It's crazy that that daniel guy does a better job with benchmarks than the more popular techtubers when he's also working as a full time teacher. He's my first port of call now, tests all settings, doesn't cut corners or skip anything and comes to conclusions the data supports.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
RTX 4060 launching on June 29.
- Thread starter Leonidas
- Start date
Elysium44
Banned
Well for whatever reason, the 4000 series is extremely efficient. (This is the Ti model.)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Founders Edition Review
NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launches today. The green team's new $400 card offers plenty of performance for even the most demanding titles at Full HD and beyond. Our review confirms that thanks to the amazing energy efficiency of the AD106 GPU, the Founders Edition runs cool and quiet at all times.
HeisenbergFX4
Gold Member
I didn't really watch the videos thoroughly just wanted to get them here for others to see that might be interested in the card
Trogdor1123
Gold Member
I actually got to them and skimmed them and they weren’t that bad.
Essentially, if you can actually get one for 299, it’s probably ok.
SmokedMeat
Gamer™
Hopefully Nvidia finally releases a 4000 series card besides the ultra pricey 4090, that’s not a joke.
We’ll see what real world benchmarks look like in a couple days.
We’ll see what real world benchmarks look like in a couple days.
Leonidas
Member
And AMD selling a card with similar raster (but worse RT and upscaling) at a 10% discount is classic AMD
Hudo
Member
Yeah, like I was saying, the GPU market is fucked. I do hope that Intel make a high-end competitor next to scare nVidia a bit so they stop selling fucking consumer cards at business card prices (a 4090 for $1500 is fucking ridiculous That card should cost $700 max and the 4080 should cost $500 max).And AMD selling a card with similar raster (but worse RT and upscaling) at a 10% discount is classic AMD
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
AMDToo™And AMD selling a card with similar raster (but worse RT and upscaling) at a 10% discount is classic AMD
Leonidas
Member
What more is there to know? Should be similar raster to 7600, but with much better RT, better upscaling (DLSS) and much better power efficiency, while costing 11% more.
Skifi28
Member
Are you being paid monthly or per post? Asking for a friend.And AMD selling a card with similar raster (but worse RT and upscaling) at a 10% discount is classic AMD
Last edited:
SmokedMeat
Gamer™
I’m not in the market for a new card, but you don’t look at benchmarks before buying a GPU?
I don’t go by guessing what something should be.
Leonidas
Member
I do, but it seems obvious my "guesses" from publicly known benchmarks won't be too far off the reality.
We know damn well the card will be better at RT, has better upscaling and is more efficient compared to the 7600.
Maybe my raster "guesses" might be off by + or - 5%, what difference would that make?
SmokedMeat
Gamer™
You replied to me asking what more is there to know.
Benchmarks. That’s what’s more to know. The publicly known stuff was supplied by Nvidia at set settings.
Leonidas
Member
Okay then, my only question to you is, if it turns out as follows
RTX 2080-tier raster (+/- 5%)
much more efficient than 7600
20% better RT than 7600
is it still a joke of a card as you call every 40-series card not named the 4090?
I want to know your response to this now before all the reviews come in where people copy the thoughts of their favorite reviewers
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
4060 is shite gravy, especially the price. Not a hill to die on.
SmokedMeat
Gamer™
Okay then, my only question to you is, if it turns out as follows
RTX 2080-tier raster (+/- 5%)
much more efficient than 7600
20% better RT than 7600
is it still a joke of a card as you call every 40-series card not named the 4090?
I want to know your response to this now before all the reviews come in where people copy the thoughts of their favorite reviewers
I’ll have to see benchmarks. At $300 if you’re talking roughly ballpark performance of a five year old card that retailed for $600, then I’m not impressed.
Hopefully it’s a good bit better. I’d like to see GPU manufacturers start delivering some value, and I’m sure I’m not the only one considering how abysmal GPU sales are.
Last edited:
Leonidas
Member
The 2080 launched at $700-$800 5 years ago. Which in todays money is closer to $850-$960.
The chance of that happening is practically 0%...
Nvidia has 84% market share.
It's Intel/AMD who have abysmal dGPU shipments, though Intel at least has had their highest dGPU shipments yet last quarter.
RX 7600-tier, but with much better RT, much more efficient and better upscaling.
SolidQ
Member
PseudoRT doesn't mean nothing for those tier cards. efficient ok, upscaling not much games support this, just not bad bonus
Leonidas
Member
4060 is capable of decent RT, we've seen it already in the Jayz2Cents video with CyberPunk DLSS Quality enabled. Upscaling is in pretty much every demanding game these days.
4060 Ti and 7600 says hi (both launched last month with 8 GB VRAM).
simpatico
Member
I missed the Ti specs and honestly don't even look at AMD. Sad state all around. Especially with storage prices being decent recently.
Shit man if we're doing it like that then the 8800 GTX would cost around $880 in todays money and this card runs rings around that, what a bargain from Nvidia!
Leonidas
Member
I never said it was a bargain, I simply pointed out the error in the post which said RTX 2080 was a $600 card, it most definitely was not a $600 card at launch, you couldn't even buy it at $700 as most cards were selling for at least $750 when it released but most cards matched the FE price of $800.
There are still cards on the market that perform close to 2080 in performance, so it is relevant, and it's only two generations old with a modern feature set and still better RT than AMD's current mid-range GPUs...