• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PlayStation 4 Pro Reviews

Pro added a dude

I'm not an expert.... but...

The resolution on BF1 can very a lot every second. That could be a simple case of different resolutions under the same Specs (Pro downclocked to the same GPU of PS4 OG and 16 units).

Keep it cool guys, and let's wait until the release of the console.

Fifa patch is also not available at the moment.
 
Just finished up my written review, too. Again, apologies for the delay, but hopefully you all enjoy the read:

In summary, the PS4 Pro convincingly serves up some stunning improvements for a very competitive price. And that's without even mentioning the larger hard-drive size and support for 1080p Remote Play and Share Play. The reality is that this new console can do everything that the PS4 can do – but it can do it significantly better.

Thus, if you're in the market for your first PS4, then we'd recommend future-proofing yourself and plumping up the extra for the PS4 Pro right out of the gate. If you're a 4K television owner or an avid PlayStation VR user, then the upgrade is also a no-brainer. The question of whether you should buy the brand new box only becomes more complicated when pointed at people who already own a PS4 and have no intention of buying a new screen.

If you happen to fit into that bracket – which we're sure many of you do – then you must ponder one thing: how much does having the best PlayStation experience you possibly can matter to you? Supersampling means that PS4 Pro delivers the very best image quality possible on a 1080p set, and graphical options like those found in inFAMOUS: Second Son and Rise of the Tomb Raider are sure to become more common as the console matures.

If those things are important to you, then the PS4 Pro is a fantastic upgrade. And while the design of the device ensures that no PS4 owner will ever be left behind, enthusiasts looking for the very best PlayStation hardware may eventually find themselves succumbing to what Sony is describing as the future of play.

http://www.pushsquare.com/news/2016/11/hardware_review_ps4_pro_-_4king_amazing
 

Electret

Member
I'm not an expert.... but...

The resolution on BF1 can very a lot every second. That could be a simple case of different resolutions under the same Specs (Pro downclocked to the same GPU of PS4 OG and 16 units).

Keep it cool guys, and let's wait until the release of the console.

Fifa patch is also not available at the moment.

18. 20 CUs are on the OG PS4 die with 2 deactivated.
 
Don't be prematurely calling for bans now.

Right. Here we go. Tried to hit the share button at the exact same time on each console. Think the PS4 took it a split second before the Pro though.

battlefield1_20161109uojw0.png

PS4
battlefield1_20161109t4s1r.png

PS4 Pro

Hadn't moved an inch, so not 100% sure why the positions are slightly different.

Have at it, GAF.

(edit: 2160p image was captured - https://abload.de/img/battlefield1_20161109z3kof.png)

if that is the difference for bf1 in pro mode then i'm going to be super disappointed. i figured dice would certainly bring something impressive technically. i happen to think frostbite is the nicest-looking engine being used today.
 
Mmm... the bullets, the leather strap, the reflections on the glove, the foliage in the left foreground. It's not a huge difference, but I can see it. I'm looking at a 900p monitor.

You know, it could be the dynamic resolution working on both images at the same GPU right?

BF1 also has a bug with that (can reach 160x110 resolution on PS4)

18. 20 CUs are on the OG PS4 die with 2 deactivated.

As I said, not an expert, but you know my point. The frame buffer is quiet unstabble while playing BF1. You can have very different results using the same PS4 on the same level.
 

dano1

A Sheep
if that is the difference for bf1 in pro mode then i'm going to be super disappointed. i figured dice would certainly bring something impressive technically. i happen to think frostbite is the nicest-looking engine being used today.

Pro patch isn't even out yet. Everything should look identical.
 

belvedere

Junior Butler
if that is the difference for bf1 in pro mode then i'm going to be super disappointed. i figured dice would certainly bring something impressive technically. i happen to think frostbite is the nicest-looking engine being used today.

1080p/60 is all I care about.
 

Elios83

Member
IF Battlefield1 still isn't patched (and that shouldn't be that difficult to find, just read the update history of the game) the only differences you'll find are probably due to the quality of the internal upscaler to 1080p. Maybe the Pro has a slightly better upscaler compared to the standard PS4?
Also can't people with Twitter simply ask Dice what's going on with their game and the Pro?
 

scently

Member
Its also possible that what you are seeing in the BF1 pics is a result of the different scalers in the two systems. Its possible the PS4P has a better scaler.
 

kanuuna

Member
Sorry for not scrubbing through the thread, but I've a dumb question: Are the screenshots captured with the share button saved at 3840x2160 to the hard drive, even if the display only supports 1080p?
 

Elios83

Member
Wow most disappoint Pro game yet but not surprised, it is Dice i will never buy another game from them after BF4 launch.

Still if they make a GOOD Pro Version i might reconsider that but looks like they won´t lol

There's nothing to be disappointed, since the game hasn't likely been patched yet.
What you see here is basically standard PS4 upscaler 900p to 1080p vs Pro upscaler doing the same thing.
It indeed seems a bit more clear but it's a very minor difference.
 
Fingers crossed hoping theres a patch coming because that difference is so minimal its not even worth mentioning.

Surely they can do better than that...
 

renzolama

Member
Still no mention of impressions of the remote play improvements anywhere? I want to know whether the Pro improves on the 100+ms input latency limitations of the original design. With the current PS4, you can't get below ~100ms even on a PC with an ethernet-to-ethernet connection, and using 5ghz on the PC seems to break the streaming consistency such that it stutters every 10-15 seconds because its not buffering data properly (my network setup is optimal, trust me). I'd love to know that the Pro will allow me to play shooters at a more reasonable input latency, at least something closer to steam/nvidia streaming.
 
For a 50inch with a viewing distance of 10', there's 0 benefit

http://referencehometheater.com/2013/commentary/4k-calculator/

Even eyesight @ 20/20 as per the calculator.

Those viewing charts are total horseshit. When people actually do an experiment people easily see a benefit from 4K. 55" TVs at 9ft: http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/4k-resolution-201312153517.htm

Snellen acuity tests don't account for color, motion, emitted vs reflected light, etc, so you can't just do the math to determine when a resolution change is perceptible.
 
Really? So 50% more power than the pro but will only output Pro levels of graphics?


As a double dipped PS4 owner the Pro is just not offering enough for me and others (including reviewers) at present. That's the bottom line.

The Pro is more than 300% the power of Xbox One and that's not enough! but a 50% increase is suddenly amazing?

The standard PS4 has 50% more power than the Xbox One, BTW.
 

Humdinger

Member
Those viewing charts are total horseshit. When people actually do an experiment people easily see a benefit from 4K. 55" TVs at 9ft: http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/4k-resolution-201312153517.htm

A few caveats: 1) they used two different TV sets, so you never know what uncontrolled variability that introduces; 2) they don't address whether HDR was controlled for (I'm assuming it was, but they don't mention it); and 3) they describe the differences as "not big."

Also, note that they chose that distance and TV size (55" and 9') because it was controversial, i.e., that's the range where expert opinion itself wasn't very clear.

I believe that when a variety of different experts all say pretty much the same thing, there is some truth to it. However, there is a range of opinions. I think some of the viewing distance tables are overly conservative. If you look at a bunch of them, not just one, and if you use them as a general guideline rather than 100% gospel truth, I think they are useful.
 
A few caveats: 1) they used two different TV sets, so you never know what uncontrolled variability that introduces; 2) they don't address whether HDR was controlled for (I'm assuming it was, but they don't mention it); and 3) they describe the differences as "not big."

Also, note that they chose that distance and TV size (55" and 9') because it was controversial, i.e., that's the range where expert opinion itself wasn't very clear.

I believe that when a variety of different experts all say pretty much the same thing, there is some truth to it. However, there is a range of opinions. I think some of the viewing distance tables are overly conservative. If you look at a bunch of them, not just one, and if you use them as a general guideline rather than 100% gospel truth, I think they are useful.

There were no HDR sets back then (test is from 2013). The "Experts" don't say anything. The charts are all different. They're all untested mathematical extrapolations based on a false premise.
 

Inuhanyou

Believes Dragon Quest is a franchise managed by Sony
As a primarily PC gamer the PS4 Pro doesn't entice me at all. My standard PS4 is enough to experience exclusives.

Same.

I'm willing to wait for PS5. Infact, i actually think it would have been more prudent for Sony to release an Xbox One S like upgrade, essentially keeping the hardware the same, just bringing out general support for HDMI 2.0 with 4K output support to 4K televisions, 4K media apps, HDR ect in the Slimline revision.

I still think they made the ecosystem segmented and more complicated needlessly with the Pro push. I don't think anyone invested in Playstation for the games coming up were that much clamoring for what Pro is offering before it was announced. I think they could have easily waited out another 3 years with the PS4 hardware how it orignally was.

With that being said, now that its hear, i think there's nothing wrong with a lot of people interested in what they are selling now.
 
The Pro is more than 300% the power of Xbox One and that's not enough! but a 50% increase is suddenly amazing?

The standard PS4 has 50% more power than the Xbox One, BTW.

Those thinking that that graphics will be night and day between ps4 pro and scorpio will be surprised. it's only about 45% increase in power theoretically. Close to the 40% increase between xbox one and ps4.
 
I don't think anyone invested in Playstation for the games coming up were that much clamoring for what Pro is offering before it was announced. I think they could have easily waited out another 3 years with the PS4 hardware how it orignally was.

Man you couldn't be more wrong. I know tons of us have been dying inside a little every time a game like Witcher 3 comes out and all the reviews talk about PC version having far superior graphics. Can't wait to see what the Pro can do.
 

Inuhanyou

Believes Dragon Quest is a franchise managed by Sony
Man you couldn't be more wrong. I know tons of us have been dying inside a little every time a game like Witcher 3 comes out and all the reviews talk about PC version having far superior graphics. Can't wait to see what the Pro can do.

The PC will still have superior graphics, performance and resolution ceiling. Just like PC's always have had.
 
Same.

I'm willing to wait for PS5. Infact, i actually think it would have been more prudent for Sony to release an Xbox One S like upgrade, essentially keeping the hardware the same, just bringing out general support for HDMI 2.0 with 4K output support to 4K televisions, 4K media apps, HDR ect in the Slimline revision.

I still think they made the ecosystem segmented and more complicated needlessly with the Pro push. I don't think anyone invested in Playstation for the games coming up were that much clamoring for what Pro is offering before it was announced. I think they could have easily waited out another 3 years with the PS4 hardware how it orignally was.

With that being said, now that its hear, i think there's nothing wrong with a lot of people interested in what they are selling now.

How do you know this. Can you read minds? I think it's a little on the arrogant side to assume you know what people need or want.

And how did they make the ecosystem segmented complicated. There isn't a game on PS4 Pro or any in the future that can't be played on regular PS4 and vice versa.
 
The PC will still have superior graphics, performance and resolution ceiling. Just like PC's always have had.

Yea you really really don't get it. It's not about having exactly the same performance. It's about getting an upgrade without having to buy a PC which I have no interest in.

Just because the Pro isn't for you doesn't mean you have to pretend it's not a good move for many of us. And by the way it's pretty obvious by the contradictory nature of your post that you wish you had a Pro and a 4K HDR TV . . . like me ;)
 

ViolentP

Member
How do you know this. Can you read minds? I think it's a little on the arrogant side to assume you know what people need or want.

And how did they make the ecosystem segmented complicated. There isn't a game on PS4 Pro or any in the future that can't be played on regular PS4 and vice versa.

He said that's what he thought, as in his opinion. And I personally believe library isn't the only unifying factor. Performance differences will have an effect on user mentality. While I applaud their foresight in keeping performance of the Pro in parity with the PS4 in multiplayer, one can't help think of the wasted potential of the added horsepower.

Ultimately, Sony is venturing into uncharted waters and they're making their decisions best they can with the little market research available to them. This will certainly be used to microsofts advantage come Scorpio.

More like poster child of devs doing bare minimum?.

This has been my biggest concern with the Pro/patch model. Seems results will always vary based on developer motivation.
 

Hawk269

Member
As a primarily PC gamer I always gotta have the best hardware available no matter the platform. I blame my PC side for this.

Yeah, me and my Titan X Pascal SLI system says the same damn thing. lol. With that said, picking up my PS4 Pro tomorrow evening and come this time next year my Scorpio.
 

Hawk269

Member
Man you couldn't be more wrong. I know tons of us have been dying inside a little every time a game like Witcher 3 comes out and all the reviews talk about PC version having far superior graphics. Can't wait to see what the Pro can do.

Regardless of the power of the PS4 Pro, PC will still have superior graphics, so your point is completely moot.

What I do say about this is that I know many console gamers that don't game on PC wanting a more powerful console. Amongst the people I speak with many will be getting the PRO due to this fact and then getting a Scorpio next year. No matter what, we will never see a home console that comes out that can outclass a PC. The 360 was able to do this for an extremely short amount of time where some games ran better or about the same as the best PC's at that time...those days are now gone...unless Sony or MS decide to throw cost to the wind and makes a monster home console.
 
Regardless of the power of the PS4 Pro, PC will still have superior graphics, so your point is completely moot.

What I do say about this is that I know many console gamers that don't game on PC wanting a more powerful console. Amongst the people I speak with many will be getting the PRO due to this fact and then getting a Scorpio next year. No matter what, we will never see a home console that comes out that can outclass a PC. The 360 was able to do this for an extremely short amount of time where some games ran better or about the same as the best PC's at that time...those days are now gone...unless Sony or MS decide to throw cost to the wind and makes a monster home console.

It's not moot at all. I'm not a nerd who cares if the Pro can run max settings whatever the fuck that means. I'm a musician with a 60" 4K HDR set who can't wait for Thursday and may not even be gaming if my career keeps going this well by the time Scorpio drops.

But clearly you know everything.
 

Hawk269

Member
It's not moot at all. I'm not a nerd who cares if the Pro can run max settings whatever the fuck that means. I'm a musician with a 60" 4K HDR set who can't wait for Thursday and may not even be gaming if my career keeps going this well by the time Scorpio drops.

But clearly you know everything.

You stated that people die a little when something like the Witcher 3 comes out and people talk about how much better the PC version is...that is still going to happen when Cyberpunk comes out, the PC version will be the best version. So not sure what your point is. We know what the specs are of the PS4 Pro are and in know way will games on the PRO out perform the same game on a PC.

But clearly you don't know what you are talking about.
 

Conduit

Banned
if that is the difference for bf1 in pro mode then i'm going to be super disappointed. i figured dice would certainly bring something impressive technically. i happen to think frostbite is the nicest-looking engine being used today.


Game isn't patchet yet.
 
Top Bottom