I still don't understand why no reviewers went back to adjust the rating/review accordingly.
They'd have to rate it higher because the current economy makes it easier to acquire cars than at launch.
They want rare cars to feel "rare" thats my guess. Its pretty stupid either way but I wouldn't call it predatory.
Yep. I called this years ago when Phil first said he prefers GaaS over single player games. The entire idea behind these games is making more money. It's not about quality content. It's about milking money out of content. Cant do that with single player games so third party publishers turned to GaaS shit. This was one reason why we put so much stock into first party titles because we know or rather knew that the main objective of first party was to sell consoles. And the best way to do that was to release GOTY quality single player content we just dont see from EA, Activision, Ubisoft and other greedy third party publishers who more often than not put revenue over quality.
Nonsense?
wccftech.com
www.metacritic.com
Cars in the legendary dealership raise and drop in price depending of they real market value. Thats why some cars has an arrow pointing up if the car is increasing in value or an arrow pointing down if the value is decreasing. Its been part of the game system since launch.
Yup. Bunch of ppl concern trolling without even being aware of the game economy. They added a good amount of races that pay ALOT of credits, that any increase in car prices is meaningless.
It’s always like that, it’s why I use Steam reviews instead of critics reviews nowdays, there reviews can be updated and you can filter for playtime to weed out trolls.
I doubt this will kill the game.
I have most of the fanboys on this thread on my PSN friends list and they all have 150+hours of GT7 playtime.
Yeah they should have increased the metascore as the game now has a much better economy than it had at launch.
If we have to keep this thread open, can we pin this comment to the top so that the tin foil hats can see and then exit in an orderly fashion?To establish that it's long been known that they will vary with the dynamic insurance pricing. It's not new, and not the same as suddenly having a standard brand car set at 500,000 CR in patch 1.14 suddenly leap to 1.2m CR to get a bump in MTX.
Basically 'feature working as intended and described'. But it means we will get a topic every time we get a refresh.
Gran Turismo 7 "Legend Cars" Will Be Dynamically Priced by Hagerty
Gran Turismo has partnered with specialist classic car insurance and valuation company Hagerty, in a collaboration that will see the brand provide real-world, dynamic values for some of GT7's most exclusive cars. The tie-in will be part of the game's "Legend Cars" dealership -- previously known awww.gtplanet.net
"More intriguingly, the vehicle values will be dynamic, and guided by Hagerty’s own real-world expertise. Although no interval has been stated yet, the prices in the dealer will rise and fall (as indicated by blue and red arrows) as they would in a real classic car dealer, using the Hagerty Valuation Tool."
And those greedy cunts also charge 10 EUR for the PS5 upgrade.
I like the game, I’ve been wishing for a proper GT all the way since GT5 (GT6 came out too late), but I too have dropped the game, for now. Hopefully it’ll keep getting updates so it’s all good once I’m back. I doubt that Forza Motorsport 8 will be better tbh, GT7 have flaws but it’s a serious love letter to cars like nothing I’ve seen before, it’ll be difficult to beat. And Turn 10 was shitty with the economics as well so
Who would buy a driving sim to play a used auto market sim? This is stupid.
No, it’s
Notice how this being pointed out and the fact earning credits is even quicker than at launch it completely deflated this thread? Massive backfire.
Always is with the ignorant cheerleaders.
Leaving microtransactions out of review copies is undoubtedly a dick move, but adjusting the ratings is not the solution. If reviewers did this we would have tons of unfinished games. Game only 85% done? No prolem. Let's launch it, it will get better reviews later.
adamsapple
with a freshly chilled box of concerns or excuses. Exactly, have been saying this since the introduction of paying for online play on consoles. Unfortunately here we are, with GAAS and subscription services everywhere and everybody cheering for them.
But the old Gran Turismo only has 140 cars and 11 tracks, and GT7 has hundreds more cars and triple the number of tracks. You can have the old Gran Turismo back by not buying more cars than the old Gran Turismo had.
At least GT7 owners will get another free million credits with next month's apology newsletter.
Sony will have nothing on EA regarding monetization.
Yes they do. Thers a couple cars that got cheaper. But we dont talk about that here.
They do go down, and have done so… often.
