• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Shift Up, the first Korean developer to formalize a publishing contract directly distributed and supported by Sony

I'm doubtful it will be to be honest. They've shown two trailers at major Playstation events. I think some people are just guessing that because of the radio silence for the game this year that something is happening behind the scenes. But I think it's probably just development has taken longer than expected (it looks to be a high budget game) so they'll probably next show it when there's a release date to go alongside it. Maybe at the next State of Play or Game Awards.

Even if they decide not to censor the game, I'm still not getting a PS5

It's likely coming to PC in 1 to 3 years. Than I'll buy it. Only if it's not censored though

I'm not a fan of this current generation
 

sono

Gold Member
Sell cosmetics for this game, and Sony is sitting on a billion-dollar goldmine. 🍑

in-case-you-didnt-know-stellar-blade-is-in-development-by-v0-s7cpr1pwqwob1.jpg
I'm in
 

rofif

Can’t Git Gud
Usually, I don't comment on how ridiculous ResetEra is, since what they're going to get mad about is a foregone conclusion and they're not worth caring about in the first place.
But this really does highlight how reactionary they are and not all that much different from the sort of the people that spout "woke" every five seconds. Two sides of the same stupid coin.
But industry listens to them. Esg scores, sweet baby inc. all do everything to do well be reee crowd. Somehow these fuckers control the industry.

As if sex didn’t still anymore. I want to but a game with great assets. Sony is tragically woke recently
 

Go_Ly_Dow

Member
But industry listens to them. Esg scores, sweet baby inc. all do everything to do well be reee crowd. Somehow these fuckers control the industry.

As if sex didn’t still anymore. I want to but a game with great assets. Sony is tragically woke recently
It's a vocal minority of activists. A good example of how its a very small vocal minority is looking at Hogwarts Legacy. All discussion for the game is banned on that forum, yet it's the highest selling game of the year, during a year of some really strong game releases. So that says enough and the creators should completely ignore what that crowd (whether online or in the real world) demand from them.
 

Crayon

Member
It just sounded like you were greasing up the lane for "Sony probably didn't tell them to censor it, it was probably ShiftUp's decision". Maybe I just misread your sentence?

I mean it's going to stay the same because it's already toned down. They are making a big budget game with a major publisher now and the cheek-flappery can't be as intense as Nikke.

This:
project-eve-hyung-tae-kim.gif


Is already toned down from this:
Screenshot_20221107-150430_NIKKE-461x1024.jpg


I'm saying they probably made their decisions about what their aaa game is going to look like before they went to pitch it. What they landed on is what we've been seeing, and that's what we will get. There's no reason to think sony picked this up and has been marketing with a sexy character for two years just to do... something about her butt... in the final stretch.
 
Last edited:
I mean it's going to stay the same because it's already toned down. The are making a big budget game with a major publisher now and the cheek-flappery can't be as intense as Nikke.

This:
project-eve-hyung-tae-kim.gif


Is already toned down from this:
Screenshot_20221107-150430_NIKKE-461x1024.jpg


I'm saying they probably made their decisions about what their aaa game is going to look like when they went to pitch it. What they landed on is what we've been seeing and that's what we will get. There's no reason to think sony picked this up and has been marketing with a sexy character for two years just to do... something about her butt... in the final stretch.

Really?

Ever since Sony gave power to their western branch, they started to go down the woke route even censoring fanservice heavy third-party games from Japan.

You don't think they will censor the game?
 
Last edited:

Crayon

Member
Really?

Ever since Sony gave power to their western branch, they started to go down the woke Route even censoring fanservice heavy third-party games from Japan.

There's nooooooooo way they aren't aware that some of the appeal of the game has been the sexy character all this time. I believe their decision is made, here.

Think about it this way- what would they do to censor it? Put pants on her or shrink her butt, I guess. Sounds crazy to do something like that at this stage. Then again, crazy things happen all the time.
 
Last edited:
There's nooooooooo way they aren't aware that some of the appeal of the game is from the sexy character all this time. I believe their decision is made, here.

Think about it this way- what would they do to censor it? Put pants on her or shrink her butt, I guess. Sounds crazy to do something like that at this stage. Then again, crazy things happen all the time.

We shall see

As I said before I really don't like how Current Year Sony is like
 

rofif

Can’t Git Gud
It's a vocal minority of activists. A good example of how its a very small vocal minority is looking at Hogwarts Legacy. All discussion for the game is banned on that forum, yet it's the highest selling game of the year, during a year of some really strong game releases. So that says enough and the creators should completely ignore what that crowd (whether online or in the real world) demand from them.
Yeah but you still see everyone catering to them. Investors shit their pants thinking they can sell 10 copies less while they anger rest of us
 

MagiusNecros

Gilgamesh Fan Annoyance
Stellar Blade will probably be censored even though the only games Shift Up has made is hawt girl mobile games. If it comes to PC a couple years later it'll get uncensored via mods.

Half the time the game looks like a mobile game in action similar to Honkai Impact 3rd or Punishing Gray Raven so not expecting too much depth.

If Sony is funding it'll go down the path of Senran Kagura for sure.

It's pretty amusing they show players what they want when they announce games only to censor it later to secure a lump sum of money from these companies out of greed.
 
Stellar Blade will probably be censored even though the only games Shift Up has made is hawt girl mobile games. If it comes to PC a couple years later it'll get uncensored via mods.

Half the time the game looks like a mobile game in action similar to Honkai Impact 3rd or Punishing Gray Raven so not expecting too much depth.

If Sony is funding it'll go down the path of Senran Kagura for sure.

It's pretty amusing they show players what they want when they announce games only to censor it later to secure a lump sum of money from these companies out of greed.

I will never forgive what Sony did to Senran Kagura

Not surprised that new Senran Kagura game never came out
 
I feel like Sony is one of the driving forces on why fanservice only exists in gacha game hell these days. They cannot be trusted and shouldn't be afforded any leniency when it comes to that type of thing.

Agreed

I would have the same issue if Nintendo started to censor fanservice heavy games from Japan
 

Crayon

Member
We shall see

As I said before I really don't like how Current Year Sony is like

Depends on any changes, too. Like when blizzard changed the lingering butt-shot on tracer. Or maybe that was Micah in sfv. Or both, I don't remember. What did you think of that situation? I think it's censorship but on the most benign side.

I noticed two versions of one artwork for black desert: one had a little patch of sideboob covered up. Actually, that's similar to how peach had a dress altered to have a higher neckline in another artwork. Those arouse some kind of negative feeling in me but in proportion to how small the changes are. Those same changes might matter a lot more to someone else.

So thinking about it, I would say my expectation of no change from the presentation so far still allows for 'guidance' from Sony along the way. But that would have already happened before we ever saw it, so there is nothing to censor.

And after all, it's just a big perfect butt with some shots here and there that emphasize its glory. Nier had that.
 
Depends on any changes, too. Like when blizzard changed the lingering butt-shot on tracer. Or maybe that was Micah in sfv. Or both, I don't remember. What did you think of that situation? I think it's censorship but on the most benign side.

I noticed two versions of one artwork for black desert: one had a little patch of sideboob covered up. Actually, that's similar to how peach had a dress altered to have a higher neckline in another artwork. Those arouse some kind of negative feeling in me but in proportion to how small the changes are. Those same changes might matter a lot more to someone else.

So thinking about it, I would say my expectation of no change from the presentation so far still allows for 'guidance' from Sony along the way. But that would have already happened before we ever saw it, so there is nothing to censor.

And after all, it's just a big perfect butt with some shots here and there that emphasize its glory. Nier had that.

Even if it's benign, I would be against it

Nintendo can censor their own games. I'm fine with that as long as they don't censor 3rd Parties. That was one of issues with Xenoblade Chronicles 3 though. It seemed less fan servicey than 2. I heard they intended to make it less fanservicey from the start so not sure how I feel about that

My worry is that since NOA is getting filled up with the Blue Hairs they will start to sabotage Nintendo first Party games by saying that this woke shit sells. It's already happened with Xenoblade Chronicles 3. Didn't sell as much as 2 from what I remember.

Sex sells and there's nothing wrong with that
 
Last edited:

Crayon

Member
Even if it's benign, I would be against it

Nintendo can censor their own games. I'm fine with that as long as they don't censor 3rd Parties. That was one of issues with Xenoblade Chronicles 3 though. It seemed less fan servicey than 2. I heard they intended to make it less fanservicey from the start so not sure how I feel about that

My worry is that since NOA is getting filled up with the Blue Hairs they will start to sabotage Nintendo first Party games by saying that this woke shit sells. It's already happening with Xenoblade Chronicles 3. Didn't sell as much as 2 from what I remember.

Sex sells and there's nothing wrong with that

Sounds good. :> my bet is that this comes out like what we are expecting from the trailer. A scifi action game with a big shiny butt.
 

MagiusNecros

Gilgamesh Fan Annoyance
Even if it's benign, I would be against it

Nintendo can censor their own games. I'm fine with that as long as they don't censor 3rd Parties. That was one of issues with Xenoblade Chronicles 3 though. It seemed less fan servicey than 2. I heard they intended to make it less fanservicey from the start so not sure how I feel about that

My worry is that since NOA is getting filled up with the Blue Hairs they will start to sabotage Nintendo first Party games by saying that this woke shit sells. It's already happened with Xenoblade Chronicles 3. Didn't sell as much as 2 from what I remember.

Sex sells and there's nothing wrong with that
Xenoblade 3 had Eunie and that's all that matters. Might be a matter of taste but I enjoyed Xenoblade 3 over Xenoblade 2. Probably because of all the QoL features and the story was more intriguing then 2's. 3 was less fanservice because it probably wanted to be more serious. Out of them all I still prefer Xeno X and story wasn't it's strong suit. The World Building was.

I doubt Nintendo will allow their 1st parties to get sabotaged. Mario/Zelda/Metroid are still intact. Though I think they are getting pushed a little with the Princess Peach game a bit. That new cover art is yuck. The original cover art looked like Peach and the altered one is trying too hard to make her look like Princess Daisy.

------------------

Ahem I am cautiously optimistic that Stellar Blade will remain untouched but if it gets censored in any form I won't buy it. And only if it's on PC. A repeat of the injustice done to Senran Kagura is a auto no buy from me.
 
Xenoblade 3 had Eunie and that's all that matters. Might be a matter of taste but I enjoyed Xenoblade 3 over Xenoblade 2. Probably because of all the QoL features and the story was more intriguing then 2's. 3 was less fanservice because it probably wanted to be more serious. Out of them all I still prefer Xeno X and story wasn't it's strong suit. The World Building was.

I doubt Nintendo will allow their 1st parties to get sabotaged. Mario/Zelda/Metroid are still intact. Though I think they are getting pushed a little with the Princess Peach game a bit. That new cover art is yuck. The original cover art looked like Peach and the altered one is trying too hard to make her look like Princess Daisy.

------------------

Ahem I am cautiously optimistic that Stellar Blade will remain untouched but if it gets censored in any form I won't buy it. And only if it's on PC. A repeat of the injustice done to Senran Kagura is a auto no buy from me.

Xenoblade Chronicles 2 is my favorite due to the memorable cast, story and fanservice

Loved my Boobieblades

Fuck the reeeeing from the Blue Hairs and Retardera

As for Xenoblade Chronicles 3. Still a great game but was disappointed. I would say Future Redeemed was the way better game. Too bad that's DLC

As for Steller Blade

We shall see
 
Last edited:

Pejo

Member
Depends on any changes, too. Like when blizzard changed the lingering butt-shot on tracer. Or maybe that was Micah in sfv. Or both, I don't remember. What did you think of that situation? I think it's censorship but on the most benign side.

I noticed two versions of one artwork for black desert: one had a little patch of sideboob covered up. Actually, that's similar to how peach had a dress altered to have a higher neckline in another artwork. Those arouse some kind of negative feeling in me but in proportion to how small the changes are. Those same changes might matter a lot more to someone else.

So thinking about it, I would say my expectation of no change from the presentation so far still allows for 'guidance' from Sony along the way. But that would have already happened before we ever saw it, so there is nothing to censor.

And after all, it's just a big perfect butt with some shots here and there that emphasize its glory. Nier had that.
The blatant hypocrisy from getting uncomfortable about some ass shots, while happily promoting disgusting gore porn like MK1 in the Playstation Store is what gets me. There's lots of types of content that can cause people to get upset, but it's always the T&A, and more disproportionally the asian side T&A (where the girls are presented as attractive) that gets the axe. There is no consistency in censorship because it's all just feelings anyways, so in my opinion they should just let the devs make the game they want to make, let the age rating people do their job and rate it accordingly, and stay the fuck out of the way.

Regarding your post, I think the censorship examples you described are shitty and shouldn't have happened, regardless of how little changed. If it was little enough that people shouldn't get upset about it being censored, it should have also been little enough that nobody needed to change it in the first place.
 
The blatant hypocrisy from getting uncomfortable about some ass shots, while happily promoting disgusting gore porn like MK1 in the Playstation Store is what gets me. There's lots of types of content that can cause people to get upset, but it's always the T&A, and more disproportionally the asian side T&A (where the girls are presented as attractive) that gets the axe. There is no consistency in censorship because it's all just feelings anyways, so in my opinion they should just let the devs make the game they want to make, let the age rating people do their job and rate it accordingly, and stay the fuck out of the way.

Regarding your post, I think the censorship examples you described are shitty and shouldn't have happened, regardless of how little changed. If it was little enough that people shouldn't get upset about it being censored, it should have also been little enough that nobody needed to change it in the first place.

Well it's funny, since they will start complaining about censorship once violence and gore starts to get censored. By than I won't help them and I will be laughing and eating popcorn while they complain
 
Last edited:

Crayon

Member
If it was little enough that people shouldn't get upset about it being censored, it should have also been little enough that nobody needed to change it in the first place.

That is actually a good way to specify what bugged me about those types of changes. The ones that are tiny things that you have to do side-by-side to notice. Why bother changing them? Was any puritan satisfied by that tiny change? Was that extra two inches of sideboob on the ultra hot barbarian over the line?

And yes, the violence of mk being unquestioned makes it frustrating. I suppose we should be glad that violence is safe to explore in media, though. There's little censorous checks on violence here and there but imo because it's so easy to go so far with it. For the most part you can get crazy tearing bodies apart, but holy shit it you saw a nipple...
 
Last edited:
That is actually a good way to specify what bugged me about those types of changes. The ones that are tiny things that you have to do side-by-side to notice. Why bother changing them? Was any puritan satisfied by that tiny change? Was that extra two inches of sideboob on the ultra hot barbarian over the line?

And yes, the violence of mk being unquestioned makes it frustrating. I suppose we should be glad that violence is safe to explore in media, though. There's little censorous checks on violence here and there but imo because it's so easy to go so far with it. For the most part you can get crazy but holy shit it you saw a nipple...

I would say once they are fully successful in censoring sexy fanservice they are going to go after violence especially gore next. It's going to be interesting and funny to watch when it happens since I ain't helping the people who are going to complain
 

Thirty7ven

Banned
That is actually a good way to specify what bugged me about those types of changes. The ones that are tiny things that you have to do side-by-side to notice. Why bother changing them? Was any puritan satisfied by that tiny change? Was that extra two inches of sideboob on the ultra hot barbarian over the line?

And yes, the violence of mk being unquestioned makes it frustrating. I suppose we should be glad that violence is safe to explore in media, though. There's little censorous checks on violence here and there but imo because it's so easy to go so far with it. For the most part you can get crazy tearing bodies apart, but holy shit it you saw a nipple...

Don’t even understand the censorship thing, Last of Us 2 has nudity for example.

Isn’t this a regional thing? Baldurs Gate 3 and Cyberpunk have nudity too. In BG3 you can have female characters spreading their vag.

I’m confused where the problem is and where the notion comes from.
 
Last edited:

Pejo

Member
Don’t even understand the censorship thing, Last of Us 2 has nudity for example.

Isn’t this a regional thing?
I think it's the intent of the content. Nobody not named "Druckmann" was getting aroused at that Abby scene. But harmless stuff like Devil May Cry buttcheeks got 'god beamed' so you couldn't see it, per Sony's insistence.
 

Crayon

Member
I would say once they are fully successful in censoring sexy fanservice they are going to go after violence especially gore next. It's going to be interesting and funny to watch when it happens since I ain't helping the people who are going to complain

They wouldn't go for the violence. All the stuff era harps on can be chased down to finer and finer degrees. That's why it's insane. If they make it a federal crime to show cleavage, they'd just go for the knees, then the ankles next.
 
Last edited:

Thirty7ven

Banned
I think it's the intent of the content. Nobody not named "Druckmann" was getting aroused at that Abby scene. But harmless stuff like Devil May Cry buttcheeks got 'god beamed' so you couldn't see it, per Sony's insistence.

What about Cyberpunk and BG3?


Capcom blames European law, but people on forums blame Sony. It’s all very odd considering how gratuitous and explicit nudity gets in games like BG3, Cyberpunk, Witcher 3…
 
Last edited:

Mister Wolf

Member
I would say once they are fully successful in censoring sexy fanservice they are going to go after violence especially gore next. It's going to be interesting and funny to watch when it happens since I ain't helping the people who are going to complain

I dont think they care about violence. This has always been about controlling the power of sexuality women possess. When a women starts an only fans, pornography, prostitution, or flaunts her body to garner attention and wealth from men then its her empowering herself as they say. When men utilize female sexuality for profit and gain then he is villainized and the shaming tactics begin. This is about supremecy and control. Only stupid men fall for this current societal wide shit test that's going on in western countries. Men guilting themselves over their very nature as men. Like my male ancestors dating back to hunter gatherer time I like looking at tits and ass and I'll be damned if I'm going to let some stranger convince me that I'm wrong for doing so. Biology precedes culture and society always.
 
Last edited:
They wouldn't go for the violence. All the stuff era harps on can be chased down to finer and finer degrees. That's why it's insane. If the make it a federal crime to show cleavage, they'd just go for the knees, then the ankles next.

Well back than the censors tried to go after violent videogames like Mortal Kombat back in the SNES era. Now they will be able to succeed due to the industry being mostly cucks that will roll over. It's gonna to happen. Back than the industry fought back against that type of censorship. Now? They have thier in due to them being somewhat successful in censorship sexy fanservice.
 

Pejo

Member
What about Cyberpunk and BG3?


Capcom blames European law, but people on forums blame Sony. It’s all very odd considering how gratuitous and explicit nudity gets in games like BG3, Cyberpunk, Witcher 3…
That's kinda taking the article out of context, if you read it. The whole thing is predicated on a tweet about a customer service email from Capcom that says that they can't market to the EU, and we didn't see the original question/email that was sent to the customer service rep to begin with. The article even goes on to say:

However, what this response fails to explain is why only the PS4 version of the game is censored, while European releases on Xbox One and PC remain uncensored

Plus that article even links to these articles that describe Sony's policy (at the time).


It sure feels like you just googled "DMCV Sony Censor" and found an article title that fit your agenda.

*edit*

Regarding Cyberpunk and BG3, that essentially proves what I just claimed, that Sony's policy is disproportionally applied to Eastern developed games.
 
Last edited:
I dont think they care about violence. This has always been about controlling the power of sexuality women possess. When a women starts an only fans, pornography, prostitution, or flaunts her body to garner attention and wealth from men then its her empowering herself as they say. When men utilize female sexuality for profit and gain then he is villainized and the shaming tactics begin. This is about supremecy and control. Only stupid men fall for this current societal wide shit test that's going on in western countries. Men guilting themselves over their very nature as men.

Funny enough they have a issue with Sexy Fanservice anime games. If it's something like BG3 where lot of the characters are butt ugly they will include nudity

Cyberpunk 2077 is one of the rare examples of attractive characters and having nudity in the game
 

Thirty7ven

Banned
That's kinda taking the article out of context, if you read it. The whole thing is predicated on a tweet about a customer service email from Capcom that says that they can't market to the EU, and we didn't see the original question/email that was sent to the customer service rep to begin with. The article even goes on to say:



Plus that article even links to these articles that describe Sony's policy (at the time).


It sure feels like you just googled "DMCV Sony Censor" and found an article title that fit your agenda.

What agenda? There’s full on nudity in other games just like I mentioned.

So please explain why I can see female characters in BG3 butt naked going around showing their labia, but at the same time I’m supposed to believe there’s a censorship problem.
 

Crayon

Member
Well back than the censors tried to go after violent videogames like Mortal Kombat back in the SNES era. Now they will be able to succeed due to the industry being mostly cucks that will roll over. It's gonna to happen. Back than the industry fought back against that type of censorship. Now? They have thier in due to them being somewhat successful in censorship sexy fanservice.

Way different, then. That was congresspeople grandstanding. They stopped when the thing played out and we ended up with ratings on games. A sensible outcome, actually.

Today, we are talking about a widespread hysteria. Violence is too many degrees separated frome sex and race. The next thing to censor/cancel will always be tied to race, sex, and so-called power differentials. And there is no end goal to any of this so it's not like they will accomplish something particular (like esrb ratings) on censoring sex and have to turn to something else.
 
Way different, then. That was congresspeople grandstanding. They stopped when the thing played out and we ended up with ratings on games. A sensible outcome, actually.

Today, we are talking about a widespread hysteria. Violence is too many degrees separated frome sex and race. The next thing to censor/cancel will always be tied to race, sex, and so-called power differentials. And there is no end goal to any of this so it's not like they will accomplish something particular (like esrb ratings) on censoring sex and have to turn to something else.

I won't be surprised if it happens though

It's funny how Cyberpunk 2077 and Baldur's Gate III aren't censored but Anime Fanservice games are. Just double standards as usual
 
Last edited:

Mister Wolf

Member
Funny enough they have a issue with Sexy Fanservice anime games. If it's something like BG3 where lot of the characters are butt ugly they will include nudity

Cyberpunk 2077 is one of the rare examples of attractive characters and having nudity in the game

Because those games present female sexuality in a way men usually want it presented. Notice they liked Bayonetta, a woman that uses her sexuality in a domineering way. With males being submissive to it. This is about power.
 
Because those games present female sexuality in a way men usually want it presented. Notice they liked Bayonetta, a woman that uses her sexuality in a domineering way. With males being submissive to it. This is about power.

That's what I'm trying to get at

They really don't like feminine sexy women who defer to men. They absolutely hate it when they see that in entertainment. Why do you think that most of western entertainment has woman characters that act exactly like men?

I would bet if I played Cyberpunk 2077 that all the female characters would fall under that strong independent women type trope. Only difference is they made them pretty
 
Last edited:

Mister Wolf

Member
That's what I'm trying to get at

They really don't like feminine sexy women who defer to men. They absolutely hate it when they see that in entertainment. Why do you think that most of the western entertainment has woman characters that act exactly like men?

I would bet if I played Cyberpunk 2077 that all the female characters would fall under that strong independent women type trope. Only difference is they made them pretty

Thankfully Asian men and some men in European countries didn't fall for the shit test. I find when dealing with these people that try to use emotional manipulation in an attempt to control(shaming, guilting, etc) you present them indifference or you match their hostility. Never debate/defend your position. They are no authority where you need to explain yourself. This is an example of how to handle them:

 
Thankfully Asian men and some men in European countries didn't fall for the shit test. I find when dealing with these people that try to use emotional manipulation in an attempt to control(shaming, guilting, etc) you present them indifference or you match their hostility. Never debate/defend your position. They are no authority where you need to explain yourself. This is an example of how to handle them:



How South Korean Men deal with thier women is the way to deal with these crazies

Those guys go as obnoxious and loud as the feminists that try to shout them down. I remember hearing they go oink oink oink whenever a feminist shows up and tries to raise a stink.

That's what more and more men in the west should be doing
 

Mister Wolf

Member
How South Korean Men deal with thier women is the way to deal with these crazies

Those guys go as obnoxious and loud as the feminists that try to shout them down. I remember hearing they go oink oink oink whenever a feminist shows up and tries to raise a stink.

That's what more and more men in the west should be doing

The men in the west are influenced heavily by the shaming tactics. I can go in on the reason for that but it's not really for are gaming forum discussion.
 

Mister Wolf

Member
Yeah understandable

Shaming doesn't work on me

It's a shit test that most men fail. Thanks to social media we have it on a societal wide scale. Honestly I can somewhat see it happening being emotionally manipulated within the confines of a romantic or familial relationship but letting complete strangers do it to you is bonkers to me. Shows the fallen state of men within our society. Its only going to get worse, there is no coming back.
 
Last edited:
It's a shit test that most men fail. Thanks to social media we have it on a societal wide scale. Honestly I can somewhat see it happening being emotionally manipulated within the confines of a romantic or familial relationship but letting complete strangers do it to you is bonkers to me. Shows the fallen state of men within our society.

I don't have any social media

What you mentioned about relationships and emotional manipulation is the main reason why I don't date or get married since I know how most women are nowadays. I would rather just avoid that or hit it or quit it but the latter option carries lots of risks too.

But this is getting off topic

Seeing how they destroyed western entertainment is funny to watch. I'm like guys just are gonna to watch anime or something not western if you keep on doing that. Not to mention guys aren't gonna to date or marry you girls anyway due to the shitty personality

They are trying to infest Japan and I hope Japan resists as much as they can

That's all I'm gonna to say about the subject since this is kind of off topic
 
Last edited:

MagiusNecros

Gilgamesh Fan Annoyance
It's a shit test that most men fail. Thanks to social media we have it on a societal wide scale. Honestly I can somewhat see it happening being emotionally manipulated within the confines of a romantic or familial relationship but letting complete strangers do it to you is bonkers to me. Shows the fallen state of men within our society. Its only going to get worse, there is no coming back.
If any romantic partner are put through these stress tests to see what the other partner can get away with or manipulate the other into doing they don't love you for you but for what you could be and what resources/wealth you have. You walk away from these people immediately. You must be a ruthless gardener and weed out your soil so that only trees, flowers and mushrooms remain. And that's all I got to say about that.
---------------

Personally unless Sony does some corporate meddling I think Korean Booty Babe should be fine. Then again when handling of Blue Protocol was given to Amazon Games they started censoring stuff which essentially makes the MMO dead on arrival all because they want to stay true to the original "vision" of the game while bringing the game over for "modern audiences" and claiming they want it to be "family friendly" but keep the gambling components in the game.

Very hypocritical of these companies to be all "Sex bad but gambling and violence good". Just makes you ask who the game is even for?

Would prefer my game characters to be larger then life instead of duck faced, rotten pear shaped people with heaps of insecurity issues and be told that being a circus clown is what you should strive for.
 
I honestly have zero problems with it being censored......as long as there is the option for the original (full sexy developer intended) costume. I'm 40+ and it would be kinda embarrassing for my wife and kids to walk by while playing it...lol. I don't want them to take away the sexy options. Just wanna be able to turn it off when I want to. 🙂
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom