Just because you prefer coke, that doesnt mean pepsi sucks.
Gaspode said:Someone I know from a spanish forum has done this:
Thanks to OtogiNeverDies.
Zer0 said:ppl have a lot of free time lol
Ryudo said:Ha ha, so now after stealing Marcus's face .... Solid oldie is no longer great art.
Zer0 said:mm.when i moves old snake rapes marcus so badly,what expressions marcus face have? angry,and angrier ?
Mrbob said:The Kojima love fest here has been great and fun, but I think all this gloom and doom about the X360 being underpowered is too prevelant. Here is my supporting evidence:
![]()
Look at the detail in both pictures. It is extremely close in quality. In fact, juding on picture alone I would give the edge to Gears of War. GoW is a 2006 game too.Just goes to show you that X360 is not doomed nor is it supremely underpowered compared to the PS3. The PS3 will be more powerful, but the difference won't be huge. Enjoy both! The PS3/X360 two console future is the way to go!
![]()
quadriplegicjon said:the gears of war character is using a form of polybump.. do we know if the mgs character is using something similar.. ? if it isnt.. its clearly superior.
quadriplegicjon said:the gears of war character is using a form of polybump.. do we know if the mgs character is using something similar.. ? if it isnt.. its clearly superior.
Ryudo said:I would think something along the lines of your avatar![]()
SolidSnakex said:Whatever they're using, its impressive
Bodom78 said:MGS4 had better animation because it was motion captured. I prefer the MGS theme so far bat GOW looks way better, espically the face detail.
op_ivy said:it looks the same, as in, the same graphics running the show, yeah. but obviously any time you run a cut scene, you get artistic camera angles and perfect scene placement. a while back there was a clip of gears of war and cliffy b from g4. this clip had both gameplay footage and some breif cinema clips of the game. the cinema clips of gears of war looked incredible. arguably comparable to this mgs cinema footage.
Divus Masterei said:Way better? Maybe in stills you can call it comparable, but I've just seen the high-rez vid from gearsofwar.com and you can easily tell it's not just the animation. The lighting on the characters themselves looks better in MGS4, the actual lvl of geometry on the GoW models becomes apparent when they move, when interacting with shadows and when they get close to the camera, and you can tell that most of it is just textury as it doesn't look properly 3d in that vid, outside of the face it looks like the rest of the body is low-poly and limbs are low-poly cylinders with some tacked on textures in motion, at least to me.
Anyone who sees these vids/trailers side by side will obviously notice it, you won't get away with it like with pic comparisons, and it's not just animations, framerate, Particle Effects, Polycounts, lighting, etc. Epic won't get away with using 4-5k poly bodies and tacking on Normal Maps, I've been complaining about UE3-epic models for quite a while now(ever since that engine was unveiled, prior to even knowing anything about GoW.), and I'll keep doing it till I see a vid where the characters impress me.
Excelion said:Quoted for great truth. Seems to have been ignored though. MGS4 is of a cutscene, GoW's screenshots and movies show actual gameplay. And here's a screen from the Gears of Ware Cinema on G4 you were refering to. Has incredible lighting with dust particles flying everywhere and nice animation. Every bit as impressive as anything shown for MGS4 so far.
Mrbob said:Gears of War doesn't look too bad in motion. The problems with its animation in gameplay are overstated.
Mrbob said:Gears of War doesn't look too bad in motion. The problems with its animation in gameplay are overstated.
It's only a matter of time until everything else catches up.nitewulf said:another MG game trailer blows away everything else ey? same will keep happening every generation i guess.
Divus Masterei said:Way better? Maybe in stills you can call it comparable, but I've just seen the high-rez vid from gearsofwar.com and you can easily tell it's not just the animation. The lighting on the characters themselves looks better in MGS4, the actual lvl of geometry on the GoW models becomes apparent when they move, when interacting with shadows and when they get close to the camera, and you can tell that most of it is just textury as it doesn't look properly 3d in that vid, outside of the face it looks like the rest of the body is low-poly and limbs are low-poly cylinders with some tacked on textures in motion, at least to me.
Anyone who sees these vids/trailers side by side will obviously notice it, you won't get away with it like with pic comparisons, and it's not just animations, framerate, Particle Effects, Polycounts, lighting, etc. Epic won't get away with using 4-5k poly bodies and tacking on Normal Maps, I've been complaining about UE3-epic models for quite a while now(ever since that engine was unveiled, prior to even knowing anything about GoW.), and I'll keep doing it till I see a vid where the characters impress me.
OptimusPrime said:HAAUAUAUAH well they are there...
I like fucking you people up....cos your all so damn easy. :lol
pestul said:If Konami was making MGS4 for X360.. I have no doubt it would look identical to the PS3 trailer. The animations are pretty much similiar to thier two previous games (which is awesome), and they could pull that off on much inferior hardware to the 360. It's just a great developer, who actually cares. I'm looking forward to seeing a nice Bungie teaser..
Out of interest, what exactly can't the X360 do that the PS3 can do as shown in MGS4?"So far there hasn't been a single 360 that matches MGS4 from a technical angle. I highly doubt MGS4 can be replicated perfectly on 360."
"So far there hasn't been a single 360 that matches MGS4 from a technical angle."
DCharlie said:Out of interest, what exactly can't the X360 do that the PS3 can do as shown in MGS4?
I mean, i know we haven't seen anything to match the game on the X360 so far, but does that mean as fact that the X360 can't do it?
Just wondering.
On a spec sheet basis - is there anything in that MGS4 demo that , on paper, the X360 can't do? and if so , what is it?
DCharlie said:... is there anything in that MGS4 demo that , on paper, the X360 can't do? and if so , what is it?
Vennt said:Excite the masses? *bad-da-dish*
*Runs*
DCharlie said:Out of interest, what exactly can't the X360 do that the PS3 can do as shown in MGS4?
I mean, i know we haven't seen anything to match the game on the X360 so far, but does that mean as fact that the X360 can't do it?
Just wondering.
On a spec sheet basis - is there anything in that MGS4 demo that , on paper, the X360 can't do? and if so , what is it?
RE5 is the closest so far.
bishoptl said:What the hell is going on here?
Goreomedy said:Oh SNAP!
But yeah, saying the Xbox360 will never be capable of MGS4 quality graphics is quite ignorant. The games we've seen are first generation, and hardly tap the full potential of either console.
The future is very bright for both systems. Perhaps brighter for one... but the proof will be in the puddin', baby.
Insertia said:I'm basing this purely on what I've seen of MGS4 and the games shown so far for Xbox360.
.
Insertia said:PS2 was never able to match Halo or DOA3 technically.
"I agree. I may be wrong though but I believe it's only target footage."