MilkyJoe
Member
Yes. That was the joke.
no shit
Yes. That was the joke.
If it ended up with Jaguar and 6TF GPU, it really isn't that much more powerful than PRO. Similar power difference between PS4 and X1.
I've said the same, I was told it was the same as this current generation.Yeah, 1.8 is the same as 500.
And lets also forget the bandwidth and everything else we dont know about.
Yeah, 1.8 is the same as 500.
And lets also forget the bandwidth and everything else we dont know about.
1.8 TF will be eaten going to higher resolutions than PRO. Native 4K is demanding as hell
1.8 TF will be eaten going to higher resolutions than PRO. Native 4K is demanding as hell
Jaguar is 4 years old tech
Puma is 3 years old tech
Excavator is 1 year old tech
Zen is current year tech
xb1 and ps4 launched late in 2013 with jaguar cpu cores, that got released in mid 2013
Carrazio apus based on excavator cores are used in laptops, too with either max 15 or 35 watt tpd
Well, I was at E3 last year and face to face with a very senior Xbox exec that looked me right in the eyes and said with a smile "Stay tuned, we aren't holding back" specifically about Zen. There was no ambiguity. We were discussing AMD Zen, with others there to witness it.
He is right.
I remember PS4 being 40% stronger and CHEAPER releasing together. Scorpio will be 40% stronger and EXPENSIVE a year late.I remember when the specs for Xbox one were announced, everyone was calling it dead in the water compared to the PS4 because of .500 Tflops difference.
Funny how things change.
Who says every game has to be 4K?
What if the game is 1080, now what?
He is right.
I remember PS4 being 40% stronger and CHEAPER releasing together. Scorpio will be 40% stronger and EXPENSIVE a year late.
The calling dead MS was because it was $100 expensive for a inferior hardware compared with PS4.... how do you sell that???
1.8 TF will be eaten going to higher resolutions than PRO. Native 4K is demanding as hell
How do you know the price? Magic 8 ball
All right, fair enough, thread gets a bit crazy at times. Apologies.
Who says every game has to be 4K?
What if the game is 1080, now what?
What if that game is 900p on Pro, now what?
I don't think he needs magic balls to make that prediction really. It's got to be more at the time that Scorpio releases.
P.S. I love "kiss and make up" GAF in these threads.
If it ended up with Jaguar and 6TF GPU, it really isn't that much more powerful than PRO. Similar power difference between PS4 and X1.
The only problem with this is Shinobi said dev kits aren't even out yet and wont be out until Feb/March most likely.
So is there some slide out there that is detailing all of what Scorpio has already? Nah i dont think so - due to the fact many developers were also surprised by the announcement of Scorpio at e3. As in that was the first time they heard of it too.
So the speculation should still be out there. Just not some outlandish claim on either end. I cant wait to see what the final spec is and what it will do for my current and future library!
What if that game is 900p on Pro, now what?
no. already 1/5 of all tvs sold in the us last year were 4k
https://twitter.com/npdtech/status/817165043108298752
this number will likely grow close to 50% this year. the huge 4k hype happened just in late 2016. and 4k still managed 19% share for the full year
So speculation? No hard facts it's more than pro?
This is it.
Would be hilarious if it costs $599 LOL
Cant wait to see the memes
you know what i mean by me saying "all". And you knew i was implying another slide pointed to devs, not the public who visit xbox.com.
Which pill have we swallowed today, the red or blue lol?
Would be hilarious if it costs $599 LOL
Cant wait to see the memes
Sounds wrong there, bruh.P.S. I love "kiss and make up" GAF in these threads.
It's going to be $399. I'm almost certain. There is no way MS is going above $399 unless this is aiming for relatively non-existent levels of market share.
Yeah, I've been saying $399 for a while. Anything more and it's suddenly not attractive enough when compared to the competition.
The return of subsidized consoles then? Can't see it costing any less than $450 to manufacture.
Or even every couple years. And the slow uptake of PS4 Pro is one result, and should be very worrying to Microsoft. Scorpio may well grab the eye of those early tech adopters you mentioned. But that's a niche group, yet somehow people seem to think it'll also somehow boost the Xbox market as a whole. For most consumers, Scorpio will simply be the most expensive console on the market.Of course I know that. So do you know, that most people don't upgrade their home console every year either?
you know what i mean by me saying "all". And you knew i was implying another slide pointed to devs, not the public who visit xbox.com.
This is pretty self explanatory. Zen is a brand new architecture. Jaguar wasn't, it was basically just an improved Bobcat (6 year old tech).
Yeah, so? That doesn't change the fact that their desktop APUs are not suited for the consoles Sony and Microsoft want to build. There were 17W and 35W Richland APUs back in 2013, Microsoft and Sony still went with Jaguar over it. You're putting way too much emphasis on wattage and not enough on die size.
yeah that should developers adress. give options for either 4k or 1080p high fidelity. maybe even a third high FPS option.I wasnt referring to 4k tv marketshare when i said "more bang for the buck", but rather a games graphical bells and whistles. Im sure im not alone in thinking that using 6tf of power to make 4k xbox1 games is a bit of a joke.
I'm not the biggest tech guy but we know it's going to be 6 teraflops and use AMD . Isnt that enough for devs to build a test rig and start testing games ? Just curious
What if its $399, will you cry? Now that would be a meme I would like to see
Yes? It's all about relative differences. The differnce between PS4 and XB1 is 40%, the difference between PS4 pro and 6TB Scorpio is 43%
Are you going to feel stupid if you're proven right but the damn thing costs $700?
When can we expect devkit leaks - March?
I think that if MS has to take a loss on it, they will. Because while I'm sure they would like to make a profit on each sold, I also think they want to be able to sell the console to make it somewhat of a success.
And MS is going second, so they have data from the Pro launch available. They know what kind of market is out there for these sorts of upgrades and they also know that they are far more limited in actual markets vs. Sony. And unfortunately for them, one of their main markets (or even two really) is extremely price sensitive.
It's going to be $399 or lower.
It's going to be $399. I'm almost certain. There is no way MS is going above $399 unless this is aiming for relatively non-existent levels of market share.
It'll be tough. If the market for mid gen refresh consoles is as small as it seems to be, even for Sony, then taking a loss of $50 - $100 makes no sense.
If it's $399 I doubt the Pro will stay at $399 so most likely it'll always be the most expensive console unless MS decides to eat the cost on it. I don't see that happening as bundles are the new "discount". Way cheaper then discounting hardware and still increases value
I don't think there is anyway on this earth that the Pro doesn't get a discount ethier before or just as the Scorpio releases. Maybe down to $349 with a game packed in?
Scorpio will be the most expensive console on the market, will it represent value to core gamers, thats the question?
Yup. They are not oblivious enough to go above 399, methinks. That's around the maximum pricepoint the current market will bear for a console. They aren't going to get caught with their pants down with a 499 box again anytime soon. They learned that lesson with the XB1, power be damned.
And I think they can realistically put out a 6TF box at that pricerange in late 2017. Sony will possibly have the PS4 Pro at around 299-329 by then, replacing the current model PS4 entirely.
Sounds wrong there, bruh.
I don't think there is anyway on this earth that the Pro doesn't get a discount ethier before or just as the Scorpio releases. Maybe down to $349 with a game packed in?
Scorpio will be the most expensive console on the market, will it represent value to core gamers, thats the question?
I don't think MS is designing or marketing this for the price conscious consumers. They have the XBOS for those people. I also don't think they expect Scorpio to dramatically increase their market share.
IMO Scorpio will be an enthusiast machine at launch for people who are willing to spend 2-2.5x the price for 4x the performance.
That's a fool's game. Keeping the Scorpio marketshare tiny like that by catering to a niche enthusiast crowd is a surefire way to have the hardware go underutilized by devs that will just keep catering their efforts to the vast majority of conventional XB1 devices. What would the incentive for the developers be? Sure we're all dreaming of a future where every game simply scales upwards to make use of additional hardware, but that's not happening with consoles anytime soon.
Paying more for 4x the performance sounds great on paper. But you realize you're still beholden to the developers who have to actually put in effort to make their games shine on an additional hardware setup that barely anyone will own.
Nah, I think they have to go mass-market and slowly phase out the old XB1, considering the Scorpio it's official replacement.