Lol wat? GT has better lighting. Forza has better resolution. I vaguely remember that video but if they say they were equal on lighting, I'll give you that. GT is superior. It's also probably superior in asset rendering BUT if you're doing it at a lower resolution, and the overall result isn't any more believable, HDR notwithstanding, than I don't see how they were unfair.
GT7 was unimpressive IMHO too. Obviously, I'll reserve judgment for the final release but Forza 5 at launch managed to be beautiful and impressive on Day 1, despite releasing on unimpressive hardware.
"How 'bout these airvents then? They're botth very detailed"
Keep in mind that at the start of the video the guy says they're playing Forza on a PC at max settings, whereas GT is on the PS4 pro.
Are you kidding? Look at them. It's like a generational difference. Who needs higher resolution when the results are like this? And, is this guy trying to tell us that occlusion mapping is the reason GT looks way better? This is the guy who said Halo is some better lighting away from looking as good as we all expected, isn't it?
5:59 - come on.
6:05ish - he specifically makes a point that the GT car is 'less powerful' in a tech analysis. Are we kidding? Let's ignore that the porsche has visible yellow break discs whereas the Forza one doesn't? Is that because the more powerful car doesn't need break discs? Maybe, I dunno~
6:20ish - "The interior is similar... equally well modelled" he says as one car has a stereo and the other doesn't.
6.33 - "GT does have the edge in terms of ___
(heaps of stuff but since they made fewer cars than Forza it's explained. Is that
seriously meant to be a technically savvy analysis?
7:00ish - "[Forza has heaps of great tracks with an HD texture pack for oneX and PC users - PS4 has less tracks but they're all gorgeous]"
7:15ish - "When placed side by side it's clear that both games offer a high level of detail" Come on, you look at that video comparison footage while he says this and tell me GT doesn't look a century better.
7:20ish (next point) - "[GT looks great... Forza takes risks which explains why it looks worse]"
I can't go through the whole video doing these captions, I've taken these few notes to get my point across. At least concede that I am standing on reasonably solid ground in saying that the guy was kind of stretching for reasons to say Forza is on the same level as GT in terms of visual quality.
EDIT: from memory, in other parts he talks about how GT has background detail and better draw distance, but he says Forza hides that with less open views in its tracks... he doesn't imply that this is a downside. Later, he talks about how Forza's crap trees (two flat 2D images arranged at 90 deg around a Z-axis) are "Less distracting" thanks to fewer artifacts. Is he actually making a parody video? Much later: "Crashes have much more visceral impact in Forza" he says as the car remains entirely unscathed by a front-on collision.
Later edit: i think the game review industry at large has a vested interest in keeping both sides of the console war seemingly viable - to maximise fanbase access.. i think this guy is like a leading exponent of this kind of doublespeak