Brosky, I have a lot of 3090 RTX, do you know how many of them I use for games? None, there is nothing on PC that takes advantage of it, unless you want to play fortnite @4k60. PC master race is an embarracing place for decent games, enjoy your best in class FS2020 while we true gamers enjoy games, not GPU cocks.
Usually in "OT" threads. That is their main point.
Reconstruction is a type of upscaling. I'm being trolled again right?
Wait, you have a lot of 3090's, but you don't use any of them? Are they just sitting in the boxes still? I'll buy them off your hands, since you aren't using them. send me a PM.
What you say it's very approximative and not accurate at all. You need to handle the GE properly and the whole hardware customization to get the limit in rendition (something not possible without a deep knowledge of the hardware with a couple of years of training). Optimization is fundamental in a close hardware but I say an obilvious thing. Furthermore say the ps5 is very similar to the ps4 is laughable with all respect. Never said Housemarque are dump not sure where you get it from my post. Still you should post your criticism to someone who know more deeply the ps5 hardware indeed here where you can't have a contradictory if you are really interested to go in deeper to such stuff, you act as your opinions are incontrovertible laws.
They are used professionally don't worry hehehe. I have one on my workstation, tried Cyberpunk 2077...meh ok. Loved the game, played it on my 2070 Super at home, didn't feel the need to bring a 3090 home to play it.
Reconstruction is a type of reconstruction... it gives you a final native image.
Really? All you have to do is load up any of the latest games and watch GPU-usage. A fully optimized pipeline will have the GPU pegged in the high 90s%. That's an objective way of knowing the graphics engine is at least utilizing all the GPU. Playing around with settings and resolutions, etc.. can indicate to the average gamer the limitations of the GPU.
That's rude Pedro. Thought you was better than that.
Turn your GPU clocks to 0 hz and keep having the same joy.
Man, I'm still not used to it. I mean, Returnal is a good looking game with a solid 60 fps and great IQ, yet all I see here is people bickering and acting in a really childish way. Moving goals from PS fanboys and XB fanboys and PC fans always saying how magical PC gaming is, how incredible superior and infinite it is in every single aspect. Very tiring. And this happens all the time.
God damn it, lol. Wanted to see if I could snag a few more.
From what ive seen demon souls runs at 1440p 60 reconstructed to 4k and nobody could tell the difference, ue5 was 1440p reconstructed to 4k and nobody could tell the difference some games using dlss2.0 1440p look better than native 4k. This is the point a 1080p game without reconstruction to 4k isnt the same as a 1080p game reconstructed to 4k. Arguing about this is simply ignorance.
Oh come on don't be so sensitive.
3080 aint cutting it either brah
www.guru3d.com
Actually DF is saying the game is fantastic in visual terms.... so DF is not disagreeing with you.
I think you both are so close to each other in the back and forth.
You're so smart. Nice comment.
It's one of the rare moments, soak it in.
Fuck even Nvidia has called dlss upscaling. The literal definition of upscaling is to improve the size or quality of something. Taa reconstruction is a method of upscaling.
I don't pixel push though. DF does that. I'm all about the rendering because that's my wheel house.
There is a remarked difference between the Sony gamers and the Xbox gamers on these boards. It's very telling. I just gave a critique yesterday in the Halo thread. I never once had to explain away for pages on end why I said what I did. And never once did the Sony gamers jump on me for my statement.
You mean the PS5. I agree that Sony has some excellent 1st party companies that make great games that I, personally, like. But the conversation is about rendering and performance. In that sense, everything hardware vendor is under the microscope - and that's OK.
PC does more than pixel pushing. The draw on the PC is that it's an agnostic hardware and it's where all the innovation and R&D for advanced rendering will come from. We can't hate on that if people are drawn to that. Also, 1st party PS exclusives take up the number of fingers I have in both my hands compared to all the other games that are shared across all platforms - and the PC does give the best experience.. so not sure why you think there is no use for the PC.
3080 aint cutting it either brah
"Last week the system requirements for the game the medium got released, and many wonder about the game targeting 30 FPS. As it now turns out, the game cannot even reach 60 FPS in 1920x1080 with a GeForce RTX 3080, and that's with Raytracing disabled."
The Medium: Game Performance Below 60 FPS even at 1920x1080 / RTX 3080
Last week the system requirements for the game the medium got released, and many wonder about the game targeting 30 FPS. As it now turns out, the game cannot even reach 60 FPS in 1920x1080 with a GeFo...
The PS5 is actually better off compared to the best PC has to offer, compared to how the PS4 fared. Even better if you only stack it up against current mid-rage PC specs. The 2013-2014 mid-range GPU was around 70% faster then the PS4 GPU, while the current mid-range is only around 15% faster. Going to the top end, a 780ti ($699) was 230% faster then the PS4 GPU, while the 3090 ($1499-$3000) is only 60%-70% faster then the PS5 GPU.
I don't know how you're vetted tbh.
This game is made by a small studio compared to giants that do incredible feats in the infustry like insomniac, naughty dog or santa monica. Its their first 3rd person game and their first game on ps5 plus its 60fps and people dont realise the density of particles on screen such a game is very computationaly demanding. Theres 3d gpu particles everywhere, theres sprites everywhere aswell, theres interactive gpu particles theres fluid simulation on the fog its not your simple voxels or uninteractive raymarched volumes its interactive fog and fluid simulations all at 60fps and blistering traversal speeds. At this point the quality of production is whats important.
The 5700XT is not the PS5 equivalent. Also, what exactly is that graph measuring?
Its quite a bit faster than a ps5 equivalent.
No it's not
Its quite a bit faster than a ps5 equivalent.
Ps5 then
Eventually. Have not really been looking for one the past few months. I'll probably wait until they are shelve stock ready, and a revision will probably be out by then as well.
You are wrong.
www.computerbase.de
What makes you think it is the equivalent? AC Valhalla runs at a near perfect 60FPS on the PS5 with resolution measuring between 1440p-4k, while the 5700XT in the very same game at similar settings hovers in the low 50s at a locked 1440p.
Are you really saying that consoles provides some magic to games be more creative/innovative while PC forbid that? Freaking shooters with a crosshair on screen like Returnal itself were created on freaking pc!!!
It's Because of the fraud that playstation 5 fans have become. And the fact that most of you are In denial about your preferred system. So you make up Features And Technical facts that don't exist. When you really should be telling Sony to stop giving us sloppy seconds. But you prefer not to and at the same time say how bad Your competitors hardware is, that's why I'm on your case......
Yeah. Ps5 is not better in every area vs. 1080ti (flops, memory bandwidth esp.) but overall it's better than 1080ti, but not by much. Just a more modern architecture with a faster geometry pipeline (clockspeed) and can do RT much more easily. Not to mention Pascal was worse with async compute than the old GCN architecture let alone RDNA.
