• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Is 7.5 billion too much and MS overpaid?

aries_71

Junior Member
It's nice to see XBOX fans happy again. Exciting times for sure!
Well, it’s a change of pace, though I suspect it will be short lived. The truth is that you can spend month after month in this forum absorbing only bad news/negativity on the Xbox brand. Some of it well deserved, other not so much. I would expect a more balanced Neogaf this generation, but I don’t keep my hopes high.
 

showernota

Member
Probably worth the price tag for the board room reaction alone.
fKcIEW.gif
 

HarryKS

Member
Breaking news for you, companies do buy & sell their own shares for cash flow all the time, it's perfectly legal and accepted practice.

Glad that you've learned something new today.

Keep going down that rabbit hole of stupidity.
They don't sell their own shares for cash flow. They do raises. And raises are done by companies well ahead of time and companies still in prospective range. Dilution does not happen at that level.
If they need money, they go to the bond market, they don't sell their shares.

Your previous posts on the topic were so stupid that it makes it hard to explain it to you without sounding mean. I apologize.
 

Eliciel

Member
They should buy EA/CDPR/Ubisoft and Nintendo oh and while at it Just buy Sony already all for 200 Gazillion - all combined in 1 single GamesPass!!
 
Last edited:

NickFire

Member
I have no idea if they overpaid. My hot take would be obviously they did, but how could I possibly know the value of something like this? I'm sure MS has given this ample consideration from all sorts of angles.

I'll say this for sure though. If they could have bought Rockstar for the same amount then they should have. A simple tweet that GTA will be a console exclusive would probably win the console sales war for either party.
 

Vol5

Member
Did they overpay? Time will tell. Save for Doom, I personally believe they were on a downward trajectory regardless.
 

PaNaMa

Banned
I think it's all relative, I mean everyone overpays for everything.

To put it in perspective: 15 million game pass subscribers presently paying what, $10-15 dollar a month, depending on if it is Ultimate. I'd say most go Ultimate, but we'll meet at $12.50.
12.5 x 15,000,000 is $187,500,500 USD per month. 2.25 billion dollars in revenue a year from game pass alone. And that number is ever increasing. So 7 billion doesn't seem that hard to absorb, and the acquisition only ensure people keep subbing to GamePass.

So even if they overpaid for the studio and IPs, the investment will be recouped in no time and just creates more and more money for them in subscription fees. I can't even imagine not having game pass now
 

Bolivar687

Banned
There are accountants and lawyers who ran the numbers on this and know better than any of us here, even those who might be involved in M&A.
 

CitizenX

Banned
if you are in it for the long haul yes/ maybe because the actual ROI will be years maybe a decade down the road.
 

The Alien

Banned
Disney paid $4B like 10 years ago.
This was just before everyone started snatching up content for streaming services. Honestly, even back then, $4B was a steal.

Did Microsoft pay too much? Its a lot of money, but I don't think so.
  • MS needed to secure it. They needed the games/IPs. Its a great fit all around. Many games fill their desires (RPG, horror, FPS action, narrative)
  • They get 8 development studios (includes a Japanese studio they have long sought).
  • Numerous proven and classic IPs including a deep back catalog of games. Also includes IPs they can do more with (Prey, Quake, etc.)
  • All the tech...they got at least 2 game engines (iD Tech and Creation Engine).
 

NullZ3r0

Banned
Amazon, Facebook and Google would have paid it. And that's why Microsoft bought them.

What you folks may not realize is that there are giants eyeing this hundred billion dollar industry that Microsoft would have a tougher time battling than Sony and Nintendo. Microsoft has advantages that neither Sony nor Nintendo can touch. So keeping those other three out of gaming made this purchase a necessity.

Phil wasn't throwing shade at Sony and Nintendo when he said that Google and Amazon are his real competitors. That's just reality.
 
Last edited:

Faenrir

Member
Considering all the good studios and huge IPs, no they didnt overpay.
People only talking about Bethesda are either ignorant or trolling.
 
I think it's all relative, I mean everyone overpays for everything.

To put it in perspective: 15 million game pass subscribers presently paying what, $10-15 dollar a month, depending on if it is Ultimate. I'd say most go Ultimate, but we'll meet at $12.50.
12.5 x 15,000,000 is $187,500,500 USD per month. 2.25 billion dollars in revenue a year from game pass alone. And that number is ever increasing. So 7 billion doesn't seem that hard to absorb, and the acquisition only ensure people keep subbing to GamePass.

So even if they overpaid for the studio and IPs, the investment will be recouped in no time and just creates more and more money for them in subscription fees. I can't even imagine not having game pass now
Some subscribers on game pass will be spending less money than they otherwise would. Game Pass has saved me hundreds of dollars, literally...dollars that would be primarily in Microsoft's pockets since most of the "big titles" I didn't buy due to it are from Microsoft themselves. Adding Zenimax to this doesn't increase my Game Pass value for Microsoft, on the contrary it just decreases it even more. My deal gets better, Microsoft's worse.

You simply can't do the math you are doing to decide anything, because the math doesn't show anything with the knowledge we as outsiders have. I'm not sure even Microsoft knows, because Microsoft would have no idea how much I would normally buy that I'm not right now. They can only guess.

So I guess what Microsoft is banking on is people paying for game pass who never buy games normally, those who want to reward Microsoft by buying the games anyway, or those who will spend a ton on DLC/add-ons. I have no idea how big the groups are, but the people I know personally are all saving money by buying Game Pass, rather than enriching Microsoft even more.
 

Darius87

Member
7.5 billion for Bethesda

Let's do a best case worst case scenario here.

Gamepass has 15 million subscribers now. Worst case, everyone pays $1.00 (because I know some idiot is gonna say this) a month for 12 months. that's 15,000,000 x 12 = $180,000,000 in 1 year.

The more likely case is that a good portion of users are paying the $9.99 price. For simplicity, middle of the road case is as the dollar subs end (assuming the number of subscribers stays the SAME) (15,000,000 x 10.00) x 12 = 1.8 billion in 1 year

Add in that a lot of people have game pass ultimate at $15 a month. Consider the additions coming from people who will do Xbox All Access for games pass and the XSS or XSX. IF literally no one did Xbox All Access the number goes up.

Let's imagine it's half and half (I don't know what the actual numbers are) So 7,500,000 x 10.00 + 7,500,000 x 15.00 = 187,500,000 x 12 = 2.25 billion in 1 year.

ALL THIS IS IF MICROSOFT NEVER GAINED ANOTHER SINGLE SUBSCRIBER.

The likelihood especially with Bethesda on board, means the subscribers will go up. There is very few reasons not to have Gamepass at this point.

My point is Xbox Gamepass is going to print money. The subscribers will fluctuate, their will be more entry level deals for $1, but Microsoft is playing the long game. There is no scenario I can think of short of a complete collapse of the games industry that will keep this from being profitable in short order.

And to answer the question OP, this was highway robbery. Xbox will net dividends from this.
so you're saying ms enslaving employees and companies to release theyr games for free on game pass? your calculation is by far most delusional i've seen, ms have to pay to every developer whos game is on game pass also ms have to pay for theyr first parties studios who makes games for them.
 

KRYPT83

Member
Depends, I mean outside of Evil Within most of those IP's have some Xbox heritage and are popular to the Xbox fanbase.
But was they going anywhere if MS didn't buy them?
Yes Amazon and Goolge was trying to buy them then consoles would of been screwed
 
Overpaid. Who cares though.. MS is fine with it. That division ain't making money for a long time tho.... it's all strategic moves for now hoping for a future long term pay off.
 

BeforeU

Oft hope is born when all is forlorn.
Elder Scroll, Doom and Fallout has huge fan following and these names are instantly recognizable to people of every age. Beside the Fallout 76, their output is also been consistently great. So at the end, it will increase the value of gamepass. No one knows if their investment will pay off or not, it will ultimately be up to how they leverage the talent. Nothing in life is a sure thing, so lets wait and see. They must have thought this through, also don't forget, because of COVID, money is cheap right now, hence big acquisition makes sense for companies like microsoft
 

tillbot8

Banned
It's a colossal price, but it is also a colossal studio. It's hard to say if it will pay off (of course it will pay off, massive feather in xboxs cap) but I mean to the Microsoft investors was this worth over 7 billion dollars overall? I think if Sony bought it it would of benefited them moreso. Xbox has been penned into a corner, if the Series X fails Microsoft may pull the plug on Xbox division in the next gen. So it seems an all or nothing move to me. But I admire the ballsyness of it!
 

diffusionx

Gold Member
Most of what Zenimax publishes, although generally of good quality doesn't sell that much. So the question is: are fallout and tes worth 7.5 billion?

Maybe, but there is value to Doom, Quake, etc.

Also - Bethesda spent less than $6M for everything Fallout (except for a MMO that never came out) in 2007.
 

Jigsaah

Gold Member
so you're saying ms enslaving employees and companies to release theyr games for free on game pass? your calculation is by far most delusional i've seen, ms have to pay to every developer whos game is on game pass also ms have to pay for theyr first parties studios who makes games for them.
You lost me at "enslaving". You reek of bias. Don't talk to me.
 

BeforeU

Oft hope is born when all is forlorn.
It's a colossal price, but it is also a colossal studio. It's hard to say if it will pay off (of course it will pay off, massive feather in xboxs cap) but I mean to the Microsoft investors was this worth over 7 billion dollars overall? I think if Sony bought it it would of benefited them moreso. Xbox has been penned into a corner, if the Series X fails Microsoft may pull the plug on Xbox division in the next gen. So it seems an all or nothing move to me. But I admire the ballsyness of it!

hahahahaha

haven't heard this in a while, thats for the laugh
 

Mister Wolf

Member
And what is the value of an IP, last fallout did not sell well and was a mess.

Disingenuous to prop up an online spinoff as representative of the Fallout franchises popularity. Especially when looking up the sales of the mainline Fallout game that released this generation.
 
Last edited:
Seems too much considering Disney bought Lucasfilm aka Star Wars for ONLY 4 billion. 7.5 billion is a little too much imo.

MS has this kind of cash lying around in couch cushions on the Bellevue campus alone.

So, no.

It's a smart move for a bunch of reasons. Time will tell how well Phil and company manage things, but Nadella opened up the Big Swinging Dick wallet.

All the concern trolling is delicious though. Yummmm. 😉😎
 
Last edited:
I think its a good time to re look at this thread.
After seeing what Codemasters went for, and the massive push to buy up devs and publishers in the wake of this one, seems like it wasn't just a super smart decision from MS, but a really good value one at that.
 

Sw0pDiller

Member
They are trying to build gamepass as big as netflix. You need to get better value than the competition. Right now they are lacking just that so the need big games and big names. But the competition is not sitting still. Microsoft just showed everybody it's business time and they need to step up their game.
 

Fredrik

Member
Yes but what choice did they have honesty? Anyone who is opposed what realistic alternative was there? Sony locked up all the 3rd party deals. They needed something big to get fans excited for Tuesday pre orders and reading online it worked.
There was actually a rumour that Sony had talks with Bethesda for an exclusivity deal on Starfield. Would’ve been a nightmare for MS.

While the Zenimax aqcuisition don’t change anything short term, especially since they can’t talk about it yet, it’ll change a lot in the future. The number of big IPs they own is seriously impressive now. Only question is how they’ll spread them out on other platforms. Generally speaking I hate exclusives but strategically it would make no sense to pay this much only to still release everything on all platforms as if they hadn’t even purchased them. Since everything MS owns is on PC too I don’t think exclusives are all that bad, it’s always worse when it happens on Sony or Nintendo platforms since the games are locked to one single platform.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom