Name one. One game from a digital storefront that's "lost forever". A delisted game is not the same a "lost" game.You've got it backwards. So long as there is DRM, online authentication requirements, Steam is not future-proof. Physical media is, as long as you have the hardware to run it. Furthermore, digital games vanish from storefronts all the time and are lost forever, until they're republished.
Name one. One game from a digital storefront that's "lost forever". A delisted game is not the same a "lost" game.
Where did that figure come from? $18 a month I mean.Probably locked behind PS+, Sony is copying Nintendo here.. w/ a different pricing strategy. Hoping the few diehards who care about playing PS1 games are willing to fork over $18 a month lol
O, you mean another game you can play on PC via emulation? I meant a game you CAN'T play. And even though you tried to pull a gotcha and failed, you were specifically talking about PC. So...double fail? GG.Noby Noby Boy. PSN exclusive. GG.
O, you mean another game you can play on PC via emulation? I meant a game you CAN'T play. And even though you tried to pull a gotcha and failed, you were specifically talking about PC. So...double fail? GG.
I'd argue, that if a company cared about letting you play your game, they'd not force some to resort to piracy. Even that said, how does playing a game you bought 13 years ago on modern hardware support a developer if you can no longer buy said game on a storefront? And even then, emulation does not equal piracy. I emulate Breath of the Wild on PC and bought two copies, one for my Wii U and one for my Switch. But by all means, equivocate it however you want.If people cared about piracy and not actually supporting the developers, they wouldn't buy these games to begin with.
Only the top tier PS plan at $18 US/mth gets access to Sony's old games. The basic and mid tier dont.Where did that figure come from? $18 a month I mean.
I'd argue, that if a company cared about letting you play your game, they'd not force some to resort to piracy. Even that said, how does playing a game you bought 13 years ago on modern hardware support a developer if you can no longer buy said game on a storefront? And even then, emulation does not equal piracy. I emulate Breath of the Wild on PC and bought two copies, one for my Wii U and one for my Switch. But by all means, equivocate it however you want.
I don't think any of the PS3 store purchases could transfer to the PS4 so you didn't hurt yourself too bad by making a 2nd PSN account.I'm such a fanny because when I got a PS4 I forgot I even had the PSN account from my PS3 (I dont play online and never really bought anything digitally for the PS3) and just made a new one, so lost access to my few PSN classics.
I could do two accounts on the PS5 but if I was going to replay MGS 1 I'd just emulate them anyway.
If you can't buy the game...Like at all. Why do you care about supporting the developers of said game and bemoan the issue of emulation? It's like a "won't someone think about the billion dollar company?" situation. If they don't care enough to sell you the game, one that's delisted, why would you have qualms about emulating said game that you already own? It's makes no sense to me.You asked me to mention a game delisted that's lost forever. I mention Noby Noby Boy and you state you can pirate it. I'm not looking to derail this thread, but emulating a delisted game is piracy if you do not own it, which is the point that you were obviously making, otherwise you would've suggested to emulate our entire PS3 digital libraries to overcome the issue to begin with. Emulation in general is questionable, very few people that emulate abstain from emulating games they don't own. The discussion here is that these digital storefront, specially Sony in this case, care little about honouring your digital purchases, in a way that compliments game preservation.
You've got it backwards. So long as there is DRM, online authentication requirements, Steam is not future-proof. Physical media is, as long as you have the hardware to run it. Furthermore, digital games vanish from storefronts all the time and are lost forever, until they're republished.
PS+ Premium is the only tier that contains the old games. It is $17.99 a month. (you can also pay $120 a year, but either way that's a ton of money to access old games lol)Where did that figure come from? $18 a month I mean.
If you can't buy the game...Like at all. Why do you care about supporting the developers of said game and bemoan the issue of emulation? It's like a "won't someone think about the billion dollar company?" situation. If they don't care enough to sell you the game, one that's delisted, why would you have qualms about emulating said game that you already own? It's makes no sense to me.
When people like me said, backwards compatibility should be a standard, we'd get so much push back from people, "I don't want to play old games, It's a useless feature, etc..." and then we get threads like this. If BC was a standard, it wouldn't be an issue. And until these billion dollar companies get their shit together and offer it or get pushback from their communities, you just have to take what they give you. OR you can take it in your own hands and do whatever the hell you want with the games you bought.
If you can't buy the game...Like at all. Why do you care about supporting the developers of said game and bemoan the issue of emulation?
When have they ever not?I dont see how Sony will honour past purchases as free BC upgrades.
It doesn’t actually say exactly that. It says that 340 are included in the tier. While I totally think you are right, I’m choosing to believe it might be different… but it probably won’t sadlyOnly the top tier PS plan at $18 US/mth gets access to Sony's old games. The basic and mid tier dont.
UPDATE: All-new PlayStation Plus launches in June with 700+ games and more value than ever
PlayStation Plus and PlayStation Now come together; players can choose from three flexible options.blog.playstation.com
Like... we're honestly going to take the most expensive way of accessing that content and run with it?Only the top tier PS plan at $18 US/mth gets access to Sony's old games. The basic and mid tier dont.
UPDATE: All-new PlayStation Plus launches in June with 700+ games and more value than ever
PlayStation Plus and PlayStation Now come together; players can choose from three flexible options.blog.playstation.com
Exactly, but that's where I was driving at. The normal customer is paying $10 a month really if they are interested in that content. No one would pay month after month and keep renewing really...PS+ Premium is the only tier that contains the old games. It is $17.99 a month. (you can also pay $120 a year, but either way that's a ton of money to access old games lol)
Exactly, but that's where I was driving at.
It does on pc and Xbox to a certain extent. Not fully though.Does buying a game on one platform entitle you to be able to play that game on all future platforms??
Do companies sell universal copies of games??
If you never bought anything digitally, how did you get the few PSN classics you lost?I'm such a fanny because when I got a PS4 I forgot I even had the PSN account from my PS3 (I dont play online and never really bought anything digitally for the PS3) and just made a new one, so lost access to my few PSN classics.
I could do two accounts on the PS5 but if I was going to replay MGS 1 I'd just emulate them anyway.
There were PSN games that you could re-download on the PS4 (if a PS4 version existed).I don't think any of the PS3 store purchases could transfer to the PS4 so you didn't hurt yourself too bad by making a 2nd PSN account.
Unless I'm wrong... If that's the case, then consider me a fanny too, lol.
"never really" essentially means "rarely" lolIf you never bought anything digitally, how did. you get the few PSN classics you lost?
There was PSN games that you re-download on the PS4 (if a PS4 version existed).
I figured as much but I wanted to be absolutely sure. lol"never really" essentially means "rarely" lol
This is how you set yourself for disappointment and future ranting because things didn't go accordingly to your assumptions.Retail no, but the digital ones I think will be available to be purchased separatedly in the PS4 & PS5 stores in addition to be included in the sub. For the digital PSP & PS1 games that were available on PSP, Vita and PS3, all of them were crossbuy between PSP, Vita and PS3. So I assume now will be crossbuy between PSP, Vita, PS3, PS4 and PS5.
I assume that in the future they'd be able to sell them also on PC, mobile and future PS consoles.
Microsoft didn’t force Sony to do the way they will do. You can still buy any game on GamePass, including OG Xbox and 360.You wanted subscription services and now we’re getting them. MS forced Sonys hand to do this nonsense by paywalling the classic games. If they give you the ability to pay for then individually I will honestly be surprised.
My backlog of games is ridiculous that I don’t even need to worry about this until well after the new tiers launch. Sure will be interesting though but you can bet Sony are going to milk us dry.