You don't seem to get my point. It runs at a lower resolution because the CPU is getting hammered and thus the GPU has to run at a lower frequency. That's my theory at least.Avengers runs better on ps5 .... at lower resolution. From when worst resolution is tied to CPU?
Well surely in a subhd capture can't appear better...Looks more like Switch quality mode.
So when games runs at lower resolution on series X what's happen there? Variable frequency there too? CBR isn't cheap as you think. You save around of the 25% of perfomance compared the full native res, on the GPU.. Ps5 runs at 1440p CBR as lower resolution Vs around native 1200p on series X. Make your count .You don't seem to get my point. It runs at a lower resolution because the CPU is getting hammered and thus the GPU has to run at a lower frequency. That's my theory at least.
Has ethomaz called the devs already, though.
Wow, this and Mortal Shell show there must be a serious bottleneck on PS5, lower resolution by like 40%+ but still has tanking framerates.
Bro, Avengers looks like complete dogshit on the PS5. Don't make me post screenshots.So when games runs at lower resolution on series X what's happen there? Variable frequency there too? CBR isn't cheap as you think. You save around of the 25% of perfomance compared the full native res, on the GPU.. Ps5 runs at 1440p CBR as lower resolution Vs around native 1200p on series X. Make your count .
I hope they can get it to a point where it matches the original first in visuals and effects. I haven't tried the latest patch much yet, but the PC version looked like this for me (right is the original release)remaster of the remaster for a 2007 game...
add something significant, like VR mode
think this was the cutscene part no?Wow, this and Mortal Shell show there must be a serious bottleneck on PS5, lower resolution by like 40%+ but still has tanking framerates.
So obviously you don't give a shit how much CBR costs in terms of GPU perfomance and what's the tech reason behind, but because looks like dogshit means your theory about variable frequency is validBro, Avengers looks like complete dogshit on the PS5. Don't make me post screenshots.
If you're so certain that my theory is wrong, just wait it out. Time should prove you right.
CBR gives you around 50% more performance compared to native (highly depends on the game though). And I mentioned Avengers because it's very CPU heavy. That's kinda my point.So obviously you don't give a shit how much CBR costs in terms of GPU perfomance but because looks like dogshit it means variable frequency it's the cause there.
Like no. Completely false. 1,2 of more perfomance in the more optimal scenario, 1,4 for some shaders. You don't have a clue of what your are talking about. Just go to read on the net. Not surprising to see you to use the 50% of less pixels as metric. That's why I warning you to be careful to consider CBR cheap. It is but not as much it could to let intend. And in any case the CBR used in Avengers is awful. DiCE is the only who knows how to use it properly in a variable resolution.CBR gives you around 50% more performance compared to native (highly depends on the game though). And I mentioned Avengers because it's very CPU heavy. That's kinda my point.
Don't listen him. He's a clown. He posted a subhd capture in the Outriders thread to prove AF wasn't that bad on series X. He doesn't knows the shame unfortunately when talks about ps5 and likes to provocate the other users with nonsense posts, manipulative captures and harassing likes. I never seen him a single time have a serious conversation about the ps5 hardware. Just trolling.think this was the cutscene part no?
"Serious bottleneck" lol your concern trolling is hilarious. That's motion blur, not a resolution issue. See vid below (time stamped).Wow, this and Mortal Shell show there must be a serious bottleneck on PS5, lower resolution by like 40%+ but still has tanking framerates.
You reading more into it. He sounds exactly like he normally does. Poorly optmised game that’s all
See there you are with your sony glasses on. He says it runs better than xbox so where is your problem. It’s just a poorly optimised game on both systemsNah, he is extremely happy that he probably came.
Bigly? Is that a word?Another piece of evidence for my theory that whenever the CPU gets really hammered, PS5 loses out bigly to the XSX due to the variable frequency. We'll see how the theory persists in the future when we get more next-gen games.
See there you are with your sony glasses on. He says it runs better than xbox so where is your problem. It’s just a poorly optimised game on both systems
Your next-gen \vs/ the next-gen she tells you not to worry about
woah! I assume XSX/S has the same frame rate issues?Has ethomaz called the devs already, though.
This even exists on PC, IIRC.woah! I assume XSX/S has the same frame rate issues?
Again with your Sony glasses. Is what he saying wrong?He's a member in the XboxEra.
Has ethomaz called the devs already, though.
Again with your Sony glasses. Is what he saying wrong?
So you saying he an Xbox shill but what he is reporting on crysis on the ps5 is right?Did I say that? But if things aren't going his way he'll blame lighting.
So you saying he an Xbox shill but what he is reporting on crysis on the ps5 is right?
so where’s your problem?
Are there any games that are a Native 4K on both platforms?And this is at 1800p right?
I want a developer risky enough to release both versions of a game at 4k to just watch the world burn.
Are there any games that are a Native 4K on both platforms?
Can't seem to remember seeing any.
So he’s not allowed to be?He's too happy.
Sadly, Crytek peaked with this game (even though both Crysis 2 and 3 are good) so they're clinging to it.
I don't think there is, that's my point.
thats when you hit checkpoints it drops. but let them go offwoah! I assume XSX/S has the same frame rate issues?
So let me get This straight
So he’s not allowed to be?
they have to take any win they can getThis game is a next gen version?
Well you already look super salty so I think you should just leave it there
So if he doing a video, and a video where he says it performs better on ps5 over Xbox he should be miserable?I'm confused about something.
Why should he be happy about performance issues on any platform?
I know what his job is but to be unbias he shouldn't display joy when a platform has performance issues.
If I was in his position I would love to see all platforms do well. And wouldn't be happy is a platform has terrible performance issues.
Needing VRR to keep things smooth is bad news.VRR wins out again.