Cherrypepsi
Member
Don't know why you feel that way, sorry I guess.
To me gamepass is one of the most customer friendly things out there.
To me gamepass is one of the most customer friendly things out there.
If Sony just accepted game pass on their platform and got a cut of the sub, purchases etc.
I'm a loser because I enjoy game pass?
I'm a loser because I enjoy game pass?
If Sony just accepted game pass on their platform and got a cut of the sub, purchases etc.
Sony already have 2 existing game subscriptions subscriptions, if Bloomberg isn't lying again what they are doing is to merge them into a single service with different tiers (like GP) and to include here a few extra things. Btw, they are more successful than MS here too, this merged sub will start with aprox. the double of subs than GP.Sony now wants their own subscription, which is understandable given the success with game pass,
Game Pass won't be published on PlayStation, and Sony won't put their games day one on their own subscription. From time to time they'll include some indie or AAA at launch, as did until now.I am pretty certain, that Microsoft and Sony will not only pay for day one third party games on their services, but probably also pay third party games to be exclusive on their services.
If Sony just accepted game pass on their platform and got a cut of the sub, purchases etc.
The moderators accept people calling me a loser, but I will be polite against anyone calling me slurs.You're a loser to make a thread about "anti-consumer" clickbait, only to tell people one company should bend to the knees of another because Sony doesn't have Gamepass and, because you enjoy Gamepass, that is anti-consumer.
Yes because two services will probably end up turn many games into third party exclusives on the services.I'm not following you here. You enjoy Game Pass, but if Sony creates their own version of Game Pass then that is being anti-consumer?
Yes because two services will probably end up turn many games into third party exclusives on the services.
I believe you didn't read the entire post.
The moderators accept people calling me a loser, but I will be polite against anyone calling me slurs.
Because I'm probably the only one who's gonna get banned for calling other people slurs.
I did mention in the beginning, that I would have meant the same if spartakus came first. I edited it out because a mod changed the title, so I thought it didn't fit anymore.
Like I said in my example, Netflix went to shit after hbo and Disney made their own platforms. And the same will happen now.
But given I'm not a Sony shill it's okay to call me a loser. Nice Gaf.
Yes because two services will probably end up turn many games into third party exclusives on the services.
I believe you didn't read the entire post.
It was poorly worded.You still didn't explain why Sony is anti consumer in this case. Because it will create a new service instead of accepting the service you enjoy and preach so much?
The beauty is, you don’t have to subscribe to gamepasss and can simply buy the games that are on it. Also if you do subscribe to gamepass, you can buy the games at a discounted price. It’s not anti-consumer at all.Gamepass in its current state is a subscription that values your money a lot.
Microsoft first party titles day one, and a big catalogue of third party games. Some are even there day one.
Sony now wants their own subscription, which is understandable given the success with game pass, but this will hurt these subscription based services.
Just like are seeing both Microsoft and Sony acquiring companies to the left and right, we will now see the same that happened into TV streaming series.
Netflix had everything at the beginning. Then hbo and Disney wanted to make their own services to gain 100 percent revenue.
I am pretty certain, that Microsoft and Sony will not only pay for day one third party games on their services, but probably also pay third party games to be exclusive on their services.
If Sony just accepted game pass on their platform and got a cut of the sub, purchases etc.
These companies should stop ruining this for the gamers. It's anti consuming and I am sick of it.
Not only do you seem to think Sony does not have a subscription service you do not realize that PS Now lunched before Game Pass. If you want to argue Sony is more focused on subscription models due to the success of Game Pass, carry on warrior.Gamepass in its current state is a subscription that values your money a lot.
Microsoft first party titles day one, and a big catalogue of third party games. Some are even there day one.
Sony now wants their own subscription, which is understandable given the success with game pass, but this will hurt these subscription based services.
Just like are seeing both Microsoft and Sony acquiring companies to the left and right, we will now see the same that happened into TV streaming series.
Netflix had everything at the beginning. Then hbo and Disney wanted to make their own services to gain 100 percent revenue.
I am pretty certain, that Microsoft and Sony will not only pay for day one third party games on their services, but probably also pay third party games to be exclusive on their services.
If Sony just accepted game pass on their platform and got a cut of the sub, purchases etc.
These companies should stop ruining this for the gamers. It's anti consuming and I am sick of it.
No. It's because instead of enjoying it you write essays about it. Although I'm sorry I called you a loser I feel bad about that.I'm a loser because I enjoy game pass?
OP doesn't have a problem with GamePass, it's "pro-consumer". His problem is with PS Now or Spartacus, that's "anti-consumer" because it adds competition to GamePass.Dont see a problem with GP or PS Now. They are options. You can still buy games for $60 or $70 if you want.
Just like movie sub plans. You can still buy a BR or digital download of your fav movie for $20.
It's The_Mike - he's 100% serious. If it's Xbox, it's great. If it's PlayStation it's horrible. Even if it's the exact same thing.I can't tell if the OP is a poorly executed joke or for real?
No one needs to sub to these services. So long as these games are sold in stores and are available on sub services, I could careless.
Now, should they only release games on sub services, then I see a problem.
Why make more money on your own platform when you can make money for someonbody else.
Sony shouldn't create a service because that would "ruin" Gamepass, but instead should integrate Gamepass into the Sony ecosystem? Is that really your point?
Really dude?
My post was poorly worded and apparently because people are more interested in that instead of the topic itself is sad.I can't tell if the OP is a poorly executed joke or for real?
I can enjoy it and list my concerns as well. Only a sith deals in absolutes.No. It's because instead of enjoying it you write essays about it. Although I'm sorry I called you a loser I feel bad about that.
Go advertise for PlayStation somewhere else instead of putting words in my mouth.It's The_Mike - he's 100% serious. If it's Xbox, it's great. If it's PlayStation it's horrible. Even if it's the exact same thing.
Usually people aren't this transparent with their double standards. It's pretty laughable.
Thanks to Milton Friedman a company's job is to make money, exclusively, anti-consumer is OK as long as next quarter is in the black.
1. Your thread title using the term "anti-consumer" is absurd. That's a dumb term gamers like to throw around anytime busineses aren't bending over backwards to entitled gamers.Gamepass in its current state is a subscription that values your money a lot.
Microsoft first party titles day one, and a big catalogue of third party games. Some are even there day one.
Sony now wants their own subscription, which is understandable given the success with game pass, but this will hurt these subscription based services.
Just like are seeing both Microsoft and Sony acquiring companies to the left and right, we will now see the same that happened into TV streaming series.
Netflix had everything at the beginning. Then hbo and Disney wanted to make their own services to gain 100 percent revenue.
I am pretty certain, that Microsoft and Sony will not only pay for day one third party games on their services, but probably also pay third party games to be exclusive on their services.
If Sony just accepted game pass on their platform and got a cut of the sub, purchases etc.
These companies should stop ruining this for the gamers. It's anti consuming and I am sick of it.
Gamepass in its current state is a subscription that values your money a lot.
Microsoft first party titles day one, and a big catalogue of third party games. Some are even there day one.
Sony now wants their own subscription, which is understandable given the success with game pass, but this will hurt these subscription based services.
Just like are seeing both Microsoft and Sony acquiring companies to the left and right, we will now see the same that happened into TV streaming series.
Netflix had everything at the beginning. Then hbo and Disney wanted to make their own services to gain 100 percent revenue.
I am pretty certain, that Microsoft and Sony will not only pay for day one third party games on their services, but probably also pay third party games to be exclusive on their services.
If Sony just accepted game pass on their platform and got a cut of the sub, purchases etc.
These companies should stop ruining this for the gamers. It's anti consuming and I am sick of it.
Thanks to Milton Friedman a company's job is to make money, exclusively, anti-consumer is OK as long as next quarter is in the black.
The premise of the thread I understood was that moving away from owning the console + the game disc with the data for the game was better than renting access to the game on a computer you don't own for a limited time over an also payed internet connection.Which is why competition is one of the main factors keeping companies "pro consumer". Which itself makes the entire premise of this thread kinda dumb.
What I meant is having subscriptions like these to each separate platform will eventually hurt both player bases.