• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Possible Megaton Incoming. New Rumor surround Microsoft series S

93xfan

Banned
MS holding the entire generation back with their shitty 4TF machine.

I'm conflicted in wanting Xbox to fail, on one hand theyre gotta be a competitor to light a fire under Sony's ass, on the other hand I hate to see multiplatform devs being forced to design their games around such a weak hardware

The GPU is the most scalable thing in a console. I doubt this GPU will be lower spec than the minimum spec requirements needed for PC anyway.
 

Mod of War

Ω
Staff Member
tenor.gif
 

93xfan

Banned
199 one s
299 one x
399 series s
499 series x

this seems like the most likely scenario to me

also explains the 200 dollar "rumors"

Do you honestly believe there will only be a 20% difference in price between the Series S and the Series X?

That’s almost as bad as people who believe next gen will cost $600-$700 USD.
 
Why were the developers complaining about it?

Its more work! And I've only seen like...a couple of devs complaining. And I've seen devs mention the obvious "it's called scaleing" with games just running at lower resolutions,framerate, and less bells n whistles.

Whats next?
 
Last edited:

Punished Miku

Gold Member
New rumors from some insiders and reported by some reliable youtubers I do not wish to advertise here about the Price of Series S.

Rumors suggesting the base model could sell for a super aggressive price at $399 and the Lockhart model for a crazy $200.

The lockhart is said to have a more powerful gpu than the One X but all digital and not on the level of a Series S.

Microsoft has the pockets to do something crazy like this if they choose too. If a person can play the new Halo for $200 with a lower resolution, holy shit that's impossible to beat. Stay tuned!

Here is one of the fellows I am talking about, and respect him.


This would be the silver bullet.

They need to be your 3rd console. You will still get PS5. You will still have switch. Or if xbox is cheap and has gamepads you'll get it too.
 

Bolivar687

Banned
They said the same thing last time - Microsoft was supposed to overperform and underprice the PS4 with Xbox One because of the imaginary Microsoft war chest.

The Xbox One X retails right now for $400 - $500. I honestly can't believe I'm reading people in this thread saying they really expect a $200 Lockhart. I don't know how anyone would think Game Pass is the subsidized console's lifeline when it cuts into their game sales.

I expect the Series S pricing to surprise us but this would be suicidal.
 
If they really don't care about selling hardware, why don't they publish their games on Playstation platforms ?

Why make new consoles if you don't care about making money from it ?

If they only want to sell software and services, why not publish on Playstation consoles ?

I would buy Gears of war 6 on Playstation 5.
Because they care about services, because selling Xboxes are then selling gateways to their services, because you’re assuming Sony would want or let them sell their games/services on PS. The “why don’t they sell their games on PlayStation” argument makes no sense and implies it’s entirely up to MS where and for how much they sell their games and services for. It ain’t that black and white chief.
 
So this is just a YouTube version of the following rumour that's already been discussed to death?

 

tryDEATH

Member
lol wtf, people really have the face to say things like "MS has the pockets to do something crazy like this."

Yes, it's crazy and precisely because MS doesn't go around burning money that they have the pockets in the first place. Wake up, that's not how business work for a trillion dollar company or for any successful business.

Really this is your argument, so we just going to ignore their past failures in difference sectors to gain market share. Zune/Zune Pass, Windows Phone, Multiple Windows Tablets, Bing, and many other products cost the company billions, but that never stoped them from investing and trying to gain more and more market share in all sort of sector.

The Xbox is no different it is a fight for the living room and has been since the Xbox One launch, only now they actually know where the future lies and everyone is ready for it. I mean they already have the technology in Xcloud and their primary competitor is using their hardware/software. This is a sure bet for MS to go in and recuperate a huge chunk of market share that they lost this generation as this will be the last chance to lock in customers into their eco-system.
 

Shin

Banned
I hate to see multiplatform devs being forced to design their games
Nonsense, they choose to, just like they Japanese publishers choose to release most of their games on PS only.
When they could be making more money on Xbox and perhaps PC as well, they will do what makes most sense to them financially.
It doesn't mean a game has to suffer and this way of thinking has been making the rounds for a while, yet the concept isn't new nor has held back hardware/games in the decades it has been done.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
If you use ReviewTechUSA as any kind of source, you’ll fall for anything... just like he does and then puts out a video later saying he was wrong, often.

The majority of his videos are his opinionated clickbait off of other people’s information/rumors/etc.

His mini console unboxing videos are decent all things considered.
 
Last edited:

carlosrox

Banned
Who or what is Series S?

Did this rumor exist before or is this new?

How many fucking code names and system names are MS gonna tack on, Jesus. I don't even know what's what anymore.
 

iJudged

Banned
$400/$200 seems unbelievable.

But hey.... MS does make about $30 billion profit per year!

If they subsidize an extra $100 per unit above and beyond a $500/$300 price:

1 million sales = $100 million extra costs
10 million sales = $1 billion extra costs
50 million sales = $5 billion extra costs
100 million sales = $10 billion extra costs

Spread those costs over 6-7 years of a generation, and it's pennies per share annualy.
Not how shit works lol
 

sinnergy

Member
Who or what is Series S?

Did this rumor exist before or is this new?

How many fucking code names and system names are MS gonna tack on, Jesus. I don't even know what's what anymore.
That’s why they are codenames, for internal use , they can use as much as they like.
 
Last edited:

SaucyJack

Member
New rumors from some insiders and reported by some reliable youtubers I do not wish to advertise here about the Price of Series S.

Rumors suggesting the base model could sell for a super aggressive price at $399 and the Lockhart model for a crazy $200.

The lockhart is said to have a more powerful gpu than the One X but all digital and not on the level of a Series S.

Microsoft has the pockets to do something crazy like this if they choose too. If a person can play the new Halo for $200 with a lower resolution, holy shit that's impossible to beat. Stay tuned!

Here is one of the fellows I am talking about, and respect him.



Sounds like a fanboy wet dream.
 

TTOOLL

Member
Really this is your argument, so we just going to ignore their past failures in difference sectors to gain market share. Zune/Zune Pass, Windows Phone, Multiple Windows Tablets, Bing, and many other products cost the company billions, but that never stoped them from investing and trying to gain more and more market share in all sort of sector.

The Xbox is no different it is a fight for the living room and has been since the Xbox One launch, only now they actually know where the future lies and everyone is ready for it. I mean they already have the technology in Xcloud and their primary competitor is using their hardware/software. This is a sure bet for MS to go in and recuperate a huge chunk of market share that they lost this generation as this will be the last chance to lock in customers into their eco-system.


And all the products you mentioned and don't make them money are DEAD. XBOX is not a first gen device, the OG XBOX was. XBOX nowadays is a successful and profitable brand. The day it isn't anymore MS will just kill it just like all the failures you mentioned.
 

kuncol02

Banned
I dont see the digital version selling less then 500.

Ok lets say ssd is the same so maybe they throw something in to price it equal.
Its either this or we are looking at 600 for the disc version.
I could see Sony subsidizing only disc less version of PS5 to push people to digital only nightmare future.

The Xbox One X retails right now for $400 - $500
I bought mine for ~320$ (including 23% sales tax) bundled with all Gears games and new Modern Warfare (literally on its launch day).
 

acm2000

Member
pretty sure the series s will be to replace the one and one x on the market while playing the next gen games at current gen levels of detail, and thus all current one models will be replaced by it.

With all the back end stuff MS has been working on it could work well, its been working for PCs since day 0 and if it works out would be a huge step in making next gen affordable for all, not everyone cares about 4k60 but rather than want the new experiences and stories that come with all the sequels and the rare new ip that we get these days.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 775630

Unconfirmed Member
I don't know how anyone would think Game Pass is the subsidized console's lifeline when it cuts into their game sales.
In case of PS4, the average number of games bought in the whole generation was 10.7. (1.18 billion games sold on 110 million users). Let's say the average game price would be $45, because a lot of people buy them in sales and not at full price. This results in $480 per user spend on games.

Let's say Microsoft stops selling games and only does Game Pass. Microsoft Game Pass is $10 per month. So to match that they need to be able to sell on average 4 years of Game Pass next-gen to each user. $480 / 10 (price GP) / 12 (months) => 4 years, of the 7 years (normal generation span).

It might be difficult to get to that number, but then again it's not impossible. Let's not forget that for each game they actually sell the need for Game Pass to get break-even goes down too. And maybe that average $45 is even wrong, and is lower or higher.
 

Rolla

Banned
They should try selling one SKU first.... I mean they tried having loads of SKU's last gen.... they sell them here for less than 200 all the time. It just doesn't matter.

FACTS! They're planning on selling a less powerful console (lockheart) in comparison to the PS5 and they think that's going to help?!

tenor.gif
 

sircaw

Banned
At 200 hundred bucks give it to me,

I will grab it after i collect my new Ferrari from the dealers for 5k
 

UnNamed

Banned
Series X at 499€ is a good price considering the hardware inside. Pricing it at 399€ would means MS have other plans for XBOX besides selling just consoles and games. It is simply impossible with the current market.
 

Roronoa Zoro

Gold Member
No no no please don't be real. Next gen games already look like small leap as it is.

Ah fuck it's gonna be real isn't it. It's gonna sell gangbusters isn't it.
Honestly they should just rebrand the X1S as the series X and tell people it's next gen. Then they can say they have the cheapest next gen console for sure and apparently scalable engines means there's no drawbacks
 

Roronoa Zoro

Gold Member
Very unlikely.
$549-499 and $299-249 is more likely.
If it's half the series X I was thinking that must mean series X is $599. What's the point of having the cheaper alternative if youre gonna price gouge yourself on the high end one? Just say you're cheapest from the cheap one
 
So the cheaper model will sell more than the deluxe model everyones raving about being the “most powerful“ console ever made? I’ll be laughing my ass off if that turns out to be true.
Possibly. Depends on the price of XSX. Usually its the hardcore that are first in line to buy next gen premium consoles. So I expect both will sell very well unless XSX is 600 bucks or something, which is highly unlikely.
 

DESTROYA

Member
Possibly. Depends on the price of XSX. Usually its the hardcore that are first in line to buy next gen premium consoles. So I expect both will sell very well unless XSX is 600 bucks or something, which is highly unlikely.
Well don’t you think that’s pretty disingenuous if your user base is mostly made up of a cheaper less powerful console ?
What makes you so sure the next gen XsX won’t cost $600? Stuff you heard on the internet.
 
Last edited:

REE Machine

Banned
My theory like many have touched on in this thread.

Their bread and butter is going to be Game Pass. It is in their best interest to get the new Xbox in as many hands as possible. You give the hardware away pretty cheap then you get the money from the subscription. The printer business has been doing this for years. You can buy a decent desktop printer for $35 but when it's time to replace the ink, it's time to pay the piper. The ink is often times more expensive than the machine.
Your theory already sucks because they arent giving you a reason to get s new xbox and phil said you dont have to buy one
 
It is possible MS will go super aggressive like this. It makes more sense now than ever as they have pivoted away from the 360/XB1 model.

This will at least be real competition for PS5, which I'm guessing will be at least $50 more expensive because of the SSD and premium cooling/design.
 
Top Bottom