Are we in rdr2 territory?
I think their numbers are wrong here.
Laggiest game ever that controls like absolute shit yet got insane reviews. Never mind how your game plays, all that matters are cinematic presentations and story.
Not that fishy. It has been shown multiple times that DLSS for instance can look better than native resolutions because it's more temporaly stable.This machine learning stuff that looks better than native smell a bit fishy, what is the deal here?
This is simplifying the reality of things. DLSS has trade-offs compared to native. While it is often better at resolving fine details, it still has issues with a variety of things such as transparency effects or rapid light movements. The headlights of cars in Cyberpunk leave a pretty noticeable ghosting trail with DLSS quality. The TAA on the other hand is blurry as hell.
Well, it varies from case to case. DLSS can cause artifacts that are very distracting, but when it doesn't can be better than native for sure.
Not talking about that, but the fact that these console have machine learning hardware inside.
It runs at 60fps on PS4 Pro? I don't think so.
Know your place. Not your problem.
If you look at the floor.
You will notice all of those things. Especially if you play on a larger screen.
Damn, thought it did. What a shame it’s being held back on PS4 and can’t even do 60 frames. Guess I’ll wait.
On Pro it runs like the first game. between 45-50fps which is already a great improvement compared to 30fps. This is how I played the first game on Pro and I was not disappointed.
You try way too hard, sometimes.
Implying graphic whores know what input lag even is..
I don't think it's cpu holding back that 53fps....
50+ FPS on tablet PS4 PRO CPU
So PS5 CPU launching this game:
120fps-gang! Where u at?
The unlocked fidelity mode is also awesome with vrr that and the targeting 120 mode are really the only choices to make
I read it’s mostly 45-55 (can hit 60 in the quiet sections or looking at the sky) the only question then becomes is it uncapped all the way up to 120 for the ultimate future proofing?
Where did you read that? That would be a good result if true.
you would think that since insomniac uncapped the games all the way to 120 on all modes but for some reason it seems uncharted on fidelity mode specifically was only uncapped to 60 dont know if that was an oversight or error but either way i hope ragnarok is uncapped all the way to 120
The unlocked 40 mode is better than the locked 60 mode (frame times and input delay are very similar)
It’s a toss up and I will try both before I settle, but 60 locked is a bit better than 40 even tho 40 is WAY better than 30.
I’m not talking about the locked 40 I’m talking about the UNLOCKED 40 (the one that averages 45-55 like uncharted and Spider-Man) that mode is the ultimate way to play especially for a first play through.
I agree, if you have a good display for it, that would be the sweet spot way to go.
I assume by your response you don’t have that display?
I do, but some displays disable certain backlight features and the picture is too dark.
Ah I see so you don’t have an oled (I want to get one in the future) I was just saying the unlocked 40 mode cause it’s both paired with vrr and a 120hz container feels similar (actually can feel straight up better when hitting the higher end of the average) to the locker 60 mode at 60hz output and you now can appreciate the max visuals. The only other valid choice besides unlocked 40 on a 2.1 display is the targetting 120 mode
