-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
[DF] Resident Evil Village: The Digital Foundry Tech Review + PS5, Xbox Series X|S Analysis!
- Thread starter 3liteDragon
- Start date
Krizalidx11
Banned
STATIC EVIL 8
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
rickybooby87
Member
I want to watch it, but I don't want to see anything until I get my copy tomorrow. What's the word on performance?
Bumblebeetuna
Member
How is this different than the other DF RE8 thread
Last edited:
TheDude108
Member
Interesting the loading time differences between the two, with PS5 being a lot faster.
Performance seems a little better on XSX in RT mode.
Performance seems a little better on XSX in RT mode.
Last edited:
TGO
Hype Train conductor. Works harder than it steams.
Retail copy, the other was the demo
M1chl
Currently Gif and Meme Champion
Whole game probably...
More importantly is the game already playable when I take a short flight to NZ?
Last edited:
Tripolygon
Banned
Not bad at all. The loading though still amazes me what is possible when developers use next gen api.
skit_data
Member
Seems the CB implementation in this title is actually really really good. It will be interesting to see if this becomes a trend in the future and if so provides devs with more flexibility when pushing other parts of graphics than resolution.
Just like the demo XSX has a performance advantage in those heavy scenes.
But my biggest takeaway is the load times on PS5. Damn, thats fast. Unlike most other games, Capcom seemed to have utilized PS5s storage speed in the proper way.
Edit: I’m also reading the PS5 version (27.3 GB) almost half the size of the XSX version (50 GB). Can anyone confirm this?
Just like the demo XSX has a performance advantage in those heavy scenes.
But my biggest takeaway is the load times on PS5. Damn, thats fast. Unlike most other games, Capcom seemed to have utilized PS5s storage speed in the proper way.
Edit: I’m also reading the PS5 version (27.3 GB) almost half the size of the XSX version (50 GB). Can anyone confirm this?
Last edited:
VeganElduderino
Member
double the pages for this thread
Stephen Curry
Member
XSX with the expected performance boost and PS5 with the expected shortened loading.
The world is healing
The world is healing
i do think the Xbox should be loading quicker than that though. Probably wasn’t completely optimized for it.
Last edited:
Thirty7ven
Banned
Glad it has 3D audio.
It's 30.22 GB on Xbox. I just checked by installing via the app.
saintjules
Member
Less than 2 seconds load on PS5 + adaptive triggers...I got both 2 and 3 remakes on Xbox, but 8 will be PS5 it seems.
Last edited:
Kilau
Member
Good things come to those who wait.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Retail vs. Demo
Kuranghi
Member
As a PC guy who will play there if the performance/IQ is better this couldn't have come at a better time because I can't upgrade my GTX 1080 for a while yet and the framerate + IQ of the CB 4K is way above what you get on PC. I could do native 4K + better texture resolution but only at 30fps on PC but I did back and forth comparisons and its nowhere near enough of difference in IQ to justify losing half my frames.
In motion the texture resolution and internal resolution increase does make a good difference on my setup but since I am at 30fps that kind of cancels out the clarity increase anyway and when you stop and look at things without moving the camera CB 4K looked really similar to native 4K on my PC just with slightly less aliasing on hard contrast straight edges, but nowhere near enough to justify the lost frames.
To get locked 60 99.9% of the time on PC I had to do 1440p and that looks like ass compared to the CB 4K even though they say its a similar number of pixels as 1527p per frame. PS5 all the way for me, I'll get PC version later for IQ run.
sncvsrtoip
Member
Performance advantage in rt mode in heavy scanes roughly around 10-15% for xsx, ps5 very fast loading times 1.5s, 8.5s on xsx
Caio
Member
So it looks very good, identical on both without RT, but XSX performs better with RT, mostly in the more demanding scenes, up to 10-15% when the engine has to deal with more reflections. PS5 much faster loading times. Also VRR(Ricky will love me now), is helping XSX to be even better when the occasional dips occur, making them almost imperceptible.
XSS, err, don't know what to say...
XSS, err, don't know what to say...
Last edited:
DenchDeckard
Moderated wildly
The most important thing in this new comparison is the loading times. PS5 is smashing a blistering couple of seconds but Xbox series X is underperforming really. Intereting to see if they can patch it, but 2 seconds vs 8 is a considerable gap no matter which way you play it.
SSD in effect!
SSD in effect!
Last edited:
Thirty7ven
Banned
1.57 to 8.47 is 4x?
And up to 18% heh, hehehe. Yeah I guess that’s one way to look at it.
Super impressive what Capcom did with the PS5 ssd.
At least it doesn't seem like there's any loading once you're in game(?)
My guess is bc it's sponsored/faster ssd/storage API is there they were able to do that transition only effect. Xbox def shouldn't be 5+ times slower, but they probably aren't using the optimal APIs/whatever for Series. Either way 8 seconds is still pretty good.
Where did you make up this Stat? The up to 18 percent. Not even John and Richard stated this.
thicc_girls_are_teh_best
Member
I wonder why this is the "most important thing"
...The load times aren't the end of the world tbh; I'm thinking Capcom aren't leveraging DirectStorage API (let alone SFS) on the Series platforms here, but they might be tapping into Sony's SSD I/O stack more directly. Considering the marketing partnership, I would be surprised if Sony did not provide them the assistance there as needed.
MasterCornholio
Member
Well considering that both versions are the same the amount of data is probably similar. It's pretty impressive that the PS5 manages to load it that quickly. But I'm also wondering if they could have done a better job with the I/O on the XSX.
Null Persp
Member
Better performance with RT on Series X during heavy sequences, very fast loading time on PS5, solid performance on both.
summary:
summary:
Mr Moose
Member
Most important thing in this new comparison, the last one didn't show it, this one did, we already knew how it runs.I wonder why this is the "most important thing"
The load times aren't the end of the world tbh; I'm thinking Capcom aren't leveraging DirectStorage API (let alone SFS) on the Series platforms here, but they might be tapping into Sony's SSD I/O stack more directly. Considering the marketing partnership, I would be surprised if Sony did not provide them the assistance there as needed.
DF says is 10% is that wrong and is 15%? Just asking. Haven't seen the video.
ChuckeRearmed
Member
I wonder what contributes to longer loading times on Xbox Series as on Playstation it did not even show the image.
Ass of Can Whooping
Member
Loading speed 5x faster on PS5
MasterCornholio
Member
Better performance with RT on Series X during heavy sequences, very fast loading time on PS5, solid performance on both.
summary:
Each systems strength is being taken advantage of in this game. That's something that I always like to see. It's solid on both.
MasterCornholio
Member
Well in theory the PS5s I/O has more throughput. That definitely helps.
assurdum
Banned
Series X doesn't goes to 50 FPS as lowest anyway
Last edited:
Zathalus
Member
It's literally in the video?
58 FPS vs 49 FPS.
Note the "up to", it's not always that far ahead.
assurdum
Banned
On ps5 too. What's exactly the point?
Last edited:
skit_data
Member
Idk wether its ”the most important thing” to most people but it is quite a remarkable difference in terms of percentage compared to each other. So far many games have exhibited quite small or sometimes pretty much equal loading times in multiplats.I wonder why this is the "most important thing"
The load times aren't the end of the world tbh; I'm thinking Capcom aren't leveraging DirectStorage API (let alone SFS) on the Series platforms here, but they might be tapping into Sony's SSD I/O stack more directly. Considering the marketing partnership, I would be surprised if Sony did not provide them the assistance there as needed.
It might be one of the most important new things this comparison brings to the table, since we haven’t seen a difference this big between the two in a next gen title afaik, just like the Hitman 3 comparison brought quite a big difference between the two in terms of res and shadow settings.
