paulyboy81
Neo Member
Genuinely curious, has anyone found examples of lower geometry detail in the Series X version (or by extension, higher in the PS5) aside from a lightbulb in a cutscene?
The filtering is not as good on series x, pick any point more than a third up the picture and it's clear to see., which is why the picture was posted. It wasn't posted for your benefit if you don't believe the filtering is broken on PC and Series X|S, but there's 2 or 3 before the image was posted stating for a fact it was.I never mentioned broken af. AF also looks the same in the picture. Contrast is higher on PC making it look a bit more detailed.
And I'll be here unlike you, if i does get the settings changed to match that of the ps5 and the performance takes a hit like it did with dirt 5 well never see you again, under this account name anyway.
Oh ffs, you coward. You spend post after post saying things like "running as designed", then you get a chance to put your money where your mouth is and you run off screaming "NO YOU". "NO YOUR SQUAD".Thats not how it works with adults. if I was trolling, I'd be making stuff up like you, which by the way, you have just admitted too.
As there is proof of what I've said in this thread, which you confirmed by saying they'll fix it, don't know why you could think that's trolling.
Saying things you don't want to hear <> trolling. Don't argue with evidence and I'd have been done with this a while ago, but your squad doesn't seem to want to let it go.
Though I edited my post I never say texture were different eh. Just look worse on series X.Textures are the same
Didn't performance go down after the patch on PS5? I am too lazy to find the video, I know it did with Assassin's Creed Vahalla because Ubisoft are useless.Performance actually went up when they patched the settings bug.
AF looks the same. PC contrast is jacked way up giving a sharper look.The filtering is not as good on series x, pick any point more than a third up the picture and it's clear to see., which is why the picture was posted. It wasn't posted for your benefit if you don't believe the filtering is broken on PC and Series X|S, but there's 2 or 3 before the image was posted stating for a fact it was.
Series X has advantages over PC in that setting for sure, particularly with vegetation and tessellation, but filtering is not the same at all and it's disingenuous to suggest it is.
Your recollection is as fuzzy as the images you create from youtube videos.Performance actually went up when they patched the settings bug.
At oblique angles. Be specific or you are wrong.Though I edited my post I never say texture were different eh. Just look worse on series X.
Dat 0,27 of difference. Higher CUs push to the extreme the average fps on series X I guess. Oh sure you don't look to the average just to the FPS spike which happens occasionally on series X too eh, just look to the curve in the line, is not that tough. But as alwaysPerformance actually went up when they patched the settings bug.
Your recollection is as fuzzy as the images you create from youtube videos.
when the texture are horrible to look?At oblique angles. Be specific or you are wrong.
Didn't performance go down after the patch on PS5? I am too lazy to find the video, I know it did with Assassin's Creed Vahalla because Ubisoft are useless.
lol.Oh ffs, you coward. You spend post after post saying things like "running as designed", then you get a chance to put your money where your mouth is and you run off screaming "NO YOU". "NO YOUR SQUAD".
How the hell you wimp out of a ban bet when you've been showing such bravado, but have the balls to talk about being an adult under these circumstances I do not know.
Only when viewed at oblique angles. At right angles they look exactly the same.when the texture are horrible to look?
From my post you quoted. What is it wrong in my sentence? Texture are horrible to look on series X compared ps5. That's all I said..
I don't like to persist but it's not just the angle, in some spots texture seems really less detailed even if it is just AF the cause (though I'm not entirely convinced is just that)Only when viewed at oblique angles. At right angles they look exactly the same.
Your fanboy brain is just playing tricks on you.I don't like to persist but it's not just the angle, in some spots texture seems really less detailed even if it is just AF the cause (though I'm not entirely convinced is just that)
Look the texture more close to the screen seems worse mip mapping too imo.
You really accuse someone to be fanboy? Really?Your fanboy brain is just playing tricks on you.
Yes sir.You really accuse someone to be fanboy? Really?
Relax dude and abandons the high of your throne; you aren't exactly in the good position to accuse someone of anything looking at your post history. If you want discuss about tech aspects you are welcome but you are not new to adopt such arrogant attitude when you haven't other argumentations.Yes sir.
Utter rubbish.AF looks the same. PC contrast is jacked way up giving a sharper look.
Haha quote one post for me please.Relax dude and abandons the high of your throne; you aren't exactly in the position to accuse someone of anything looking at your post history.
Haha quote one post for me please.
This forum is full of human garbage. Just look at any thread that has to do with minorities or women.
I must have stopped listening when he said series x is much closer to the PS5 but still doesn't match it as the PS5 has longer draw distances, sharper textures, and better filtering into the distance.The NX Gamer breakdown tells you this if you bother to watch it and not just make things up.
Dude dont go there. I agree with your point about cherry picking these framerate screens, but that is what we have had in the vast majority of comparison threads sicne launch, and by Sony fans cherry picking the screens usually.Dat 0,27 of difference. Higher CUs push to the extreme the average fps on series X I guess. Oh sure you don't look to the average just to the FPS spike which happens occasionally on series X too eh, just look to the curve in the line, is not that tough. But as always
You very clearly do. It’s fucking hilarious.
excuse me sir, do you have any of those symptoms?
It certainly does. Learn what contrast can do to an image. I currently am it for a walk with my dog but I'll dig into this post more later.Utter rubbish.
Contrast is not going to add details that filtering or lack there of is wiping out.
There are parts of the image where the filtering looks virtually identical, specifically before the dead body on the mound just near the big rock on the left. Surely if the PC just had higher contrast, which it doesn't, it has better filtering, but lets play devils advocate here, shouldn't the contrast induced extra sharpness be consistent throughout the image?
That post is 100% fact.
Just an example but there are other posts where you like to spit out personal judgment from the high of who knows what but sure it's not easy to extrapolate from the message board
Yes I still don't know what's happening on Xbox. It could be low AF, or something else, or a combination of low AF and something else.I don't like to persist but it's not just the angle, in some spots texture seems really less detailed even if it is just AF the cause (though I'm not entirely convinced is just that)
Look the texture more close to the screen seems worse mip mapping too imo.
I suspect also it uses dynamic AF on series X because it's not so evident in every spot. Crysis on PS3 did the same to save perfomance and PS3 has splitted bandwidth. I don't think it's a coincidence.
It looks literally exactly like low AF. It's very easy to check. If there was another difference it would of been noticed when viewing textures straight on. They could just look straight down and show the difference, but since there isn't any they didn't do that.Yes I still don't know what's happening on Xbox. It could be low AF, or something else, or a combination of low AF and something else.
I boosted the contrast on the image myself, it just made it look slightly more saturated, and still blurry.It certainly does. Learn what contrast can do to an image. I currently am it for a walk with my dog but I'll dig into this post more later.
I must have stopped listening when he said series x is much closer to the PS5 but still doesn't match it as the PS5 has longer draw distances, sharper textures, and better filtering into the distance.
Plus ZERO VRS making everything just look bad.
But I think you should stop bringing up Dirt 5 in every thread, it doesn't prove what you think it does.
Who knows though, version 4 might finally get everything to match? It's pretty good on my PC now, just wish they would allow the option to turn off VRS.
We need the same exact spot with the PC version (without DLSS) to be sure. Only pics of PC vs XSX should be enough to settle this. Because the difference of clarity can be big. In some spots it's like trilinear vs 4xAFIt looks literally exactly like low AF. It's very easy to check. If there was another difference it would of been noticed when viewing textures straight on. They could just look straight down and show the difference, but since there isn't any they didn't do that.
Dude...if you think the most of the people in this forum is trash why are you even trying to discuss about us? Go in another forum with people of the same your high level and shut up.It certainly does. Learn what contrast can do to an image. I currently am it for a walk with my dog but I'll dig into this post more later.
That post is 100% fact.
That's not exactly normal a game drops to 35 FPS because you use a sniper gun anyway eh....though I would be really interesting to see Hitman 3 stressedDude dont go there. I agree with your point about cherry picking these framerate screens, but that is what we have had in the vast majority of comparison threads sicne launch, and by Sony fans cherry picking the screens usually.
They even tried to cherry pick that Hitman 3 part in that comparison vid where the XSX version droped to 35fps for a split second while ADS's that gun, and it only happened once when ADSing, but no the 'XSX version drops to 35fps'.
Why you persist so much about it's just AF? AF doesn't affect the details close to the screen. Did you cared at least to check the capture? Even the npcs lied in the ground are affected. Just look at it. Just look at the steps wood on the ground. They are even more detailed on series X but the ground it's still better on ps5. Why AF doesn't affects the wood too?It looks literally exactly like low AF. It's very easy to check. If there was another difference it would of been noticed when viewing textures straight on. They could just look straight down and show the difference, but since there isn't any they didn't do that.
Framerate approximately the same on average, DRS range lowered to 900p not 1080p like pre patch.You said performance went down, you lied.
Framerate approximately the same on average, DRS range lowered to 900p not 1080p like pre patch.
Series X drops lower than PS5 at the start of every race.
Performance = worse.
Are you still talking exclusively about 120hz mode?Image quality is improved on Xbox, resolution is improved on Xbox, framerate is higher on average on Xbox. That is not a downgrade in performance.
Are you still talking exclusively about 120hz mode?
As just said, series x drops to 900p post patch 2, it was 1080p only before.
You continuing to say different angles when they are exactly the same shows how fos you are.Your fanboy brain is just playing tricks on you.
Firstly, the average what? There was only 1080p for Series X prior to update 2 according to NXG, it's therefore impossible for the average to go higher when 1080p is the highest it goes in 120hz mode.The average is higher though as he states in the video, so performance hasn't gone down. People tried to claim that once the settings bug was corrected that performance would suffer, it didn't, it went up in framerate. He clearly states in the video that both the Series versions run better after the patch.
He lied about Dirt 5's performance?You said performance went down, you lied.
There's definitely changes here and they're not all for the better and generally the PS5 can have more issues now than it did in the older versions which is what I'm saying. I don't think everyone was wrong when they said that was an issue it generally does. If its going to stutter randomly it will do it on the PS5 now where it didn't do it before.