• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Old, Odd. British internet suicide ruling:"elaborate matrix" of fictional identities.

Status
Not open for further replies.

way more

Member
A teenage boy was sentenced in a British court on Friday for assuming false personas in an Internet chat room in order to induce an online friend to try to kill him. The boy who was convicted, 14 at the time of the events in question, fooled his friend, then 15, with an "elaborate matrix of deceit" [and] fictional identities, including that of a spy, in the chat room, the court was told. Known only as "John," the boy invented a host of fictional characters to induce another teen, "Mark", to kill him.

The older teenager was eventually persuaded that he had been recruited by the British Secret Service to kill Boy B, after which he would be rewarded with a job as well as a sexual relationship with the 39-year-old female “spy”.

Judge David Maddison said “I accept, fantastic though it seems when looked at now in the cold light of day, that ... so convincingly were the characters presented to you that you really did believe you had been recruited by the Secret Service to kill your co-accused and face the consequences if you did not do so.”

"The end result is that you are to be sentenced for the extraordinary offence of inciting another to murder you and a further offence of perverting the course of justice."

Is "offence of inciting murder upon yourself," really a crime in Britian? At least the kids' are alright.
Boy A "carried out his orders to the letter" and stabbed boy B once in the chest and once in the stomach.
But boy B did not die and spent a week in Wythenshawe Hospital in Manchester before recovering.

Boy A pleaded guilty to attempted murder and boy B pleaded guilty to perverting the course of justice and incitement to murder.
Boy A was given a two-year supervision order and banned from any contact with boy B.

Boy B was given a three-year supervision order, banned from any contact with boy A and was told he must only access the internet under adult supervision and must not enter chat rooms under any circumstances.
Preverting the course of justice? That seems pretty damn vague. But then, who do you charge in this case. I think boy A got off a little too easy for attempted murder.

For the complete story.
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2004/05/30/2003157534
http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/34123.html
 
D

Deleted member 1235

Unconfirmed Member
So this kid tried to trick another kid into killing him, the original kid?

And the original kid got stabbed in the gut and chest and didn't die? Possibly could be a real secret agent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom