Gamernyc78
Banned
Glad you all are enjoying bright HDR, doesn't address the bad animation, flat lighting and dull textures throughout the world though.
If you say so

Last edited:
Glad you all are enjoying bright HDR, doesn't address the bad animation, flat lighting and dull textures throughout the world though.
Game has to take cuts from somewhere to get all that foliage swaying and the likes. My issue is the oversaturation of the colors. It doesn't look realistic.
I'm still getting the game and it does look like a nice, fun AC game set in Japan
So you haven't played the game either?I see nothing wrong with what he said. It has an 83 meta score. Its a solid title. But criticizing him for not thinking it's "special"? Gameplay is very similar to AC with pretty basic, repetitive side quests. AI is piss poor. Stealth is piss poor. However, the world, art, combat is good.
Does my TV suck or something then? I mean I got a Samsung KS8000. What am I missing?Yep; this game is a great showpiece for the TCL Series' HDR capabilities. While TLoU Remastered and TLoU II's HDR look amazing on the R617 in terms of chromatic contrast, GoT's implementation of chromatic contrast is even more impressive and is coupled with the best luminous contrast that I've ever seen. I didn't know that the R617 could look this good; the highlights are super bright.
Gameplay is definitely solid which is why I honestly don't care much about the graphics and can play the game happily. It's just that the bad lighting and textures isn't "here and there" its throughout the whole game and can be quite jarring at times.
That video is in SDR. It's automatically invalid.Does my TV suck or something then? I mean I got a Samsung KS8000. What am I missing?
I'm not crazy, and I think the OP has a valid point.
I edited the post and you're making excuses. If its in SDR, both videos are in SDR. so you can still compare. Need somebody who's not biased to look at this please.That video is in SDR. It's automatically invalid.
I feel the same way with obvious lod pop in, itās crazy distracting seeing detail all draw in at the same distance.
Snow Runner is guilty of this, I love the game but seeing rocks get drawn in as you ride down the road is distracting and a little annoying if I havenāt had my medicine!
I think GoT is the perfect example of what happens when a console gen goes on too long. I hope most agree Sucker Punch squeezed all they could from the PS4 and taking into consideration the ancient hardware sacrifices must have been made.
We're not talking about SDR, however; we're talking about HDR.I edited the post and you're making excuses. If its in SDR, both videos are in SDR. so you can still compare. Need somebody who's not biased to look at this please.
Please, just watch the video. There are some obvious changes that the video points out that are clearly downgrades.We're not talking about SDR, however; we're talking about HDR.
I edited the post and you're making excuses. If its in SDR, both videos are in SDR. so you can still compare. Need somebody who's not biased to look at this please.
So you haven't played the game either?
Probably a combo of budget and SP. Looking at their games, they had a slew of high-80s SLy games during PS2.The sword gameplay is literally the only thing that keeps this game interesting to me. The rest, bar the occasional graphical wow moment, is of PS3 presentation level.
I cringe every time I see the bad NPC animations or the cinematic bar single camera angle no-movement cutscenes. Especially jarring when you had a āproperā cutscene with animations etc right before the PS3 style one.
I wonder what happened during development, would love a behind the scenes thingy by Geoff.
Well it looks better than the areas with low detailed textures and npcs than in FF7 remake.
This game has more solid graphical package than that game. Besides TLOU 2 probably had a blank check from Sony and was in development longer by a much larger team, so was RDR 2.
Itās on par with most other open world games in terms of graphics.
I think a major part of the wow factor was the art style which seems to be tons of bold colours, leaves and things like that. If this game had a more traditional action game colour palette, most people wouldn't care.People are being hard on this game, because so many reviews are gushing about HOW AMAZING IT LOOKS, when honestly, it's pretty in parts, other parts it's really fugly. The lack of arm movement in scenes where people are talking to you is offputting too.
Hug your Xbox tighter while you cry about how good this game looks, OP. Your tears will be less saltier and your heartache less painful.
That's a way to put it,I am baffled at the downgrade talk, I only see artistic differences between E3 and playing through the E3 section in the retail release. What are you all smoking, i remember folks were quick to call downgrade for Second Son when that launched too only to have them proven wrong time and again. Just stop with this silly downgrade talk on Ghost.
That youtuber breaks it down better than I can explain here. The overall product is not what we were shown 2 years ago. It approaches the E3 Presentation but to say there's no downgrade is absolute insanity to me.
So none of the game looks like this 2018 image?
![]()
The art style is great, but the game took a huge hit from (moving foliage & leafs), the animations are bad, AI is bad, etc...
It's like it was made to waw people on trailers to make a Buzz about the game and playstation so they can sell more units.
This game is a contender for best looking game this gen, whatchou talkin bout boy
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
i don't know man, you tell me:So none of the game looks like this 2018 image?
![]()
... are you ok ? i'm confused.Sure... sure, thanks for the āconcernā...
i don't man, you tell me:
... are you ok ? i'm confused.