PSVR2 is more future looking. Inside out tracking better be there.
You get two hours out of standard quest 2 using virtual desktop to wireless stream pc vr games. Wifi 6e will be out by then so they could absolutely have a wireless solution and frankly should given the market leader in 2020.this. fucking annoying i havent used mine in ages. but again people are fools to expect a wireless one unless they want 30min of battery
Wireless is a big ask I think at this point on what will likely be a budget headset. If they could do some type of add on that would keep the cost of the headset down but give premium buyers the option, I think that would be the best scenario.It also needs to be wireless.
Wifi 6 doesn’t benefit vr over wifi 5. Wifi 6e does though. They could have a usb c wifi 6 e single that plugs in to the console, or do network streaming through your router like virtual desktop does on quest 2.I seem to remember a bunch of people saying the next PSVR headset was the reason for the WiFi6 inclusion in the PS5. Ah well. That said, I have no doubt it'll be a great piece of hardware for those who enjoy VR.
Wired is a deal breaker imo. This thing is probably a year or two out and is already inferior to the Quest.Delighted with this. I knew Sony would continue to support VR, but was worried they might wait until the halfway point of the console cycle again. But if devkits are going out now, a 2022 release seems nailed on.
I had four huge issues with the first PSVR:
-The visuals: Were mostly blurry PS3 quality. The PS5's power should solve this
-The move controllers: New controllers should solve this
-The resolutions and FOV being just a little worse than I'd like - they state this is being improved
-Dealing with the unit being tethered to the console - still a problem
3 out of 4 ain't bad at all. I would pay extra for a wireless version though, and I hope it's set up to work naturally on PC as this will expand their potential audience quite a bit.
Lastly, I hope previous PS4 PSVR games are made compatible with the new headset. I don't want to lose Astro Bot, Res Evil 7, WipEout or Tetris Effect.
Wired is a deal breaker imo. This thing is probably a year or two out and is already inferior to the Quest.
SONY GIVE ME Gravity Rush VR on PS5... or at least patch GR1 & 2 to be playable in VR.I buy it In 3 years.... I actually got PS vr 1 month ago
I understand everyone's situation is different but, the way I have set it up, I only have to deal with a single cable already (I know the earlier versions had more cables). So yeah if PSVR2 comes with a single cable then it's just the same as PSVR in my case.![]()
For the love of God, keep it to the ONE cable or better yet, WIRELESS if they can pull it off.
The PSVR is a freaking mess with cables. Terrible.
Going to book mark this one to see how poorly it ages. I am with you on the preference for wireless. Makes a much better experience. But lets not talk out our ass and say this is going to be inferior to a mobile chip powered stand alone visor.Wired is a deal breaker imo. This thing is probably a year or two out and is already inferior to the Quest.
2022, let's go!!
Do we have any idea what studios are making VR games?
Do you mean you'd want a standalone PSVR with the processor in the headset (a la Quest) or that they should find a way to wirelessly transmit the data from PS5 to the headset?Wired is a deal breaker imo. This thing is probably a year or two out and is already inferior to the Quest.
But the wireless edition will come with a vomit bucket.Latency is the single big reason.
Imagine people who are on the borderline of VR making them sick. Add some input/movement latency due to wireless....won't be pretty.
You get about 6 ms of added latency over wifi 5,and wifi 6 which is very small overall. Wifi 6e claims to get that down to 1-2 ms, but you do have encoding and decoding latency because you need to do compression to send out wirelessly. With a GeForce 2070 super I get 4 ms of encoding latency and the quest 2 decodes hevc at 6-7 ms. Overall I range from 30-40 ms which you just can’t perceive even in vr.Do you mean you'd want a standalone PSVR with the processor in the headset (a la Quest) or that they should find a way to wirelessly transmit the data from PS5 to the headset?
Because I don't know hardware tech but I feel like the latter solution would introduce lag that would be unacceptable in a VR setting and could potentially cause nausea. Of course I could be wrong about that, I don't know.
To fully utilize the PS5's power and keep the cost acceptable it seems like the compromise is a wire. I don't like it, but I understand it.
Out of interest why? What am I missing? Quest 2 lasts a good 3hrs and that’s doing all the processing. PS5 will be doing the processing task, so why would the battery only last 30mins?this. fucking annoying i havent used mine in ages. but again people are fools to expect a wireless one unless they want 30min of battery