I know but if you disable crossplay game makes you play with ai because there's not enough people on ps5 to fill a 128 player lobby. I won't pay 70 euros to play with bots. Apex does it well, COD Vanguard apparently does it well. Battlefield should do it too.
Implementing balanced aim assist for consoles.What do they do well?
Absolutely.
Pre-ordered the gold edition yesterday. Couldn't pass at 67€ for that on PC
I've played about an hour of this bug ridden glitchfest this morning at a friends house. My time is more valueable than what it offers. Yes, I take a game of this quality as an insult. Plenty of better alternatives out there. If you're fine with this level of quality, good for you., but I see nothing offensive about this offering.
I've played about an hour of this bug ridden glitchfest this morning at a friends house. My time is more valueable than what it offers. Yes, I take a game of this quality as an insult. Plenty of better alternatives out there. If you're fine with this level of quality, good for you.
Yet if the did WWI again, someone would just say "this feels like BF1 DLC"
Shit, someone could just argue with BFV "oh this feels like BF1 DLC" etc
You are not going to please everyone. Some like the modern/futuristic stuff, some like the old WWI/WWII stuff. I like BF1 and I can't even fucking argue that they had a lot of "new" going on in that game, I like it cause it focused on a lot of the classic concepts in the first place, I'd argue with the whole tornado thing, robot dogs, largest map in BF history and increased player count, BF2042 does more new then the last few BF titles, you just want to ignore facts on this man...
I don't even know how anyone sees BF1 as "feeling of something new" based on a old war and based on BF1 more so continuing BF core concepts vs some revolutionary new idea or something. I like all the BF titles, but your comment sound forced as fuck, like you are trying your best to pretend some brand new things happened in BF1, but zero new anything is happening in BF2042.
Basically we got 128 players before as that isn't "new" to BF
We got robot dogs before
We got grappling hooks before
and we got tornados that alter the actual physical map before as nothing like that is "new" apparently? Are you 100% sure about that?
I like certain BF's more then others too, what I don't do is spread BS about a game and make shit up like the new game offers nothing new compared to xyz. Theses are some of the most changes we've seen in BF in a whole generation, nothing done in BF4, BF1 or BFV even comes close to what they are attempting in this game and something tells me when a sequel rolls out like BF Vietnam or something, we'll get the same shit like "doesn't even come close to that feeling of something new BF 2042 created" lol
This might be true but EA should know better…You can believe it’s a “beta” to fit your own rationale, but it is actually a beta, warts and all. It is a months old version, missing many features. This doesn’t indicate anything other than that. You can see many of the missing features in the trailers intended for the launch version if you want. Yet, that doesn’t guarantee a great game, I realize, but there seems to be a lot of folks rushing to judgement on a beta, not a demo, hence the disclaimer upon launching the file - and that seems to speak more about the players state than the beta’s.
I remember there being much more destruction in previous batllefields no?
The other BF titles didn't have tornados in em that could kill you.... so...
Yes they'd say that, but both of us know that the state of the game won't really change till launch because "beta" has become a glorified "demo" for companies like EA. They're known for releasing unfinished crap. It's not like this would be the first time. Not even for a bf game.Its a beta......
I also see the quality of it reflects that its a beta... soooooo
Got it on VoiduWhere u bought it?
3? counting this....we're looking at 5 games in a row.The beta on the PS5 is in a really bad state. Flickering, and screen shaking is constant. You also have random glitches in the PC version which made just trying to play the game a chore.
But the worst problem with the game is how it doesnt feel like a 128 player game. Conquest as a mode and the map design is atrocious. The gunfights around the flags are so poor, I am shocked any work was put into them. There are no lanes. No room to room fights. No trenches. No feel of advancing. It's like they just slapped together a bunch of flags and called it a day. I would expect this from PubG devs or those new PC focused studios making military sims. What a huge downgrade from BF1.
Lastly, the specialist system makes no sense. No one wants to play together. They all look like. I dont understand how a team with thousands of employees, five different studios helping them out were able to create only 4 characters in three years. Squads in MAG were 8 people large. Why cant we have squads that big on next gen consoles and PC? Everyone could revive each other with ranged med kits on ANY class. Dying never felt like a waste of time.
DICE needs to just quit making video games. This isnt on the big bad EA. This is three games in a row they have completely fucked up due to their own incompetence. Everything they learned in BF1 is gone. EA gave them five studios, and this is what they produce?