• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Ridley Scott's GLADIATOR 2 budget is now at 310 million dollars

thefool

Member
Why are people surprised by these numbers? Titanic cost $200 million to make in the mid-1990s. It is not at all surprising that an action movie 30 years later would cost 50% more in unadjusted dollars.

A big difference is that, according to the info posted in this thread, it took 49 days to shoot Gladiator 2 while Titanic took 160 days.
 
Last edited:

Chiggs

Gold Member
Not even close actually Star Wars Force Awakens was like 530 million.

This cracks the top 10 at #10, replacing ... Justice League which was 300 million


This list is wildly inaccurate because it doesn't:
  • Factor in marketing budgets.
  • Factor in the cut for theaters.
Avatar 2's listing should have been the first red flag in that article.
 
Last edited:
Studios are preflopping their films. This first Gladiators made like 450 million WW.

Gladiator 2 would have been a successful movie if it's anywhere near the first's quality, I'd guess 700 million ceiling. On a normal 200 million budget this would be a smash hit.

already at 310 were talking 620 million is required to break even. It's just not happening.
 
Last edited:

Jinzo Prime

Gold Member
Could you explain this part? If something cost 310 to make then 310 in revenue is required to break even, isn't it?
Box office revenue is split between the studio and the theaters. The exact percentage fluctuates from week to week, theater to theater, and from country to country. Marketing costs are not included in the movie's budget.

Since it is so hard to pin down how much the studio makes from each ticket sold, we use a general rule that says that a movie must make 2.5 times its budget to break even.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom