Zoro7
Banned
This is a really bad take.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
How the PS4 Won a Console Generation
- Thread starter kretos
- Start date
rofif
Can’t Git Gud
They won because halo turned to trash and so did gears of war.
I was a 360 guy before this and loved those games. xbox one had nothing to offer that would not be on pc. ps4 had great exclusives so thats it
Bumblebeetuna
Member
Yet it’s backed up by generations of console history. Maybe an exception exists for PS2, I don’t remember how competitive the GCN and Xbox were, but that’s why an exception for every rule exists.
Burythelight
Member
So bloodborne, last guardian and dreams were safe bets? Most of new ips in ps3 era were bad.
Men_in_Boxes
Snake Oil Salesman
What did Sony do last gen that was anything other than "not fumble the ball"?
It's best AAA games got lapped by Mario Oddessey, Breath of the Wild, Smash Bros, Animal Crossing, and Smash. Lapped by games on a console with half the install base.
PlayStation needed a leadership change and got it because Trent Dilfer isn't going to bring you another ring.
Ass of Can Whooping
Member
They fumbled the ball because they can't outsell powerhouse nostalgic IPs from Nintendo?
Are you daft? They don't need to try and outsell those games and it is neither their focus nor should be.
Last edited:
Men_in_Boxes
Snake Oil Salesman
1. "Powerhouse nostalgic IP"
2. Looks at those IP on WiiU.
Sony's goal should have been to build can't miss IP. Instead, they built a few really good IP that the market views as less than elite.
Sony squandered much of their opportunity over the last 7 years. They should have put their foot on the gas rather than coast.
Ass of Can Whooping
Member
I'm sorry are you trying to suggest those aren't powerhouse IPs? Even on a failed console like the Wii U where they still sell millions?
You mean coasting by making a new 10 million seller IP like Horizon, or the fastest selling playstion IP Ghosts of Tsuhima? Even God of War managed to sell faster than a mainline Mario game reaching close to, if not already surpassing 20 million sales, and you think they're just coasting when they've repeatedly broken records with their inhouse games?
Last edited:
Men_in_Boxes
Snake Oil Salesman
They're not powerhouse IPs. They're in the good to great category.
We're no longer in the "10 million in sales" is elite era.
That doesn't mean God of War, Ghost of Tsushima, and Horizon are are bad, but they aren't industry leading. The market has grown since 2003.
I'm not shoveling dirt on Sony by any means. I'm optimistic about their leadership changes, but I'm not particularly impressed with the PS4 generation either.
Last edited:
Ass of Can Whooping
Member
Yes they're powerhouse IPs. How can you even say something so stupid? I don't think any other Sony or Xbox fanboy on this site would say something that dumb
The Last of Us is a 20 million seller, Uncharted 4 is a close to, if not already reached 20 million seller, Spiderman is a 20 million seller, God of War is a close to if not already a 20 million seller, and then you have their new IPS on top of that which are either 10 million sellers or higher.
Sony is actually competing quite well with Nintendo's 20+ year old established franchises, and in terms of new IP success they have Nintendo beat.
They weren't coasting. That's just nonsense
Last edited:
Men_in_Boxes
Snake Oil Salesman
Those numbers are elite IF AND ONLY IF, you don't look at the best selling Switch games, the Switch user base over the last 3 years, and the fact that Nintendo laughs at Sony for dropping their game prices.
Or
If you don't look at Fortnite, Minecraft, League of Legends, Counter Strike, Rocket League, Overwatch, PUBG etc...
Sony's games do great. But they aren't industry leaders anymore. That's on Sony.
Ass of Can Whooping
Member
You just referenced Super Mario Odyseey and Zelda, which God of War and Spiderman actually beat in terms of the race to 10 million and most likely 20 million too.
Those multiplayers type games didn't just come out of nowwhere this gen. They have always generated and garnered the largest playerbases for decades. That's nothing new and it's dumb as fuck to compare them. Multiplayer games have continued to grow, as have single player games.
Last edited:
Men_in_Boxes
Snake Oil Salesman
It's not about the race to 10 million. The Switch just released in 2017.
It's about total impact and total revenue.
God of War and Spiderman are not on the Nintendo franchise tier.
Last edited:
Ass of Can Whooping
Member
So they're not on the Nintendo franchise tier even though they managed to beat two nintendo franchises? Got it
Last edited:
Men_in_Boxes
Snake Oil Salesman
No, they're not.
Ass of Can Whooping
Member
Right we've established you still say alot of stupid things
In any case, they don't need to achieve NIntendo franchise tier. They need to do their own thing which is to continue to create successful new AAA ip, which is something Nintendo struggles with.
Mr Moose
Member
And Horizon Zero Dawn, with a ginger female protagonist from people who made pew pew games. Safe as fuck.
Imru’ al-Qays
Member
Sony's first party games have never been industry leaders. That has never been their strategy. Their games are system sellers, they don't care if they top the sales charts so long as they move consoles.
Nintendo needs its games to not only sell consoles, but to constitute the bulk of sales on their consoles because of their historically weak third party outreach.
PropellerEar
Member
There's over 1billion PS4 games sold.
True king of last gen.
True king of last gen.
Men_in_Boxes
Snake Oil Salesman
Grand Theft Auto, Gran Turismo, Final Fantasy, Tekken, Metal Gear Solid, and Crash Bandicoot were all industry leading games/franchises at one point. All of them viewed as PlayStation franchises too.
But that was then. This is now.
10 million - 20 million units sold isn't leading the industry anymore. They're great sales but these companies are looking at 100+ million players over the next 5 years as their goal.
The PS4 was wildly successful but how much did it position Sony over the next 5-10 years? In my opinion, not as much as it could or should have.
Last edited:
Imru’ al-Qays
Member
Literally none of those are Sony first party games lol. You are literally the stupidest person on this website.
Men_in_Boxes
Snake Oil Salesman
True, but they were all viewed at "PlayStation" franchises.
Let's leave the insults at the kids table.
Ass of Can Whooping
Member
Why do you think Sony puts themselves as the face of games like Fornite and COD?
Bumblebeetuna
Member
Bloodborne is a Souls game, lol.
The other two, if you want to call them risky I mean, cool? So you picked out two lower budget lower sales games. Amazing.
Either way we saw way more risk and way more quality and quantity during the PS3 era when they were in a fight with the Wii and 360. They coasted last gen. Just look at their output, lol.
PropellerEar
Member
GTA5 has sold over 20m on PS4, under 10 mil on XBone, and 0 on Switch.
PS4 true King of last gen.
PS4 true King of last gen.
Ass of Can Whooping
Member
Everyone's output lowered genius
Men_in_Boxes
Snake Oil Salesman
Sony is not "the face of Fortnite and CoD". I don't even know what that means lol.
Epic and Activision are the face and biceps of those franchises.
ArtemisClydeFrog
Banned
2021 and we still console warring, huh
Bumblebeetuna
Member
You lack reading skills and want to sarcastically call someone else genius. That’s adorable. Almost as adorable as your petty insults you’re throwing around at other people. At ease, warrior.
Ass of Can Whooping
Member
Epic and Activision are a little logo
From a consumer stand point, they see a big playstation box with fornite or COD marketing plastered all over.
Sony understands this better then you, which is why they aren't trying to compete with them and utulusing their strengths the correct way and not jumping on bandwagons and failing miserably.
Men_in_Boxes
Snake Oil Salesman
PropellerEar
Member
Cod black ops 3 sold 15m+ on PS4, half that on XBone, and 0 on Switch.
PS4 is the true king of last gen.
Ass of Can Whooping
Member
Here's the facts for you
Sony came into the the PS4 generation weaker than any generation before
The entire corp had to focus on restructing which obviously hindred funding for every division
In the middle of the PS4s lifetime their output and quality kept increasing as the success for PS kept growing
Now we're in the next generation where PlayStation is the strongest they've ever been, and their first party output being the best it's ever been
Does that sound like coasting to you?
Ass of Can Whooping
Member
You can call it whatever you want, but the fact is they're viewed as the go to console for these games
Bumblebeetuna
Member
I see a lot of irrelevant excuses coming from you, but at the end of the day your pathetic “but but MS and Nintendo output was down too!” just tells me you agree with me, Sony’s PS4 output was down compared to PS3. None of those excuses you typed up matter, and the idea that Sony’s output and quality were increasing is laughable at best.
Just to help you out so that you don’t waste more of your time writing up bullshit:
I didn’t say they released bad games
I didn’t say MS/Nintendo did great, in fact I said the opposite
I merely said compared to the previous gen where they were in a fierce battle, their output was better. Yes, they coasted last gen when it was apparent they would have no competition. Again, just look at the games instead of reaching for excuses
Enjoy the last word here, not wasting time with a console warrior.
Last edited:
Men_in_Boxes
Snake Oil Salesman
They're not.
PlayStation probably accounts for less than 30 percent of the Fortnite player base.
Fortnite is the platform, not PlayStation.
The industry is evolving. PlayStation, XBox, and Nintendo are losing influence to Fortnite, Animal Crossing, and League of Legends.
Games used to be overly simplistic and shallow, which is why you bought a PlayStation or Nintendo. The platform would provide the player with fun experiences until they got bored and moved on to the next experience.
The platforms over the next 10-20 years are going to be franchises/games, not PlayStation.
Playing 5,000 hours of the next game will replace playing 5,000 hours of (insert console here).
That's the direction everything is headed. You'll see Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft position towards this reality soon enough if you haven't already.
Ass of Can Whooping
Member
I see a lot of irrelevant excuses coming from you, but at the end of the day your pathetic “but but MS and Nintendo output was down too!” just tells me you agree with me, Sony’s PS4 output was down compared to PS3. None of those excuses you typed up matter, and the idea that Sony’s output and quality were increasing is laughable at best.
Just to help you out so that you don’t waste more of your time writing up bullshit:
I didn’t say they released bad games
I didn’t say MS/Nintendo did great, in fact I said the opposite
I merely said compared to the previous gen where they were in a fierce battle, their output was better. Yes, they coasted last gen when it was apparent they would have no competition. Again, just look at the games instead of reaching for excuses
I never disagreed their output early in the PS4 was bad, but it had nothing to do with coasting, and the facts are there
From 2017/18, Sony was releasing a minimum of 2 AAA games every year, and now look at what they're doing coming into the PS5 generation, in the first year alone, they released Demon's Souls, Spiderman and are coming out with Returnal, GT7, Horizon, Ratchet and Clank and bunch of other smaller titles.
And this is while they're reporting record levels of revenue
When you use the "excuse" rehtoric, that just tells me you don't like to learn, which is fine but not a healthy mindset
Arkam
Member
Sure the launch prices/specs were an initial factor, but after year one it was clearly GAMES, GAMES, GAMES! I could have skipped the entire X1 gen and missed what.... 5 great exclusives? I waited and got an X1X for BC mostly. PS4 on the other hand had (what felt like) dozens of superlative exclusives. I spent the entire gen with AAA exclusives in my backlog.
Ass of Can Whooping
Member
You think people are going to play Fortnite without a device or something? is that it?
Men_in_Boxes
Snake Oil Salesman
Nope. It's on a bunch of devices.
Ass of Can Whooping
Member
So you're one of those mobile devices are going to kill console gaming type of chaps eh?
PropellerEar
Member
Prob 70-80% of Fortnite players are on console.
30%+ of Fortnite players are on PlayStation.
PS4 is king of last gen.
30%+ of Fortnite players are on PlayStation.
PS4 is king of last gen.
Last edited:
Note that PS4 was by far the most profitable PlayStation console ever. PS4 was a golden goose for SIE.
For Nintendo the Switch era seems to be set to out profit the Wii/DS era.
Last edited:
SkylineRKR
Member
This isn't true.
Remember how Sony kept investing in and pushing out meaty single player experiences in a landscape dominated by online multiplayer shooters. This is a risky move and on PS3 they didn't always sell great, I was surprised when Sony actually bought Sucker Punch as Infamous was doing and scoring decent enough, but not great. MediaMolecule isn't my thing, but MS would've 100% axed that studio back then. MS also would kill off Last Guardian on the spot, seeing its development hell and sales potential. Sony pushed through with these projects despite being market leader. They didn't have to, its not like TLG or Dreams or even LBP raked in millions for them.
All you have to do is look at new IP. Because new IP is the most risky move one can do.
Sony delivered TLG, Days Gone, Tsushima, Dreams, Bloodborne, Detroit, Knack, Driveclub, Astrobot and probably more.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Locked