• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

[NX Gamer] AC: Valhalla - XsX vs PS5 - The first REAL head to head battle.

Knitted Knight

Knitted Knight

Banned
MrS said:
The real winner is the one who skips this game.
Click to expand...

Yeah kinda not surprised to see this bugfest not getting destroyed by the mainstream reviewers but the likes of Day's Gone got the hammer for bugs. You even got disappearing characters in this crap....

Can you imagine a Sony exclusive shipping like that with those type of bugs. We would never hear the end of it.
 
Last edited:
sircaw

sircaw

Banned
ethomaz said:
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

Y90iMZl.png


It is fake from ERA! :p
Credits to Flappy Pannus.
Click to expand...

i just chocked on a piece of toast. fuck you dammit. "lollipop_disappointed:
 
assurdum

assurdum

Banned
VFXVeteran said:
I can run Valhalla at 4k/60FPS ultra settings on my 3090 but it will dip below frequently. But how can you assess the graphics engine as being badly optimized when it's portable for multiple platforms and is doing a SHIT ton of game features? Where are your qualifications to make such a claim? Just because a game can't hit a constant target doesn't mean it's badly optimized. Some of these games are over ambitious in what they do and unless we know specifically what's unoptimized in their engine to make their games run like they do, we really should shut up about it - no offense.
Click to expand...
VFXVeteran said:
Whoever the 'loser' is, don't go crying about it's a 3rd party title and therefore the developers don't know how to optimize.. :messenger_tears_of_joy:
Click to expand...
Isn't it a bit contradictory?
 
Sejanus

Sejanus

Member
GHG said:
Can confirm. While previous AC/Ubisoft games are guilty of being poorly optimised, this isn't one of them.

The game looks far better than Odyssey while running better. The settings do what you expect them to do and there is a lot of performance that can be clawed back by turning certain things down or off.

People love to throw around the word "unoptimised" without knowing what they are even talking about. Unless they can specifically point out what exactly is unoptimised it's not even worth a discussion.
Click to expand...
Don't you know every one is developer, because they vomit words like frames caches geometries textures.
 
A

azertydu91

Hard to Kill
Xaero Gravity said:
It's a nice way of saying autism. Console warriors are definitely on the spectrum.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't consider that as autism, maybe more of an extreme validation bias.I feel like some people define themselves with their purchase, so someone not liking what supposedly defined them is perceived as an attack.
Because instead of understand I don't like X product, they understand I don't like you through X product.
And it is part of human nature to defend yourself under perceived attack, which is where lies the problem.
And the vicious circle can continue if someone just expressed an opinion then got attacked for basically nothing so he feels the need to defend himself and it goes on and on.
 
Knitted Knight

Knitted Knight

Banned
omonikrim said:
I would say if ps5 version will be 30 fps I would be extremely pissed off especially when they claimed 60 FPS. The hell is that shit.
Click to expand...

Ubisoft? Miles Morales can load from cold boot at 4.40 secs, save state to gameplay, at 1.32 secs. A total of about 6 secs for an open world game. 4k/30 RT, dynamic 4k/60...

Ubisoft's crap takes 50 secs or more to load on PS5.

It's what it's.
 
Last edited:
J_Gamer.exe

J_Gamer.exe

Member
Holy shit at the differences... PS5 is miles ahead there and look at the resolution, shit back comes xbox here.... neck and neck now, tearing, frame rate drops, stalls, this has the lot. Omg PS5 uses its new feature hidden under that big chassis, its a robotic arm which literally reaches over and turns off the xbox, I tip my hat to you Sony. Well played old bean. Years spent developing that...

OK enough of that, anyone actually watching this damn thing yet? Damn youtube 👎
 
J_Gamer.exe

J_Gamer.exe

Member
J_Gamer.exe said:
Holy shit at the differences... PS5 is miles ahead there and look at the resolution, shit back comes xbox here.... neck and neck now, tearing, frame rate drops, stalls, this has the lot. Omg PS5 uses its new feature hidden under that big chassis, its a robotic arm which literally reaches over and turns off the xbox, I tip my hat to you Sony. Well played old bean. Years spent developing that...

OK enough of that, anyone actually watching this damn thing yet? Damn youtube 👎
Click to expand...

Forgot to mention thats the Robot Dna 3 feature in use there or Rdna 3 for short.... 😁
 
Stuart360

Stuart360

Member
sircaw said:
All we got to do is, not matter what happens, xbox does not win in a comparison video by more than 18% otherwise Stuart360 Stuart360 will blow up in an explosion of spunk. "lollipop_disappointed:


Just looking out for you Stuart.
Click to expand...
Got it.
I actually said i'd already pick the PS5 version of Valhalla due to the XSX seemingly having more tearing, in that other comparison thread. Tearing is a big no no for me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

[IGN / NXGamer]: Star Wars: Jedi Survivor PS5 vs Xbox Series X|S Patch 7 Performance Review
3
4K
adamsapple replied
Digital Foundry: The Outer Worlds: Spacer's Choice Edition - PS5 vs Xbox Series X/S Tech Review, Performance Tested
Analysis Review Hardware 2
79
9K
winjer replied
[NxGamer] Spider-Man Remastered PC vs PS5 vs Steam Deck vs PS4 vs 750Ti - Technical Review & Comparison
5 6 7 8 9
404
36K
01011001 replied
DF: Grand Theft Auto 5 - PlayStation 5 vs Xbox Series X - Graphics/Performance/Features Tested
2 3
139
9K
Werewolfgrandma replied
[DF] Assetto Corsa Competizione Upgraded For PS5 and Xbox Series X/S - Full Analysis
2 3 4 5
204
14K
Neo_game replied
Top Bottom