• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

[NX Gamer] AC: Valhalla - XsX vs PS5 - The first REAL head to head battle.

We need to know about those texture detail differences - if any.
Draw distance differences - if any.
Pop-in differences - if any.

Next-gen brings a lot of new to the table in terms of these face-offs. The first DF face-off was bland and boring.
 
Last edited:
The only guy I saw saying that was due the fault HDMI cable.
was that persons name @Riky by chance?


I luv ya Ricky, if that was x-fighter damn he would of been salty.


This person:


But it appears he had a faulty HDMI cable so the PS5 version may very well run better.
 
Last edited:

Nikana

Go Go Neo Rangers!
NXGamer NXGamer like

giphy.gif
 

Boss Man

Member
Do Ubisoft games typically have much of a performance boost on the more powerful console or do they typically go for parity?
 

sircaw

Banned
I guess it was this guy.



But he corrected himself.


do HDMI cable break that often, that's kinda strange.
 

ethomaz

Banned
This person:

Yeap he fixed it.


Smooth now on PS5.

do HDMI cable break that often, that's kinda strange.
I found stranger too but who knows.
 
Last edited:

ethomaz

Banned
just a little update.

The video in the OP gone wrong in processing so it will never show anything.
The new video was uploaded but it is private yet.

It will take at least a hour to process again.
 
I'm going to go with all the rumours about the PS5 having far better dev tools and being further along than the XSX and say, PS5 more stable Frame rate, resolution similar.
 

assurdum

Banned
Whoever the 'loser' is, don't go crying about it's a 3rd party title and therefore the developers don't know how to optimize.. :messenger_tears_of_joy:
So
3rd party doesn't count anymore as graphic benchmark
developer don't know how to optimise game at the start of the generation
Seems we are finally passed in the refuse phase. That's was fast. How the things can change in few days.
 
Last edited:

sircaw

Banned
And NXGamer NXGamer when are you doing the bugsnax performance video.

What kind of gamer are you, real men play bugsnax, stop wasting time on these crappy comparisons with games no one plays, what's next some crappy demon souls game. sigh "lollipop_disappointed:

Your the best.

 

Greeno

Member
Do Ubisoft games typically have much of a performance boost on the more powerful console or do they typically go for parity?
Ubisoft games are usually optimized badly. I don't think they try to create parity between hardwares but they end up with parity nontheless. The 3080 isn't able to run Valhalla at 4K 60FPS ultra settings (where ultra settings don't look that much different from high and medium settings).
 

VFXVeteran

Banned
Ubisoft games are usually optimized badly. I don't think they try to create parity between hardwares but they end up with parity nontheless. The 3080 isn't able to run Valhalla at 4K 60FPS ultra settings (where ultra settings don't look that much different from high and medium settings).

I can run Valhalla at 4k/60FPS ultra settings on my 3090 but it will dip below frequently. But how can you assess the graphics engine as being badly optimized when it's portable for multiple platforms and is doing a SHIT ton of game features? Where are your qualifications to make such a claim? Just because a game can't hit a constant target doesn't mean it's badly optimized. Some of these games are over ambitious in what they do and unless we know specifically what's unoptimized in their engine to make their games run like they do, we really should shut up about it - no offense.
 
Last edited:

ethomaz

Banned
Excuse my ignorance but what is a tism ?
Google is telling it is clenching a jaw which doesn't really make sense.Is that a saying ?
Maybe that help...

fanboyism, xboxism, playstationism, etc.

It is added to make a collective outlook.
 
Last edited:

Greeno

Member
I can run Valhalla at 4k/60FPS ultra settings on my 3090 but it will dip below frequently. But how can you assess the graphics engine as being badly optimized when it's portable for multiple platforms and is doing a SHIT ton of game features? Where are your qualifications to make such a claim?
What are you on about? Where did I say the graphics engine is badly optimized? I'm simply saying what I've seen. The game doesn't run 4K 60fps Ultra that well on the 3080. It also doesn't have that big of a visual improvement from high settings to ultra settings. Next time, please don't act rude.
 

GHG

Member
I can run Valhalla at 4k/60FPS ultra settings on my 3090 but it will dip below frequently. But how can you assess the graphics engine as being badly optimized when it's portable for multiple platforms and is doing a SHIT ton of game features? Where are your qualifications to make such a claim? Just because a game can't hit a constant target doesn't mean it's badly optimized. Some of these games are over ambitious in what they do and unless we know specifically what's unoptimized in their engine to make their games run like they do, we really should shut up about it - no offense.

Can confirm. While previous AC/Ubisoft games are guilty of being poorly optimised, this isn't one of them.

The game looks far better than Odyssey while running better. The settings do what you expect them to do and there is a lot of performance that can be clawed back by turning certain things down or off.

People love to throw around the word "unoptimised" without knowing what they are even talking about. Unless they can specifically point out what exactly is unoptimised it's not even worth a discussion.
 
Top Bottom