• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Xbox Series S "Brilliantly Designed Machine"

Status
Not open for further replies.
The XSS provides the same experience as the XSX but certainly with compromises on visuals. Not one person can point to a feature missing on the XSS outside of the blu-ray drive. Jason Ronald nor anyone else at MS promised that every game running on the system would have the same graphical performance but the resolution. They could never make that promise because game developers make the choices on how games run on hardware not the engineers. Anyone that states the contrary is being ridiculous and holding the budget console to standards more expensive systems aren't. Implying that MS has lied about the best value in gaming right now is just another volley in the console gaming war.
The best value in gaming right now is a 2nd hand PS4.
Still, i wish you luck in your push for "value". As it is, most people promoting Series S, don't even USE the series S themselves. That had been the case ever since it was announced; most supporters of the console always declare that they prefer a Series X and that Series S is for "other people".
 
Last edited:

KAL2006

Banned
Honestly I personally think a Series X is just much better value. It's not just about power, the storage space on a Series S is too low. Yes you can stick a external drive but sooner or later majority of games will be Series S and X exclusive and that SSD would need to be used. Upgrading to the external SSD is so costly at that stage you nearly paying the same price as a Series X.
 
The best value in gaming right now is a 2nd hand PS4.
Still, i wish you luck in your push for "value". As it is, most people promoting Series S, don't even USE the series S themselves. That had been the case ever since it was announced; most supporters of the console always declare that they prefer a Series X and that Series S is for "other people".
It's funny you say that because the biggest detractors of the XSS are people who don't own an Xbox AT ALL. At least the people who own the XSX are in the same ecosystem would be way more knowledgeable than a person who doesn't and is interested in throwing stones.

I wish you luck what I'm certain is a totally sincere quest to discover the brilliant way the XSS is engineered. You can start by seeing how many $300 consoles capable of raytracing are on the market. There are also tons of videos on YouTube of people who own the XSS and can provide credible commentary on their experiences. Here is one such video that touches on that value.

 

dcmk7

Banned
I am well aware but I am not just a fan of blatant misinformation.


Blatant misinformation? Well let me point it out explicitly for you, all captioned for your benefit.

JwsgoiM.jpg

7t926c8.jpg

W5snXSa.jpg


Hope that helps bud.


But to recap:

"The same great next gen experience at 1440p and features as Series X just at a reduced rendering resolution"

As of right now, he seems to have mislead. Or overestimated the performance of Series S, maybe the situation will improve? Maybe not. Be interesting.
 
Last edited:
What is even the metric for "brilliantly designed", anyway?

Arguably you could have made the same argument for the PS3. A machine so "revolutionary" that it nearly killed Playstation as a brand, had PS4 not gone back on track. I guess you can argue something is "brilliant", if you disregard if it actually acheived its inended goals or not.

Brilliantly designed if following ways:

Totally modular design.

Effective cooling of ram + soc using single heatsink. Leads to smaller console size with inbuilt power supply.

Has master chief pic on power supply shows attention to detail.


The best value in gaming right now is a 2nd hand PS4.
Still, i wish you luck in your push for "value". As it is, most people promoting Series S, don't even USE the series S themselves. That had been the case ever since it was announced; most supporters of the console always declare that they prefer a Series X and that Series S is for "other people".

Eh?

It's my only console. No way I am getting anything else. For 4 yrs at least.

I think Doom Eternal might be the best looking game on system. And am super happy with that level of fidelity for 4 yrs.
 
Blatant misinformation? Well let me point it out explicitly for you, all captioned for your benefit.

JwsgoiM.jpg

7t926c8.jpg

W5snXSa.jpg


Hope that helps bud.


But to recap:

"The same great next gen experience at 1440p and features as Series X just at a reduced rendering resolution"

As of right now, he seems to have mislead. Or overestimated the performance of Series S, maybe the situation will improve? Maybe not. Be interesting.
There is a universe where he isn't lying; the alternate universe where Series S was the top selling console in the world and everyone make third party games using Series S as the baseline.

In that unlikely scenario, then it would be true that Series S would be good enough to run all the games. Basically the situation with the PS2 being the hardware baseline for a long time.

However, we are not in that universe. Series S is not the baseline, and developers are not interested in treating it as one. At best it is treated like the "minimum requirement" of PC game titles, essentially only meeting the bare minimum to be certified and not at all the intended gaming experience.
 
"The same great next gen experience at 1440p and features as Series X just at a reduced rendering resolution"

As of right now, he seems to have mislead. Or overestimated the performance of Series S, maybe the situation will improve? Maybe not. Be interesting.
You forgot the "is designed to" part. I bet One X/Pro/5/XSX were designed to deliver 4k too, but not all games do have native 4k. Also this is just a guy talking, it would be another thing if they would advertise it on xbox.com
 

dcmk7

Banned
You forgot the "is designed to" part. I bet One X/Pro/5/XSX were designed to deliver 4k too, but not all games do have native 4k. Also this is just a guy talking, it would be another thing if they would advertise it on xbox.com
He's inadvertently put that target on the consoles back with his claim, so I suppose it can be used as a metric for how the console is faring.

It's falling quite a long way short at the moment. Sure it depends on developers but when own internal first party studios are dropping next gen features and game modes, it's quite surprising. You would think they would be the ones to guarantee the same experiences after all.

Maybe the technical limitations are too much?

Would have been better off just saying it's designed to run next gen games albeit with some compromises.

But agree PlayStation and Xbox are guilty promoting 4k when games are nowhere near that, that's bad but not as bad as Series S.

It's entire existence and primary promise was you get the same features as it's big bro.
 
Last edited:
You forgot the "is designed to" part. I bet One X/Pro/5/XSX were designed to deliver 4k too, but not all games do have native 4k. Also this is just a guy talking, it would be another thing if they would advertise it on xbox.com
We already had Xbox change their website advertising on the fly in the past. You are acting like what Xbox said on its website is some kind of permanent record when, in fact, it changes to suit the needs of the day.
 
But agree PlayStation and Xbox are guilty promoting 4k when games are nowhere near that, that's bad but not as bad as Series S.
It's the same to me. you should never take avertisings too serious expecially if nobody said " We promise you XY / i will have XY". I never expected S to deliver 1440p the whole gen, i never expected the 4k consoles to deliver 4k.
We already had Xbox change their website advertising on the fly in the past. You are acting like what Xbox said on its website is some kind of permanent record when, in fact, it changes to suit the needs of the day.
They all keep changing their websites. For me only counts what the website said when something is released and i don't know what Xbox,com said on XSS release. Do you?
 

dcmk7

Banned
It's the same to me. you should never take avertisings too serious expecially if nobody said " We promise you XY / i will have XY". I never expected S to deliver 1440p the whole gen, i never expected the 4k consoles to deliver 4k.
It would be the same for me as well, if it was just the resolution target they couldn't meet, but having all the missing game modes and features in XSS titles pushes it into another level of mismarketing for me personally.

They shouldn't say it's same experience to then have users discover they're playing without raytracing or playing at 45fps whereas XSX is having a better superior experience. That doesn't seem fair.
 

twilo99

Member
1440p is really hard to push, maybe some games will manage 1440p, but I doubt we will see many, at least not natively, there will certainly be some upscale magic going on.


The series s does everything the x does at lower resolution.
 
It would be the same for me as well, if it was just the resolution target they couldn't meet, but having all the missing game modes and features in XSS titles pushes it into another level of mismarketing for me personally.

They shouldn't say it's same experience to then have users discover they're playing without raytracing or playing at 45fps whereas XSX is having a better superior experience. That doesn't seem fair.
I would agree if it would say so on the package or the website. But it was just a video that >99% of the S owners never saw. Let's be honest, the target group of the S wouldn't even recognize that stuff when they play their FIFA/Madden/BF/COD. Most core gamers would, but no core gamer will go for a S.
 
They shouldn't say it's same experience to then have users discover they're playing without raytracing or playing at 45fps whereas XSX is having a better superior experience. That doesn't seem fair.

Series S almost always have better frame rate due to lower resolution or settings.

Flight Simulator
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Shadow of the Tomb Raider.

All comparison I saw recently.
 

dcmk7

Banned
Series S almost always have better frame rate due to lower resolution or settings.

Flight Simulator
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Shadow of the Tomb Raider.

All comparison I saw recently.
There has been titles with lower framerates.

This immediately comes to mind for RE8..

BDtDpV4.jpg


But granted there are much more examples of modes and RT missing.
 
Last edited:

Gavon West

Spread's Cheeks for Intrusive Ads
Series S is a great console. Games look great. It's dead quiet. I can easily pack it up in and bring it on the road. And GP is just ridiculous. Not one regret. I just wish they'd fix the QR on some of these games. I was so disappointed when I found out the Ascent and Flight Simulator didn't have it. Neither does 12 Minutes.


On second thought, fuck the S. Just get a GameCube and be done with it.
 
Blatant misinformation? Well let me point it out explicitly for you, all captioned for your benefit.

JwsgoiM.jpg

7t926c8.jpg

W5snXSa.jpg


Hope that helps bud.


But to recap:

"The same great next gen experience at 1440p and features as Series X just at a reduced rendering resolution"

As of right now, he seems to have mislead. Or overestimated the performance of Series S, maybe the situation will improve? Maybe not. Be interesting.
How could Jason Ronald control what features a game developer would implement in their games on the XSS? What FEATURES are the XSS console missing that the XSX has outside of the blu-ray drive? VRR? Quick Resume? FPS Boost? There are plenty of games on the XSS that have raytracing and 120fps modes but you and your friends move the goal posts to a new standard. It's on the developers to take advantage of what a system offers.

Where is your outrage when the PS5 and XSX don't run games at 4k when that is on their boxes (thanks THE DUCK THE DUCK )? Why focus your attention on on the budget box when you know it's offers features and value a more expensive console lacks? If the XSS is so bad you'd figure the more expensive system would beat it in every category yet the value box has more 120fps titles. I'd be more upset about that.

Most importantly if you are going to accuse MS of lying about the device they are selling when are you going to take your complaint to the BBB? It should be pretty easy since you have the damning evidence in the promotional video. Get to it man the masses are being conned right now!
 

elliot5

Member
How could Jason Ronald control what features a game developer would implement in their games on the XSS? What FEATURES are the XSS console missing that the XSX has outside of the blu-ray drive? VRR? Quick Resume? FPS Boost? There are plenty of games on the XSS that have raytracing and 120fps modes but you and your friends move the goal posts to a new standard. It's on the developers to take advantage of what a system offers.

Where is your outrage when the PS5 and XSX don't run games at 4k when that is on their boxes (thanks THE DUCK THE DUCK )? Why focus your attention on on the budget box when you know it's offers features and value a more expensive console lacks? If the XSS is so bad you'd figure the more expensive system would beat it in every category yet the value box has more 120fps titles. I'd be more upset about that.

Most importantly if you are going to accuse MS of lying about the device they are selling when are you going to take your complaint to the BBB? It should be pretty easy since you have the damning evidence in the promotional video. Get to it man the masses are being conned right now!
the XSS haters also conveniently ignore when stellar games like Psychonauts 2 come out and render at 1680p, beyond the 1440p spec AND offer 120 fps modes to boot. It's a perfectly serviceable device.
 
the XSS haters also conveniently ignore when stellar games like Psychonauts 2 come out and render at 1680p, beyond the 1440p spec AND offer 120 fps modes to boot. It's a perfectly serviceable device.
Why would they do that though? It's almost like they have no legitimate argument at all...
 

dcmk7

Banned
How could Jason Ronald control what features a game developer would implement in their games on the XSS?
So you accept that he was promising something that he was in no position to promise?!

Hallelujah! That's been my entire point, it was a stupid thing for him to claim.

We are in agreement that he intentionally or unintentionally was claiming the console was much more capable than it actually is. Since developers can't extract the same experiences. Even first party studios have seemingly abandoned that idea.

It's taken a long long time, but finally found something we can agree on.

Maybe next time you won't be too hasty about saying I'm spreading misinformation when you ultimately agree :messenger_clapping:
 
Last edited:

Rykan

Member
I remain of the opinion that the Xbox series S is a poor value console that isn't a good purchase for anyone.

For just 100$ more you can buy a Playstation 5 DE (well, eventually anyway) which has an SSD with nearly double the storage and its also significantly faster. That alone is worth the 100$ extra, but on top of that you get also get a proper current gen system with much better specs than the series S has.

I've heard the argument that it's supposed to be a good fit for gamepass, but it really isn't. Gamepass as a service is suitable for people who play a lot of games. If you buy a Series S, you'll be playing the worst version of all of those games and you'll probably struggle with SSD storage. Do you happen to have a "Go to" game like, say, Call of Duty for example? That's nearly half your SSD storage gone already.

If you want an Xbox, get a Series X.
 

THE DUCK

voted poster of the decade by bots
I keep hearing about the series S "not selling well" due to stock on the shelves. This is NOT a valid measurement for sales whatsoever. You have zero idea how many are selling. Are you also saying the switch isn't selling well? (as there has been stock in stores for months.......)
 

Rykan

Member
I keep hearing about the series S "not selling well" due to stock on the shelves. This is NOT a valid measurement for sales whatsoever. You have zero idea how many are selling. Are you also saying the switch isn't selling well? (as there has been stock in stores for months.......)
While I agree to some extend that the fact that there is stock on shelves isn't a valid measurement for sales, I do think it says something about the interest in this console.

I don't know what the situation with the Series S is in other parts, but the system has been widely and readily available in Europe since launch while both the PS5 and Series X remain sold out and very hard to get.
The Xbox is currently falling behind the PS5 in sales despite the series X being constantly sold out. While production cycles are probably the largest contributor to this difference, I do think that the Series S sitting on shelves is a contributing factor to PS5 pulling ahead in terms of sales.
 
So you accept that he was promising something that he was in no position to promise?!

Hallelujah! That's been my entire point, it was a stupid thing for him to claim.

We are in agreement that he intentionally or unintentionally was claiming the console was much more capable than it actually is. Since developers can't extract the same experiences. Even first party studios have seemingly abandoned that idea.

It's taken a long long time, but finally found something we can agree on.

Maybe next time you won't be too hasty about saying I'm spreading misinformation when you ultimately agree :messenger_clapping:
Nope my point was he helped design a system that has all the same features as a console $200 more but it comes at the cost of graphics. If developers choose not to use to features its up to them. To hold the console engineer responsible for the games developers make on the console is ridiculous.

I've asked you numerous times for ONE example of a missing feature on the XSS outside of the blu-ray drive. You have no answer. I asked you to show a PC or console that provides more features and performance for the same money. You have no answer. I asked why you make a big deal when the XSS is missing a GRAPHICAL feature when other more costly consoles miss those features and again you have no answer. Just more nonsense about how MS and Jason Ronald are liars. How interesting.

Returnal is a 1st party Sony game. It doesn't run natively at 4K nor does it have ray traced reflections. The game isn't held back by needing to run on multiple platforms. Are you going to call Sony liars because this game doesn't use the features of the PS5? It should really upset you seeing how the PS5 is more expensive than the XSS. Why not have the same energy? We both know why.

We are not in agreement because Jason Ronald was accurate when he described the capabilities of the XSS. It has hardware raytracing, it has multiple titles that run at 120fps and has the exact same feature set of the XSX minus the drive. It does everything all the current generation consoles can do and it some cases even more. It does these things for $300. You and your friends HAVE spread misinformation trying to twist a comment into something that was never claimed. I don't know why you are on this crusade but you really should take your complaints to the BBB if you think they have merit. 😉
 
Even though it has its shortcomings, I still think its a great device and I'd for sure have one in a spare room hooked up to a smaller screen. I'd use it for all of the indie titles.
 

dcmk7

Banned
Nope my point was he helped design a system that has all the same features as a console $200 more but it comes at the cost of graphics. If developers choose not to use to features its up to them. To hold the console engineer responsible for the games developers make on the console is ridiculous.

I've asked you numerous times for ONE example of a missing feature on the XSS outside of the blu-ray drive. You have no answer. I asked you to show a PC or console that provides more features and performance for the same money. You have no answer. I asked why you make a big deal when the XSS is missing a GRAPHICAL feature when other more costly consoles miss those features and again you have no answer. Just more nonsense about how MS and Jason Ronald are liars. How interesting.

Returnal is a 1st party Sony game. It doesn't run natively at 4K nor does it have ray traced reflections. The game isn't held back by needing to run on multiple platforms. Are you going to call Sony liars because this game doesn't use the features of the PS5? It should really upset you seeing how the PS5 is more expensive than the XSS. Why not have the same energy? We both know why.

We are not in agreement because Jason Ronald was accurate when he described the capabilities of the XSS. It has hardware raytracing, it has multiple titles that run at 120fps and has the exact same feature set of the XSX minus the drive. It does everything all the current generation consoles can do and it some cases even more. It does these things for $300. You and your friends HAVE spread misinformation trying to twist a comment into something that was never claimed. I don't know why you are on this crusade but you really should take your complaints to the BBB if you think they have merit. 😉

Don't change goalposts that's disappointing.. here's what you had written..

How could Jason Ronald control what features a game developer would implement in their games on the XSS

We just agreed (with your post above) he shouldn't have said that. He was in no position to promise that but he did it anyway so he either intentionally or unintentionally mislead people with his claim. Was a stupid thing for him to say, and I agree with you 'how could he know?' He couldn't! So why would he say it? It's weird.

That was the one and only point I was trying to make and ultimately proved.

And hey, it's a good to hold companies to account. Only way they learn from their mistakes.
 
Last edited:

THE DUCK

voted poster of the decade by bots
While I agree to some extend that the fact that there is stock on shelves isn't a valid measurement for sales, I do think it says something about the interest in this console.

I don't know what the situation with the Series S is in other parts, but the system has been widely and readily available in Europe since launch while both the PS5 and Series X remain sold out and very hard to get.
The Xbox is currently falling behind the PS5 in sales despite the series X being constantly sold out. While production cycles are probably the largest contributor to this difference, I do think that the Series S sitting on shelves is a contributing factor to PS5 pulling ahead in terms of sales.

It was sold out in North America for many months. I agree the X and PS5 are still hard to get, and there's no denying there is more demand for the X and the PS5. However that doesn't mean MS isn't enjoying considerable sales of the S.
All it would have taken is a week or 2 of excess stock (either through a lack of sales or an increase in production) to give the impress of it "not selling" only due to having a week or 2 of stock on hand.
 
Series S + Game Pass is the perfect console for casuals or companion console people who aren't primarily Xbox users imo
 
Last edited:
I like how mad people are that Series S even exists.
And i like how Xbox customers seem to invent imaginary anger in order to derive entertainment from it, instead of just playing games like everyone else.

If you want Series S to exist just to troll, you are admitting that was what it was always meant to do. Instead of actually deliverying games.
 

elliot5

Member
I've heard the argument that it's supposed to be a good fit for gamepass, but it really isn't. Gamepass as a service is suitable for people who play a lot of games.
I disagree. Even if you only play a few titles, if you are interested in MS' offerings you get them Day 1 and at a fraction of the cost as it would be if you bought games off the PSN store with the Digital PS5. Literally 7 months worth of content for the price of one digital PSN game. Not something you can trade in or sell once you're done to recoup costs. And once the ball starts rolling MS will be releasing first party AAA games at least once a quarter.

And if you instead opt for the Series X to play those Xbox exclusives that's $200 more. You can get 3 YEARS of game pass ULTIMATE for $180... less than the upgrade to the Series X alone. Yes there are downsides, but that's a ton of value. I think for a lot of us $100 or even $200 isn't much in the grand scheme of things, but that is a lot to plenty of families. Even better, you can get the All Access plan for just $25 a month.
 
Last edited:

Connxtion

Member
Man am scratching my head in this thread.

The guy said it was 1440p, same features. So if one game is that or higher than he’s correct.

We have games over 1440p and games with the exact same features at a different resolution. As was said by the guy.
(PS5 and XSX, aren’t 4K 90% of the time even without raytracing, so those should be held to the same standard as XSS in my eyes, in fact PS5 is basically never 4K native.)

So XSS is great for what it does, end off 🤷‍♂️ peeps who don’t own one then your opinion means squat on the subject. Yes you’re entitled to one but doesn’t make it valid or worth bothering with.

And that goes for me also, I only have the XSX, had no need for the XSS. But I can see what the little machine that could is trying to do.
 

ReBurn

Gold Member
If you want Series S to exist just to troll, you are admitting that was what it was always meant to do. Instead of actually deliverying games.
Do you really think Microsoft released the Series S just to troll people? That's kind of dumb. It delivers every game that Xbox One and Series X delivers so I don't see what the problem is. People getting upset about it is stupid, especially if they were never going to buy one anyway. There are lots of people who legitimately like it.
 

Schmick

Member
I honestly don't see the issue here. I've seen plenty of posts of XSS owners perfectly happy with their console and some have also mentioned friends and other people they know enjoying it too.

That's all that matters.

It's is also evident that some people have not and traded it in or sold it. Which is also fine.

I have seen plenty of XSX's and PS5's in selling in second hand electronic stores so it is not just XSS that gets sold.

So evidence suggests that all the consoles are enjoyed but some are not.

That's all that matters.
 
Series S + Game Pass is the perfect console for casuals or companion console people who aren't primarily Xbox users imo
Yup. It worked for me.

I'm a PS fan but can appreciate the strides Xbox has made.

Back on PC now and just subscribed and downloaded Xbox GamePass Ultimate for PC so happy to continue some of my Xbox games. However it sux that The Division 2 doesn't carry over progress from Xbox. Ubisoft can suck a fat one #$&^#%^#
 
This thread is still going on...

Reading some of the posts, I can't believe you guys are serious.

The Series S doesn't "hold back" any current gen game from fully attaining it's vision on the Series X or PS5. EVERY current gen game that is out now or will release till the end of this gen, can be scaled down to play on this console. If it's playable on the Series X, it WILL be on the S too, period.

It's the SAME:
- CPU (and architecture),
- RAM (same generation, but reduced total amount and bandwidth from Series X, 10 GB GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus, of memory for it's perf target, where 8 GB is available for games and operates at of 224 GB/s and 2 GB reserved for system memory at 56 GB/s),
- I/O subsystem,
- Internal storage (half the space of the Series X, but with the SAME throughput and it's hardware decompression block),
- Controller (okay the white looks way better than the black so the Series S wins here),
- HDMI 2.1 cable (it doesn't even need a 2.1 cable as it doesn't target 4K 120 Hz which requires 40 gbps bandwidth , but Microsoft went out of their way to give you one inside the box, instead of just a HDMI 2.0 cable which does 1440p 120 just fine, and NOT cut costs in BOM)
- OS (and it's important features like Quick Resume)

There is absolutely NO bottleneck here, unlike the jaguar core CPU trash that were in the PS4 and Xbox One generation which held their GCN GPU's back from squeezing 100% load on perf. The only significant drop down here is the GPU (which is still from the same RDNA2 architecture stack, but a low end Navi 24), which is 1/3rd of the X in performance, due to it's target.

This is basically a mid-range 1080p gaming PC that does high framerates with ease at the expense of a resolution drop, and some intensive graphics settings like ray tracing.

You guys are so hung up on that Jason Ronald video about the mention of "1440p target" that you're not opening your eyes to the other major benefits in performance.

Microsoft really fucks up in their PR department one way or the other, and this is nothing new.

They should have just said:

The Series S is a console that targets from a range of 720p to 1440p internal rendering resolutions, from 30 fps to 120 fps, with or without advanced rendering (or just lighting instead of good old pre-baked, as we're not yet there on using fully ray traced renderers, even on high-end PC's yet, as we use dynamic ray tracing in a rasterized renderer, except maybe a couple of games like Minecraft RTX and Quake II RTX, which use fully ray traced and fully path traced renderers, and both of them are PC ONLY) techniques like ray tracing, next-gen I/O subsystem feature set like instant load times, improvements in asset streaming to eliminate industry-wide practice of "elavator rides", "forced cutscenes", "crawling through tight spaces" sections in games to mask load times, 3D spatial audio, etc., based on the developer's set of requirements for their performance targets.
It's targeted towards customers who don't immediately want to invest in a new 4K TV or monitor, just to play and enjoy next-gen games, forced to spend 100's to 1000's of dollars, when they can experience next-gen gaming with displays they already have or spend just under a $200 for a decent 1080p 144Hz monitor to play at high framerates.


That's all they had to say, "it's upto the developers".

They wanted to avoid the "720p" wording so much because of what they went through in the Xbox One generation, until the One X released, from bad PR and communities making the Xbox brand a meme, and the press/media outlets posting borderline youtube/facebook shitposting articles for that clickbait ad revenue.

The Series S is just an amazing piece of compact engineering with monstrous performance under the hood, whether you like it or you don't. The added cherry on top is that it's so small that it can be carried anywhere, like the PS2 Slim, minus the wired controllers (I know there were wireless 3rd party alternatives which existed back then, so don't try to comeback with this, as they're all third party, and not from Sony).

I bet none of you physically go to any of your friends' or neighbors' places, or attend lan events and play some games of halo, cod, gears, battlefield, or couch co-op sessions like cuphead, streets of rage 4 etc, at all. None of that set of people, worry about how much pixels are displayed at 400% zoom or whether they are checkerboarded or native resolution. All they know is to get together during the time they have, grab a few beers and have fun playing their favorite games.

This thing serves an audience that is not ONLY the enthusiast, and THAT is it's USP, oh and the price + gamepass.
 
Last edited:
Don't change goalposts that's disappointing.. here's what you had written..



We just agreed (with your post above) he shouldn't have said that. He was in no position to promise that but he did it anyway so he either intentionally or unintentionally mislead people with his claim. Was a stupid thing for him to say, and I agree with you 'how could he know?' He couldn't! So why would he say it? It's weird.

That was the one and only point I was trying to make and ultimately proved.

And hey, it's a good to hold companies to account. Only way they learn from their mistakes.
You are the king of goal post shifting dude. XSS has 120fps mode you complain about no raytracing. XSS has a game with raytracing you complain about pop-in! Jason Ronald has every right to tout the features the XSS has. He knows what the XSS can do, he cannot control if a developer uses those features. He 'promised' the XSS had raytracing. Are you saying that isn't true? He 'promised' the XSS has the ability run games at 120fps and it would support FPS boost are you stating those are lies? He NEVER said every game on the XSS would use EVERY feature the system is capable of. No console manufacturer ever in life makes that claim and its silly for you to push that narrative. It isn't that complicated man.

Again if Sony says the PS5 can output 4k and a developer like Housemarque chooses to a develop a game in 1080p did Sony now lie about the PS5 capabilities? You have no logical argument.
PS5 and XSX, aren’t 4K 90% of the time even without raytracing, so those should be held to the same standard as XSS in my eyes, in fact PS5 is basically never 4K native.
Not one time has anyone explained why PS5/XSX not being native 4k all the time despite what is on the packaging is OK but the XSS not always having raytracing is a major problem and MS is lying to the public. Why is it OK that the PS5 has fewer 120fps titles than the XSS but it's the XSS that should be discontinued? People are really strange.
 

dcmk7

Banned
You are the king of goal post shifting dude.
I only had one point. Which you agreed with.. so I'm not sure what you're going on about. You said yourself Jason Ronald was in no position to claim what he did, he after all pretty much promised that you'll see the same next-gen experience JUST at a lower rending resolution. And that's not true. At least not yet.

But anyway, I've started to repeat myself and since I'm not interested in taking this argument in the 10 different directions that you want to take it in (it's weird you moving the goalposts like that.. having said I was guilty of that) and I've proved the one point I wanted to make. Feel like this a good time to end this.. as I feel we are a post or two away from you calling developers lazy again.
 
Last edited:
I only had one point. Which you agreed with.. so I'm not sure what you're going on about. You said yourself Jason Ronald was in no position to claim what he did, he after all pretty much promised that you'll see the same next-gen experience JUST at a lower rending resolution. That's not true.

I've started to repeat myself and since I'm not interested in taking this argument in the 10 different directions that you want to take it in (it's weird you moving the goalposts like that.. having said I was guilty of that) and I've proved the one point I wanted to make. Feel like this a good time to end this.. as I feel we are a post or two away from you calling developers lazy again.
You never had a point man. You and your friends have been pushing that Jason Ronald and MS are lying about what the XSS is capable of. You were wrong when you first made the claim and if you are still pushing that you are still wrong. If I said developers are lazy you said MS has been lying. We were never in agreement because you were making a nonsensical claim.
 

dcmk7

Banned
You never had a point man. You and your friends have been pushing that Jason Ronald and MS are lying about what the XSS is capable of. You were wrong when you first made the claim and if you are still pushing that you are still wrong. If I said developers are lazy you said MS has been lying. We were never in agreement because you were making a nonsensical claim.
He said the words he said, it's on video, I even captioned it for you. No one put words in his mouth.

You confirmed yourself in a post, that he was in no position to make his very misleading claim. We were in agreement.

Now you're backtracking, since you realised you said something negative about MS maybe?? Whatever it is it's sad to see. But fortunately doesn't change facts.
 
Last edited:
He said the words he said, it's on video, I even captioned it for you. No one put words in his mouth.

You confirmed yourself in a post, that he was in no position to make his very misleading claim. We were in agreement.

Now you're backtracking, since you realised you said something negative about MS maybe?? Whatever it is it's sad to see. But fortunately doesn't change facts.
Please quote when Jason Ronald promised every game on the XSS would use every feature of the system. He said the XSS has the same next generation experience. What features are the XSS missing changing the fundamental experience bro? I keep asking and I figured you'd stop dancing and actually answer the question. List them out. You called him a liar prove it.
 

dcmk7

Banned
Please quote when Jason Ronald promised every game on the XSS would use every feature of the system. He said the XSS has the same next generation experience. What features are the XSS missing changing the fundamental experience bro? I keep asking and I figured you'd stop dancing and actually answer the question. List them out. You called him a liar prove it.
moving-goalpost.gif


I did prove it.

So after we agreed on that point, you backtrack and desperately try and move the goalposts? That's very sad.
 
Last edited:
moving-goalpost.gif


Have proved the point I wanted to make.. You're resorting to pretty desperate measures now bud.
You never had a point as I've stated numerous times. At least I am not wildly shifting from complaining about raytracing, then 120fps modes, then pop-in, then calling engineers liars. You and your buddies have long since proven you guys were desperate to 'get' the value console. Who knows why. 🤔 Glad to see you admit how silly you are and will move on. Thank goodness.
 

dcmk7

Banned
You never had a point as I've stated numerous times.

Weird.. you thought the same as me earlier and were in agreement.. remember when you said this below. It was my entire point:

How could Jason Ronald control what features a game developer would implement in their games on the XSS

What you had written is correct, so he shouldn't have promised what he did since he was in no position to do so. Same experience at just lower resolution hasn't materialised yet.

So he was misleading..

We were on the same page albeit briefly, until you realised you had inadvertently insulted MS. Or something..

Your reversal and subsequent backtracking has been rather strange to say the least.
 
Last edited:

THE DUCK

voted poster of the decade by bots
Dcmk7 and Darmage619, I agree 100%. 😄
Did you guys hear the rumor that the Series S actual transforms into the xbox mini fridge when not in use?
 
I wish you luck what I'm certain is a totally sincere quest to discover the brilliant way the XSS is engineered. You can start by seeing how many $300 consoles capable of raytracing are on the market. There are also tons of videos on YouTube of people who own the XSS and can provide credible commentary on their experiences. Here is one such video that touches on that value.
It has some RT hardware, but in practice games that use it have to lower the resolution so low (or even games that don't use it) that the "experience" becomes lackluster and compromised, when it holds the frame rate as well as the other next-gen consoles.

Plus MS lied in their marketing material about what you can expect from it in terms of performance and resolution from games running on this machine.

Now, saying something is well designed is not a factual statement, this machine looks good, it doesn't make noise and it's a bit cheaper than a PS5 without the disc drive... complete waste of money once you notice that you will need to upgrade the storage pretty soon after you got it. But it's well designed, it's just not a very enticing product.
You are the king of goal post shifting dude. XSS has 120fps mode you complain about no raytracing. XSS has a game with raytracing you complain about pop-in! Jason Ronald has every right to tout the features the XSS has. He knows what the XSS can do, he cannot control if a developer uses those features. He 'promised' the XSS had raytracing. Are you saying that isn't true? He 'promised' the XSS has the ability run games at 120fps and it would support FPS boost are you stating those are lies? He NEVER said every game on the XSS would use EVERY feature the system is capable of. No console manufacturer ever in life makes that claim and its silly for you to push that narrative. It isn't that complicated man.
If the compromises you have to make to reach a performance target (120fps) or use a graphical feature (RT... but everything else on the image is so bad that they should not have used it)... using these points/features as selling points becomes misleading.

People are better off with a used One X if they absolutely want an Ms console, it's that simple... or spend the extra cash for a Series X, wait if you need to save money somehow, you'll thank yourself for having controlled your impulse later.... I can see only regret for those who got this machine.
It's funny you say that because the biggest detractors of the XSS are people who don't own an Xbox AT ALL. At least the people who own the XSX are in the same ecosystem would be way more knowledgeable than a person who doesn't and is interested in throwing stones.

I wish you luck what I'm certain is a totally sincere quest to discover the brilliant way the XSS is engineered. You can start by seeing how many $300 consoles capable of raytracing are on the market. There are also tons of videos on YouTube of people who own the XSS and can provide credible commentary on their experiences. Here is one such video that touches on that value.


There is a word for this kind of social media figures: shills

MS likes to give stuff out to entice social media figures, there are even some that confirm it in interview, without shame... it's not new, they tried to save the One with that kind of BS.... now they pay in order to sell their overstock of series S machines.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom